Did Irish leader Daniel O’Connell help make the Famine happen? -- “Graves are Walking” book tells powerful Irish Famine truths
By: Niall O'Dowd | Published Friday, September 14, 2012, 10:02 AM | Updated Friday, September 14, 2012, 10:02 AM
 |
| Famine memorial in Dublin |
“Striding nearer every day
Like a wolf in search of prey
Comes the famine on his way”
That poem in “The Nation,” the journal of the Young Irelanders, who were the Irish republicans of 1846 summarizes what was occurring as Ireland headed full tilt for the
Famine and disaster.
In his new book “The Graves are Walking” John Kelly gives an extraordinary insider account of the events that led to the Famine and the machinations on high and the suffering of the peasants below.
It is still an insane thought that the most successful country in the world at the time allowed millions to starve in Ireland, its’ closest colonial neighbor.
Imagine the US, the land of plenty, allowing millions of Hawaiians to starve in a
Famine there and you get some sense of the absurdity.
This book reveals insights which have rarely been glimpsed and it does not shun controversy.
The role of
Daniel O’Connell as liberator of the
Catholic masses is well documented.
But also documented here is
O’Connell’s disastrous decision to throw in his lot with Whig leader Lord John Russell who became Prime Minister in July 1846 at the beginning of the worst period of the Famine.
O’Connell did so to help gain the repeal of the Act of Union between Britain and Ireland, which was at the source of so many of Ireland’s problems.
But in the process he backed a man who had become a fully-fledged free trader who insisted that market prices must be received and no government intervention made – even when the result was millions of Irish starving because they could not afford to buy the imported corn.
Russell’s predecessor, the Tory leader Sir Robert Peel, as Kelly points out, had adopted a far more humane policy and had been widely praised for ordering and freeing up imported corn for starving Irish the previous year when the worst of the Famine was blunted.
Kelly has made a profound point about
O’Connell that it was the biggest mistake of his life as Russell paid no heed to repeal and the Irish starved by the millions.
The book is scathing about the various British viceroys who came over to Ireland during that period, but kind to the many incredible charities, such as the Quakers and many American organizations as well who did their best to alleviate the suffering.
There is a hilarious chapter on Monsieur Alexis Soyer, a French chef who had proclaimed he had the perfect ingredients for a gourmet soup to save the starving Irish and was much praised in The Times of London and elsewhere.
He even demonstrated this for hundreds of aristocrats in Dublin watched by a “large and brilliant assemblage” and no doubt by the starving peasants as well. Even Monty Python could not have done such a scenario justice.
M.Soyer, gourmet soup and all were soon dispatched back to Britain and obscurity.
The fate of the Famine ships is also discussed in great detail, as is the sense of impending doom in cities such as Montréal as the famine increased and the Irish boats kept coming, discharging their wretched cargo.
The scenes at Grosse Ile, the quarantine Island as depicted by Kelly would bring tears from a stone, while the unlikely rise of the Irish in New York from Famine masses to political power is also documented.
A great read if you’re Irish and even if you’re not. "The Graves Are Walking" is already deservedly a best seller in Ireland.
44 Comments
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Switch to the desktop site to post a comment.Seanmor | Dec 02, 2012, 07:21 PM EST
ancarver: Your comment of 14 Sept, 1110 hrs, reminds me of an item I once read about O'Connell and Thomas Davis regarding teanga na nGael. Dasis, a Protestant patriot of Welsh descent who bemoaned the declime of the language, made his feeling known to the "Liberator". In response, O'Connell acknowledged Davis' concern in a condescending, rediculing manner. However, Daniel O'Connell deserves credit for his campaign to repeal the Act of Union and restore self-government to the whole Irish nation.
Searlit | Sep 18, 2012, 12:37 AM EDT
@Pittsburghkid, that's quite a good analogy.
ancavker | Sep 17, 2012, 03:53 PM EDT
sirpeter: Do not paint all Irish-Americans with the same brush (apart from whether O Dowd is right or wrong) Any how on a lighter note. A friend of mine here in the U.S. who is Irish born (came here in the late 1980's), just came home from a trip back, and was shocked that someone over there told her she too is now a Plastic Paddy as she has lived in the U.S. too long!!!
