The President's appearance before Patriots 49ers game led to a wild racist attack on Twitter
Posted on Monday, December 17, 2012 at 10:55 AM
Larger Text
Print
E-mail
10 Comments
RSS 
Recent Posts
- Boston Bruins goalie Tuukka Rask punches Toronto player in face during game
- Meet Filomena Tobias: The Miami fan who flipped the bird at Joakim Noah
- Miami Heat fans have a new poster child
- The Chinatown Yellow-Faces consider name change in light of Redskins debate
- LeBron James becomes second NBA player to come out after Jason Collins
Archives
Sadly, it’s not.
Before the game, NBC showed the President of the United States, Barack Obama, deliver his moving speech at the Newtown memorial for victims of the Sandy Hook shooting. Considering that one of the teams about to play football were wearing a decal on their helmets in memory of the victims, and considering that the tragedy has permeated all levels of US society, including sports, you would have imagined this was a safe enough decision by NBC (to show The President’s speech before the game).
You can probably see where this is going.
The President appearing before the game to an audience of primarily football fans invoked an explosion of hatred on the social networking vehicle Twitter unlike anything this column for one has seen before.
A couple of things before we really get started, before diving into the minds of some of the most ignorant, ugly and hateful people on this planet. First, be warned, some of the language in the individuals messages is triple X-Rated. If you are not into that kind of thing, definitely don’t read on from here. Second, these people don’t really deserve any exposure, however it is probably more important to expose the ignorant and hateful messages for what they are, than hide from the issue (like the cowards who deleted their twitter accounts once they were exposed).
Let’s get started with a question. Why is it okay in the United States for people to make hateful, racist and threatening comments in social networks? The USA, one would assume, imagines itself to be a civilized country. However, for some reason, these individuals have not been charged with a crime. Now, don’t bother coming back to that query blathering on about the constitution. That document protects ‘free’ speech, not hateful speech. Look it up, there are laws against 'hate' speech. Most other civilized countries deal with this sort of thing. Take the United Kingdom, for example. In the UK, if you make a racist, threatening or otherwise comment on a social networking site, you get to face police charges.
Take the three most recent cases in the UK. A Newcastle University law student was charged with sending grossly offensive messages, which included racist taunts and was sentenced to a two-year community order with 240 hours' unpaid work and ordered to pay £150 costs to the court. Another student from Swansea pleaded guilty to a charge under the Crime and Disorder Act of making racially aggravated comments, he will be sentenced this week and is going to most likely be jailed for a short period. A middle aged football fan was also given a suspended prison sentence after pleading guilty to two offences under the Malicious Communications Act. It was said he had sent out "grossly offensive" racist comments.
It’s not just the UK of course. Other countries are adopting a zero-tolerance attitude to, in particular, racist tweets. Greece famously kicked the belligerent, aggressive and arrogant triple jumped Voula Papachristou off their Olympic team just before the games in response to her mocking African migrants and expressing support for a far-Right political party on Twitter. Zero tolerance in action.
Here’s the part that really bemuses this column. Not only are these comments hateful and racist, they are treasonous as well! They are not just insulting and in some cases threatening any old Joe Punter walking the street. These ignorant, seemingly uneducated, obviously misguided and foolish people are threatening the Commander in chief, the President of The United States. You simply should not be allowed do that. Question him and his politics, sure, but calling him names as are seen below? That’s really going to be allowed?
Why is no one suggesting these people are charged with treason?
They absolutely should be, at the very least. These people should have the book thrown at them.
The right wing nut-jobs that are the far majority in the below often spout forth about supporting the military. Well, as anyone who has served, as anyone who actually knows anything about the military knows, you salute the rank, not the man. The President of The United States is the highest rank in the military, and these disgusting, monosyllabic, Neanderthal-like idiots are insulting the highest rank in the military that they so often sycophantically heap adulation on.
This paradox shows most of them are not capable of exhibiting the free thinking, the ‘freedom’ of thought they so often thank that same military for protecting.
Let’s have a look at a selection of the offending messages. Please bear in mind the language in these is atrocious. It is as offensive in its hateful content as it is in it's often pathetic, mistake strewn delivery, even allowing for the 140 character limit on Twitter.
Interesting to note a number of the cowards have already fled Twitter.
However, many still remain, defiant and angry.
Once again, if you don't like bad language (or the butchering of the English language either!) do not read on. I do feel however that these ignorant fools should be named and shamed for all to see, hence the publishing of the below.
Where do you start? On a night when The President, the NFL, the Patriots and the 49ers all carried themselves with absolute class, these pathetic individuals chose to pour their disgusting brand of hate and abusive vitriol at the leader of the United States.
Most of them chose to use racism as their weapon of attack.
Racism is a disgusting disease. It needs to be hunted down and cut, knifed, scooped out of society completely before we can truly call ourselves civilized human beings. Treasonous racist comments are worse yet, and the United States should follow the rest of the civilized World and come down hard on these idiots.
The NFL can send a message by speaking out against these messages of hate. The NFL was the vehicle the culprits used, and if the NFL has a backbone, it should stand up for the leader of the country it is played in. Sports can send a message, as it often does. One of the greatest things about sports is it brings people from all races together to take part in sporting events together.
Sports breaks down barriers and welcomes one and all, by and large.
