Tim Pat Coogan slams American Embassy as ‘Kafkaesque’ after visa refusal - Responds to Ambassador Rooney statement that rules were followed
Posted on Saturday, December 01, 2012 at 07:17 AM
RSS 
Recent Posts
- The Irish community returns to Hurricane Sandy hit Rockaways to aid ongoing recovery
- Young Irish woman turned in to U.S. authorities by Irish immigrant support group - Boston-based Irish International Immigrant Center does the unspeakable
- Profile in Irish fighting courage - Heffernan’s campaign for respite care for families dealing with fatal rare illnesses such as Batten’s disease
- Senator Schumer says Irish deserve a separate deal for visas because of 1965 shutout - Says “Schumer visas” set to give Ireland 10,500 visas a year for the future
- Prospects for immigration reform bill are 50-50 say the pols privately - House seen as major obstacle as Senate gets closer to a vote
Archives
![]() |
| Tim Pat Coogan |
Coogan’s comments come after U.S. Ambassador Dan Rooney defended the consular staff and how they treat individuals.
The exchange comes after Coogan was denied a U.S. visa twice for a book tour and was only granted one after the intervention of U.S. Senator Chuck Schumer who was responding to Irish American concerns.
In his statement given to IrishCentral, Tim Pat Coogan said: “As I suspect I am the only prominent Irish writer to have been barred from the U.S. in the recent past I feel I must reply to the Ambassador Rooney statement.
“I have only the friendliest feelings towards Ambassador Rooney personally but have found dealing with the U.S. Embassy Kafkaesque.
“I have been reliably informed many others less prominent than I have had very bad experiences also.
“There is no reason for such difficult behavior towards a friendly country.”
Read More: Diplomats gone wild at U.S. Embassy in Dublin say concerned Irish
“My case is simple. I was unexpectedly turned down on two visas and was only phoned out of the blue by an anonymous Embassy spokesman a day after my book tour was due to begin to say my third application had been successful.
“This success followed a major campaign of protest from Irish Americans, which prompted Senator Charles Schumer to intervene on my behalf. By then it was too late for my book tour.
“The refusal came as a great blow to me personally given my record of friendship towards the U.S. And at no time was I given an explanation by Embassy officials as to the reasons.”
Ambassador Rooney in his statement said: “I want to respond to a series of media reports about a delay in a visa for a prominent Irish writer. These reports were particularly harsh and showed a fundamental misunderstanding of the visa process.
"Although we cannot comment on individual cases, I do want to say that during my time as Ambassador to Ireland I have seen how our consular officers at the U.S. Embassy in Dublin are dedicated to facilitating travel between Ireland and the U.S.
"Our consular officers, like their counterparts all over the world, have the difficult job of enforcing U.S. Immigration laws. They do vital work, but their service often goes unsung and can even be derided by those who don’t understand the law and the process or don’t like the outcome. Let me say that each applicant’s eligibility for a visa is evaluated individually and objectively under U.S. law. No Embassy officer, including the Ambassador, has the legal discretion to disregard a finding of ineligibility or to waive any requirement for administrative processing.
"The service to their country that U.S. consular officers provide is essential to keeping our borders safe,” the statement ends.
I have to say the Rooney statement is problematic to me. Everyone agrees in keeping U.S. borders safe but making it incredibly difficult for Ireland’s leading historian and most pro-American writer to come here hardly qualifies for positive border security measures.
Ambassador Rooney’s point that the letter of the law is always applied is debatable. How is it that when Senator Schumer intervened the rules changed and a visa magically materialized?
Read More: United States visa ban on Tim Pat Coogan removed after Senator Schumer steps in
Rooney seems to be in the paw of the Embassy securocrats, most notably US Consular official Bradley Wilde who has drawn huge criticism for his attitude from those Irish who deal with him and some of his staff.
As I understand it, there have been high level expressions of concern from the Irish government about the refusal of visas to several Irish people, none as famous as Coogan before this but nothing has changed.
Perhaps Ambassador Rooney could refer back to what a predecessor, Jean Kennedy Smith said about Coogan and his new book ‘The Famine Plot’
“He has the wisdom of a craftsman, the urgency of a journalist the depth of a historian..... he is one of the greatest social commentators of our time’
Surely a dangerous man to allow into the United States!
31 Comments
15 - 31 | See all comments
seanomelb | Dec 04, 2012, 05:53 PM EST
All opinions are on the table until the truth is known,that will take years(if ever).
Report abuse
cillowen | Dec 04, 2012, 01:28 PM EST
The Irish without whom the American colony would scarcely be. Rooney a gutless wonder who had to stick within parameters laid down by the Troika. Words usurped by the governing head of triad were on the list for suitability testing - that would be number one criteria. Next reject hurdle being the chutzpah of historian whose book rekindles old truths on human cargo practices that the Saxon motherland engaged in - by jove I think he's got it. The
Big Kihuna cousin picking up where momma left off - and without much of a history of its own the cousin relies for meaning on such a most excellent history of the British Empire. Much of which they stole from the Celts or from whatever they imagined - St. George? St. Patrick's cross on Union Jack, The shamrock unashamedly adorns Willie's tunic and Queenie's standards. Glorious past to be embraced by all unawares. Wonder if folks are aware of the problems of today all flow from
the Mother.