IrelandNorth | Sep 17, 2012, 08:55 AM EDT
O Connell's undoing was when he called off one of his highly successul "monster meetings" (ie mass rallies) for a repeal of that constitutional sleigh-of-hand, Act of Union, 1800/'01. Daniel finally bumped up against the reality that democratically-challenged English imperialism will always threaten military action, even against cuddly constitutionalists like Dan "da man" O' Connell. And then will criminalise physical force when it raises its inevitable head.
MichaelSavage | Sep 17, 2012, 06:46 AM EDT
"It is still an insane thought that the most successful country in the world at the time allowed millions to starve in Ireland, its’ closest colonial neighbor." It is not an insane thought once one properly understands the prevailing depopulation policy of the establishment in control of the British Empire. A famine in one of the most fertile most fishery rich countries in the world? Our best produce was robbed from us at gunpoint and shipped to the mainland UK. It was Genocide by Starvation and can be called nothing less.
seanomelb | Sep 16, 2012, 08:12 PM EDT
Should read "the life of Thomas Mitchell" by Sillard 1889.
dukmarshal@aol.com | Sep 16, 2012, 07:31 PM EDT
If it is to be finger pointing then point at; 1) the English press 2) the English government 3) the English lords 4) most of the landlords, both absent and present.
dukmarshal@aol.com | Sep 16, 2012, 07:16 PM EDT
Though I have not read this book, currently reading Paddy's Lament", I cannot fathom the idea of someone pointing a finger at Daniel O'Connell and blaming him for an Gorta Mor. When he threw in with Russell he was trying to repeal the act of union. He had already gotten nowhere with Peel's party.
WoundedKnee | Sep 16, 2012, 05:06 PM EDT
There's a poignant parallel between Ireland during the Great "Famine" and Ireland today. During the "Famine" Irish food was produced in abundance--corn, wheat, vegetables, beef. It was sent out of the country. Into the country came "food" that was alien to the Irish and had no tradition there--maize or American-style corn. Today, something similar happens. Young Irish men and women, the flower of Ireland, stream thru the Departures area in Dublin Airport. At the same time, aliens with no connection with Ireland are flooding in. The Irish of 1847 couldn't digest maize/corn, and today's Irish are getting sick on Mass Immigration.
Galeforce | Sep 16, 2012, 03:01 PM EDT
Let me tel ya. This is all true in this book and because of travellers like paddy, that mix ad spend time with settle people, country people We are all starting to understand each other more.. Long may it continue, long live the travelling people.
Pittsburghkid | Sep 16, 2012, 02:24 PM EDT
Ireland's problems never change. Irish Kings invited the English to Ireland, who brought settlers to displace the Irish. Today the Irish are inviting the EU, who are bring settlers to displace the Irish. Ireland should look to the Swizz for a role model.
patsav | Sep 16, 2012, 05:43 AM EDT
The last I knew, Hawaii was in the United States and not its closest neighbor.
Lokelani | Sep 15, 2012, 11:58 PM EDT
Sirpeter: I don't think it is fair for you to put down Irish American's. "There but for the Grace of God" go you. No reason to be so boastful & proud; you had nothing to do with where you were born; you could have been born in England & there's nothing you could do about it & you'd be singing a different tune then. I happen to be one of those Irish American's you are talking trash about and I happen to love both America, where I was born & also Ireland, where my ancestors originated from. Check yourself. Rose O'Connor
seanomelb | Sep 15, 2012, 10:41 PM EDT
Why do you keep referring to it as a "FAMINE" Niall? are you out of touch with the reality of what actually happened. You are correct in saying that peel had a more humane attitude than his opposite number and yet O'Connell slated Peel and would not support his Irish relief programme's(The Life of Mitchell by Sillard 1989).
