Sidewalks by Tom Deignan


Deignan Blog
Sidewalks by Tom Deignan

Liberal attack on Mitt Romney is wrong - Larry O'Donnell attacks the Mormon faith

Posted on Wednesday, May 09, 2012 at 09:35 AM

RSS


Recent Posts

Archives

submit to reddit

Lawrence O’Donnell

Liberals love to say that right wingers hijack religion and exploit it for political purposes. Maybe.  But liberals also made it very easy to do so.

For a group of people who – rightly – like to take credit for defending people’s rights, liberals still have a blind spot when it comes to religion in general and Christians in particular.  This is particularly troubling because the liberal Christian tradition in America is so strong.

The latest lefty to fall into this trap is Irish American MSNBC talk show host Lawrence O’Donnell.

Last month, O’Donnell, who once worked as a close aide to sainted Irish American Democrat Daniel Patrick Moynihan, was doing what liberal talk show hosts always do -- bashing Mitt Romney.

Nothing wrong with that.  In fact, Romney’s charge that Barack Obama is trying to “establish a religion in America known as secularism” is desperately in need of correction.

But what did O’Donnell do?  Instead of taking Romney to task for wildly exaggerating Obama’s dedication to an anti-religious agenda, O’Donnell went after the Mormon faith.

“Religiously, Mitt Romney lives in the glass house of American politics,” he said.

O’Donnell then added, “Mormonism was created by a guy in upstate New York in 1830 when he got caught having sex with the maid and explained to his wife that God told him to do it. Forty-eight wives later, Joseph Smith’s lifestyle was completely sanctified in the religion he invented to go with it, which Mitt Romney says he believes.”

First of all, as O’Donnell later admitted in an apology, this is inaccurate.  Most scholars believe Smith had his religious awakening prior to the scandal involving the maid.

But that is far from the most important point here.  Irish Catholics, in particular, should be quite wary of pointing out the peculiarities in a given religion as proof that a candidate is somehow unfit for office.

After all, O’Donnell used to work with Moynihan, who was not only a senator but a first-rate scholar of the kind of bigotry Irish Catholics faced as they climbed the social ladder in America.  More than that, Moynihan worked for the first Catholic president!

Lord knows, back in 1960 many people said things like this, “John F. Kennedy believes in a religion led by a guy who wears a funny hat, who never gets married, and claims to be infallible.  They also decided that it’s OK to eat meat on Thursdays and Saturdays, but not Fridays.  They also put ashes on their foreheads once a year.”

Every religion is open to criticism such as this. Which is why O’Donnell should not have attacked Romney the Mormon.

Instead, he should have attacked Romney the Republican.  Or Romney, the exploiter of religious fear, which is what the Republican candidate was doing by implying that Obama -- who many

Republicans still believe is a Muslim -- holds anti-religious views.

Yes, it is true that O’Donnell ultimately apologized, but it really never should have come to that.  There have been countless times where people on the left side of the political spectrum, who show respect and stand up for the rights of Jews and Muslims and atheists, nevertheless bungle the matter when it comes to Christians of varying stripes.

The reasons are obvious.  Liberals tend to view conservative Catholics and Protestants as part of the power structure.

And, since they are in favor of taking on the power structure, liberals generally believe they are acting
bravely when they tackle issues cherished by religious conservatives.

But there are some problems here.  First of all, in the case of Romney, he is, by every definition, a member of a religious minority.

To slam aspects of his faith, but then give others a free pass -- like, say, all those Democrats who call themselves Catholic but support abortion and the death penalty -- is unfair.

More importantly, liberals and their inability to debate religion well have created a truly bizarre scenario -- Christians who feel persecuted in the United States!

Yes, we have this state of affairs partly because right wingers are so savvy at exploiting this.

But they’d have nothing to exploit if O’Donnell and his colleagues didn’t consistently make such blunders.

If attacking Romney the Mormon is the Democratic plan for success in November, it’s going to be a long campaign.

(Contact “Sidewalks” at tomdeignan@earthlink.net or facebook.com/tomdeignan.)


