News


IRA's ambush of Michael Collins was fortuitous new report reveals



Guinness PubFinder Ad

A report reveled in a new book "The IRA: A Documentary History 1916-2005" claims that the death of Irish freedom fighter Michael Collins involved a hail of gunfire.

Collins was killed while exchanging rifle fire with ambushers.

He was the only fatality wounded in this battle.

He had ordered his convoy to stop and return fire, instead of choosing the safer option of driving on in his touring car or transferring to the safety of the accompanying armoured car, as his companion, Emmet Dalton, had wished.

The book contains previously secret internal documentation held by the IRA.

It is believed that the report was sent to the IRA headquarters two days after the August 22, 1922 attack.

The attack is written in the Irish history books- Beal na mBlath in West Cork.

Up to his point it was speculated that Collins was shot by one of his own soldiers but the release of this report states that most of his crew had moved up towards Clonakility and away from the ambush site before Collins' death.

The report states the "firing was terrific", with the "Free Staters" relying on a machine gun to take on nine IRA riflemen.

"The engagement lasted one hour" according to the report.

It states that it stopped when the Free State soldiers moved the barricade blocking the road.

The book’s author, historian Brian Hanley, said: "For years this first-hand report on Collins’s death lay hidden in the papers of former IRA chief of staff, Moss Twomey.

"These were donated to UCD in the 1990s and contain a vast amount of information on the organisation through the civil war into the 1940s."

He added: "The Béal na mBláth ambush would seem to have been relatively straightforward and indicated Collins was somewhat naive in his approach by allowing his whereabouts to be easily known.

"As with many of the other reports, it indicates the very violent nature of the War of Independence and later IRA actions."


Nster.com


15 Comments

See all comments

After reading just about everything on the Great Michael COllins, I can say with confidence that Peter Harts book is 90% speculation and in the most negative way against Mick. It is full of lies, and I cannot believe it was allowed to be published. Peter could not get teh information he wanted and in return published a book full of crap.He sounds like just another brit spitting out a bunch of lies.
Peter Hart's book is full of sh*t,He didn't die in a hail of bullets,he dies by a single shot to the head and the speculated that Collins was shot by one of his own soldiers is more crap.Firing was terrific..more crap.For starters only a handful of ambushers were left as most had left the area,the machine gun was jammed and out of order and Collins was out in the open firing when he was shot.He was never that stupid if firing was terrific.Also the IRA didn't know who they shot at the time..but they did know they shot someone important. @Marycollins..don't mind Georgyboy he's Irish Central's village idiot,and on the run from an american mental institution, he's hiding out here.
Us Yanks are still trying to figular out who killed JFK. Follow the money. The money for the revolution came from Boston, and Joe Kennedy control Boston with his father-in-law, Honey Fitz. Around the time of the Irish Revolution, Joe Kennedy became extremely wealthy, though an insider (insider deals were legal at the time). You see Henry Ford need coal mines. So he brokered the deal through a company Joe Kennedy worked for. Joe Kennedy bought up the mine and sold them back to Henry Ford, and made about 25 million. Henry Ford would never have been taken for 25 million, except he wanted to build cars in England. The class conscience English would never let a Scotch-Irishmen build cars in England, unless their was something in it for them. Northern Ireland. England got Northern Ireland, Ford got to build cars in England, and Kennedy got the money.
Old news indeed. The report was published five years ago in the late Peter Hart’s ‘Mick, The Real Michael Collins.’
The confrontation was just about over at that point. As the Republicans were retreating , a stray bullet fired by one killed Michael Collins.
maryCollins--You seem to be taking it personally, with your mention of "my relative". Relax, the guys who ambushed the Free Staters that day had never even heard of you. It was nothing personal!
Hi, I think it's interesting that it seems the shooting stopped once my relative was killed. So, it seems the mission was complete. If it were to kill all in the attack then the fight would have gone on. I didn't read that either side ran out of bullets. They had enough for Mick and then it was over.
Kevin: perhaps it was just my interpertation, but many writers tdday, as well as revisionist historians always point out that the war of independence and civil war was violent, and therefore wrong. They would like us to believe that had the Irish just been patient they would have gotten home rule and all would be well. Any attempt to honor the men of the 1916 rising and war of independence/civil war is met with crys of supporting violence and the provos, or todays so called republican dissidents. It is pathetic that Ireland should have to apologize for fighting for their independence. Do you remember the outrage in some quarters (Kevin Meyers formerly of the Irish Times to name just one), when Kevin Barry and others were giving a proper burial some years ago after being ignored for years?
There's a lack of historical knowledge here. De Valera did not kill Collins. In fact Dev was pretty irrelevant to the men who faced Collins--he most certainly was not their leader. It was while fighting against a unit of the West Cork Brigade of the IRA that Collins was killed in action. This Brigade had borne the brunt of the fighting against the British. It democratically decided, as did most IRA Brigades, to stand by the Republic proclaimed in 1916 rather than accept the dismantlement of that Republic and partition of their country by the eactionary forces of big business, ranchers and clerics. I happen to think that these men were right.
Well said 'dan Breen' DeValera was a bastard. I hope he is rotting in hell.
Native ? DeValera was Native ! He was the cause of collins death. As well as IRA men. DeValera should have been shot ! To men responsible for the next eighty years of violence, DeValera & Carson rot in hell ! If there is one ! Long Live Collins !!
this website is very good, you can go and see it===sh0es4world.Com===shoes
I don't see where the author made any comparison between the war and IRA activities and any World Wars, but I agree with you that it's a bit odd to feel the need to tell the reader that the war was violent...
ancavker, I agree with you. It's a bit crazy for the article to speak of the "very violent nature" of "later IRA actions" when you think that only a few weeks earlier the Free Staters had used artillery in the streets of Dublin.
This is old news. It was known for years that Collins was probably not shot by his own men, but raher by a stray bulet after engaging with the IRA in west Cork. As far as the comment at the end of the article about the violent nature of the war of independence and later IRA actions, which I assume would include the civil war, well um, duh!! Wars are violent. However comparing it to the world wars,and many other conflcits before and after, the violence was not great.
 




Log into IrishCentral with your Facebook account


or sign-in directly

E-Mail:
Password:
 Remember me Forgot my password
Not a member? Register Now!
print this article Print
email this articleE-mail