The enemy is...multiculturalism - foiling home-grown terrorist plots
Posted on Thursday, February 10, 2011 at 07:58 AM
RSS 
Recent Posts
- Remembering Morton Downey, Jr, the father of trash TV
- Father Andrew Greeley’s powerful faith - remembering the larger than life Chicago priest
- Ireland’s rotten Apple scheme - two-bit operation need to pay their dues to maintain “civilized society”
- Sleazy secrets and the American Dream of Dublin born spy Kevin Richard Halligen
- 'The Great Gatsby' author F Scott Fitzgerald’s death and burial another Catholic lesson
Archives
In his new book The Matchmaker of Kenmare, Irish novelist Frank Delaney sends his characters on a tour of World War II-era Ireland. Soon, they become sucked into the era’s foggy diplomacy, visiting the war-town landscapes of both England and Germany. These characters are able to move around without raising too much suspicion, in part, because they are from Ireland, and Ireland, of course, was neutral during World War II.
We can argue some other time about Irish neutrality in the face of Nazi barbarism. What this does remind us of is that people – and nations – have had to make tough choices in the past.
During World War II, the Irish weighed their unique history with British imperialism against the realities of 1940s politics and made their choice.
This is interesting to think about as British and American politicians are now saying some provocative things about religion, immigration and terrorism on both sides of the Atlantic.
Over in Great Britain, Conservative Prime Minister David Cameron blasted the very concept of multiculturalism.
As The New York Times put it, Cameron criticized “the country’s decades-old policy of ‘multiculturalism,’ saying it has encouraged ‘segregated communities’ where Islamic extremism can thrive.”
Cameron criticized what he referred to as the “hands-off tolerance” of Britain and other European countries, adding that they had encouraged Muslims and other immigrants “to live separate lives, apart from each other and the mainstream.”
Meanwhile, on this side of the Atlantic, Congressman Peter King, new chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, prepared to hold hearings next month which will focus on the role Muslim Americans have played -- or not played -- in foiling home-grown terrorist plots.
King, for years a well-known presence in Irish American circles, is no knee-jerk immigrant-phobe.
Indeed, there is understandable concern on both sides of the Atlantic about terror, and about whether or not immigrants are assimilating, or are instead participating in plots to destroy the very nations they once chose to adopt as their homelands.
Which brings me back to World War II. Let me call upon another expert, though not a novelist or congressman or prime minister.
My mother grew up in 1940s Brooklyn, when another global war was raging. In talking to her over the years I’ve gotten a fairly strong sense of what her block in East Flatbush was like, in part because there were many other blocks just like it.
It was -- though no one used this word back then -- a “multicultural” block. Mostly white ethnic, with plenty of working class Irish, German and Italian Americans.
That bears repeating because, as any regular viewer of the History Channel knows, among our enemies during World War II were … the Germans and the Italians!
The Irish, of course, were no enemy. They were simply neutral.
Which is kind of how some Fox News devotees view the French these days. It’s not that they’re against the global war of terror. They are just kind of neutral.
The point is not that everyone on my mother’s block got along. From what I can tell my grandmother showed no prejudice, mainly because she hated everybody.
But here, living side by side, were the children of immigrants from nations the U.S. was fighting a bloody war against. Yes, of course, there were spasms of anti-German sentiment, and some Italian-Americans were indeed sent to camps, and a handful of rough Irish kids teamed up with members of the German American Bund and dreamt up terrible anti-Semitic conspiracy theories.
But in their day-to-day lives that multicultural Brooklyn block endured. And did so under circumstances that seem more disturbing than our current concerns over terror and multiculturalism.
Yes, we should be vigilant, and we should demand that immigrants grasp what is great about America. But there is a fine line between vigilance and fear-mongering.
We want our immigrants to know what is great about America. But it seems as if the native-born also need to be reminded from time to time.
(Contact tomdeignan@earthlink.net or facebook.com/tomdeignan.)
13 comments
Page 1 of 1 pages
pacifist | Feb 14, 2011, 10:07 AM EST
JOHNTOBIN, You ask where on earth did I get my ideas on where the Church of Rome? I suggested in the post I submitted that anybody doubt my claims check them out by trawling the internet -and was a challenge to you and others, but it was also saying not to take my word for what I was asserting as I have? So why do you believe what you do? Have you investigated and proved the foundation of your beliefs as I have? I submitted a much more extensive reply to you but the Moderator hasn't posted it so far, although I hope that it will appear.
