An Irish nun, a Catholic hospital, a dying mother, an abortion, and...
Posted on Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 11:49 AM
RSS 
Recent Posts
- Rachel Corrie honors Irish history, while Israel forgets its own
- An Irish nun, a Catholic hospital, a dying mother, an abortion, and...
- Déjà vu: Phoebe Prince & Catholic Church scandal
- Archbishops of Canterbury who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones
- Nobody buying what Catholic Church defenders selling
Archives

My friends,
It has not taken long for news of the excommunication of an Irish nun in the misbegotten state of Arizona to reach around the world, even to the far-off mission in which I am blessed to serve.
You can read the whole story here, but in brief: Sister Margaret McBride, a longtime and faithful worker at St. Joseph's Hospital in Phoenix with some pioneering accomplishments helping the poor to her credit, has been excommunicated by local Bishop Thomas Olmsted. Sister Margaret was a member of the hospital's ethics committee, which faced a terrible decision. A patient with an 11-week-old fetus was dying in the hospital from a rare heart condition, in which the strains of pregnancy can tip the balance between life and death.
Founded in the then-"Wild West" by the Irish Sisters of Mercy, steeped in Catholic tradition and famous for its outreach programs to the impoverished and especially the large undocumented immigrant community, it was a wrenching choice. Doctors and medical experts were unanimous in their belief the mother would die unless her pregnancy was aborted.
Sister Margaret agreed with the hospital committee, and the abortion was performed.
Bishop Olmsted reacted even faster than the medical staff, which was facing an emergency life-and-death decision. Sister Margaret McBride is now Margaret McBride.
"An unborn child is not a disease. While medical professionals should certainly try to save a pregnant mother's life, the means by which they do it can never be by directly killing her unborn child. The end does not justify the means," the bishop declared.
Olmsted added that if a Catholic "formally cooperates" in an abortion, he or she is automatically excommunicated.
"The Catholic Church will continue to defend life and proclaim the evil of abortion without compromise, and must act to correct even her own members if they fail in this duty," the bishop said.
Although I cannot disagree with the bishop's theology and support the Church's protection of the sacredness of all life, I suspect he needs "medical" treatment himself: a strong injection of reality.
Most important is a simple reality: If the mother of an 11-week-old fetus dies, the fetus will also die. It is too soon in life for the child to survive outside the womb no matter what the hospital might try. That means two deaths. Is there really a morally defensible reason for two innocents to die when one can live? It's a hackneyed phrase, but what would Jesus have done?
Over the years, the Church's solid wall guarding all life has allowed an exception or two. For example, while euthanasia and so-called "mercy killing" is condemned, the Church has made it clear that there is no need to use "extraordinary means" to preserve life when, in the best judgment of all and with prayerful reflection, there is no real hope for the patient's recovery. Of course, this does not mean a call to the murderous "Doctor" Kevorkian, but usually the withdrawal of life-support equipment that is filling the patient's lungs with air and his heart with blood in a way that is more mechanical than medical.
In this matter, the Church has taken good counsel from the world of science to make a just and merciful clarification in doctrine. But while there has been considerable debate within the Church about the kind of dilemma faced by St. Joseph's Hospital, no "exceptions to the rule" on abortion have been forthcoming.
It is long past the time to reconsider this. If all life deserves our protection and is sacred to our Creator, then a mother's life is just as worthy as her child's. How has this become lost in the battle over abortion?
Bishop Olmsted is an intelligent and compassionate man. Like most in the religious community, he has spoken out forcefully against Arizona's immoral new "law" that is nothing more than an attack on the humanity of those who have sought a home and a life in America. While all agree that immigration reform is badly needed, human attack dogs and "camps" are not part of the answer. "Illegal" or not, a sick immigrant is welcome at St. Joseph's Hospital, even if the Diocese must foot the entire bill. God's Mandate to love all as one means charity for all.
It also means forgiveness, in this case, for Margaret McBride. She has spent a long career doing God's Own Work on earth, and even if you believe that she has erred in this heartbreaking moment, I believe her Catholic Ministry should continue.
In a world in which many, if not most people walk past the poor and suffering without a second's thought, Margaret McBride heard God's Call to Love and made answering it her life's work. I pray that Bishop Olmsted will deeply reflect on all Margaret McBride has done in the Name of God and the Church, and reconsider his decision so that the poor may continue to feel the love of Sister Margaret McBride.
God bless you all!