44 comments

Next Previous Page 2 of 3 pages
Liberals can do what ever they want -look at their Pres.candidate John (I think I'll cheat on my cancerous wife)Edwards!
I have no problem attacking Romney for being Mormon, considering what the Mormon "church" has actually done -- paid to pass prop H8 using lies and fear and two-faced sanctimony; baptized people into the Mormon faith after they're dead, even if they specifically said they do not want to be, and even if they're devoutly another religion (Ann Frank, for example!!!); excommunicated people for not following their secret masters's dictates when it comes to political and personal beliefs...the list is endless. I'd have no problem attacking Rick Santorum for being Catholic, because he wanted to force the whole country to follow his religion's dictates. And don't get me started on Newt Gingrich's supposed christian conversion. America is supposed to be a secular nation, not one based on one interpretation of god. But the right wing is turning christianity into the modern version of communism, and so far as I'm concerned, anyone who uses their religion to get votes or to justify passing laws that restrict the rights of Americans deserves to be condemned for it.
hollaback makes an important point about conservatives throwing the mantle of religion over their homophobic (and misogynist) politics. "For example if they can create a consensus that it's somehow off-limits to criticize teaching that gay people are subhuman as long as you wrap it up in religion, that gives them a huge political advantage." They do not even need to go that far. Conservatives are now claiming that their "freedom of religion" as Christian fundamentalists gives them the right to write discrimination into law. This tactic is a betrayal of Christianity and an abuse of the US Constitution. We should not give it a polite, PC, treatment. Religion is a fair target when a candidate bases policy on literal bible reading or papal teaching or some weird idea of God's will. Isn't it relevant to object to a practicing Christian Scientist becoming US Surgeon General? Then we can and should question the right's invoking religion to exempt any policy from criticism.
according to most posters here the only religion qualified for the presidency would be atheist. All presidents, senators and house members have been part of a religious group including Mormons(Harry Reid). Their religous leanings can and will shape their judgement, as long as no law forces a person to belong to a religion then it is up to the people to decide their worthiness of election..
Romney will never bring religion into debate as the consequences would politically destroy him. His mantra of keeping quiet about religion reminds me of John Cleese "shh- don't talk about the war"
You may feel differently about Mormonism and the distinction between Church and State when they baptize your grandparents and re-write your state laws Mr Deignan.
Most have no idea of what separation of church and state means, you'll be surprised by the answers.
do you fear they will take over the banks, the car industry, the insurance industry, and ultimately the health care system? I am with you in my fear of big government takeovers, much better to really on the people working for their own self interests. (And So It Begins) the bashing and tearing down of what will be one of the dirtiest campaigns in history. A cornered animal is the most dangerous.
Bill Maher did a pretty good job of bashing Mormonism last week and has done so in the past. Yes, Mormonism is a whacko religion, but to Romney's credit, and unlike Santorum, he rarely brings religion into the debate or his stump speaches...maybe for good reason. What I fear more than their (Mormons) theology, is the church's insatiable desire to own and control businesses...you know, free enterprise. Along with separation of church and state, there should also be...separation of church and business ownership.
is reverend wright a mormon? Certainly not a muslim. But is Obama's spiritual leader. Romney is not the closest to possibly being president that is a mormon, that would be Senate majority leader Harry Reid.
Britfether, great post. FastEddy, no mormon has been elected President.Romney is the closest one has ever gotten. His daddy dropped out after claiming he had been brainwashed by LBJ.
I see. It's ok to bash Catholics 24/7, but God forbid someone should go after the Mormon cult. What dead people will they baptise this week. How many wives does it say I can have in the Book of Mormon? I think these Mormons are nuts and anyone who has had to live under their whackjob rule would agree.
I'll tell you what. Go and read the Book of Morman and what they believe. Then come back and tell me that they aren't from another planet altogether. I don't care if it's politically correct or not, liberals have every right to be sceptical of any belief that allows someon like Romney to take offense at something like same sex marriage and then turn around and side with his relatives and associates who have more than one wife. If having more than one wife is a conservative value, then that is a new one on me. If he condemns gays, then let him also condemn those in his own religion who practice marriage outside of the law. That is why he is much more a hypocrite than he is a politician and anyone who can't tell is blind. This guy has more sides to him than theinside folds of an accordian. but if he sticks to his religious beliefs in the Book of Morman, then what he believes in makes the gays and lesbians look like a bunch of angels.
This hurts, but I will have to agree with you. A man's religion is off-base (including the President's for all of you down there who call him a Muslim without a shred of evidence). Just listen to Romney and you'll find plenty to legitimately criticize (Did he really save the auto industry?)
Is fear saor-intinneach mise, ach i mo bharuil fein, ni chreidim go bhfuil se riachtanach an rud e sin a bheith magadh faoin gcreideamh daoine eile. Mormannach no duine ar bith eile. I am a liberal-minded man, but in my own opinion (and just speaking for myself and no-one else)I do not believe it necessary to be mocking the faith of other people. Mormon or anyone else.
Next Previous Page 2 of 3 pages




Log into IrishCentral with your Facebook account


or sign-in directly

E-Mail:
Password:
 Remember me Forgot my password
Not a member? Register Now!
print this article Print
email this articleE-mail