News


IRA interviews must be handed over to Feds and British, top US court rules

No confidentiality for IRA participants in Boston College oral history project


Brendan Hughes
Brendan Hughes, Former IRA Commander

Guinness PubFinder Ad

Interviews with former IRA members collected for a Boston College Irish history project cannot be sealed until after their death and must be made available to British authorities and US Justice Department prosecutors, a US Appeals Court has ruled.

The material will now be handed over to police by next month according to press reports.

The British government have been seeking the interviews carried out by researchers Ed Moloney and Anthony McIntyre with leading figures from the IRA and Loyalist paramilitaries as part of a Boston College oral history project. Senators John Kerry and Chuck Schumer had been among those seeking to keep the information secret until the participants had died as had been agreed with them.

The court, as a lower court did, has sided with prosecutors who want full access to the interviews. Moloney and McIntyre had claimed that their assurance to the subjects that their testimonies would not be revealed until after their death covered them.

Chief Judge Sandra Lynch stated the researchers could not claim that they had specific rights under her reading of a legal treaty between the United States and the United Kingdom.

She also stated that the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in its 1972 "Branzburg v. Hayes" decision that journalists do not have the right to refuse subpoenas based on their own promises of confidentiality.

"As in Branzburg, there is no reason to create such a privilege here," Lynch wrote. "The choice to investigate criminal activity belongs to the government and is not subject to veto by academic researchers."

Boston College had originally sought to block access to the records also but later relented and agreed to hand some over. Separately, they have sought to stop the release of seven other tapes but the chances are now very slim after this ruling.

The British request came after testimony from a former IRA senior figure Brendan Hughes, one of those interviewed who sought to implicate Sinn Fein leader Gerry Adams in the notorious Jean McConville murder, appeared in a book ‘Voices from the Grave’ by Ed Moloney after his death.

McConville was killed for being a British spy in 1972 by the IRA, but her body was not found until 2003. Hughes, who had fallen out with Adams, made the allegation in the Moloney book but his evidence was hotly disputed.

Former IRA figure Dolours Price was one of several former IRA members who gave interviews as part of The Belfast Project between 2001 and 2006. All participants were assured the interviews were  secret until their deaths. But Northern Ireland police probing the IRA 1972 killing of McConville want the recordings.

The British authorities are said to be especially interested in the testimony of Price as she was close to senior figures in the IRA early in the camapign and they believe she has information on several murders. She was formerly married to actor Stephen Rea and has suffered post-traumatic stress following force feeding during her time in prison.