— Father Tim
70 Comments
15 - 70 | See all comments
LadyEireofCork | Jul 09, 2010, 01:18 PM EDT
I too am a registered nurse who spent a great deal of time in Labor & Delivery. There are many difficult and at times heart wrenching decisions taken on, esp. in the obstetrical field. If a mother's life is in peril and the baby is not at viability, then the decision to abort is necessary for the mother to live. There are so many different aspects to any one of these cases, but I agree that life should be preserved. If the mother had a grievous condition that would have been exacerbated by the continuation of the pregnancy then her life would be taken into consideration.
Report abuse
georgeG | Jul 08, 2010, 11:19 AM EDT
I think there is a lot more to this story. I think Ms. McBride must have been involved in many questionable decisions at the hospital. There is a huge crisis of both ignorance and disobedience to catholic ethics today. Malpractice fears are causing doctors to recommend abortion when there is any doubt and institutions are trying to save money by accelerating the death of terminally ill patients in inhumane ways like dehydration and starvation. Go to the original sources and learn about the Catholic positions rather than speaking from emotion and ignorance!
Report abuse
Padraig | Jul 08, 2010, 09:02 AM EDT
Simply, well said Father Tim.
Report abuse
HughesDohmann | Jul 05, 2010, 10:16 PM EDT
I think the problem here is that the abortion was done at a Catholic Hospital.
This is not acceptable I would think.
Reality ? What is that ? It bites ya know.
Report abuse
irisheyesjenn | Jun 25, 2010, 09:12 AM EDT
Margaret McBride, consider yourself fortunate that you have been released from the binds of a church which despises woman and children. This church chooses to excommunicate a nun for saving a woman in a situation with no ideal outcome, while it continues to embrace priests who rape and torture children. I am thankful to know that in the end God will judge.
Report abuse
Irishwabe | Jun 12, 2010, 03:20 PM EDT
Dear Fr. Tim,
Your reference to Arizona as a misbegotton state and your additional reference to "undomcumented immigrants" is appaling. Your Irish relatives must be turning in their graves. The correct expression is "illegal aliens." The Irish immigrants worked hard to build a life for their families in America. They were not drug pushers, murderers, etc. Horray for Az for defending itself and its people. JW
Report abuse
MaggieO | Jun 08, 2010, 08:41 PM EDT
I'm a 38 year Registered Nurse and throughout my career I've witnessed many heart wrenching decisions made to forego life support. It's never easy. If Catholic Priests were able to become pregnant maybe the Church's stand would be different. It must have been very difficult for Sister Margaret to make her decision,but sometimes the good of the one out weighs the good of the many.
Report abuse
maireadinmelb | Jun 08, 2010, 05:24 AM EDT
It is not about praying for non believers. It is about a medical necessity to save a woman's life. Bishops are great at telling people to exercise compassion! What if she is a mother who has other children and compassion for them! As if losing her child was not enough trauma for the mother without criticism for those who have never been in her situation!
Report abuse
ritmomente | Jun 03, 2010, 12:33 PM EDT
Try as you may, seanomelbourne, you cannot separate the word faith with God. Nor can you accurately comment on faith without acknowledging the presence of God. I continue to pray for non-believers like you.
Report abuse
broedersvl | May 30, 2010, 08:15 PM EDT
I think its time for Bishop Olmsted to pay a permanent visit to the bosom of the Holy Spirit.
Report abuse
seanomelbourne | May 28, 2010, 07:58 PM EDT
amusing you use the word "faith" from the Latin "fides". FAITH: "the unshakable belief in something without proof or evidence.FAITH: honesty or sincerity as in "good faith" take your pick ritomente. (source Collins dictionary 4th edition.) WE both have faith ,Doe's that infer I lack faith,hope,charity and love.
Report abuse
ritmomente | May 28, 2010, 05:42 PM EDT
For those religious and priests that use their title to abuse children, there is a special place in hell for them. I only wish a little bit of hell visit them while here on Earth. As an athiest, your opinions on someone with faith has no meaning whatsoever.
Report abuse
seanomelbourne | May 27, 2010, 07:57 PM EDT
I have faith and trust in my fellow man/women. As for morals I am no different to to you or most other people. Life's journey will decide faith and morals.
How do you account for religious people who fail your
insincere test. I feel I am more "charitable"than you are where is your soul. May your god go with you.
Report abuse
ritmomente | May 27, 2010, 08:36 AM EDT
How is it silly that you should be ignored on faith? You have none. Morals? Where do they come from? To all with a soul, it comes from God. To you, it must come from a Freudian dream.
Report abuse
70 Comments
Report abuse