Anti-gay leader Maggie Gallagher threatens 'bloody mess'
Posted on Tuesday, July 26, 2011 at 10:01 AM
- Violent attacks on gays in New York up 70 percent in 2013
- Will New York Senator Chuck Schumer ditch gay couples for an immigration deal?
- If nobody's happy, it's working – the abortion debate and Irish politics of stalemate
- Conservative news entertainment complex claim Barack Obama leader of Al Qaeda
- Why Irish grudges are passed on - a long tradition of never forgetting
After New York enacted its first legal same sex weddings at the weekend, the anti-gay activist told the Christian Broadcasting Network that 'it's gonna be a bloody mess in New York.'
Gallagher's overheated rhetoric was eye-popping after a weekend that saw a self-declared right wing Christian fundamentalist murder almost 100 teenagers in defense of his own 'traditional values.'
On Sunday the National Organization for Marriage (NOM) organized a public protest against same sex marriage in the city with support from the group New Yorkers for Constitutional Freedoms (a group 'dedicated to influencing legislation and legislators for the Lord Jesus Christ').
The constitutional freedoms these groups were protecting were their own of course, and they clearly refused to see the irony in calling for the removal of the freedoms of others. But framing the debate in terms of violent acts towards gays was a new gambit for the increasingly desperate activist.
NOM's anti-gay and largely religiously inspired march attracted notably large numbers of Latino and African American protestors (who incidentally, also make up a large percentage of the city's gay and lesbian community, leaving an very open question as to the strength of family love and acceptance in their own communities).
Gallagher told the crowd that outlawing marriage equality would be 'mission critical' for the anti-gay organizations.
Gallagher would be better off strengthening her own marriage than trying to undermine someone else's. Perhaps she could have spent the millions her organization has raised on helping the disadvantaged, the elderly and the infirm rather than hounding and harassing her gay neighbors for no other reason than her animus toward their existence.
Now that Gallagher's organization is losing the argument with Democrats AND Republicans, can we expect to hear even more of this dangerously overheated rhetoric from her organization?