American in Ireland


Gold medal for Katie Taylor cost Irish taxpayer close to $400,000

Posted on Wednesday, August 15, 2012 at 08:25 AM

RSS


Recent Posts

Archives

submit to reddit

Katie Taylor captured Ireland's only gold medal
at the London Olympics.
{Photo thanks to Reuters}
Did you see Monday's pictures from Bray, Co Wicklow? Tens of thousands of people gathered to celebrate Katie Taylor's Olympic gold in boxing. There were similar scenes in other Irish hometowns of the country's successful Olympians.

Ireland's national television station, RTE, provided quite a bit of coverage of these events and undoubtedly will provide even more from today's national "homecoming" event in Dublin. Tremendous stuff. These local celebrations and the big one in Dublin cost a bit, but it's only a small sum and what taxpayer would quibble when the public mood is so keen on these celebrations?

Well, maybe me.

Although the truth is I don't have a big problem with these events. The public joy over Katie Taylor's success in her hometown, where I happen to live, is universal. Taylor, or I should say Katie as us locals refer to her, is a source of real pride to the people of Bray. {I'm still not comfortable with women's boxing, but I admire the way she conducts herself as an athlete and as a person.}

____________
Read More:

Katie Taylor overcome by emotional return in her hometown of Bray

A sort of Olympic homecoming announced for Dublin on Wednesday

When Irishwoman Katie Taylor goes for Olympic gold I won't be watching
_____________

What irks me, however, is the amount of taxpayers' money that goes to pay the athletes Ireland sends to the Olympics.

The Irish government pays €40,000 ($50,000) annually to each of Ireland's elite "high performance" athletes. This year there are 27 such athletes, some of whom actually did well in London and won medals. Katie Taylor is one of the 27 and she has received almost €300,000 ($370,000) in government funding (aka our money) since 2005.

Why? What does the Irish taxpayer get for this investment? After all, our government is bankrupt. Maybe the view is 'what's another few million euros into the vast debt pit in which we find ourselves?'

Don't get me wrong, it's not just Taylor. And at least she won a medal and set up Monday's happy day in Bray. Boxer Paddy Barnes, who got €40,000 this year and has received over €200,000 ($250K) in total, won a bronze and is the toast of Belfast.

Track athletes Olive Loughnane and Derval O'Rourke have received sums similar to Taylor, but neither of them was near a podium finish in London. Clay Pigeon Shooter Derek Burnett has received €270,000 ($330,000) and finished his Olympics in 46th place (I think). David Gillick has received similar money and didn't even make it to London.

There are boxers, cyclists, sailors, canoeists, archers and others receiving government money to compete in their sports. Why? What public benefit do we get for this money?

A crowd of up to 20,000 fans greeted Katie Taylor in her
hometown of Bray, Co Wicklow on Monday.
{Photo thanks to the Irish Times.}
I fully understand what the politicians get from spending our money in this way. They will be indirectly claiming credit for Ireland's Olympic medals, trying to cash in on the feel-good vibe the medal-winners provided. I'm sure they're keen to be seen on the stage in Dublin with the athletes later today. Of course, there will be no shots of any of them with the David Gillicks on the payroll. (And I don't know his story. He could well have been injured, but that only begs further questions as to how the government chooses who to fund, etc.)

The old amateur ideal of the Olympics is long dead. The International Olympics Committee makes a ton of money on the games. Let them pay the athletes who compete. I mean, nobody asks the taxpayer to pay the salaries of those who play in the NFL, NBA or English Premier League.

Besides, Katie Taylor is worth a whole lot more than €40,000 to the IOC. She is a tremendous advertisement for the Olympics. Not only should they pay her, but they should give her a huge raise.

I love sports. I watched a lot of the Olympics and rooted for the Irish competitors. Regardless I don't understand why the public should be so keen to pay the athletes who compete. Are we that desperate to see a medal hanging over a green jersey and the Irish flag flying from a stadium roof?

I'm not. I can endure, even enjoy, an Irish-medals-free Olympics.


46 comments

Next Previous Page 2 of 4 pages
Éamonn,

On the one hand, I generally don't let those comments phase me. On the other, such vitriol does turn people off commenting. I know I sometimes just can't be bothered.

I would have thought that commenting on how a government spends the money it raises through taxes was always up for discussion and that I as a tax-payer - I clearly stated above that I live in Bray - am fully entitled to express my view.
shuvonn,

You make some good points. I'm sure NBC would die if Americans won no medals. But, as far as I can make out, there is no government money for Olympic athletes. There was a suggestion recently that those who win medals and the accompanying prize-money should have that income exempted from federal taxes, but that's not a law yet.

American athletes are paid, but by the American Olympic Committee, which (I'm guessing) gets its money from corporate sponsorship, maybe a cut from the IOC of their NBC billions.