Report abuse
ancavker | Dec 04, 2012, 09:08 AM EST
smyrnian: Surely you must agree that refusing Mr. Coogan admission to the country, would lead to all kinds of speculation. Any reasonable person would acknowledge that there appears to have been no legitimate reason not to allow him in. If there was, than he should have been told what it was. Sorry I will think for myself, and not leave it up to the State Department or U.S. embassy to do it for me.
Report abuse
seamus60 | Dec 03, 2012, 05:12 PM EST
Well when no reason is forthcoming all we can have is speculation. As no poster has come up with anything else, surely we can assume its because of the mans badmouthing Isreal. Perhaps TP has a dirty little secret.Then again can`t be too dirty when they are allowing him in.
Report abuse
anglo-norman | Dec 03, 2012, 04:58 PM EST
Smyrnian- Spot on...
Report abuse
Beaugeste | Dec 03, 2012, 03:26 PM EST
I'd ban tim pat coogan from just about anything....probably the most singularly stupid author in history....
Report abuse
Smyrnian | Dec 03, 2012, 12:48 PM EST
This article is a load of nonsense. Typical IC article chick full of opinion and quotes but no facts. We do not know what the reasoning was behind the US embassy decision. Until then all opinions are built on speculation and one's particular ideology and agenda.
Report abuse
IrelandNorth | Dec 03, 2012, 06:22 AM EST
To reiterate a former -iteration. It's not about nationality or personae. It's about political economy. To paraphrase Sen Al Gore in his 'ecomentary' - "An Inconvenient Truth", it's always difficult to convince anyone of anything which it's not in their economic interests TO know! Tim Pat Coogan's - "The Famine Plot: England's Role in Ireland's Greatest Tragedy" should be required reading for all countries' diplomatic services to Ireland (not least British). And also for anyone who want's to read an unarguably objective treatment of a rather shamless imperial episode. (PS Speaking of political economy, how much may Ka£kae$qu€ry cost the US tourism industry?)
Report abuse
curtisjohnson | Dec 02, 2012, 10:48 PM EST
""No Embassy officer, including the Ambassador, has the legal discretion to disregard a finding of ineligibility or to waive any requirement for administrative processing." This begs the question of who makes the finding of ineligibility as well as the fact that the State Department obviously has the power to waive any defect - you can bet this happens on a regular basis through the London embassy.
Report abuse
bob mcbride | Dec 02, 2012, 08:14 PM EST
Hey slainte9. If you said cheers 9 times u drank too much. I know black people with the last name mccarthy and their not Irish. There are irish people with Italian last names like costello and kinseela. So give up your garbage about names will ya! God help u! Gobshite!
Report abuse
eiriamach | Dec 02, 2012, 08:05 PM EST
seanomelb, I did not intend to disagree with you on that point about pro-British or pro-Israeli sentiments. I don't know much about current British or Israeli pressures on American embassy staff or State Dept. On Niall's 11/30 article, I commented on the total unreliability-- considering the sources!-- of theories about gays and (American) Jews influencing State Department/ Embassy decisions, but I was not thinking then of Israelis. I just dunno about that, so you're right; such things are possible.
Report abuse
seanomelb | Dec 02, 2012, 06:01 PM EST
eiriamach it is not unreasonable to believe that pro Israeli or British sentiments played a roll in the denial of the Visa. Coogan is a well known supporter of Palestine and an embarrassment to Britain in his writings. Until the truth is known all options are on the table
Report abuse
Cookie Duffy | Dec 02, 2012, 03:53 PM EST
Although I doubt the embassy would ever provide one, Mr. Coogan should have received an explanation with the first denial. His relationship with America is stellar and the denials - twice - were totally uncalled for.
Even for an American, dealing with a U.S. embassy is difficult. I was recently in the embassy in Managua, Nicaragua, and was astounded that absolutely no one spoke English to me until I entered the office in which I had an appointment. I encountered five people in official capacities on the grounds of the embassy before opening the door to the office and not one would speak English to me.
Report abuse
eiriamach | Dec 02, 2012, 03:39 PM EST
BeReasonable sounds like a life-long by-the-rules bureaucrat. Someone at the Embassy should have asked questions, done some research, and spoken up about the denial of this visa. Or are those highly paid professionals not allowed to think at all, just to push paper according to the rule book? Thanks to Senator Schumer, though it shouldn't have required the efforts of a senator to fix this mistake. But the comments DanOLoingsigh mentions about gays and Jews "in some earlier posts" are not paranoia. They're deliberate smears with not a word of truth in them.
Report abuse
- Young Irish woman turned in to U.S. authorities
- Irishman John Downey arrested for 1982 IRA...
- Michael Flatley, star of Lord of the Dance...
- One in seven people on social welfare in...
- Did Pope Francis perform an exorcism at the...
- The top ten things I dislike about Irish...
- 'I expect terror attacks during G8 summit'...
- Violent attacks on gays in New York up 70...
- Nigerian migrants send $653 million a year...
- Top bishops clash over excommunication of...
31 Comments

Report abuse