Trouble brewing at Notre Dame several weeks after Elizabeth Seeberg tragedy
By: Cormac Eklof | Published Monday, November 22, 2010, 10:30 AM | Updated Friday, September 9, 2011, 9:56 PM

Almost two months after terrible tragedy, there is an ugly situation brewing on campus at Notre Dame.
On September first of this year,
Elizabeth Seeberg, a 19-year-old freshman, reported to Notre Dame Campus Police that she had been sexually assaulted the day before by a
Notre Dame football player.
Elizabeth did everything she could to follow the correct protocols after this terrible personal event. She told her friends and family about the assault. She wrote down what had happened in a hand-written statement. She sought treatment at a local hospital and consented to a DNA evidence kit. She reported the assault to Notre Dame campus police. She sought counseling
The alleged attack took place August 31
The accused attacker is still kitting up, playing football for Notre Dame. The accused played yesterday in the game against Army. Elizabeth Seeberg died September 10 of a suspected overdose of a drug prescribed to her for depression and anxiety.
What happened in the ten days between the alleged assault and Elizabeth’s death?
Nothing.
Until this weekend, there was no statement, no communication, no nothing from Notre Dame.
Furthermore, more than two months later,
Notre Dame refuses to publicly acknowledge what actions university officials have taken to investigate her allegation.
St. Joseph County Police Department officials have gone on record to say that Notre Dame campus authorities
did not tell them about her report of a sexual attack nor did they refer the case to the county's special victims unit. A campus police log, which is probably going to be mentioned a lot in the coming weeks, shows the matter was assigned and then kept within the department.
Worryingly Notre Dame appears to be dangerously close to appearing to attempt a cover up.
Bear in mind the appropriate agencies are saying Notre Dame did not contact them at the time of the incident, and then read this from their official statement on the situation;
"We take our obligation seriously, we involve law enforcement officials as appropriate, and we act in accordance with the facts."
So, either law enforcement or the college are lying.
By saying (and doing) nothing, Notre Dame have said everything they need to say. They have left themselves open to questions of a very serious nature.
Perhaps worst of all, Notre Dame’s coach
Brian Kelly, when asked about the incident, said ;
"If someone was late for a meeting, the university would not deal with that,"So a player’s punctuality is on the same par as a player allegedly sexually assaulting a young woman who subsequently and tragically killed herself?
The school could have headed all of this off at the pass, and in turn protected its people, like Kelly, who are clearly poorly equipped, for whatever reason, to comment on the incident. When all is said and done, the burning issue is, a young woman did everything she could have done in reporting this incident in good faith and trust to the Notre Dame authorities. For whatever reason, Notre Dame then decided to sit on its hands. The correct response would have been to disclose all pertinent information to the correct authorities, and, to both investigate and indeed defend the player in question, discreetly take him out of the lineup.
The fact that the player is innocent until proven guilty is not up for debate. What is open for question and debate, however, is how Notre Dame have left themselves open to a world full of problems, if this player is proven to have assaulted the tragic central figure, and yet still is running around playing a game with the Notre Dame jersey on his back.
Some things are bigger than sports, and Notre Dame should have recognized that this was one of them.
Linkage
25 Comments
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Switch to the desktop site to post a comment.CitizenWhy | Dec 29, 2010, 10:35 AM EST
Why are people stll going to Catholic authorities when a crime is committed? That poor girl should have gone directly to the police. If they took no action she could have appealed to the Attorney General or to a judge. She should have gone immediately to the police to start a criminal investigation, and then sued the player in civil court. The parents should still sue, adding Notre Dame to the suit. Civil suits are often the only way to get justice for rape in the USA, their rules of evdidence less stringent that in criminal court.
DaddyMac22 | Dec 17, 2010, 04:04 PM EST
@ Murphy66 - That changes nothing, did you see the text the alleged rapist's friend sent the poor girl? Unbelievable. It has also come out that Notre Dame didn't talk to the alleged rapist until a week after Lizzy died, absolutely unacceptable. The whole point behind much of the outrage on this is just how poorly ND has handled the whole situation. The guy might be innocent, although he certainly sounds at the very least like a creepy, manipulative leech type, the point is ND should have done so, so, so much more. If you come down on any side of the story other than Lizzy's there's something wrong with you.