Report abuse
JOHNTOBIN | Feb 12, 2011, 06:10 AM EST
Where on earth did pacifist get his,or her ideas on the Church of Rome from?However,I do agree with the comments from the same person regarding Irish neutrality during World War 2.There were also contacts between British intelligence MI6 and the Irish intelligence organization.Cannot think of its name.G something I think.
Report abuse
jamieLM | Feb 11, 2011, 01:23 PM EST
All the posters have made valid points. I'm with Countyred. I'm an American. I'm "mixed" with a lot of Irish ancestry. Tom, you have a NYC perspective on America which doesn't always reflect life experiences in other parts of America, like the Midwest, and especially in rural America. My experiences and those of my parents, grandparents, and great-grandparents are often unlike those of Americans living in the East. Rural Midwestern assimilation took place rather quickly after the 1st immigrant generation. Some communities were of mixed ancestry and other neighboring communities were defined predominantly by one ethnicity (Irish, German, Swedish). Everyone wanted to be seen as American ASAP, although at home, many held onto some customs and the language of origin. Both of my grandfathers (of Irish descent) and all of their brothers fought in WWII in the Army, Navy, and Marines. My grandfathers tell me that in the mixed and non-mixed ethnic communities everyone they knew when they were little kids, called themselves Americans - no hyphens. In the 1940's, everyone was united in their hatred for Hitler and his Nazis, including those of German descent. It does take time for immigrants to assimilate into American culture. Some are more willing and are better at doing it than others. Some don't want to assimilate in any way. After Sept. 11, why wouldn't Americans be more suspicious and fearful? How can we tell those who want to become good Am. citizens from those who are always plotting to kill us? At times, Am. Muslim silence in regard to radical Islamic terroristic acts has been deafening. It'd be helpful to see a little more vocal support and appreciation for America from the Am. Muslim community. Btw: for those who don't like American culture - its freedoms, its laws, its language and customs, and expect America to be a clone of your country of origin - too bad. Go home or go somewhere else. I don't expect Ireland to be a smaller version of America.
Report abuse
pacifist | Feb 10, 2011, 05:14 PM EST
Tom Deignan is not exactly correct when he sates that the Ireland was neutral during the Second World War. de Valera declared a state of neutrality during what that conflict which he called " the Emergency ". But any member of the allies armed forces found on Irish territory, the RAF in particular, were taken to the border and handed over to the British, but any members of the German armed forces or spies were interned for the duration of the war. On the other hand the IRA was collaborating with the Nazi's and just imagine the consequences for the Irish had Hitler and his war criminals won the war. de Valera's cooperation with the Allies was not appreciated by Great Britain or the US and it was basically carried out in a low-profile way. Tom Deignan mentions what happened Germans and Italoan-Americans during the war, but he fails to mention that all Japanese citizens of the US were interened for the duration of the war - and perhaps for some time afterward. The Irish and the Germans would have had great political influence which safeguarded the Irish and afforded the Germans a great degree of protection. This wasn't the same with the Japanese. All's fair in love and war? I don't think so. Political leverage, cultural similarities and white skin provided a shield against the worst excesses of suspicion during that terrible period of history.
Report abuse
pacifist | Feb 10, 2011, 04:47 PM EST
Does this mean that the culture of the Native Americans will be embraced by all citizens of the US? After all it can safely be argued that all the other cultures introduced by invaders of their land are foreign influences and should be eradicated? Couldn't the same be said of my native Ireland - in religion for example. The religion of the natives was paganism and that was obliterated by the Roman Catholic Church - or, in other words, the Church of Rome which introduced a counterfeit version of Christianity not having any roots in authentic Christianity as any objective study of its doctrines and history would reveal? It certainly doesn't observe any of the seventh day weekly Sabbath and Biblical Holy Day commanded to be kept directly by God by the word of His mouth all of which Jesus Christ and His disciples, later His apostles faithfully kept. But it replaced those holy days with thise with roots in paganism such as Xmas and Easter. Anybody doubting this can trawl the internet and check wether what I say is true or not don't just reject them on a preconceived notion. Yes - multiculturalism is a dangerous and toxic influence on all civilizations throughout history. Maybe people should investigate and find out from whence their own civilizations originated.
