John Boehner’s Catholic controversies
Posted on Thursday, May 19, 2011 at 12:48 PM
RSS 
Recent Posts
- 'The Great Gatsby' author F Scott Fitzgerald’s death and burial another Catholic lesson
- Anthony Weiner running for New York mayor and the Italian mob and Irish Americans strong ties
- Victor Navasky lauds Thomas Nast - American cartoonist known for his racist Irish ape-like drawings
- Immigration is not the problem - history of anti-Irish behavior reflecting on the Chechnyan bombs in Boston
- The good old anti-British days - Margaret Thatcher haters and spats in New York during World War II
Archives
![]() |
| House Speaker John Boehner. |
A series of unfortunate events last week, however, turned him into a public figure who couldn’t please Catholics no matter what he did.
This is a story about two Irish Catholic priests, the ongoing fallout from the Catholic Church sex scandals, the looming 2012 presidential race, and how religion plays a complicated role when it comes to hot-button topics such as abortion, but also poverty, immigration and social justice.
This all began when Republican Boehner was invited to give the commencement address at Catholic University in Washington D.C. There is often a kerfuffle when invitations such as these are extended.
Who can forget the outrage when President Obama -- who supports a woman’s right to choose on the
issue of abortion -- was asked to address Notre Dame’s graduating class a couple of years back?
Other Democrats have faced similar protests, whether the issue is speaking at a Catholic college or receiving communion during a heated campaign.
For this reason, Boehner (who was himself raised Catholic) seemed like a safe choice for Catholic University.
After all, though Catholics have traditionally been Democrats throughout American history, a shift has taken place in recent decades. Especially among avid churchgoers, the lean towards the Republican Party has become prominent.
Perhaps that’s why over 70 priests, nuns and faculty members from Catholic colleges decided to examine Boehner’s record on issues that are not abortion, and yet are still important to church teachings.
"Your record in support of legislation to address the desperate needs of the poor is among the worst in Congress. This fundamental concern should have great urgency for Catholic policy makers. Yet, even now, you work in opposition to it," their letter reads.
The letter particularly cited proposed cuts in the Boehner-supported budget to Medicare, the Women, Infants and Children (WIC) nutrition program and food stamps.
According to the letter, the budget "guts long-established protections for the most vulnerable members of society."
Boehner ended up giving the commencement address (and, of course, weeping), without referring to the dust-up.
Interestingly, this conflict didn’t get nearly the attention that other church-politician conflicts normally get. Why?
I suspect the mainstream media prefers it when Catholics keep things simple and stick to abortion, rather than thornier social issues such as the death penalty, poverty, labor rights and even immigration.
But in case Boehner thought he had earned a well-deserved rest from Catholic controversy, he was wrong.
Boehner also recently nominated an Irish American priest, Father Patrick J. Conroy, to hold the position of chaplain for the House of Representatives. The position opened up when another Irish American, Father Daniel Coughlin -- the first ever Catholic priest to hold the chaplain position --announced his retirement last month.
On the surface, this seems like an acknowledgement of Catholic political clout.
However, things got ugly last week when House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, a Democrat, rescinded earlier support she’d lent to Conroy’s nomination. Pelosi’s office said “new information” had come to light regarding Conroy.
Though accused of no wrongdoing himself, Conroy works for the Oregon Province of the Society of Jesus, commonly referred to as the Northwest Jesuits. This order agreed to pay $166 million to victims of sexual abuse earlier this year.
According to Pelosi, Boehner's office did not mention that settlement during the vetting process.
Conroy is expected to land the coveted chaplain’s post. But not before proving what a lightning rod Catholicism can be in this day and age.
And just wait until presidential contender Newt Gingrich -- thrice married -- gets on the campaign trail and goes on and on about his newfound Catholic faith.
Maybe it’s good that Catholics can cause trouble for both Republicans and Democrats. For too long, politicians have sought to exploit their connection to religious values, without thinking through all of the implications of this connection.
Or, perhaps, things will just keep going on the same messy, messy course.
(Contact Sidewalks at tomdeignan@earthlink.net or facebook.com/tomdeignan)
5 Comments
See all comments
snakehips | Jun 02, 2011, 11:19 AM EDT
You know what, the Founding Fathers of the United States of America were very clear about seperation of Church and State.
Why don't these "boobs" concentrate on unemployment, infastructure, national debt, etc. instead of the stuff that should be left to individual conscience?
You know why? because the real stuff is hard and the Pelosi's and Boehners of the world are not up to the tasks of handling the hard stuff.
Report abuse
TiocfaidhArmani | May 20, 2011, 05:17 AM EDT
Jesus didn't want the state to do anything because we didn't have structured democracy's back in 20AD ffs. Do you really think Jesus would not want peoples taxes going to the disadvantaged instead of tax breaks for oil companies that already make billions.
US christians are deluded.
Report abuse
Gearoid4 | May 19, 2011, 04:00 PM EDT
The issues of poverty, the unemployment, the environment do not approach the level of abortion in terms of gravity. How can we discuss these subject matters in terms of justice when the most defenseless in the womb are exterminated on a daily basis? These social concerns are being used by 70 protesters to castigate the Republican speaker of the House, John Boehner. Clearly these malcontents are from the left, socialist side of the debate and it is typical of them to try to shamelessly balance the debate concerning abortion by throwing social issues into the arena. They are not equal as the Church has rightly pointed out when they are weighed on the scales of gravity.
Report abuse
Gearoid4 | May 19, 2011, 03:52 PM EDT
The 70 protesters stirring up controversy concerning the invitation extended to House Speaker John Boehner reveal their leftist, socialist leanings. They bemoan the supposed failure of Mr Boehner to protect the most vulnerable during previous rounds of cuts to social programs. Indeed society should be about provision for those effected by financial,employment or health issues. But at what level should aid be given? Catholic social doctrine nobly aspires to communities intervening at their own local level via organisations integral to them i.e subsidiarity. As a matter of charity we should share our goods willing with those who are less well-off materially But Jesus did not instruct the state to make the unemployed or poor heavily dependent on social programs or tax it's way to redistributing wealth. On the other hand we see those at the top echelons of society accumulate obscene amounts of wealth in contrast with the falling incomes of those in the middle and working classes.
The reason why Obama's visit to Notre Dame raised vociferous opposition was in relation to his pro-abortion stance. Those on the left of the debate harp on about a politicians record on the poor, labor rights, the environment etc. But these issues even though important, do not approach the level of abortion in terms of gravity. Abortion is nothing more than the taking the life of the most defenseless in the womb. Thus if someone cannot appreciate this reality in terms of priorities then they need to re-examine the nature of their beliefs.
Report abuse
5 Comments

Report abuse