seamusmoore | Nov 24, 2010, 09:53 AM EST
I am not an "angry fan", I am an alumnus who has been quite critical of Notre Dame, particularly its "Irish" studies program and the increasing secularization of its faculty. That said, I do get angry when someone gives them stick based upon one article in a newspaper, containing an allegation (failure to inform local authorities)that are proven to be false within a day . The statement from the St Joseph County Prosecutor's office made on Monday CLEARLY indicates that: A) they were informed of the incident by Notre Dame Police Dept; B)they were kept informed of the progress of the investigation by NDPD, which is fully qualified and recognized by St Joe County to perform such an investigation; C) they received the report of the investigation ten days ago and are evaluating it. Therefore, an investigation HAS occurred despite your claim to the contrary. With regards to public identification of the player (which ND effectively would have done if they suspended him until the investigation was complete), there is FEDERAL student privacy laws that have to be adhered to. If the St Joe Prosecutor indicts the player, we'll find out who he is and what the facts are; if he is innocent, we won't (which I am sure YOU will have a problem with). Like any criminal investigation, there is a process to be followed and laws to be adhered to. It is very sad when a young person like Elizabeth Seeberg takes her life (a situation which occurred in my own family), everyone looks for a reason why. Could it have been prevented? BTW, Elizabeth's family has hired a former federal prosecutor to look into the matter, he has not made any statement pending the outcome of the investigation, perhaps you should do the same.
DaddyMac22 | Nov 24, 2010, 07:20 AM EST
Absolutely fascinating to watch a pack of angry ND fans descend on this, and avoid the actual issue, which is that ND are still playing a player that clearly needs, at the very least to be investigated and cleared, openly. Amazing how ignorant and insensitive you ND fans are coming off. A girl died! Set aside your angry, aggressive team affiliation for one short second and look at the broader issue.
seamusmoore | Nov 23, 2010, 12:09 PM EST
DaddyMac22 I mentioned Elizabeth Seeberg's name in my earlier post to you in an attempt to make you aware of facts, not rhetoric. In the words of the late Daniel patrick Moynihan, "you are entitled to your opinion, but not your own set of facts".
seamusmoore | Nov 23, 2010, 11:58 AM EST
bankmeister you got that right although in fairness to Eklof his story is based on the 11/21 Chicago tribune article which was completely refuted by the St Joe prosecutor's statement yesterday.
bankmeister | Nov 23, 2010, 11:47 AM EST
I see that greyhound has voiced exactly what I wanted to share. I've never heard of/visited this publication before, but my first impression, based on the "writing" of Mr. Eklof, is that it is an unprofessional, sensationalist piece of garbage.
DaddyMac22 | Nov 23, 2010, 11:37 AM EST
@ seamusmoore - 'the girl', as you call her, the girls name was Elizabeth Seeberg. Perhaps you forgot, while you defended ND so staunchly.
seamusmoore | Nov 23, 2010, 10:42 AM EST
eiriarmach First, the girl was a ST MARY's student, not Notre Dame; therefore, she wouldn't go to the ND website you referred. Now, with respect to your criticism of the procedures ND has in place, Notre Dame has a police force fully trained to investigate and refers cases to the St Joe Prosecutor like they did here. BTW, rape has never been alleged in this case if you do a little research. Sexual assault constitutes a range of acts including uninvited physical contact of any kind.
seamusmoore | Nov 23, 2010, 10:30 AM EST
daady mac 22 Clearly, you did not read the St Joe prosecutors's statement.
seamusmoore | Nov 23, 2010, 10:20 AM EST
hey DaddyMac22: OBVIOUSLY you didn't read the statement from the St. Joe County Prosecutor's Office which I based my comments on. I am an ND grad and am not all hesitant to criticize the University where it is warranted by FACTS. READ the STATEMENT.I tried 3 times to link the actual article containing the Prosecutor's statement but I don't think IC's software let's us link outside articles in. i will try again, if it does not appear, google "Elizabeth Seeberg death" to read it for yourself.
DaddyMac22 | Nov 23, 2010, 09:42 AM EST
@ eiriamach - Brilliant comment from eiriamach, who shows a really good grasp of the actual issue, instead of just trying to blindly defend ND. Excellent stuff.
greyhound | Nov 23, 2010, 09:14 AM EST
Eckloff also accused ND of doing nothing in the ten days from the alleged assault and the untimely passing of Ms. Seeberg. St. Joe Prosecutor confirmed that a "voluminous report" from the ND Police about the complaint was delivered to them for review. Did Nothing?
greyhound | Nov 23, 2010, 09:08 AM EST
St. Joe's Police now confirm that their previous statement was a mistake on their part and ND did notify them of the incident. St. Joe's added that ND Police Dept. is capable of handling such an investigation. So Ecklof's assertion that either ND or law enforcement was "lying" and DaddyMacs's assertion that ND "dropped the ball" are both proven to be wrong. Insisting that you wait for all the facts to come out without making baseless accusations isn't being an apologist for anyone or any team it's the responsible thing to do..