curtisjohnson | Sep 15, 2012, 10:24 PM EDT
Anything that deflects blame from the british terror state (with a history of worldwide manufactured famines, the other notable example being in India) is automatically considered scholarship. I doubt he mentions the fact that the terror state continued to steal what little funds the Irish people had in the form of forced tithes to the Anglican "Church."
lcobryan | Sep 15, 2012, 06:26 PM EDT
Are the Irish under attack now? The IMF and this ridiculous premise for a book? The famine was our fault? We couldn't afford the imported corn. But why did we need the corn? Yes, the blight destroyed the potato crop but that was the only crop. The british landowners stole all the other food we produced along with our livestock to pay their rents and feed the english. Why are we even talking about corn? Why doesn't he talk about rent abatement?
jacersagain | Sep 15, 2012, 05:50 PM EDT
Sorry Niall @ 11.23am today, your sales pitch for a book that alleges some blame lies with Daniel O’Connell for An Gorta Mór is out of order. The notions in the book, as described by you above are just too much for any decent Irish person having high regard for The Great Liberator, ones which would appear to present a revisionist history of events of early 19th century, are reviling. How anyone, even John Kelly, can think they can give an insider account of events of 160 years ago is derisible. Given the reaction of most of the posters below, you have in fact discouraged people from buying the book. I’m reading an excellent new book ‘Dublin 1916’ by Claire Wills which is fascinating because it not only gives first-hand accounts of what happened in the GPO and in Dublin during the Rising but also gives reactions of the media, poets and prose writers of the time. Now there’s a good read.
odubslaine | Sep 15, 2012, 04:57 PM EDT
"I don't think there's any point in being Irish if you don't know that the world is going to break your heart eventually..." Daniel Patrick Moynihan
Searlit | Sep 15, 2012, 02:58 PM EDT
Didn't they Have Daniel O'Connell in jail near the end of his life? I don't know if I could stomach a read that blames the genocide on The Great Liberator! He was the only one able to take the yoke off the neck of the Irish, by defeating the last legacy of the penal laws. I don't think it's a useful way to promote a book. Sorry, Niall.
mlchellus | Sep 15, 2012, 11:26 AM EDT
Toilet paper. The Irish died because they didnt have a potato or open their mouths to feed on the soup - RUBBISH. Revisionist history is only done to sell books. It was ethnic cleaning - same as England tried to do in India. JOHN KELLY & O'DOWD - Read some history books, apologize to the O'Connell family and grow an Irish soul.
Niall O'Dowd | Sep 15, 2012, 11:23 AM EDT
folks it would help some of you if you bought the book rather than comment on what you have not read. It is a valuable insight into the Famine , incredibly well researched and thought through
mamaginnty | Sep 15, 2012, 10:46 AM EDT
O'Dowd trying to sell a book of fiction. All people have to do is read the Penal Laws that the irish had to live under. Yes they went hungry when blight hit the potato crops, but that turned out to be a great cover-up to the genocide that followed then. O'Connell died well before the true horror began.
cillowen | Sep 15, 2012, 10:11 AM EDT
banned for
cillowen | Sep 15, 2012, 10:10 AM EDT
the concern over katie exposed boobies is most displeasing to nigh all patriots unlike the blasphemous video that gets them creaming.
cillowen | Sep 15, 2012, 10:10 AM EDT
Tooth fairy - John Mitchel viewed him as a soft lad who was so into believing the goodness of the occupier. Living to experience their gravitas it was then curtains for him - getting him outta town.
