Periscope


Latest 'Get Gerry Adams' effort is led by deeply troubled woman -- Dolours Price has long history of mental illness after force-feeding

Posted on Tuesday, October 02, 2012 at 08:20 AM

RSS


Recent Posts

Archives

submit to reddit

Political activist and former volunteer for the Provisional IRA Dolours Price (Photo: Pacemaker)
Political activist and former volunteer for the Provisional IRA Dolours Price
(Photo: Pacemaker)


Long ago and far away there seems little doubt that Gerry Adams was a senior figure in the IRA in West Belfast.

How could he not be? His neighborhood was under siege from the British Army and every able-bodied man back in the days when the Troubles were at their height was involved.

What is interesting about recent attempts to get Adams to admit the past is how the context is never given.

Decades of  complete Unionist misrule led to a tinder-box situation after civil rights marchers were batoned and beaten off the streets in 1968 and 1969.

It all  inevitably exploded and then all hell broke loose when the British Army was called in to defend the indefensible status quo we had Bloody Sunday and a fully fledged IRA campaign. That was the Northern Ireland that Gerry Adams grew up in

Dolours Price, now Gerry Adams chief accuser was caught up in it too, coming from a strong Republican family.

In March 1973 she was arrested on board a plane going to Ireland just as a 300 pound bomb detonated at the Old Bailey courts and one person was killed and many injured Her sister Marian was arrested alongside her.

Her time in prison did not go well. She and her sister went on a hunger strike and were force- fed for 200 days an horrific experience which has caused much of the mental trauma she experiences today.

Almost 40 years on, Dolours Price the former wife of actor Stephen Rea, is sadly still suffering the effects.

“She had a history of psychiatric problems and substance abuse,” said journalist Ed Moloney.

“She has been diagnosed with PTSD [post-traumatic stress disorder], had been hospitalized repeatedly, and....(is)  taking strong psychotropic drugs.

Indeed, on the day she spoke to [The Irish News] she was on day leave from St Patrick’s psychiatric hospital in Dublin.” Moloney said referring to the controversial interview she gave  to that newspaper where she first alleged Adams sent informers to their death.

She is unrepentant about her past and makes no bones that she wants to destroy Adams and the process if she can.

The Irish Sunday Times quoted her this weekend  saying she defended her acts while in the IRA and actually enjoyed them. “It was an exciting time, there was no real order or structure to everyday life, the war had taken away all normal routine ... I should be ashamed to admit there was fun in it in those days,” she said.

The same Sunday Times article notes that in 2001, Price was found guilty  in a Dublin court of stealing prescriptions. “She seems to have an alcohol problem but is taking steps to address it,” said Judge Thomas Fitzpatrick .

Five years later Price was disallowed access to Maghaberry prison, where she was visiting a dissident republican prisoner “She was verbally abusive and threatening and was in no condition to be allowed into the visiting area,” said a senior Prison Service source.

She has also received three convictions for theft in recent years and has attempted suicide.

Little wonder Adams does not feel it is politic to pursue her accusations against him in court.

Last weekend he stated: “I am not of a mind to trail Dolours Price through the courts . . . she is unwell.”

Those who are putting her up to the statements she is making, given that she is a seriously ill woman have a lot to answer for it seems to me.

She should be allowed time and space to try and recuperate from her many problems It is sad to see her used as a “Get Gerry Adams” vehicle by sections of the media.




92 Comments

15 - 92 | See all comments

Dano. The point being made is that had the brits stood up to unionists, the ones fearing change. Sunningdale of 73 may have saved thousands of lives. To praise those who had opposed it as great peace makers for accepting it 30 years later is hardly an achievement that should allow any of them be elevated into great statesmen travelling the world in order to heal all conflict.
Sorry, Seamus...was referring to the current Assembly....
Dano, You said earlier the parties who eventually formed the N.I administration. Who on the Nationalist side were in that admin other than the SDLP. The party who were representing the vast majority of Nationalists.
Seamus - Nationalist hardliners the SDLP? not quite how I remember it...Sunningdale was their idea...so no surprise they backed it...there were pro and anti on either side...
Dano, The Nationalist hardliners were the SDLP and they were all for it. The unionist parties were the ones against it and should have been stood up to. Because they weren`t most likely cost thousands of lives and all the other mayhem that accompanyed it.
Seamus - Hardliners on either side...the parties who eventually formed the NI admin...
Dano, Neither side ?
ancavker…The fact is neither side was ready to do a deal…a necessary precondition to any agreement…governments have to take account of civil resistance...not sure what else they could have done?
Dano. You in the same post lumped the Birmingham six and those killed into the one of who was more deserving of rememberance.
Seamus - It's logic, not twisted, to assert that if any event had not happened, things would not have developed as they did...
Seamus – republican victimhood is not the same as republican victims…
Dano. In the hierarchy of republican victimhood ring a bell ?
Seamus - Maybe you can help by saying where I referred to the Birmingham 6 as victims of republican violence?
Dano and his twisted logic re the Birmingham six at last we now know you for the Brit apologist that you are.
Dano. In an earlier post you referred to the Birmingham six as victims of republican violence. That can only mean that had the IRA not placed the bombs no one would have been arrested in the first place. Thats your logic, not mine. As your logic is so twisted on this incident can we assume you also meant that had the IRA not be fighting, no one would have had a reason to bomb Dublin /Monaghan, thus expanding the war ?




Log into IrishCentral with your Facebook account


or sign-in directly

E-Mail:
Password:
 Remember me Forgot my password
Not a member? Register Now!
print this article Print
email this articleE-mail