The family of Kate Fitzgerald, 25, the American-born young woman who took her own life in August, have hit out at The Irish Times for the way the newspaper treated their daughter’s final published article.
The Times altered the article on their web site after a possible libel case issue arose.
Parents Tom And Sally Ann Fitzgerald, who moved back from the US to settle in Cork, slammed the Irish Times for their actions.
In response, Times editor Kevin O’Sullivan stated that “From the outset of this very tragic story, the sole aim of The Irish Times was to focus on an important issue for people with mental illness.”
He stated: “The Irish Times’s decision to edit the initial piece and publish a clarification and apology was necessary in the context of fairness."
In their letter published on Broadsheet.ie the FitzGerald’s wrote: “Our daughter, 25 year-old Kate Fitzgerald, had the last conversation of her life just before 7pm on August 22, 2011.
"She spoke to Peter Murtagh, then Opinion Editor of the Irish Times. Peter promised that her article on depression, suicide and workplace attitudes to mental health would be published in the Irish Times.
"Only hours later, Kate took her own life, fully believing that her last message to the world was in safe hands. Sadly, she was wrong.
"Kate was a great fan of the Irish Times. She was very proud that the Irish Times had published three of her articles. Her last published article was to be anonymous, at least for a while. To Kate, the Irish Times was the pinnacle of Irish journalism.
"True to his word, Peter Murtagh published Kate’s last words on September 9, not realizing that Kate was dead.
"When we spoke to Peter on September 10/11, he was deeply moved by the story of Kate and wrote an excellent article that was published in the Irish Times on Saturday November 26.
"The story shook the nation, becoming the most read story on Irish Times online for an unprecedented three days in a row.
Ireland needs to get serious about mental health
"On Monday, it was picked up by this website and within two days, became the #1 story on both Facebook and Twitter. This website had connected the dots and identified Kate’s employer.
"The Irish Times, Kate’s iconic newspaper, ran for the hills. First, they butchered the article by removing key parts. Next, they blacked out the whole article, including the accompanying suicide hotline numbers.
"As a final indignity, Irish Times editor Kevin O’Sullivan published an apology for publishing Kate’s last words, saying that 'significant assertions within the original piece were not factual.' We made it known that we stand behind her last words.
"Sally and I met with Kevin O’Sullivan, editor, and Denis Staunton, deputy editor on Tuesday, December 13 at the Irish Times office in Dublin. Peter Murtaugh observed for part of the meeting. We demanded to know what elements of Kate’s article were "not factual." The editor apologised for any distress he might have caused us.
"Despite repeated requests, he could not identify a single statement from the article that was "not factual." He said they cut the article for "legal reasons."
"We asked for a retraction for calling Kate a liar and gave them two days to do so. Both editors stated that saying Kate’s words were "not factual" was not equivalent to calling her a liar.
"Like many readers, we fail to see that distinction. Two days later, we received a call from Kevin O’Sullivan, again apologizing for any offence caused, but declining to give us either a retraction or an apology, for "legal reasons."
"Mr. O’Sullivan also presumptuously stated that Irish Times readers had no difficulty with his retraction.
"On one level, Sally and I understand this. Sally is a voice teacher in Bantry who runs concerts for charity, and I run a small technical writing and Irish language services company in rural West Cork.
"We do not advise Ireland’s Taoiseach and the Fine Gael party. We do not chair Ireland’s national broadcasting authority. We do not offer PR advice to the princes of the Catholic Church. We do not have daily access to talk shows and newspapers. In short, we are not influential.