These fools who would spoil and indeed harm the overall ethos of sports, which is bringing man (and woman!) together no matter what race or creed we all are? Send a message to them and their kin. Send them to jail for treason. You salute the rank, not the man, and the highest rank in the United States came under serious attack.
No matter your political allegiances, we should not be accepting this.
Follow Cormac on Twitter
10 Comments
See all comments
Oldloadr | Dec 20, 2012, 09:23 AM EST
DaddyMac22 - What you perceive is based either on your bias or your lack of reading comprehension. In case you missed it, the commentator made much ado about the legality of the comments quoted above. I merely pointed out his error; sorry if you can’t handle the truth. I didn’t like the nasty things the left had to say about GWB, but I accepted their RIGHT (all caps, just for you) to say them. Same thing applies here, these folks had the right to say what they did and I am OK with that. BTW, only 9 of the 41 quotes above contain any reference to race. Most of the rest don’t even rise to the level of mild insult. So yes, I get the point that another left-wing attention starved “reporter” is trying to stir up outrage where no crime has been committed. Insults are a part of life for a politician and I’ve heard BHO hurl a few himself.
Report abuse
DaddyMac22 | Dec 20, 2012, 08:36 AM EST
@Oldloadr: ha ha Oh my God you are unreal. You are completely ignoring the overall point of the piece in order to press home your angry right wing agenda. You are basically coming across as defending the disgusting comments made about the President of The United States. You know that, right? That's how you come across. Maybe you are OK with that.
Report abuse
Oldloadr | Dec 20, 2012, 08:11 AM EST
DaddyMac22 - You seem to be the one with anger issues. I'm not angry at all actually. The fact that you don't seem to see the unintentional consequences of hate speech laws is disturbing. Or, do you see, and hope for them to occur here as they have in Canada for instance where a church pastor can be arrested for reading the 2nd chapter of Romans from the pulpit? BTW, in your "perfect world," who decides what “hate speech” is? If I say that BHO is a typical Chicago machine thug, is that hate speech to you? If it is, then you are already in an Orwellian reality. Maybe you should research a subject before you climb up on your charger and go after those windmills…
Report abuse
DaddyMac22 | Dec 20, 2012, 05:17 AM EST
@Oldloadr: clearly, from your aggressive, sarcastic and angry response, you don't get the point. Objectivity? Good lord! You think you are being objective? Your right wing agenda is as clear as day for all to see from your standard, angry, response. The only shock is you didn't use all capital letters like most angry right-wingers. Yes, of course, us center\left types all want an Orwellian society, of course! Naturally! What a weird finalé also, how on earth could hate speech do anything positive?! Once again your astounding response is like something from the right wing checklist of angry rants.
Report abuse
Oldloadr | Dec 19, 2012, 02:50 PM EST
DaddyMac22 - Oh, I get the point that the commentator is incensed that Americans would say mean nasty things about the POTUS. Great, I get that. However, referring to either laws that don’t exist or are not applicable only shows a lack of objectivity on his part. The fact that he thinks all of these people who made the various statements he copied into his text should go to jail is disturbing.
I am thankful we have freedom of speech in the USA and I wonder about other countries that have allowed their freedoms to be curtailed to avoid offending anybody. When a society starts restricting speech, when does it stop? You may be OK with an Orwellian reality complete with thought police, but most Americans are not.
Hate speech laws tend to restrict religious expression as well, are you OK with that?
Report abuse
DaddyMac22 | Dec 19, 2012, 10:38 AM EST
@Oldloadr : you have completely and utterly missed the point of the article, which is that the level of disrespect shown for the office of President is absolutely disgraceful. Interesting to note you thank God for a lack of hate speech laws. Fascinating. I doubt any God would want thanks for that.
Report abuse
Oldloadr | Dec 19, 2012, 09:25 AM EST
1. I assume the "reporter" here is not American and has never visited the States nor read the US constitution, therefore, I'll give him a pass on his ignorance of the both Article 3, section 3 (Treason) and the 1st Amendment. However, I find it amazing that he would blather on about a hate speech law that doesn't exist (thank God).
2. There are laws concerning making threats against the POTUS, however, no quotes mentioned in this article reach the legal bar for threatening the POTUS.
3. I'm afraid that citizens of the USA have as much right to call the POTUS anything they want (and the loony left was just as disrespectful of GWB) as you have to call them knuckle-dragging Neanderthals. Of course, this right to disparage the POTUS is not applicable to members of the armed forces as for them, he is the commander-n-chief; for the rest of the country, the POTUS is just another politician.
Report abuse
thetint | Dec 19, 2012, 05:04 AM EST
You voted in Raygun twice, Bush Snr once and Bush Jnr once and allowed him to steal the other election without a whimper. The USA is disintegrating from the inside with selfishness and greed. Check the Roman Empire.
Report abuse
jimmy3025 | Dec 17, 2012, 04:48 PM EST
The presidents speech didnt come before the game, it came right in the middle of the first quarter where we missed a lot of game action, it lasted 15 minutes, why not air it during halftime? that would make a lot more sense than cutting into something that clearly a lot of people were passionately watching.
i will say there was no right for all those hateful remarks to be made. although i did have a few harsh words directed towards my tv and nbc when the switchover happened
Report abuse
Report abuse