Sidewalks by Tom Deignan


Deignan Blog
Sidewalks by Tom Deignan

Liberal attack on Mitt Romney is wrong - Larry O'Donnell attacks the Mormon faith

Posted on Wednesday, May 09, 2012 at 09:35 AM

RSS


Recent Posts

Archives

submit to reddit

Lawrence O’Donnell

Liberals love to say that right wingers hijack religion and exploit it for political purposes. Maybe.  But liberals also made it very easy to do so.

For a group of people who – rightly – like to take credit for defending people’s rights, liberals still have a blind spot when it comes to religion in general and Christians in particular.  This is particularly troubling because the liberal Christian tradition in America is so strong.

The latest lefty to fall into this trap is Irish American MSNBC talk show host Lawrence O’Donnell.

Last month, O’Donnell, who once worked as a close aide to sainted Irish American Democrat Daniel Patrick Moynihan, was doing what liberal talk show hosts always do -- bashing Mitt Romney.

Nothing wrong with that.  In fact, Romney’s charge that Barack Obama is trying to “establish a religion in America known as secularism” is desperately in need of correction.

But what did O’Donnell do?  Instead of taking Romney to task for wildly exaggerating Obama’s dedication to an anti-religious agenda, O’Donnell went after the Mormon faith.

“Religiously, Mitt Romney lives in the glass house of American politics,” he said.

O’Donnell then added, “Mormonism was created by a guy in upstate New York in 1830 when he got caught having sex with the maid and explained to his wife that God told him to do it. Forty-eight wives later, Joseph Smith’s lifestyle was completely sanctified in the religion he invented to go with it, which Mitt Romney says he believes.”

First of all, as O’Donnell later admitted in an apology, this is inaccurate.  Most scholars believe Smith had his religious awakening prior to the scandal involving the maid.

But that is far from the most important point here.  Irish Catholics, in particular, should be quite wary of pointing out the peculiarities in a given religion as proof that a candidate is somehow unfit for office.

After all, O’Donnell used to work with Moynihan, who was not only a senator but a first-rate scholar of the kind of bigotry Irish Catholics faced as they climbed the social ladder in America.  More than that, Moynihan worked for the first Catholic president!

Lord knows, back in 1960 many people said things like this, “John F. Kennedy believes in a religion led by a guy who wears a funny hat, who never gets married, and claims to be infallible.  They also decided that it’s OK to eat meat on Thursdays and Saturdays, but not Fridays.  They also put ashes on their foreheads once a year.”

Every religion is open to criticism such as this. Which is why O’Donnell should not have attacked Romney the Mormon.

Instead, he should have attacked Romney the Republican.  Or Romney, the exploiter of religious fear, which is what the Republican candidate was doing by implying that Obama -- who many

Republicans still believe is a Muslim -- holds anti-religious views.

Yes, it is true that O’Donnell ultimately apologized, but it really never should have come to that.  There have been countless times where people on the left side of the political spectrum, who show respect and stand up for the rights of Jews and Muslims and atheists, nevertheless bungle the matter when it comes to Christians of varying stripes.

The reasons are obvious.  Liberals tend to view conservative Catholics and Protestants as part of the power structure.

And, since they are in favor of taking on the power structure, liberals generally believe they are acting
bravely when they tackle issues cherished by religious conservatives.

But there are some problems here.  First of all, in the case of Romney, he is, by every definition, a member of a religious minority.

To slam aspects of his faith, but then give others a free pass -- like, say, all those Democrats who call themselves Catholic but support abortion and the death penalty -- is unfair.

More importantly, liberals and their inability to debate religion well have created a truly bizarre scenario -- Christians who feel persecuted in the United States!

Yes, we have this state of affairs partly because right wingers are so savvy at exploiting this.

But they’d have nothing to exploit if O’Donnell and his colleagues didn’t consistently make such blunders.

If attacking Romney the Mormon is the Democratic plan for success in November, it’s going to be a long campaign.

(Contact “Sidewalks” at tomdeignan@earthlink.net or facebook.com/tomdeignan.)


