Periscope


New York Times' Paul Krugman blames Irish bank regulators for financial crisis

Posted on Monday, March 08, 2010 at 05:55 AM

RSS


Recent Posts

Archives

submit to reddit

Paul Krugman,Nobel Prize winning economist and New York Times columnist. has laid the failure of the Irish economy in the past two years squarely at the feet of those whose job it was to regulate and oversee banks.

Krugman's Monday columnn is given over to an examination of the two crises in the U.S. and Ireland which he says were similar in impact but very different in how they came about.

In Ireland he says there were no exotic financial instruments such as derivatives which caused such grief over here.

He writes "As a new research paper by the Irish economists Gregory Connor, Thomas Flavin and Brian O’Kelly points out, “Almost all the apparent causal factors of the U.S. crisis are missing in the Irish case,” and vice versa. Yet the shape of Ireland’s crisis was very similar: a huge real estate bubble — prices rose more in Dublin than in Los Angeles or Miami — followed by a severe banking bust that was contained only via an expensive bailout."

But Ireland he points out had "none of the American right’s favorite villains: there was no Community Reinvestment Act, no Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac."

Part of the reason he says is that key players in Ireland had no reason to fear failure as they knew regulators were on their side and they would be bailed out if all went wrong.

"Rogue-bank heads retired with their large fortunes intact.” There was a lot of this in the United States, top executives at failed U.S. financial companies received billions in “performance related” pay before their firms went belly-up.

But Krugman says the key reason why the economy has tanked in Ireland was “regulatory imprudence”: the people charged with keeping banks safe didn’t do their jobs.

"In Ireland, regulators looked the other way in part because the country was trying to attract foreign business, in part because of cronyism: bankers and property developers had close ties to the ruling party."

Krugman says the lesson from the Irish crisis is that "letting bankers do what they want is a recipe for disaster."

"That’s why we need an independent agency protecting financial consumers," he concludes.




7 Comments

See all comments

Krugman is 100% correct
All too mant people pay all too much to the rantings of Mr Krugman.
Krugman has the Irish situation spot on and we as citizens of Ireland are absolutely powerless to do anything about it as those in political power are holding on to power for dear life, using every legal loophole and the trappings of power to fend off every challenge. The people responsible for the mess are still in power and they do not even acknowlege their part in the financial crisis.
I don't believe the regulators 'looked the other way' as Krugman writes. I think they were (and still are) unsure how to manage a banking system while we're using a currency with interest & exchange rates that are totally unsuited to our economy.
What he says is true. Our Government at the moment are running scared and afraid to lose power because there is another big scandal just around the corner for them and if they lose power it will all come out.
Dr. Krugman is disingenuous. Journalists, and especially a sharp economist like Krugman, should have alerted us to ENRON and AIG. Instead they were ballyhooing financial genius. Krugman was too busy hobnobbing with the ENRON board to pick up on their problems. When he should have been paying attention to economic quackery at AIG and Goldman Sachs, he was writing unsophisticated political rants about why Bush was a bum. Talk about changing the subject.
GREED, TOP DOWN (PREMEDITATED) AND TO THE BOTTOM (IGNORANT)
 




Log into IrishCentral with your Facebook account


or sign-in directly

E-Mail:
Password:
 Remember me Forgot my password
Not a member? Register Now!
print this article Print
email this articleE-mail