Irish teen sells virginity; Irish paper sells ethics
Posted on Tuesday, January 26, 2010 at 04:46 PM
RSS 
Recent Posts
- Dialed down St. Patrick's Day
- A first time for everything
- Talking religion in 2011
- The uncertainty of prayer
- Smithsonian should have kept "ant-covered Jesus"
Archives
I saw this first on The Huffington Post and followed it through to a couple of UK papers. The original (as far as I can determine) is from the Belfast Telegraph. Read it here. Essentially, and not for the first time, a teenage girl tried to sell her virginity to the highest bidder on an action site. Apparently, a reporter for the Telegraph noticed the posting, contacted the girl to see if it was legit and then posed as a wealthy businessman to bid for the young lady's virtue.
It was not enough to verify with by speaking with her, of course. The "reporter" then had to continue the ruse until he was the highest, and winning, bidder. Why, you ask? Well, those lay people not familiar with journalist ethics might be curious, but the reason is obvious! To stop some sleazebag from winning, of course! Then the girl would be humiliated. It's not like the reporter and his editors could have just called her parents, or contacted the (most likely) unknowing auction service, or the proper authorities to report child - the girl is 16 - prostitution, or simply publish the story right away to ensure the girl's retraction. The ONLY viable option here was to continue with the charade.
Here are some great excerpts:
"Sunday Life [a section of The Telegraph] spent two weeks checking how genuine the teen’s offer was. During that time, she calmly bombarded our reporter with dozens of texts, many of a sexual nature."
"The girl — who we’re not identifying for ethical reasons — met our reporter just two days after he agreed to the £6,000 price-tag."
"The fresh faced teen turned up alone to meet our man in the centre of Newry last week. This was a huge risk as the man she was meeting could have been a dangerous serial sex offender or worse."
"The student walked home alone observed by a Sunday Life photographer, potentially exposing her address to a pervert."
Well as long as it was all in the name of journalism. I'm sure it was hard for this grown man to endure the sexually explicit text messages, the photos and the titillating conversation during which he asked her all about her virginity and plans to lose it, but hey, somebody's got to do it. If not him, it could have been some pervert.
It's also a nice touch to include the phrase "for ethical reasons" in an article like this. Stay classy, Belfast Telegraph.
It was not enough to verify with by speaking with her, of course. The "reporter" then had to continue the ruse until he was the highest, and winning, bidder. Why, you ask? Well, those lay people not familiar with journalist ethics might be curious, but the reason is obvious! To stop some sleazebag from winning, of course! Then the girl would be humiliated. It's not like the reporter and his editors could have just called her parents, or contacted the (most likely) unknowing auction service, or the proper authorities to report child - the girl is 16 - prostitution, or simply publish the story right away to ensure the girl's retraction. The ONLY viable option here was to continue with the charade.
Here are some great excerpts:
"Sunday Life [a section of The Telegraph] spent two weeks checking how genuine the teen’s offer was. During that time, she calmly bombarded our reporter with dozens of texts, many of a sexual nature."
"The girl — who we’re not identifying for ethical reasons — met our reporter just two days after he agreed to the £6,000 price-tag."
"The fresh faced teen turned up alone to meet our man in the centre of Newry last week. This was a huge risk as the man she was meeting could have been a dangerous serial sex offender or worse."
"The student walked home alone observed by a Sunday Life photographer, potentially exposing her address to a pervert."
Well as long as it was all in the name of journalism. I'm sure it was hard for this grown man to endure the sexually explicit text messages, the photos and the titillating conversation during which he asked her all about her virginity and plans to lose it, but hey, somebody's got to do it. If not him, it could have been some pervert.
It's also a nice touch to include the phrase "for ethical reasons" in an article like this. Stay classy, Belfast Telegraph.
8 Comments
See all comments
MeganFinnegan | Jan 27, 2010, 11:49 PM EST
Dear beachline,
Yes, I do realize. That's why I wrote this post. For answers to your other queries, read the original article that I link to in the post. And sorry, but I've never heard of "sensasonalism."
Report abuse
mlglynn | Jan 27, 2010, 08:35 PM EST
awful
Report abuse
wordsmith | Jan 27, 2010, 07:26 PM EST
Ever hear of yellow journalism?
Report abuse
innishowen | Jan 27, 2010, 04:52 PM EST
What of the auction sites themselves etc etc? They surely should have first port of call as to responsibility to not allow such postings.
Report abuse
beachline | Jan 27, 2010, 02:15 PM EST
OK MEGAN: why did the 16yr.old girl offer to sell her virginity? How badly did she need money? Who is supervising her? Do you realize this "journalist" was contributing to the delinquency of a minor and could face criminal charges? This sounds like "sensasonalism" instead of "journalism".
Report abuse
MeganFinnegan | Jan 27, 2010, 12:04 PM EST
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/01/26/pope-john-paul-ii-used-be_n_437075.html
Report abuse
MeganFinnegan | Jan 27, 2010, 11:47 AM EST
Allow me to comment on my own post and add that the paper missed another huge point of the story - that if some cad had been able to purchase this girl's virginity, it would have been deplorable exploitation of a minor, whether said cad was a "serial sex offender" or not. The point is not that she could have attracted some crazy guy. The point is that ANY guy answering this ad should be whipped with a belt. If the Pope can do it...
Report abuse
8 Comments
Report abuse