I have no problem with Ireland's athletes being paid, but I don't think they should be paid with taxpayers' money. I don't think any taxpayers in any country should pay athletes to compete in the Olympic games.
Yank, glad to hear YOU can handle an Irish medal free olympics, but IF you have ever watched an NBC broadcast, you would know, the US could NEVER handle a US medal free olympics, why expect something of Ireland that you would not expect of the US? Have you the figures handy for what these US olympic athletes were paid by chance?
Posting on here is a bit of an eye-opener. I fail to understand how even the most logically considered opinions are met with insults. Quite vicious insults, racist ("Yank - STFU"), insulting others' intelligence ("stupid") and even worse. Come to think of it, those posters are not actually insulting their intended targets; they are in fact abusing themselves by showing their lack of basic courtesy, decency and plain "old fashioned" manners. Very sad. I await you abuse. Éamonn, Dublin, Ireland.
Johnnymac claims it has not cost the Irish Tax payer one penny, and lies that Ireland was bailed out by the British government, when that never was the case, GB loaned Ireland money and at a higher rate, but I can tell you do not care too much for the truth when it flies in the face of your bias. GB never properly joined the EU (stayed out of the euro) and still wanted to boss them all around, it was Germany and the EU that bailed Ireland out and in fact it has been established that Ireland did not need to be bailed out at all. I suppose all them years of having a colony will not be let go easily. You neglect to mention the land taken by force by your ancestors, the gerrymandering and manipulation that went on to keep the industrialized part of Ireland and now YOU want to piss and moan? Get real, and get over it.
Why is a Yank in Ireland and does he wear the hat indoors?
How much money did Ronnie Delaney get from the government of the Irish state when he won a Gold Medal at the 1956 Olympic Games in Melbourne?
400,000 euro for Katie's gold medal... what a bargain.! Australia's gold medals cost $34 million each. Do your research you stupid yank, I'm sure the Facist State of America's medals cost even more!
Take a look at those sums of money we invested in athletes,& then look up the salaries of our politicans.Which has yielded the better results.No contest there.At least some of our athletes have delivered a boost & a feelgood factor to the country.My advice to you is to read & educate yourself on the real bludgers on Irelands tax money,Shane Ross & Nick Webb's "Wasters" & Fintan O'Toole's "Ship of Fools" are highly recommended eyeopeners to misuse on a grand scale of tax-payer money with no tangible benefit to our citizenry whatsoever,even the guy who came 46th in clay pidgeon shooting looks like value for money compared to the catalogue of public waste recorded in those books.so enjoy the moment,the next Olympics is 4 years away.
Hey plastic paddy, STFU and mind your business. Idiot.
@Johnnymac12: Team Ireland represented the whole island of Ireland. Team Ireland had 14 athletes from the North; Team GB (note: it is not Team UK) had 6 athletes from the North; 6 athletes out of 557! How can you say that Team Ireland didn’t represent ‘the six counties in Northern Ireland’ when it had far more athletes from there than Team GB? With respect, I think you and those like you need to start thinking about these issues. The Republic of Ireland has not been declared bankrupt, Johnnymac12, although it is heavily indebted –as is the UK. Furthermore, I feel I should point out to you that in 1976 the UK government was forced to apply to the IMF for a bailout rescue package (I believe it was the largest-ever call on IMF resources up to that point). So the UK has experienced this sort of thing in the past. Hopefully, both the UK and the Republic will recover quickly.
Suivness10,

Girls wrestling? I don't know. I've never seen it, but the point of wrestling is a lot less destructive than boxing I can't imagine I'd have any problem with it. Girls wrestling boys? Emmmm.
kinvara7,

Sorry, I didn't address your other question. No, I didn't see one minute of any Katie Taylor bouts. However I couldn't have if I'd wanted to because American tv pretty much ignored the boxing - men's too - and as I was in America for the nearly entire Olympics I couldn't watch Katie's fights.

However, one last time, I really see nothing appealing about watching two young women trying to punch each other in the head. I don't like boxing much anyway so I certainly have no intention of becoming a fan of women's boxing now.

branagh's comment below only adds to the argument against women's boxing.
kinvara7,

I'm not going to rehash the last argument. I didn't intend to return to Katie or the Olympics until I saw Fergus Finlay's column in the Examiner in which he argued for MORE funding for elite athletes and then told his readers where to find the information I used above. I never knew any of that until I read his article yesterday.

Again, it's not just Katie Taylor. As I said above at least she delivered. Look at the list of those we funded who did poorly. Is that money well spent?

However, you can't say the money for Katie Taylor was worth it but not the money for the clay pigeon shooter or the track athletes. The whole practice stinks.

What about that athlete the government doesn't fund? What if he or she might have been a medal contender, but couldn't compete with the athlete who gets €40K per year? Why should I believe the government does a good job of picking winners & losers? Let those who really want it figure it out. Let those who are the cream of the crop convince sponsors to pay them or convince their sporting organizations to pay them with money they get from sponsorship or TV deals.

It makes no more sense to fund an Irish canoeist than it does to fund a professional Irish soccer player. Yet the government doesn't give money to those people. Why not? Because their sports earn money and pay salaries that make sense to them as businesses/going concerns. Why should the government be funding these sports that are not sustainable as going concerns? It's no different than funding a whole bunch of bookstores even when people don't want to buy books.
Canadian,

That's how it should be done. There's no excuse for governments taxing citizens in order to pay athletes a salary.

If the sport cannot sustain professional athletes then let them remain amateur.
Next Previous Page 2 of 4 pages




Log into IrishCentral with your Facebook account


or sign-in directly

E-Mail:
Password:
 Remember me Forgot my password
Not a member? Register Now!
print this article Print
email this articleE-mail