Time to end gay deportations
Posted on Sunday, May 08, 2011 at 10:17 AM
RSS 
Recent Posts
- Violent attacks on gays in New York up 70 percent in 2013
- Will New York Senator Chuck Schumer ditch gay couples for an immigration deal?
- If nobody's happy, it's working – the abortion debate and Irish politics of stalemate
- Conservative news entertainment complex claim Barack Obama leader of Al Qaeda
- Why Irish grudges are passed on - a long tradition of never forgetting
Archives
To hear some people tell it, the truly Christian thing to do with longstanding gay couples (where one is a US citizen and one is foreign born) is to cruelly separate them from each other for no good reason other than to satisfy the majority's irrational prejudice against them.
But as more and more people are agreeing, it's reprehensible to be this willfully and needlessly cruel, because it serves no good purpose, at all, and it only breaks hearts.
On Friday Attorney General Eric Holder asked the Board of Immigration Appeals to set aside their ruling deporting Irishman Paul Wilson Dorman back to Ireland under because the Defense of Marriage Act is being challenged in court and may ultimately be set aside.
That's potentially good news for Dorman, but - other than by implication - it does little to protect the rights of other gay Irishmen and women in bi-national marriages or civil unions facing similar threats. And, let's be clear, there are thousands of them.
Reaction from conservative blogs, who monitor advances in gay rights as though their lives depended on it, was swift. In the comments section of the news story on FoxNews.com the following reaction was one representative post:
Commentator 'Ecarr' wrote: "So, Holder is not only not going to defend the Defense of Marriage Act, he's now actively seeking marital status on behalf of this fudge packer? What the HELL has this country gotten itself into with this administration?"
Well, since he asks, the administration is defending the equality of all Americans from the tyranny of heartless bigots who would remove the rights of all the people they dislike.
When they are posting anonymously, many conservative commentators feel free to express themselves in unvarnished ways that meek it clear what's in their hearts: anti-gay prejudice.
In February Attorney General Eric Holder sent a letter to House Speaker John Boehner, after determining that Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act, "as applied to same-sex couples who are legally married under state law, violates the equal protection component of the Fifth Amendment."
Holder wrote, "the President and I have concluded that classifications based on sexual orientation warrant heightened scrutiny and that, as applied to same-sex couples legally married under state law, Section 3 of DOMA is unconstitutional."
The implications of those sentiments is clear enough. There'll be no help from the GOP controlled Congress. So the challenge for Obama is, in the words of Spike Lee, to do the right thing. The executive branch can and should act.
So far the administration's movements in this area have been case by case, and frequently insultingly incoherent. There is no need for this. Longstanding gay couples who are in civil unions or marriages should qualify for immigration purposes in exactly the same way as heterosexuals. It is past time for the administration to say so.
Your basic rights should not be upheld or dismissed at the whim of of a low level government functionary forced to make a choice the administration refuses to.
We already know, because they baldly stated, that DOMA discriminates and violates the equal protection rights of gay couples. At what point will the administration act and follow the implications of their own findings?
But as more and more people are agreeing, it's reprehensible to be this willfully and needlessly cruel, because it serves no good purpose, at all, and it only breaks hearts.
On Friday Attorney General Eric Holder asked the Board of Immigration Appeals to set aside their ruling deporting Irishman Paul Wilson Dorman back to Ireland under because the Defense of Marriage Act is being challenged in court and may ultimately be set aside.
That's potentially good news for Dorman, but - other than by implication - it does little to protect the rights of other gay Irishmen and women in bi-national marriages or civil unions facing similar threats. And, let's be clear, there are thousands of them.
Reaction from conservative blogs, who monitor advances in gay rights as though their lives depended on it, was swift. In the comments section of the news story on FoxNews.com the following reaction was one representative post:
Commentator 'Ecarr' wrote: "So, Holder is not only not going to defend the Defense of Marriage Act, he's now actively seeking marital status on behalf of this fudge packer? What the HELL has this country gotten itself into with this administration?"
Well, since he asks, the administration is defending the equality of all Americans from the tyranny of heartless bigots who would remove the rights of all the people they dislike.
