News


Church's double standards over barred nun in abortion scandal


Sister Margaret McBride - excommunicated for her involvement in a decision to go ahead with an abortion
Sister Margaret McBride - excommunicated for her involvement in a decision to go ahead with an abortion

Guinness PubFinder Ad

The media and public are speaking out on the hypocrisy within the Catholic Church that has been clearly illustrated by Sister Margaret McBride’s excommunication from the Church.

Sister Margaret McBride was excommunicated, by order of Bishop Thomas Olmstead, for agreeing to the abortion of an 11-week-old fetus in order to attempt to save the critically ill mother. An immediate double stand is evident.

For example, Cardinal Sean Brady, Primate of all Ireland, has decided that he will remain as head of the Church in Ireland though he admits that he was part of a 30 year cover up of the sexual abuse perpetrated by Father Brendan Smyth. He had decided for himself that he will remain in authority within the Church until he retires.

Sister Margaret acted as part of an ethics board at St Joseph’s Hospital, Phoenix, Arizona. The board, including Sister Margaret made the decision that terminating the pregnancy in the third month of pregnancy was only possible way the doctors had any chance of saving the mother’s life.

“In this tragic case, the treatment necessary to save the mother’s life required the termination of an 11-week pregnancy,” the hospital said in a statement. “This decision was made after consultation with the patient, her family, her physicians, and in consultation with the Ethics Committee.”

Directly after this news reached the Bishop of Phoenix, Thomas Olmstead, Sister Margaret was “automatically excommunicated”.
Nicholas D Kristof, columnist for the New York Times wrote, on Thursday, about Sister Margaret’s terrible situation. He pointed out glaring double standards which the Church holds when dealing with ordained people.

“Let us just note that the Roman Catholic hierarchy suspended priests who abused children and in some cases defrocked them but did not normally excommunicate them, so they remained able to take the sacrament,” said Kristof.

He went on to quote an email he had received from an acquaintance that works in a hospital lamenting the fact that Sister Margaret had been forced to resign from her position “at the bishop’s request”.

It said “True Christians, like Sister Margaret, understand that real life is full of difficult moral decisions and pray that they make the right decision in the context of Christ’s teachings. Only a group of detached, pampered men in gilded robes on a balcony high above the rest of us could deny these dilemmas.”

Unfortunately, Sister Margaret has not yet released a statement on her situation.

While the Catholic Church is entitled to its views this episode shows their leaders to be rigid dogmatic and out of touch. It also seems that they do not care about the clear hypocrisy which they are demonstrating through cases such as Sister Margaret’s.
 


Nster.com


46 Comments

15 - 46 | See all comments

I spent two years in a seminary as a result of indoctrination by visiting clergymen when I was an innocent and gullible young lad in primary school - the priests in the seminary were known as "the Gods". I imagine bishop Olmstead thinks that HE IS GOD. Someone should remind him that Jesus preached forgiviness when on earth but that only seems to apply to paedophile priests nowadays. Oh how that fat lot protect their "mafia club". Sister Margaret should be canonised. Besides, excommunication went out with Noah´s Ark. Pity poor cranky Olmsted still living in the dark ages.
I haven't heard what the illness was in the "mother" that supposedly necessitated an abortion. I also find it ironic that any ethics board member of a Catholic hospital, especially a nun, would approve (and even recommend) an abortion for any reason. Aren't Catholic hospitals precluded from performing abortions? This issue probably should have never come up at this hospital.
Speaking of mothers--"If you put all the love of all the mothers into one heart, it still would not equal the love of Mary for her children." St. Louis de Montfort
Portia77, lacing tour argument with phrases like "fabricating lies," "brainwashing cult," "men in dresses," "sheeple," and "devious means," destroys your credibility.
Employing an arbitrary number (forty days--not thirty-eight days or 270 days) to determine ensoulment has always seemed absurd to me. Either it happens at conception or it doesn't happen at all.
What in the world is happening to the Holy Roman Catholic church? I think there is a double standard going on here with Sister Margaret and I don't like it. I'm so sick of the political crap in the hier limits of the Church. Sick to death of it.
Thank you to PORTIA 777. You said it all in terms that even "sheeple" can understand.
jesus had absolutely nothing to do with this Roman Catholic Church.....that is all fabricated lies to benefit the brainwashing cult. Jesus had no church or hierarchy, because the church is inside each human being.So, the men in dresses are part of a patriarchal scam, leading sheeple to "think" they need them to save their souls. Only the human being himself/herself can save their own souls. It is no one elses business. It was all about getting money through devious means like a salesman and keeping control over those evil children and eve-ill women
Thinking about this logically- the mother was going to die, so then the baby would also die with her as no baby can survive at 11 weeks. Then both would be dead, so any logical mind would terminate the foetus and save the mother, so she can look after her other children. Unless the evil Catholic cult was planning to remove the other children into their "care" for their own uses.?
Abortion and contraception, historically viewed as violation of MEN'S PROPERTY, have been embraced when viewed as benefiting men. Early Catholic orthodoxy upheld the Aristotelian notion of "natural" male superiority. St. Thomas Aquinas reasoned, "In terms of nature's own operation, a woman is inferior and a mistake. " The historic Catholic theory of "ensoulment," traceable to the Middle Ages, further reinforced women's subordinate status, holding that a male fetus attained human form, and therefore a soul, about forty days after conception, a process half as long as for a female fetus. From the thirteenth century until 1869 (when the all-male U.S. medical society lobbied to eliminate competition from midwives by criminalizing abortion unless performed by a doctor) the Catholic Church accepted abortion until "quickening," or prior to "ensoulment." Among cutting edge thinkers of the 19th century (idealized era of the political right), western scientist Herbert Spencer asserted that women were not related to their children, but rather functioned merely as incubators for sperm. The notion of sperm as the complete seed from which offspring develop reinforced concepts of MALE OWNERSHIP OF WOMEN AND CHILDREN.
So, in other words the womb man is only an incubator for a child and her life is worth zero. The medical profession swear an oath to preserve life, so why was the Catholic Cult even asked? Only the mother has permission to decide in this case. She and her unborn child communicate and make the decision- that is how soul contracts work. No one needs MEN IN DRESSES making decisions over female lives- like the dark ages. The Nun is well rid of the Cult and should celebrate her Freedom. We as Citizens of the universe should give her a gold medal for going with her conscience. No wonder my Father made sure my mother had her babies in a Protestant hospital...just as well as Dr Neary was the alternative, and we all learned later how patriarchal his mind was.
censored again my,my. Ionly wished a plag-ue on all your religions
Blessed are the caregiver for they will be cared for. I don't like the Church's decision. There are so-called Catholic Hospital that offer abortion services. I hope the Catholic Leaders are able to look at the bigger picture and come to a decision base on wisdom and compassion not not impulse and reactions.
Georg Dillon, your ad hominem attacks only demean YOU. Had you studied Roman Catholic moral law at a higher level than the Baltimore Catechism, you would never state, "The Church has always accepted that an abortion may be performed to save the woman's life." Go back and re-read my explanation CAREFULLY. It summarizes the Church's position nicely. If it confuses you in any way, I should be most happy to restate it monosyllabically.
murph:"Gee, GeorgeDillon, do you think I slept through my classes in moral theology at the seminary?" I suspect the only seminary you were ever in was your local pub, and I'm sure you put in the requisite hours to be well "ordained" there every Saturday nite.




Log into IrishCentral with your Facebook account


or sign-in directly

E-Mail:
Password:
 Remember me Forgot my password
Not a member? Register Now!
print this article Print
email this articleE-mail