From little corrupt acts do big corrupt acts grow?

Posted on Wednesday, March 23, 2011 at 09:15 AM

Larger Text

E-mail

4 Comments

RSS

Archives

There is a fantastic story in today's Irish Times, one that I highly recommend you read. Basically, it's a story from the 1960s about an Irish missionary priest, a bottle of poitín (Irish moonshine), an elected member of the Dáil (parliament) and the gardaí (Irish police force).

As I read the story I realized that what I really enjoyed about it was the familiarity of it. Yes because it spoke volumes to a simpler, more stereotyped, and probably more enjoyable Ireland, but also because the story could easily have originated in New York or Boston or Philadelphia or Baltimore or Albany or wherever. Spencer Tracy's character in the Last Hurrah could have acted in exactly the same manner as this Irish politician (father of Prime Minister Enda Kenny, Henry Kenny).

It's a cute story of a bit of harmless corruption. You would have to be an anti-corruption zealot to be offended by the story.

Yet as I read the story in the same paper that today has pages dedicated to yesterday's publication of a report into corrupt dealings between politicians and businessmen I wondered if the bloodthirsty jail-is-too-good-for-them crowd would find the story amusing. There seems to be zero tolerance for corruption in Ireland today.

Maybe the zealots are right? Maybe tolerating these little incidents gradually escalates into the sort of corruption detailed in yesterday's report or other tribunals into misdeeds by politicians and the gardaí?

Does it start with a politician procuring a bottle of moonshine from the police for a missionary priest which morphs into jobs for the boys from the neighborhood which morphs into mobile phone licenses for the boys with the checkbooks, with a little kickback for the politician(s) making the decision? I don't know. The first case seems harmless, the second is legally dubious and possibly immoral, and the latter is plainly 100% wrong.

Today Twitter is aflame with calls for the columnist Sarah Carey to be dismissed by the Irish Times because she admitted lying to the Moriarty Tribunal about leaking material from the Tribunal to the press. Carey says there were many leaks and thought she was acting the public good. She later admitted to the Tribunal that she had lied earlier while testifying.

She leaked; she lied; she owned up. I can probably live with that. Maybe it's just that I'm older than most of those calling for blood on Twitter, but I'm more than willing to forgive Carey this transgression. Judge Moriarty said she was one of the few to own up to leaking, although that didn't change the fact that what she did was "irresponsible, in flagrant breach of the course of dealings that had been clearly conveyed to her."

She did wrong, but I don't think she should lose her job. I see her crime as closer to getting poitín for the priest than getting a big check in your back pocket for abusing public office.

{Photo: a poitín still from MuseumsOfMayo.com.}

E-mail

4 Comments

See all comments

mamaginnty | Mar 31, 2011, 03:20 PM EDT

A money making weasel

Report abuse

Collette2 | Mar 27, 2011, 12:24 AM EDT

I agree with both these comments, you may lie to your family and there is no such thing as harmless corruption. We as Catholics have seen the consequences many times over.

Report abuse

LoyalCitizen | Mar 23, 2011, 08:37 PM EDT

You may lie to your family...You may lie to your friends...You do not lie to the nation for it is treason. Sarah Carey lied in a national tribunal, which is treason and when owning up to treason she should pay the price...In reading many of her articles in the Times Sarah Carey has abused the freedom of the press and lied to the nation far too often...Sarah Carey is a traitor, like most National Irish media who lie to the Irish People all the time.

Report abuse

MarkCassell | Mar 23, 2011, 07:26 PM EDT

There is no such thing as harmless corruption. She lied to a tribunal and yet she has the brazen arrogance to continue slighting the workings of that tribunal. She shows nothing but contempt for this Republic when she snidely laughs off the pernicious link between corrupt politicians and corrupt business people. She is full of the tired yet eternally smug arrogance that presides in the rancid halls of power in this broken Republic. Only useful idiots suggest she should be given some leeway. Then can be no compromise with corruption.

Report abuse