eiriamach | Nov 23, 2010, 08:40 AM EST
If you take a look at the Notre Dame University Counseling Center's web page on "Sexual Assault," you will notice a curious thing. The advice for friends of a victim of sexual assault DOES NOT include referring the victim to civil law enforcement so that trained officers can properly, in a timely fashion, investigate the incident, yet the advice for friends of the "accused" DOES include referring the accused to a lawyer, as well as the following: "Do not ask questions that imply you think he/she did anything wrong or conversely that suggest you want to be his/her “defending” or “prosecuting” attorney." Notre Dame seems to stack the deck against anyone's reporting rape to civil police and in favor of protecting an accused rapist from investigation by law enforcement. This shroud of silence covering an alleged rapist can be lethal and certainly leaves him free (if guilty) to rape again. Everyone who knew of the accusation and remained silent shares responsibility for the young woman's death. Most campuses in the US moved away from protecting the accused from investigation and toward helping the alleged victim 35-40 years ago. Why is Notre Dame stuck in the dark ages on women's issues?
DaddyMac22 | Nov 23, 2010, 04:15 AM EST
@ SeamusMoore, you were too busy being sanctimonious to note that despite Notre Dame claiming they contacted authorities, said authorities say they heard nothing. In effect you repeated the crux of the story, without the important part. @ the bulk of the other Notre Dame apologist comments; It is really sad and scary to see how many people jump straight to the defence of an institution that has clearly dropped the ball in this incident, instead of thinking of the larger questions. Is there much dignity being an apologist for your favoured sports team? Just curious.
seamusmoore | Nov 23, 2010, 01:29 AM EST
Being out of the country, cormac didn't learn the lessons of the Duke lacrosse case where everyone jumped to conclusions and ruined 3 young men's lives.
seamusmoore | Nov 23, 2010, 01:26 AM EST
ND did in fact report the incident to the St Joe Prosecutor's office according to a press release made today. Kelly, like the University cannot publicly comment on the case because of federal student privacy laws.
greyhound | Nov 22, 2010, 10:38 PM EST
Mr. Eklof, You really need to better job of familiarizing yourself with the American justice system and privacy laws. Failing to do so and making such claims is irresonsible and doesn't come close to any journalistic standard. ...And on top of that....You actually came to this asinine conclusion: "Perhaps worst of all, Notre Dame’s coach Brian Kelly, when asked about the incident, said ; "If someone was late for a meeting, the university would not deal with that," So a player’s punctuality is on the same par as a player allegedly sexually assaulting a young woman who subsequently and tragically killed herself? Kelly's quote was in response to a question about what situations are handled and commented on by him as the Head Football Coach and what situations must be addressed by the University only....he was citing examples not drawing comparisons. Reckless
TheOriginalWesW | Nov 22, 2010, 04:25 PM EST
I like turtles
esilvas | Nov 22, 2010, 01:10 PM EST
I don't believe the poster was making light of rape. No civilized person would do that. But, I have some questions: 1) Are ND Police obligated to report to St. Joseph County, i.e. are they vested with investigatory powers? If not, their statement may be correct. 2)IrishCraig is correct, accused and no charges filed. Respectfully, if there was no movement from the ND police, there is no reason you can not also involve the St. Joseph County police. I am a father of a very young daughter and I would not stop if there was no response after several months. There may be more to the story as it progresses. My greatest shame in this is the University did not tell the St. Joseph County police about the attack after her death. Anyone investigating this would want that information.
jekama8 | Nov 22, 2010, 11:58 AM EST
I sincerely appreciate your honesty, class and tact in writing this piece. It is a difficult topic which many would choose to shy away from. Thank you.
PhlutiePhan | Nov 22, 2010, 11:48 AM EST
The previous comment "makes light of rape". Was the player questioned? Remember the great controversy about arrests on campus for anti-abortion. Their charges are still pending. This was done by campus police and not by outside authorities.
DaddyMac22 | Nov 22, 2010, 11:45 AM EST
Hello Irish Craig. That's not a contextually fair analysis at all. Completely different set of circumstances, I'll ask you straight out, does it not worry you that Notre Dame are reporting differently to law enforcement? Notre Dame say they alerted authorities, authorites say they didn't. Would you not like to know what measures Notre Dame took? Also, if said player is 100% innocent, why is he remaining anonymous, and why didn't he come out and defend himself on the outset of allegations? Would you not agree there are questions to be answered?
IrishCraig | Nov 22, 2010, 11:31 AM EST
So let me get this straight Mr. Eklof. If you are accussed of sexual assault with no charges filed, your company should prohibit you from working? Please help me understand your logic. I never before condisered you a "bottom feeder".