modochartaigh | Sep 15, 2012, 12:11 AM EDT
oTuachair | Sep 14, 2012, 04:22 PM EDT The Whigs believed in a libertarian "freedom," the same as Paul Ryan. This would include local rule and no interference by government to aid the poor or suffering. The Whigs represented the newly powerful business ownership classes. Peal and his party represented the old gentry (many of whom were also business owners), who had some sense of obligation to the less fortunate. Of course not all members of either class supported the party that represented their overall culture or ideology. In contrast a while later you had Proudhon in France begin to articlulate a philosophy that "Worker ownership of the means of production is Freedom" and that capitalist or government ownership of the means of production is theft. This philosophy is roughly put into practice by the worker owned coop movement in the US and elsewhere and most interestingly in the large Mondragon businesses in the Basque region of Spain (they are doing well in this Spanish recession). I'm going to have to report your post for abuse. Americans can't handle the truth and it is an abuse of free speech to tell the truth. (throwing pearls before swine)
sirpeter | Sep 14, 2012, 10:26 PM EDT
Is there anything sacred..Another attack on the character of another Irishman whose only wish was to free his people from political injustice and the repeal of a union with a savage British system.Daniel O’Connell was dead in 1947.He must have thrown in his lot with Russell on his death bed. Oh! says IC but we are only the messenger.A lot of people died of starvation.Lets see what Irishman we can half blame for that.Niall your articles are depressing.Well we have sunshine at the moment so it's a different country now stupid.No!! It's not different stupid. It's the same country and I love it rain or shine.Been on this site for a year I'm glad I'm not Irish American.Ye are a disgrace!! Ye act like Americans.
Tom Mo | Sep 14, 2012, 10:13 PM EDT
We are not being helped by dwelling on the past. Why dwell on the mistakes? John Kelly is just trying to sell a book to the Irish who read the New York Times. The same liberals who just adored that Limerick whore Mc Court, with his "Angela's Ashes" scutter.
kubs | Sep 14, 2012, 09:36 PM EDT
Oh, so he must have seen the Famine coming but just ignored it for political favors, is that it? Let's let England off completely, why don't we. " Irish are to blame for their own plight" Wasn't that a Crown mantra thru the ages as they took the best land, the best crops, & forbade the best of old Irish culture . I have no great love for D.O'C. but let's remember that your (non-British) history books have documented evidence of the landed gentry moving thousands of wagons of foodstuff out of Ireland for sale in England, past the starving Irish on the roadsides. But, what the hell, let's put the blame on someone with an O' in his name. It sells books & salves the conscience.
Woodman | Sep 14, 2012, 08:53 PM EDT
Daniel O'Connell was the worst Irish sellout ever. He opposed armed struggle and got all worked up about slavery in the USA, while is own people starved to death and were much worse off than any so called slave in the USA. The worthless pig spent most of his time in London.
jacersagain | Sep 14, 2012, 08:38 PM EDT
This is a baaaad article by Niall, pushing sales of a book by some author blaming Daniel O’Connell for the tragedy of An Gorta Mór. Every Irish-American, every Irish-UK, every Irish-Oz or whatever Irish-other country and every original Irish person with the surname O’Connell had better duck mentioning their surname in future, if this rubbish by Niall is to be believed. Duck this!!!
seanomelb | Sep 14, 2012, 08:00 PM EDT
"The British press sought to inculcate that the temperament and disposition of the Irish people peculiarly fitted them for some remote country in the east,or in the west,- in fact for any country but their own;- that it was some mistake their being born in Ireland. As a matter of course the "Times" was the first to find out this singular freak! said the paper (February 22nd,1847) "Remove Irishmen to the Ganges or the Indus- and they would be far more in their element there than in the country to which an inexorable fate had confined them" The times also reported on the fate of the Irish due to the famine "we can now do to the Irish as we please" DUFFY'S HISTORY OF IRELAND SECOND EDITION 1901 on the life of John Mitchell. BTW Niall please refrain from calling it a "FAMINE"
annemcq | Sep 14, 2012, 05:28 PM EDT
The history of the famine and the Young Irelanders both in Ireland, Australia and the U.S. is "intensely researched and passionately narrated" by Thomas Keneally in The Great Shame and the Triumph of the Irish in the English-Speaking World: Anchor Books, September 2000. A great read!
oTuachair | Sep 14, 2012, 04:55 PM EDT
Giving the legacies of historical figures a shot in the arm is not uncommon, but I think if O'Connell were truly responsible for the famine, there probably wouldn't be a large statue of him in the middle of Dublin, nor an O'Connell street in every city...
