Manhattan Diary


Chicago Cardinal Blasts 'Prejudiced' Gays

Posted on Monday, February 14, 2011 at 08:59 AM

RSS


Recent Posts

Archives

submit to reddit

A group of about 50 LGBT activists led by Chicago's Gay Liberation Network picketed the city's Holy Name Cathedral and Cardinal Francis George yesterday, protesting the Catholic Church's relentless attempts to block marriage equality and civil unions in the state.

Critics contend the Church's speedy attempts to block equality legislation stand in stark contrast to their decades of foot dragging on the international abuse crisis within their own walls.

At yesterdays protest GLN leader and activist Andy Thayer told the press: “Cardinal George went into overdrive to try to defeat the civil unions bill in Springfield. Every single piece of pro-rights legislation that's ever been proposed for the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgendered community, this cardinal and his predecessors have opposed.”

But in a statement yesterday George shot back: "Some members of the Gay Liberation Network demonstrated in front of Holy Name Cathedral on Sunday, February 13, protesting against Catholic Church teaching on the immorality of homosexual genital relations and opposition to so called 'gay marriage.' These are deeply felt issues, because they speak to the personal identity of some and to the religious beliefs of others. No matter the issue, Catholics should be able to worship in peace, without fear of harassment. An open display of prejudice against the Catholic Church because of resentment of Church teachings prejudices civil discourse in our society.”

Genital relations? Prejudice? Oh now that wouldn't be an attempt to dehumanize your opponents, and claim the opprressed mantle for yourself would it Cardinal George? After all, no powerful longstanding international organization is attempting to strip you of your rights, even to express yourself in such a sinister fashion.

So perhaps you can cool the rhetoric and extend them the same courtesy that you ask for yourself. The LGBT protesters are not attempting to change the Church's mind after all, they are simply protesting at the Church's continuing political interference in their private lives.




24 Comments

See all comments

As identical twins studies show conclusively homosexual attraction is NOT genetic, not 'just born that way". It should be obvious, but if 98% of men are attracted to women, it is clear how we are 'just born". The church doesn't demonize homosexually attracted persons but it recognizes the undeniable etyology of the condition. The tens of thousands of dead young men from AIDS and that fact that 2% of the population suffers 61% of new HIV infections shows what shouldn't have to be explained. We are not at all designed for sexual acts with the same gender. Few things are as obvious as that.
Little wonder that a pedophile-priest-hiding cardinal would decide its safe to attack gays and lesbians. This "man" should have resigned in 2008 or should have been fired by the vatican. He has no business heading the Church in Chicago. This "man"a continued paying a pedophile priest and continued his employment in the diocese. A "priest" named Martin has been living in the Cardinal's residence even though he is a convicted sex offender/child molester. Four other "priests, Dubi, Grace, Maday, and Bennett.
pacifist...there is no excuse for the deleting of many posts on IC. They will delete them if they don't like them. Cahir's blog is the worst for deleting posts that fuffle his feathers. Even if I don't agree with you, never stop posting.
The last time I submitted a comment I did so in the heat of the moment and used intemperate language by name calling all of which I regret and for which I apologise to Niall O'Dowd, Cahir O'Doherty and the Moderator. However I believe the censorship is unwarranted, that the First Amendment is being disrepected and the deleting of comments displays a lack of courage and a fear of the truth. I also foolishly said I would no longer visit the Irish Central website or submit comments on topics of interest to me, but I have since changed my mind. This may annoy some, however that is my intention.
If you chose the RCC at least you would still have your head.
McNabb writes, "And if they think that the Catholic Church is their enemy then perhaps they'd like to take a run at Islam..." Right, that's my point: radical Muslims set up theocracies, states in which the Koran is, in effect, the law. Are you saying that in the US we should write the Vatican's doctrines into law? Six of one, half a dozen of the other--either way, we'd have religion running the state. No thanks!
I'd like to say to Cardinal George, "an open display of prejudice" is not illegal; the US Constitution protects it. The 1st Amendment does not limit freedom of speech to words that are sweet and polite. It protects even speech we find loathsome so that each of us has the same freedom when we need it. But the real issue in the Catholic bishops' perennial war on same-sex unions is separation of church and state. Religious leaders, as olovely points out, have no special expertise on what is moral, what "Nature" might approve or disapprove of, or even what God approves of. Yes, as McNabb says, marriage is a civil contract in which the state has an interest (to protect the couple's union as a stable environment for children while they grow up). But that means that the state protects the privacy of married couples and their families, and in the US, where religion does not write laws, such protections should apply equally to all families. How many Catholics are funding their bishops' expensive lobbying efforts to write discrimination into state laws? Why don't these Catholics have the courage to express their prejudice in words: freedom of speech is free, so use it to tell the world whose lifestyle you do not like, rather than trying to impose your sense of morality on others through the force of law. Expressing and practicing your beliefs is what freedom of religion means. Keeping your religious views out of our state laws is what separation of church and state means.
Being a homosexual doesn't excuse religious bigotry. The Cardinal's statement is appropriate and correct. And for the record, Cahir: The institution of marriage is NOT "private." It's a social union that involves more people than just the couple in question. It's also a civil contract that requires licensing by the state. Can you at least get the facts right? And if they think that the Catholic Church is their enemy then perhaps they'd like to take a run at Islam...
I'm waiting patiently to see a pregnant man walking down the street.
The church that I spent so much of my life believing in is hopelessly lost. It is totally insignificant and its officials are useless. Like people 'choose' the homosexual life style!!! Idiots!!! It is what it is and is 'natural' (because it occurs naturally) as any other life style. We must respect all people. Thre is no doubt that in a conflict of debate, my jesus would stand with the protesting gays rather than the obnoxious priests.
FAO Niall O'Dowd, Cahir O'Doherty and the Moderator: Since you do not respect the First Amendment in allowing freedom of expression having censored by total deletion of legitimate comments I submitted - comments rooted in verifiable facts and facts you could not refute - in relation to the serious and often fatal consequences for those participating in the homosexual lifestyle I will no longer read Irish Central in any form nor will I visit your website and thus will never again submit comments on any topic no matter how trivial. My view is that you are cowardly, dishonest and thoroughly hypocritical in that since you are unable to refute my assertions you delete them within a short time of their appearance. At no time did any of my comments disrepect sexually active homosexuals, but all of them presnetd the unvarnished truth of the health consequences for sexually active male homosexuals. Rtherv than letting them read the truth you conceal it and prevent those who are thinking of adopting such a death promoting lifestyle from turning away from it. You reveal a lack of genuine love and concern for these unfortunates and thus condemn many more to told misery. I can only put it down to wilful ignorance and real understanding of what is best for your fellow human beings.
Jays but you're an awful judgmental plaster of paris moygannon. Who appointed you judge and jury of what's natural. Sure isn't nature teeming with every kind of sexual coupling. Clearly you've never looked at nature in your life.
Don't overlook the Natural Law: anything contrary to nature is immoral.
And what is Cardinal George doing if not trying to ram his views down the throats of gays? They didn't ask for his input into their private lives. They didn't ask him to try and intimidate politicians into doing what he tells them. Let gays live in peace and dignity and let men like the Cardinal finally allow them to.
I think people need to realize we all have a right to live in peace not matter what we are. But that said, there are elements in the alternative lifestyle community who would like to ram their beliefs down the throats of those who do not believe as they do. Live in peace.




Log into IrishCentral with your Facebook account


or sign-in directly

E-Mail:
Password:
 Remember me Forgot my password
Not a member? Register Now!
print this article Print
email this articleE-mail