44 Comments

15 - 44 | See all comments

LosLeandros...O'Donnell's "liberal" nature is important in what respect? That he doesn't follow Bronze Age mythology blindly? That any intellectual or scientific advances made by mankind in say the last 2000 years he considers before speaking makes his viewpoint important. Is that what you meant or were you speaking in that thinking Catholic manner to which you referred?
jamieLM...I understand your POV as I have listened to Rush Limbaugh et al myself. But if helping the impoverished has only caused dependency among the poor, what has tax loopholes, oil depletion allowances, farm subsidies, etc. done for the rich?
Wait till Romney tells us that God has many wives and that the Devil is Jesus' brother and that black people will become white when they did and move to their individual planet. The media -should- do its job and let us know these are Romeny's beliefs. Don't even get me started on the magic underpants.
Romney is a lightweight when compared to Obama
...and even with both feet in his mouth, he's still a 150% improvement over Barack Hussein Obama -- by far the most non-Irish of all U.S. Presidents.
will he visit the 57 states,will he act stupidly,will he have a son that looks like travon,will he speak austrian,or go bowling like he is in the special olympics
The left do not have to hate Romney. All the have to do do is wait until he opens his mouth and he's sure to put both feet in it.
The important point is that O'Donnell is first and foresmost a liberal. Where Catholic teaching collides with liberal dogma ( particularly pertaining to matters of human sexuality ), O'Donnell's default position is that liberal dogma must prevail. The zeitgeist alway's wins out for these guy's. It is disingenuous to try to assert that O'Donnell's attack on Mitt Romney comes from a Catholic perspective. Quite the contrary, no thinking Catholic could subscribe to O'Donnell's vile views.
@eiriamach, you're right. The Mormons have done a great job in preserving our genealogical records. They also tend to be loyal and patriotic Americans. Lots of errors were made in names, especially on census records. My Protestant (non-Irish) friends have had just as many misspelled ancestral names as I've had. Many of these census takers were not well educated and had trouble spelling not only ethnic names, but simple names. The 1810 census records lists my English ancestor as "Thomas Mare" (F), whose real name was "Frances Mary", married to James and the mother of his 6 children. Good advice to try alternate spellings.
The war on poverty was waged first under LBJ and it's result has completely destroyed the black family unit and only encouraged poverty and dependence. The left divides then conquers, under the guise of helping. Robbie, the common man is the individual that needs goverment the least. government takes from the working man to feed the bureaucracy.
There are several things about Romney's Mormanism that trouble me. He donated some $30,000 to the Mormons for their political campaign in California to defeat gay marriage. Romney doesn't believe in a separation of church and state, and that is totally different than the situation we had with President Kennedy and his firm belief in the separation of church and state. Romney also lets the ultra-right wackos decide his political stance on so many issues, including health issues for females, the accessibility of health care for all Americans, civil rights for gays, and marriage equality. But despite all that, the thing that worries the most about Romney is that he is a millionaire, fighting for the rights of all billionaires. The working people in America might become poor peasants, but that isn't a concern for Romney. He doesn't care about the common working guy.
and so it begins, the hate of the left can set its eye on romney
I appreciate the author's position that attacking a candidate's religion rather than his politics is wrong, and not just because I'm a Mormon. In 2008 I thought the claims about Obama being Muslim were both ridiculous and irrelevant. Thank you for your well-thought article! In reading the comments, though, I find it curious (especially in this forum) that baptism for the dead is so eagerly attacked when the principle behind it is very similar to a Catholic person requesting a memorial mass. Yes, our government is a secular one, meaning that there is no state religion and those who take it upon themselves to run for office have an obligation to protect the rights of all citizens. But 'We the People' are as diverse spiritually as we are ethnically, politically, socially, sexually and in any other meaningful way we see ourselves. And that is as it should be. I would actively oppose denying homosexual citizens the right to vote simply because they're gay, and I wouldn't criticize them for letting their personal experience influence their voting decisions. I think, by that same token, religious experience can reasonably influence a voter's choice. :)
But the Mormons don't mind changing God's work, jamieLM. When the Mormon Church's less-than-literate teenagers copied my ancestors' Irish baptismal records for eternal storage in their mountain in Utah, they performed a sex change on one of my great-great aunts! Try persuading them to change a mistake in gender they made in a record--No way. Actually, on the whole, they've made great contributions to gathering genealogical records world wide. If you can't find your ancestors in Mormon records, try misspelling their names and changing male to female and female to male in the search engine.
I could say I'm going to baptize everyone after they die into my Happy Church. Yeah, right. Just because the Mormons say they can and do baptize people of other religions after death does NOT make it true. Where's the proof? A lot of wishful thinking on their part. God runs the show after death, not the Mormons. There's not one word in the Bible that says a Mormon, or anyone else, has the ability to do anything to anyone after death. If you're an atheist, I don't believe for a NY minute that the Mormons can baptize you either. What a load of nonsense. We could say that we're going to baptize all dead Mormons into the Catholic faith, except we're not that stupid to make such a ridiculous claim.




Log into IrishCentral with your Facebook account


or sign-in directly

E-Mail:
Password:
 Remember me Forgot my password
Not a member? Register Now!
print this article Print
email this articleE-mail