News


Diarmuid Martin: Churches dealing with clerical abuse has been ‘catastrophic’


Dublin Archbishop Diarmuid Martin
Dublin Archbishop Diarmuid Martin

Guinness PubFinder Ad

One years after the publication of the Murphy report, into clerical sexual abuse, the Archbishop of Dublin, Dr Diarmuid Martin has called the Catholic Churches method of dealing with the situation “catastrophic”.

He said the church in Ireland has become self-centered and had let itself become “beyond what is legitimate.”

“I see more clearly that the catastrophic manner in which the abuse was dealt with was a symptom of a deeper malaise within the Irish church,” said Dr Martin.

“The church in Ireland had allowed itself to drift into a position where its role in society had grown beyond what is legitimate. It acted as a world apart. It became self-centered. It felt that it could be forgiving of abusers in a simplistic manner and rarely empathized with the hurt of children.”

These comments appeared on a statement, posted on the Dublin archdiocese website (dublindiocese.ie). The statement marked the anniversary of the publication of the Murphy report on November 26, 2009.

In his statement he said the church had “also deluded itself about the faith of Irish people. It failed to recognize what radical evangelization of its structures and of its people actually meant. It spoke of renewal but really did not change. It failed adequately to recognize that renewal demands conversion.”

In the future, he said, “we need to sustain our robust child safeguarding norms and practices. They will, however, only work in the context of a renewed church.”

He said that Church is “not just an elite of the perfect. Many people with little education have a deeper insight into the message of Jesus Christ than some learned theologians or bishops.”

Speaking about he publication of the Murphy report he said “I unequivocally repeat what I said on publication of the report: ‘the Archdiocese of Dublin failed to recognize the theft of childhood which survivors endured and the diocese failed in its responses to [survivors] when they had the courage to come forward, compounding the damage done to their innocence. For that no words of apology will ever be sufficient’.”

Dr Martin said “The diocese failed not just in its responses to victims and their families. It failed itself and it failed society by trying to keep the evidence within its own structures.

“I repeat again what I said one year ago: ‘The sexual abuse of a child is and always was a crime in civil law; it is and always was a crime in canon law; it is and always was grievously sinful. The investigation of crime within society is the competence of An Garda Síochána’.”


Nster.com


11 Comments

See all comments

My prayer is that one day, Archbishop Diarmuid Martin will lead a 2nd Reformation in the Catholic Church and it will begin in Ireland. I live in the States, but I wish that someone would send him a nail and a piece of paper for me, so he could nail his demands on the Cathedral Door in Dublin! On second thought, maybe he should be sent a ream of paper and a box of nails! If anyone feels led to bless a little grandma in the States, by sending a box of nails and paper to Archbishop Martin, I'd appreciate it!
From what I have read, Archbishop Diarmuid Martin has responded much more like a man of God than in the US when the same circumstances happened during the tenure of Cardinal Law of Boston. It is obvious that Cardinal Laws "silence" was rewarded by him being assigned to a beautiful basilica in Rome, and those who worked directly with him in Boston where made bishops and assigned to places like Long Island where they went on to fight any extention of the statute of limitations for victims of abuse.
It is refreshing to hear the words of Archbishop Martin. The same conspiracy of silence goes back to the Great Hunger, 1845-51, when the Irish people died of starvation while vast amounts of food were exported. Even today, the true history is hard to come by and the victims rarely remembered. The proper authorities seem more interested in protecting the reputation of the perpetrators of this atrocity than they are in giving us all the facts about what was done to our family ancestors.
As a Catholic looking back, I can now see the turmoil created by Vatican II. The seminaries were infiltrated by "left wingers". In retrospect, there is emerging an unholy image of John XXIII and his links to Communism which has a capital c instead of the allowed Catholic look at communism with a small c. Without a doubt, the "devil" is alive and well deep within the Catholic Church. That is exactly the consensus of Malachi (Brendan) Martin.
@Dublinjas; Who exactly should obey; Priests,people, or indeed both?
"In the future, he said, “we need to sustain our robust child safeguarding norms and practices". No What you need to do in future is.. You need to obey the 10 yes there is 10 Commandments.
sdhbfgbkvlc;n,
Pittsburghkid -- I don't know where you get your information about the courts in America waiving the statutes of limitations on child abuse and not on Protestant ministers. Can you cite cases where Protestant ministers have escaped justice because of statutes of limitation. As for the Church's stand on abortion as relating to child abuse -- WOW!!! Talk about making something out of nothing! Where in your twisted logic did you come up with that one? What does protecting the life of a child in the womb have to with child abuse. Oh, I get it -- if the kid had been aborted in the first place, he/she wouldn't have around to get abused! GREAT LOGIC!!!
@Pittsburghkid, I agree your first point is sadly very accurate. I don’t think link to the abortion issue naturally follows. When my daughter was an early-mid teenager, I always wondered what to do had she become pregnant, maybe manipulated by one of the child abusers you talk about. I always thought that if the family thought the best solution was an abortion, then I would want her to have one. At that time, I was canvassed in church to sign the latest ‘anti-abortion’ petition. Based on my rationale, I could never sign one. I could not deny for other potential child-mothers, what I would want for my own daughter. I am not pro-abortion, but I am not prepared to see young lives ruined, physically or mentally, on account of my personal beliefs, or anyone else’s. These decisions are, in my opinion, best left within families; who knows a child better than the parents?…and prohibiting this choice will mean that the better connected will always get what they want, but what of the others? Abortion does not always make things easier, but neither does the alternative; you are free to choose the best solutions to your own problems, please permit others that freedom to choose without making criminals out of them.
By focusing on Priest as sex abuser, we are missing the nature of the problem. The nature of the problem is that it is not confined to Priest, but to all child care providers. Teacher, Boy Scout leaders, coaches in youth sports, dance instructors, etc. My point is that child molester gravitate to positions were their is access to children. By focusing on Catholic Priest then we are doing children a dis-service. The real reason for this concentration on Catholic Priest is the Church's on Abortion. In America, the courts waved the statutes of limitations against Catholic Priest. Protestant Minister have about the same number of child molesters, but the problem appears larger because charges are being procuted from the 1940's for Catholic Priest. This problem would go away for the Catholic Church, if the Church change their position on Abortion. It is ironic that the worst form of child abuse, Abortion is legal.
This man should be pope!
 




Log into IrishCentral with your Facebook account


or sign-in directly

E-Mail:
Password:
 Remember me Forgot my password
Not a member? Register Now!
print this article Print
email this articleE-mail