When they are posting anonymously, many conservative commentators feel free to express themselves in unvarnished ways that meek it clear what's in their hearts: anti-gay prejudice.
In February Attorney General Eric Holder sent a letter to House Speaker John Boehner, after determining that Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act, "as applied to same-sex couples who are legally married under state law, violates the equal protection component of the Fifth Amendment."
Holder wrote, "the President and I have concluded that classifications based on sexual orientation warrant heightened scrutiny and that, as applied to same-sex couples legally married under state law, Section 3 of DOMA is unconstitutional."
The implications of those sentiments is clear enough. There'll be no help from the GOP controlled Congress. So the challenge for Obama is, in the words of Spike Lee, to do the right thing. The executive branch can and should act.
So far the administration's movements in this area have been case by case, and frequently insultingly incoherent. There is no need for this. Longstanding gay couples who are in civil unions or marriages should qualify for immigration purposes in exactly the same way as heterosexuals. It is past time for the administration to say so.
Your basic rights should not be upheld or dismissed at the whim of of a low level government functionary forced to make a choice the administration refuses to.
We already know, because they baldly stated, that DOMA discriminates and violates the equal protection rights of gay couples. At what point will the administration act and follow the implications of their own findings?
29 Comments
See all comments
Wingeire1 | May 11, 2011, 09:12 AM EDT
IS this kind of language necessary??
Commentator 'Ecarr' wrote: "So, Holder is not only not going to defend the Defense of Marriage Act, he's now actively seeking marital status on behalf of this fudge packer? What the HELL has this country gotten itself into with this administration?"
Report abuse
hollabackgurl | May 10, 2011, 09:44 PM EDT
According to figures supplied by The Human Rights Campaign,
approximately 36,000 homosexual Americans are involved in bi-national
relationships. Speaking in favor of the Uniting American Families Act (UAFA),
Representative Jerry Nadler said: Today thousands of committed same-sex couples are needlessly suffering because of unequal treatment under our immigration laws, and this is an outrage. Our Constitution guarantees that no class of people will be singled out for differential treatment — and LGBT [Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender] Americans should not and must not be excluded from that guarantee.
Report abuse
olovely | May 10, 2011, 11:50 AM EDT
You have a reductive understanding of biological diversity, mrkennedy. If God created Humans why didn't He just create them and not dinosaurs, apes, shellfish, molluscs and sea horses, say? Religious people are so whacky.
Report abuse
mrkennedy | May 10, 2011, 11:43 AM EDT
Olovely, you have a wierd interpretation of creation. God created the first couple who were therefore married in his plan. If God created gay people then why didn't he just creat one sex and not two?
Report abuse
olovely | May 10, 2011, 11:01 AM EDT
God did not invent marriage. Nowhere in the Bible does it claim He did. How many gay people will God have to create for you to understand He's just fine with it?
Report abuse
mrkennedy | May 10, 2011, 10:10 AM EDT
I wonder what God The Father thought when he created "ADAM & EVE" and not Julius & Robert or JANE & LOIS?" Did he not think that the future world would be different? After all he was only the CREATER OR THE UNIVERSE AND HUMANKIND!!
Report abuse
HoundofUlster | May 10, 2011, 09:38 AM EDT
Great article. It is way beyond time to end this type of discrimination. As the Irish father(naturalized US citizen) of a gay man who fears for his life periodically due to the abuse heaped on bay & lesbian US citizens & LPRs etc.I support the reversal of DOMA.
Report abuse
Chiefjustice | May 10, 2011, 09:09 AM EDT
My Irish grand father earned the right to call himself American By serveing in the U.S. Army for five years. 1883 to 1888... And friends thats the way it should be...
Report abuse
eiriamach | May 10, 2011, 05:03 AM EDT
Olovely has listed important rights that US law currently withholds from gays and lesbians. Read the list. If you're inclined to just rant against same-sex marriage, please stop and think and deal with the injustice of depriving some American citizens of fundamental rights that others take for granted. It's wrong; it's simply wrong to deprive any of us of these basic rights, and we all know that. It makes no sense to say that some of us are "more equal" than others; either we have equal rights and equal protection of the law, or we have inequality with the tyranny of some over others. If you want inequality, please tell us how you think you can justify it and why you think we would still be Americans if we continued to be unequal.