oTuachair | Sep 14, 2012, 04:22 PM EDT
The Whigs believed in a libertarian "freedom," the same as Paul Ryan. This would include local rule and no interference by government to aid the poor or suffering. The Whigs represented the newly powerful business ownership classes. Peal and his party represented the old gentry (many of whom were also business owners), who had some sense of obligation to the less fortunate. Of course not all members of either class supported the party that represented their overall culture or ideology. In contrast a while later you had Proudhon in France begin to articlulate a philosophy that "Worker ownership of the means of production is Freedom" and that capitalist or government ownership of the means of production is theft. This philosophy is roughly put into practice by the worker owned coop movement in the US and elsewhere and most interestingly in the large Mondragon businesses in the Basque region of Spain (they are doing well in this Spanish recession).
slainte9 | Sep 14, 2012, 04:15 PM EDT
Are we saying here that it was O'Connell, and not Benjamin Disraeli who brought down the Peel government.
lcullen | Sep 14, 2012, 03:45 PM EDT
To pick up from before, Mitchel, before his transportation, was vehemently anti-O'Connell and in favor of a more violent solution to Eire's problems; he gave at least one son to the Confederate cause. O'Connell in 1846, was suffering from "softening of the brain" after being released from prison. His last appearance before Parliament was in 1847 when in the poorest of health, he pled the cause of famine relief for his people. He then went off to die in Rome but only made it as far as Genoa where he died in May'47. It is impossible to imagine how the author's intimation of complicity between O'C and Russell could have any real basis. O'C had no real power in 1846 and was under attack not only by the Brits but by the factions at home, e.g., Young Irelanders, Ribbon Boys, etc. Old Dan hit his zenith in 1828-1830 and was 71 years old in '46. He had given up the Monster Meetings as well. As to his position on the Irish language, it was the spoken tongue of his home and of his core constituency; he did not "despise" it. Rather, O'C saw the English language as the tongue of Irish business with Britain, its largest market. Conjecture is easiest made over the long view of years and I guess the 165 years since O'C's death is enough for this author. Remember also, that to a person, almost all who suffered hunger or immigration were O'c's constituency. -Larry
odubslaine | Sep 14, 2012, 03:34 PM EDT
Many of our Irish-American ancestors were driven from Ireland by some of the ancestors of the so-called Irish living there today - before, during and after the "Great Hunger", so there is plenty of blame to be spread around ...
Portia777 | Sep 14, 2012, 03:04 PM EDT
it was a Genocide - not a famine.There was plenty of food in Eire, but it was taken at gun point by British to feed the industrial cities. Genocide at the hands of the British colonialists had also happened in USA, Canada, Australia- so why would we be treated any differently.? And sure why not, when Pope Adrian 1V gave the lands of Eire and all her people as slaves to the British to keep us under control for the Romans? The Queen of England still answers to the Pope.
lcullen | Sep 14, 2012, 01:39 PM EDT
Revisionist speculation never ceases to amaze! To say that O'Connell had anything to do with the Famine is absurd. 1846 was within one year of O'C's death in 1847 and what became known as the famine was, at that time, more of a crop failure, than a "famine". O'C was 71 in 1846, a mighty age for the time; his leadership was under attack by the Young Ireland movement, one of whose leaders was John Mitchel, a man who later was to publish several journals in the Southern U.S., which were rabidly pro-slavery
WoundedKnee | Sep 14, 2012, 01:12 PM EDT
ancavker: I think you are wrong to say that O'C "despised" Irish. He simply thought it useless and irrelevant in a modernizing Ireland. His Utilitarian attitude is repeated today by countless Irish people I have heard say things like --"What good is Irish if you have to emigrate?".
WoundedKnee | Sep 14, 2012, 01:06 PM EDT
Ireland's colonial relationship with Britain in the 1840s provides many parallels to its relationship with the EU today.
ancavker | Sep 14, 2012, 10:11 AM EDT
O Connell also despised the Irish language. Thought it was backwards and ignorant. Only English can sell the cow he used to say.
like2tweet | Sep 14, 2012, 09:07 AM EDT
must buy this book