American in Ireland


Steinbrenner won but with no class

Posted on Tuesday, July 13, 2010 at 12:27 PM

RSS


Recent Posts

Archives

submit to reddit

George Steinbrenner is dead and Yankee fans should say a little prayer of thanks for all he did and they might want to throw in a few prayers asking one or two saints to intercede on his behalf and ask God to overlook many of the things he did.

I'm a Met fan and hate the Yankees. It warms my heart when they lose or even just do something stupid.

Most Met fans, including me, enjoyed the fact that George turned the Yankees into a circus. Before Steinbrenner the Yankees were supposedly all about class and professionalism, but once Steinbrenner got involved all of that went out the window.

Oh, he made the right noises, but George wasn't a classy guy. He didn't hire classy guys. Unfortunately, he did hire winners.

I never understood why Yankee fans hated Steinbrenner. In 1973 he bought a team mired in mediocrity and in a few years turned them into champions. Sure, Steinbrenner's Yankees might not have been the same as (the mostly mythological) cool professionals of the past, but they won.

Unlike other baseball owners, Steinbrenner didn't fear free agency when it came in the mid 1970s. He threw himself - and his checkbook - into building a winning team. In 1976 he had his first pennant, but that wasn't enough and following the loss to Cincinnati in the World Series Steinbrenner brought Reggie Jackson to New York to play for manager Billy Martin.

That year the Yankees romped home in the American League and won the World Series. Reggie Jackson lived up to his big contract and his own bragging and delivered when it mattered. Across town the Mets' cheapskate owners were dismantling the team and off-loaded the franchise player - Tom Seaver - because they were determinedly refusing to join baseball's new era.

It was the darkest of times as the Mets found a new long term home in last place. Meanwhile the Yankees won again despite the George & Reggie & Billy circus act.

However, George's interfering ways caught up with him in the 80s and the Yankees stopped winning. They weren't terrible, but they were never quite good enough. And what was more, the Mets were better. Those were the glory days. The Mets dominated New York, the Yankees played second fiddle and we Met fans were all able to fully enjoy Steinbrenner's show because we all knew the Mets' success was killing him.

Then came the 90s. Steinbrenner was exiled from active involvement in the Yankees for paying a gambler to try to get dirt on Dave Winfield, a big money signing who Steinbrenner derided as a bust. George became an obscure figure, unfortunately the Mets became an obscenity so Met fans couldn't enjoy Steinbrenner's discomfort as much as we would have otherwise.

Then something terrible happened. Steinbrenner returned, chastened. And he seemed to have learned his lesson. He still wanted to win, but he just wrote the checks and let his baseball people run the show. Just like that it was the 1950s all over again as the Damn Yankees won and won and won even beat the Mets in the World Series. Oh yeah, and the team was full of classy professionals. Sickening.

I think it was around that time - the late 90s - that Yankee fans mellowed on Steinbrenner.

In recent years Steinbrenner has been less and less involved in running the Yankees, leaving most of the responsibilities to his son Hank. George managed one last hurrah, a final gesture towards what he'd been in the 70s, when he all but dismissed long-time manager Joe Torre after the 2007 season. He was old and frail then and Yankee fans mostly gave George a pass on that one as they were as annoyed as he was that the team had stopped winning (temporarily, unfortunately).

Steinbrenner made the Yankees interesting and winners and for that Yankee fans should be grateful to him. Most Met fans would have loved to have had to endure the 27 years Steinbrenner has given the Yankees.


18 Comments

See all comments

Monsoonman,

Some guys are actually better with limited resources. Maybe Finley's teams would have been completely dominant - and they weren't bad in the early 70s, but it's also possible that he would have squandered money if he'd had a ample supply.