Report abuse
Countyred | Feb 10, 2011, 12:03 PM EST
Colkelly-You said it fr better than I. My family came to NY from Ireland (Cork and Mayo) in the late 1700's-early 1800's looking for freedom and a better life. They found both, but not without hard work and faith. My family too, celebrates our Irish traditions and have learned about our family history-But we have been Americans for many years, proudly I might add!
Report abuse
Countyred | Feb 10, 2011, 11:58 AM EST
I dont think it is fearmongering at all! I lived in the Netherlands for a time and traveled through Europe while I was living there. I tries to learn the various languages, but everyone politely told me that the spoke English. I did benefit from and enjoy the vast array of cultures and ethnicites and learned a great deal. What I learned most was that the number of people who were immigrants THERE became a part of the society in which they lived, not a subdivision determined to change the hearts of their hosts, or to overturn existing mores. Here in the US we are becoming multicultural soup-not a melting pot. We have over P.C.'d ouselves to the pont where we are so freakin bland! I enjoy my heritage and all the wonderful generational history that goes with it. But I am an American, not a hyphenated ethnicity- an American.
Report abuse
allentown | Feb 10, 2011, 11:43 AM EST
The American education systems use to require that those seeking an academic diploma take a foreign language in high school in order to graduate. Unfortunately, America is isolated from other countries by up to 3000-6000 miles of water. So, the opportunity to use a second language is limited after one graduates.
When I was in Europe, I passed through three foreign countries on a weekend by car, each country spoke a different language. At one time, up to 80% of Germans left Germany to go on vacation in another country.
When a friend of mine was chosen by a major German company to work at the home office for one year to learn the way they do things, he thought this would be a great time to practice his German. Unfortunately, everyone he worked with for that year wanted to practice their English.
The Islamic Jidhadist who attacked us on 9/11, all spoke English and lived most of their time in Germany where mosts Germans speak more than one language. So, how does Multiculturalism work again?
Report abuse
mmccreedy | Feb 10, 2011, 11:41 AM EST
"Multiculturalism" as it is defined today, is a recent trend, going back about 25 years or so. It creates division and suspicion between people, and should be outlawed. This policy creates "victim classes", and if you want to see the detrimental effects of this trend, look no further than the Fort Hood shootings. I support Rep. King's hearings, and those who oppose him holding them are scared that the truth will expose them for the scam artists that they are.
Report abuse
PhlutiePhan | Feb 10, 2011, 11:35 AM EST
There is no doubt of the Communist connections to the provisional IRA. Fundamental Islam is a parallel. Both are world wide movements. Both are probably linked. America has just been brought into the European "facts of life" by allowing unlimited Islamic immigration. "Fellow trvelers" came in with the sincere.
Report abuse
eiriamach | Feb 10, 2011, 10:33 AM EST
ColKelley does not speak for all Americans. I hope he does not speak for many. Some Americans think that they do not need to learn any language other than English because they think they can travel anywhere in the world and everyone will speak "global" English to them. They think they do not need to understand anyone else's culture and so there's no reason to learn foreign languages. Unlike the US, most other nations are bilingual (Ireland, for example) or multilingual (many African nations). US science and technology suffer because few Americans can read the work of scientists when they publish in German or in Asian languages. We all suffer from the insularity of not being able to talk with those who are different culturally from us. This attitude of "English only" can lead to some narrow-minded politics and some real dangers. If US law enforcement did not have the cooperation of bilingual Muslims here, they would have an impossible task of tracking the activities of suspected terrorists. Multiculturalism is difficult but worth the effort.
Report abuse
colkelley | Feb 10, 2011, 09:11 AM EST
Here is the point - Americans will accept foreigners who wish to come here to share the American dream and themselves become Americans. What We do not like is foreigners who want to come here - legally or illegally - to remain foreigners living in foreign communities speaking a foreign language in America. By definition an immigrant is someone who becomes a functioning citizen in a country other than that or their origin. My mother's MacQuillin ancestors arrived in Virginia in 1632 - may father's Kelley ancestors arrived in 1690...yet we still have distinctly Irish habits and traits in my family. One does not have to abandon any sense of identity to become an American, one only has to share that and become part of a greater whole.
Report abuse
Page 1 of 1 pages
13 Comments
Report abuse