Nster.com


73 Comments

15 - 73 | See all comments

KEEP STIRRING THE POT UNTILL IT BOILS OVER AGAIN.
Schon: Sean and Mairead get over excited when people don't agree with the IRA views and start insulting people actually living in Ireland. If you are from the Republic, you're a West Brit, a Southie, a Stickie, a Free Stater etc. (in my 55 years. 30 as an Irish lawyer,I have never heard these terms applied to my fellow citizens) yet he and Mairead choose to live in a British Commonwealth Country and Sean claims elsewhere to have been from Clondalkin, Dublin which doesn't add up. It's easy to pontificate about Ireland when you don't live here. His last post is indeed purerile. He and Mairead obviously take turns on the computer but they don't listen to anybody, so I should not bother as its falling on deaf ears.
seanomelb I'm a bit disappointed that you didn't argue with any of the facts I presented. But then, the truth is hard to deny. Luv & Kisses
Your puerile humour befits your feeble mind child killer
seanomelb I was talking about you to a friend. See that, I'm making you famous. He comes from McDonald Street of the Falls. He reminded me of the joke that was doing the rounds in the 70's. It goes like this... Sean was driving a stolen car with a bomb on the back seat. His passenger, Patrick, was a bit concerned that his driving was reckless and that the bomb might go off prematurely. 'Not to worry,' said our Sean. 'Sure, I've got a spare one in the boot.' It wasn't you that was driving that car, was it? Somehow I feel there's a resemblance. Luv & Kisses
seanomelb stay with the programme; IN IRELAND the Security forces were responsible for around 360 deaths while the republican murders killed more than 2060. There were more children killed by republicans than by the security forces, so where is your high ground? And unlike your heros, the security forces were trying to stop the killing. At the peak there was over 25,000 troops and around 10,000 RUC and reservists serving in the North. Are you telling me that with so many troops the security forces only managed to kill 360 people over 30 years? The vast majority of the 360 were republican and loyalist terrorists. Jesus, if it had been the Yanks there would have been a couple of hundred thousand dead. And about 'Shoot to Kill' Stalker... the man was a cop unaccustomed to weapons. Yes, there was a Shoot to Kill policy. The Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) was to shoot to kill not to wound. This was because a shot to the torso had a good chance of stopping the bullet preventing collateral injury to (innocent) third parties. Shooting someone in the leg would leave a bullet with sufficient kinetic energy to cause death or serious injury to innocent third parties even at some distance from the intended target. What was not SOP was Shoot on Sight. Had it been then I personally would have had a body count approaching 100, including Gerry, a number of his SF comrades and a number of loyalist murderers too. I might have bagged a couple of innocents by mistaken identity, but that was why Shoot on Sight was not British Army policy. God Seanomelb, but are you that stupid that you don't know these things? Or maybe... I know, you're using black propaganda to indoctrinate young people who weren't about at the time. Gee seanomelb you're a sly one...
"schon the righteous arrogant tommy" I suppose it was OK for tommy's like you to fire on children playing in the streets from the comfort of your armoured cars or have a shoot to kill policy which was exposed by one of your own (Stalker) or maybe mowing down civilians on bloody sunday,need I mention more, and that guilt is certainly yours.Or Captain Murphy,s (British army) expose of the deliberate murder of civilians in Aden(1963-1967)The main past time of Tommy's like you was to throw a grenade into a market place and slip the ring on one of the dead.Or the prison camps in Kenya where people starved to death (1956) I actually have an ex BA friend who was their and was transfered from camp duty to the jungle because he dared give a cigarette to a camp inmate,I could go on but I'm afraid that mud might give way on the precarious immoral high ground you stand on. It's now time for me to end this discussion with a failed human being.
seanomelb, Now, I know that with your intelligence, you may not believe me, and that it might, just might, come as a bit of a shock to yur system, but... I'm still alive! My writing this and previous posts should have given you a bit of a hint, but that's alright. I understand that delusional people find it difficult to accept the truth. But back to issues... so it's OK for you to use association to hang the guilt of the people the IRA were responsible for killing on me. Your logic is severely flawed. The republican terrorist killed more people that either the British Army or the RUC. Even the Loyalist thugs killed more than either RUC or Army. The wars in Iraq and Afghanistan were started by the US and your golden boy, Tony bLiar (the 'b' is silent) so, blame not the British Army, blame the people who have given credence to terrorism; they have shown the world that terrorism pays by giving the likes of Adams, McGuinness and their like paid jobs and respectability in society. So by your own logic you accept responsibility and praise the murderers for the deaths of the people in Omagh, the people killed in Bloody Friday and all other atrocities perpetrated by your murdering heroes. In contrast, my comrades and I in the British Army and RUC did own best to stop the murder. Remember that the Offical and Provisional IRA were quite good at killing the people that were hiding them in safe houses much more readily and on purpose... any innocent deaths caused by the Army or RUC were very unfortunate and sad but your lot when about the assassinations of the Roman Catholics providing the safe houses with gusto. Hell they even helped their arthritis with their surgical application of electric drills and deft incision of lead to Knees and other extremities. Keep taking the tablets seanomelb. They won't cure you but they might make the delusions less menacing. Luv & Kisses. PS I really think you should seek professional advice.
I'm an atheist you fool and I make no apologies for Brit terrorist like you who were killed in the north. They were hiding in the catholic population!! the nationalists were giving them safe houses and thanking them for protecting their children from immoral jerks like you go beat your Lambegh drum or burn a paddy on a bonfire or hide behind your terrorist uniform whilst killing innocent Afghani and Iraqi children or what gets your rocks off that's if you have any you spineless coward.
seanomelb You and all apologists of terrorism are as guilty of the deaths of all of the innocents and the members of the security forces who tried to prevent their deaths. You learned your bigoted history from the same priests that have preyed on the young Roman Catholics throughout Ireland. In the troubles there were more deaths from your murdering terrorist heros than from any action taken by Crown forces. I do know that there would have been a lot more deaths in the Roman Catholic population had the RUC and Army not been there to stop the loyalists. There are a lot more loyalists in the North and you just don't want to know the ones in Scotland. They were chomping at the bit to get over to Ireland to take their revenge against the republicans. But because the republican terrorists were hiding in the general Roman Catholic population, there would have been a lot of innocent Roman Catholics killed. I'm proud of my contribution in preventing deaths in any community. You show your colours lionising those murderers killing innocent people for their and your political goals. Who's the bigger man between us? You, a sponsor for murderers of innocents or me, trying to save life. I can still see the bodies of women and children torn apart by your heros bombs, the devastation caused by your heros bombs. Over our vaious discourses, you still haven't brought up any specifics in your pontificating. You still generalise about things you have never witnessed. You're all mouth and no substance. A true Irish hero?
Ex British army terrorist what else would you like me to say.How many innocents have you killed in your roll as a British tommy or maybe chasing kids through the Divis flats a fine profession for a bigot.
seanomelb take me to task and identify my bigotry instead of making ill informed generalisations. At least I have witnessed everything that I have related personally. Can you say that?
You certainly are getting through to me Schon.Your simple bigoted and childlike postings are easy to see through. I gotta laugh at your version of truth imbecile.
Dear seanomelb, you poor sad person. If, by posting in an adult fashion, (as you do perhaps?), you mean that I should distort and lie about what happened historically, I'm afraid that I refuse to lower myself to such actions. I report what I have witnessed first hand. Can you say the same? Your habit of not really reading a post is obvious from your retort... I never said where I was born. Also, it is pointless to comment without relating what points you are objecting to. Or maybe you can't, as my previous posts are historically correct and confound your bigotted republican dissembling. However, I am glad that you're not taking this personally as I can see that, though you are resisting me, I am getting through to you with the truth and that you will soon have the correct and honest history with which to revise your current inaccurate mindset. Remember, embrance your English so you can express yourself with a clear and honest mind. Luv and Kisses.
I don't care where you were born child just grow up and post in an adult fashion if that's possible. You could never be to hard on anybody except in your own feeble mind.




Log into IrishCentral with your Facebook account


or sign-in directly

E-Mail:
Password:
 Remember me Forgot my password
Not a member? Register Now!
print this article Print
email this articleE-mail