Report abuse
rpmschevy | May 10, 2011, 01:13 AM EDT
Well well well hollagurl is back and she still has not been able to defend my other post. Please why do these people get EXTRA equality as compared to me and my family Olovely and gurl? Why should they not be deported for doing something ILLEGAL? Or is that a word you have no definition of? If so, please post your address so I can come steal your possessions to reimburse myself the thousands of dollars I have had to pay the Federal Government to get my wife and daughter here.
Report abuse
rpmschevy | May 10, 2011, 01:06 AM EDT
Are you a journalist? Where are your facts about "And, let's be clear, there are thousands of them"? Truly thousands upon thousands of Irish with sexual preference homosexuality?
Just once I would like you all to in the same breath talk about following the rule of law, and that is if you are here illegally, you are REQUIRED to go home and then FILE for a visa and greencard. Tell me not a journalist Cahir, where is my justice for being separated from my wife and daughter because I went the legal and PROPER and MORAL method to have them come to the USA, and these criminals (lawbreakers thus criminals) should not have to follow the LAW?
Report abuse
olovely | May 09, 2011, 02:55 PM EDT
Have you opened a newspaper since 1948, GeorgeDillion? Same-sex couples are denied the right to marry, denied access to the more than 1,138 federal rights, protections and responsibilities automatically granted to married heterosexual couples. Among those are: -The right to make decisions on a partner's behalf in a medical emergency. Specifically, the states generally provide that spouses automatically assume this right in an emergency. If an individual is unmarried, the legal "next of kin" automatically assumes this right. This means, for example, that a gay man with a life partner of many years may be forced to accept the financial and medical decisions of a sibling or parent with whom he may have a distant or even hostile relationship.
-The right to take up to 12 weeks of leave from work to care for a seriously ill partner or parent of a partner. The Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 permits individuals to take such leave to care for ill spouses, children and parents but not a partner or a partner's parents. -The right to petition for same-sex partners to immigrate. -The right to assume parenting rights and responsibilities when children are brought into a family through birth, adoption, surrogacy or other means. For example, in most states, there is no law providing a noncustodial, nonbiological or nonadoptive parent's right to visit a child - or responsibility to provide financial support for that child - in the event of a breakup. -The right to share equitably all jointly held property and debt in the event of a breakup, since there are no laws that cover the dissolution of domestic partnerships. -Family-related Social security benefits, income and estate tax benefits, disability benefits, family-related military and veterans benefits and other important benefits. -The right to inherit property from a partner in the absence of a will. -The right to purchase continued health coverage for a domestic partner after the loss of a job.
Report abuse
Gaelicpiper | May 09, 2011, 02:39 PM EDT
O'loverly--you are obvioulsy emotionally involved in this issue. The problem, in this case, is that being gay does not entitle one to a get out of jail free card or a free pass to the movies. Gays are not more equal- they are just equal-- try reading the Constitution and the several Civil Rights Acts. The claim of right you claim will not be sustained by the Court. In your response, you attempted to cast an insult- that post only exposed your emotional baggage and immaturity as applied to the problem and the law.
Report abuse
simplesandy | May 09, 2011, 02:19 PM EDT
well I am more confused now than I ever was ..
I am an American living here in Ireland for last 6 years.My b/f is irish. We cant get married because of divorce reasons ..I won't get my alimony..and even if I did marry him he still cannot come into the USA because they just are not letting anyone in..so if this man is married to his partner he still has to go through the red tape to get into USA legally..am I wrong with this? I have been searching this and actually there is not much you can do to get into USA but get in line for your green card..that is unless Obama grants amnisty ..but we are still out because someone said you have to prove you lived together in USA for so many years ...how gross is that ...here we are in Ireland because my b/f respected the American laws and some Illegal will get in scott free because he did not..
If someone knows a loop hole I missed please let me know ..thank you simplesandy56@hotmail.com
Report abuse
29 Comments

Report abuse