American in Ireland


Irish heritage sites have to make Irish people feel welcome

Posted on Tuesday, August 21, 2012 at 05:36 AM

RSS


Recent Posts

Archives

submit to reddit

The Rock of Cashel, County Tipperary. Ancient cathedral/castle
built on a site where, tradition has it, St Patrick converted the
King of Munster in the 5th century.
A recent survey on Irish heritage sites indicated that a quarter of Irish people visit heritage sites "frequently," which surprises me to be honest. In fact, I don't believe that at all.

The same survey indicated that the prehistoric passage tomb at Newgrange in County Meath is the country's most important heritage site. That doesn't surprise me because if there's one thing that makes Newgrange different from many of the country's other sites is that Irish people go there in large numbers. In my experience that isn't the case with some of Ireland's other historic jewels.

A few weeks back I went to the Rock of Cashel in County Tipperary. It was my first time there in many years and I still can't get over how much I learned and enjoyed myself there.

The Rock of Cashel is simply fantastic. I know there seem to be a lot of places like this in Ireland and if you're on a limited vacation schedule you might not fit them all in, but if you can get to Cashel, do it.

My family and I had a great time, thanks in large part to the tour guide who did a very good job explaining the history and architecture of "The Rock."
____________
Read More:

Surprise as Newgrange wins the title of Ireland’s favorite heritage spot

Visiting Irish castles is popular for good reason

Historic sites in Ireland                   
_____________

The only negative - and it's not a big one, more of a nagging annoyance - was that the Irish-born in my traveling party (all but me) felt during the tour that the Rock of Cashel was for tourists and not Irish people.

It was subtle and more down to the tone than the actual words spoken, especially at the start of our visit, but there was a sense that we were in a tourist trap more than a place of real significance. The Rock of Cashel is not Bunratty Folk Park (although that has its pluses too, but it is primarily for tourists).

It's a little difficult to phrase because I'm not really being critical or at least I don't have an easy answer to the problem, which is that the tour was clearly designed for a non-Irish audience. Our tour guide at Cashel did a very good job of explaining the history of the Rock, the importance of the various parts of the structure, etc. but his entire talk made it obvious that Irish people were not his audience.

Again, I'm not criticizing him because he was good and I assume he was working mostly from a script that those who run the Rock of Cashel provide for their tour guides. And he wasn't wrong. Of the 25 or so on the tour there were only four or five Irish people and three of those were my family. Most of the group probably was pretty unfamiliar with Ireland and its history.

Here's an example of what I'm talking about: our guide explained that Cashel was the seat of the King of Munster, "which is the most southern of Ireland's four provinces." Every Irish person knows that. I daresay that a large percentage of Irish-Americans know that. If I had heard that when I was a young, visiting Irish-American tourist I'd have been a little annoyed to be thought so ignorant of the basics of Irish geography.

My 17-yr-old daughter was incensed. She wanted to leave the tour right then. Yet if the guide had inserted "for those of you not from Ireland" it would have had a completely different impact. It would have been perfectly acceptable. There were a lot of similar phrases where it was obvious the tour guide expected his audience to know next-to-nothing (at most) about Ireland.

I have experienced this sort of thing before. Yet I don't blame the tour guides for it happening. They know their audience and it rarely includes Irish people. That's the shame of it. Irish people don't go to a lot of their own heritage sites so those in charge of the sites run them as tourist destinations. Or maybe Irish people don't go to the heritage sites because they know that they'll be treated as tourists and they don't like that. I don't know which it is, but it's a shame regardless.

As a comparison, try to imagine the Statue of Liberty or Independence Hall or the Washington Monument being explained to those visiting as if they don't know the basics of American history or geography. It just would never happen. Wouldn't happen at the Tower of London or Notre Dame Cathedral in Paris either.

Now if this was a one-off I wouldn't mention it, but it happens regularly. As I said, it's only a minor quibble, but I do think that fixing this would make the sites more attractive to Irish visitors. Make them feel less like only 'foreigners go there.' I also think tourists prefer to visit places that the local native population values highly and visits regularly. Tourists like authenticity and the native population's presence is proof of authenticity.

Ideally Irish people will visit their nation's fantastic heritage sites more often and force a change, but short of that the people who are in charge of the Rock of Cashel and other important sites need to explain Ireland's history and geography in a way that doesn't insult those Irish people who do go. That "céad míle fáilte" they all start with should be directed at Irish people too.


19 comments

Previous Page 2 of 2 pages
Funny you mentioned the Rock of Cashel. My first visit was 44 long years ago in September 1968. It was fine fresh autumn day and after parking the hire car I climbed past the century old cross in the yard and through a stone portal. Only to be greeted by empty beer cans bottle and numerous piles of human excretement.......Some things never change!
Why is a "Hell's Fires" Club being built on the ancient seat of the FitzGerald Earls of Desmond? Where is the Respect for "Integrity and Authenticity" - in compiance with the Nara (not NAMA)Declaration of Authenticity (1994) - in such a plan? Excellent question! Shall we make noise about the construction there? To quote UNESCO’s Guidelines for the protection of World Heritage sites, “… The cultural and natural heritage is among the priceless and irreplaceable assets, not only of each nation, but of humanity as a whole. The loss, through deterioration or disappearance, of any of these most prized assets CONSTITUTES AN IMPOVERISHMENT OF THE HERITAGE of all the peoples of the world…” (emphasis added) Many Fitzgeralds are upset with the historic DESECRATION of the Earls’ Medieval Fortress at Askeaton, Limerick, in favor of re-creating an Anglo-Ascendancy Gentlemen’s Club, which was a willful desecration in the first place! Tourism rationalizations are memorializing the wanton strains of Anglo-Ascendancy sons. Why not an Amusement Park at Valley Forge? Much more can be said of other Fitzgerald heritage sites throughout southwest Ireland, altered in “integrity and authenticity,” but the site development at Askeaton is a particularly FLAGRANT VIOLATION of the spirit of “special protection” these sites deserve. The FFE website (where this Q & A was first published) will monitor, through its future interactive features, Askeaton, and other sites.
Hey Yank, thanks for raising the topic! On the matter of educating ourselves (as a people or as foreign tourists to Ireland,) regarding our national heritage sites, I have a personal learning experience to relate. Tony Sheehy, an excellent local guide to the Askeaton, Limerick, sites of the Earls of Desmond, brought a negative factor - a decidedly big one - to my, and other tourists, attention in the course of his tour. Not all, however, are sensitive to the significant ramifications of this negative factor, causing me to ask, and answer, the subsequent question. I hope those interested in sites of Irish National Heritage will give it some consideration, and corrective action!
@The Yank: I've been to plenty of Am. sites where the guides speak as if all the tourists are non-Americans. Although I'm often thinking - what Am. doesn't know that? -, I'm also sure there are plenty of Americans who could use an update on Am. history and geography. I accept the rerun of the obvious and listen for new facts about the sites I'm visiting. I realize the tourist guides have to speak to 2 different audiences at once. Your suggestion that they use the phrase, "for those of you not from _..." is a good one but can hardly preface every sentence. Still, the questionable content of a tourist guide's script shouldn't keep anyone from visiting worthy sites at home or abroad.
Previous Page 2 of 2 pages




Log into IrishCentral with your Facebook account


or sign-in directly

E-Mail:
Password:
 Remember me Forgot my password
Not a member? Register Now!
print this article Print
email this articleE-mail