News


Lord Maginnis slams Tory think-tank on same-sex marriage as perverse

Homophobic outburst as he compares gays to animals


Ulster Unionist Ken Maginnis
Ulster Unionist Ken Maginnis
Photo by Photograph: Paul Faith/PA

Guinness PubFinder Ad

After a series of outbursts that one senior party colleague called 'increasingly erratic and ill-advised', Lord Ken Maginnis, the former Ulster Unionist Party whip in the House of Lords, has sent a condemnatory email to a Conservative Party think-tank which supports same-sex marriage.

According to the Newsletter, Lord Maginnis, the veteran Ulster Unionist, was reportedly infuriated that the conservative group Policy Exchange had argued in favour of allowing gay couples to marry.

On Saturday, Lord Maginnis sent an email to Policy Exchange's director Neil O’Brien, which he also shared with journalists, senior UUP figures and two leading churchmen.

In the email, Maginnis said that he was not homophobic but was opposed to the Government’s 'perverse' proposal for same-sex marriage. Critics have scoffed at his claims however, since Maginnis was stripped of the UUP whip last month after he made blatantly homophobic comments describing homosexuality as 'a rung on the ladder to bestiality.'

Maginnis told O’Brien in his letter that he would now 'campaign against' Policy Exchange because of its support for same sex marriage.

Among those to receive copies of his email were UUP leader Mike Nesbitt, Church of Ireland Archbishop of Armagh Alan Harper and his predecessor, Lord Eames.

Lord Maginnis wrote: 'I spoke to someone last week – it may have been yourself – to express my disgust that a Tory think–tank would promote 'same-sex' marriage – which I now note they have re-titled 'equal marriage.'

'Being a firm opponent of this perverse proposal – let the Government find its own way to cope with property and financial rights of people engaged in this way of life – I now find it necessary to campaign publicly against Policy Exchange, the wisdom of financing it by private sources and the dubious nature of its 'independence.'

'I am not homophobic but totally oppose the imposition of this practice on the institution of marriage which derives its purpose and meaning from biblical sources. Please remove my name from your emailing directory.'

Policy Exchange last week published a report which said that 'the balance of argument favours equal marriage,' a sentiment Maginnis could not accept.

In their document, Policy Exchange wrote: 'We think legal safeguards should be put in place to prevent religious bodies from having to perform same-sex marriages on their premises but . . . there is no good reason why gay couples shouldn’t have the right to get married. The Evening Standard trailed the report’s findings on Friday and also penned a leader column praising the research and urging the Prime Minister to push through the reforms.'

When contacted by the News Letter for a comment, Policy Exchange replied: 'Thanks for alerting us to Lord Maginnis' email. He’s obviously entitled to his own opinion.'


Nster.com


4 Comments

See all comments

I take exception to the last sentence of DeanJackson's post. I think that a child who was heterosexual would be confused by having 2 same sex parents, not one who was homosexual. This confusion, however, would not change his/her orientation. A boy would still like girls, as a girl would still like boys.
"A man (ie male/masc/noun/sing) shall leave his father (male/masc/noun/sing) and mother (fem/noun/sing) and shall cling (or cleave) to his wife (fem/noun/sing). And the two shall become one flesh. And shall go forth and multiply." A precendent quoted in the world's best selling publication. What's complicated about it?
I can confirm that Ken Maginnis's so-called "senior party colleague" is someone who has never achieved anything in his own right, capitalised on the work done by Ken and others during 40 difficult years when, mostly, he wasn't even in N.I. and that he has been substantially rejected by the Party when it comes to enhancing his "anything goes" ambitions.
Oh dear third cousin Ken in trouble again. While I think same sex marriage a bit odd as it relates to the "traditional" concept of marriage I think same sex couples should have a right to marry each other.
 




Log into IrishCentral with your Facebook account


or sign-in directly

E-Mail:
Password:
 Remember me Forgot my password
Not a member? Register Now!
print this article Print
email this articleE-mail