Religion and politics go perfectly together, but is the church closing their doors to possible parishioners?
Posted on Thursday, October 04, 2012 at 09:23 AM
RSS 
Recent Posts
- Remembering Morton Downey, Jr, the father of trash TV
- Father Andrew Greeley’s powerful faith - remembering the larger than life Chicago priest
- Ireland’s rotten Apple scheme - two-bit operation need to pay their dues to maintain “civilized society”
- Sleazy secrets and the American Dream of Dublin born spy Kevin Richard Halligen
- 'The Great Gatsby' author F Scott Fitzgerald’s death and burial another Catholic lesson
Archives
![]() |
| Archbishop John J. Myers (AP Photo/Mel Evans) |
Moran, however, now declares himself “a spiritual refugee,” who has “fled a million miles from the church.”
He, of course, is not the only one.
“One in three American adults was raised in a Catholic family, but fewer than one in four identify as Catholic today. No other church has shed so many followers, according to surveys by the Pew Charitable Trusts,” Moran writes.
This bit of soul-searching was prompted by a controversial letter written by Archbishop John J. Myers, the spiritual leader of the Newark Archdiocese.
Myers lengthy pastoral letter on marriage and family encouraged Catholics to vote a certain way in the upcoming presidential election.
“Catholic citizens must exercise their right to be heard in the public square by defending marriage,” Myers writes.
In short, Myers is placing gay marriage, as well as abortion, at the center of the 2012 election. He adds that Catholics who don’t share his views should probably not receive Holy Communion.
Moran and many like him are wondering why such a prominent religious figure would release such a highly-charged document on the eve of the closely-watched presidential debates, and just a month before this hard-fought election, in which religious values have played a central, often contentious, role.
It’s easy to say religion and politics don’t mix, and that Myers shouldn’t go about endorsing candidates, even though Myers never technically mentioned that Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan (who is Catholic) are members of a political party whose views match the Catholic Church’s. Democrats Barack Obama and Joe Biden (also Catholic) support abortion and gay marriage.
Trouble is, religion and politics have always mixed, like it or not.
“Dagger” John Hughes, the Irish immigrant who more or less built the New York Archdiocese, openly supported political candidates who joined him in his fight to rid New York’s schools of their deeply Protestant influences.
John Drina of Massachusetts was a Catholic priest who joined the anti-war movement and actually won a seat in congress in 1970. He was followed a few years later by Robert John Cornell of Wisconsin, a priest who served in Congress until 1978.
So, if you don’t like mixing religion and politics, that is your right, but it’s been happening for about as long as people have been mixing scotch and soda.
Perhaps the real interesting place to get some thoughts on the archbishop’s priorities is St. Anne’s school in Jersey City. Or Queen of Angels in Newark itself.
Those are two of eight schools in the Newark Archdiocese that were slated for closure in an announcement earlier this year. Yes, Catholic school closures are generally about budgets and finances.
But across the country, budgets and finances are in bad shape because so many Catholics are indeed
voting. But not at the ballot box.
Catholics, instead, are voting with their feet, by attending church fewer and fewer times. They are voting with their pocketbook, simply unable to pay the high cost of (an admittedly very fine)
Catholic education.
Are people fleeing the church solely because of abortion and gay rights? No, but most polls show the vast majority of American Catholics disagree with their leaders on these issues.
And while it is easy to say an institution such as the Catholic Church has little use for polls, it’s going way too far to suggest that the church is some timeless institution that never changes or responds to the political tone of the day.
Myers, for example, is a member of the Ad Hoc Committee on Sexual Abuse of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, a body which would probably not exist but for pressure created by victims.
Ultimately, it is perplexing why so many church leaders choose to make abortion and gay marriage the most pressing issue of the day, going so far as to suggest support for these issues precludes Catholics from participating in the sacraments.
Is this an institution that really wants to be closing its doors to anyone at this point?
Doing so may go over well with some on Election Day. But it only creates more and more spiritual refugees.
(Contact “Sidewalks” at tdeignan.blogspot.com or tomdeignan@earthlink.net)
4 Comments
See all comments
eiriamach | Oct 04, 2012, 06:47 PM EDT
2nd try: Christianity is a common work of Christians, WoundedKnee, and the alienation and anguish caused by misogynist bishops is everyone's concern. Have you no better imagination than rushing to censor and drive away anyone who utters a critical word? There are plenty of attempts, with the Vatican's assistance, to bar girls from serving Mass. The Vatican has excluded female altar servers in the Extraordinary form of the Mass, and some parishes are applying this exclusion to all Masses. Fr. Lankeit barred girls from the Cathedral altar in Phoenix, for example. See also reports on the fracas in Madison, Wis. caused by Bishop Morlino's support for the SJCP priests, who prohibit girls from serving. SSPX still practices Pius X's prohibition of females in church choirs, as well as at altar. Of course women will protest--all women, of any faith or none--we're not to be silenced by cyberbullies like you!
Report abuse
WoundedKnee | Oct 04, 2012, 04:49 PM EDT
Wake up, eiriamach. There are countless girls serving Mass. Of course you wouldn't know--you're some kind of a Protestant fundamentalist. How about you mind your business and we Catholics will mind ours?
Report abuse
eiriamach | Oct 04, 2012, 01:55 PM EDT
Moran says in the Star-Ledger that "it started when one of my six sisters, at age 10, wrote the Vatican a letter asking why she couldn’t be an altar girl. She never heard back. But the dinner discussions on that planted seeds of revolt in all of us." "Revolt" or grace? I see the workings of grace in Catholics walking away and leaving their 'how to vote' booklets behind in the pews. Paul Tillich described the search for grace, "which is able to overcome the tragic separation of the sexes, of the generations, of the nations, of the races, and even the utter strangeness between man and nature. Sometimes grace appears in all these separations to reunite us with those to whom we belong. For life belongs to life." The choice between separation and union--of gays, feminists, and others--is a choice between sin and grace. In leaving a group that excludes, Christians find the grace of reunion beyond the "tragic separation" that happens when one group rejects another, separates itself, imagines itself a "holy remnant," and retreats into inherited divisiveness like Myers'.
Report abuse
4 Comments

Report abuse