You think Finley was better than Bill Veeck? Also, most of the owners in the distant past were great marketers, which explains why baseball took off. 150 years ago cricket was more popular in America.
longislander1940,

No. I never knew any of that. All I know about is how he ran the Yankees and, in truth, I know more about how he did that from '72-90 than anything that happened the past 10 years. I did say that he seemed to adopt a different management style after he got back from his banishment.
Did you every notice all the good Steinbrenner did for the NYPD/NYFD widows and other people who were sick and financially unable to pay a bill? Why dont you remember him that way.
...I add to the below: From Charley Finelys farm system and teams cam some of the Yankees greatest players.
I think Charley Finley was the most innovative and successful marketeer baseball has seen since its inception. From his farm system came some of baseballs greatest players. Can you imagine what Finley could have done if he had the resources of Steinbrenner?
DennisQ,

I agree. Too many people focused on the money he spent as if that was a guarantee of success. However, my own team had the third highest payroll in baseball last year and they didn't manage to win 50% of their games. Money combined with stupidity will still produce a loser.

Steinbrenner spent well. I doubt he was the driving force behind that hitting philosophy, but the buck stopped with him. He hired the people who made the Yankees winners and he deserves credit for that.
The problem with Steinbrenner-bashing is that it gives him no credit for shrewdness. We're led to believe that baseball got smarter despite George Steinbrenner, but I doubt this is true. I looked for a connection between Steinbrenner and sabermetrics - the use of "better" statistics to determine what actually wins baseball games. No luck finding a connection, but I remember that the Yankees under George Steinbrenner used more effective strategies than other teams. For instance, Yankee hitters ran up the opposing starter's pitch count so they faced easier pitching in the late innings. Steinbrenner isn't associated with that, but it did happen while he was the Boss. Maybe he was just lucky that somebody under him knew what he was doing. But I have to ask - how often does that happen?
I'm a Red Sox Fan. enough said!!!!
Just a matter of timing Yank, I knew you wrote from the heart and spoke your truth. You indeed are a classy guy, keep your articles coming.
Monsoonman,

Thanks for letting me know. I hadn't perceived that comment as being so negative. I've known a few guys who have taken pride in being gruff, unclassy businessmen. I guess I kinda figured Steinbrenner was like them.

I still can't get over how precious some of you guys are about Steinbrenner's memory, etc. Yes, I wrote what I wrote shortly after he died, but I wasn't the only one. I read many and saw literally hundreds of summaries of Steinbrenner's Yankee record in the newspapers. I didn't read a single one that I thought glossed over his career.

Steinbrenner died of natural causes at 80 years of age. He was very much a public figure. I see nothing wrong with discussing his public life in such circumstances. I don't live in America, but I would bet that if was in an office in NYC that the water cooler discussions would have been about Steinbrenner and very few would have demurred from giving their own opinion on his time with the Yankees simply because the man had only just died.
Yank, stop yanking our chain with a statement like: "but George wasn't a classy guy. He didn't hire classy guys"...and then go on with "I don't know what I said that was so negative"...Most let a guys corpse get cold before they start bashing him. I wonder if a corpseman could have saved George? Mr. president do you know?
Gosh, I wish I knew what I'd said that was so negative. I basically said that Yankee fans should be grateful for the way Steinbrenner ran the team. Oh, and that he made the Yankees a circus act in the 70s/80s. I said nothing else about him. I didn't talk about him outside of his role as Owner/manager of the NY Yankees. I even glossed over the whole Winfield thing, which was pretty ugly and uncharitable.
Typical Met fan. I agree with Rebelforce completly. If you only knew how much the Boss gave to charties that he kept out of the news you would change your simple mind. Keep your stupid opinions to yoursef
I'm with you Rebelforce
I agree with the writer. Steinbrunner was a no-class rich guy who contributed to the inflated payrolls and built a team of individual stars. There are many no-class owners in professional sports but George topped them all




Log into IrishCentral with your Facebook account


or sign-in directly

E-Mail:
Password:
 Remember me Forgot my password
Not a member? Register Now!
print this article Print
email this articleE-mail