Congressman Peter King's strange journey from Irish radical to Muslim inquisitor -- I no longer recognize the politician I have known for 25 years
Posted on Monday, March 07, 2011 at 06:30 PM
RSS 
Recent Posts
- President Obama’s visit to North comes at a critical time for peace process - Hopes that he can help stop slow slide into the dark side
- Boston Irish Immigration Center continues to lie about their role in turning woman in to State Department
- Why no effort to repair damage to Irish Famine memorial in New York nearly one year after? - Car slammed into memorial and ugly plywood and metal barricades still mark the site
- How sports helped defeat the 'No Irish Need Apply' racism in America - Top baseball exec Tim Brosnan tells Irish Sports 50 how Irish served as example
- Sandy scourged Rockaways is on the mend with a little help from community spirit and perseverance
Archives
I've known Peter King longer than I know any other politician in America.
We have dined out together, traveled to Ireland together and been friends for close to a quarter century.
I knew him first as the firebrand comptroller of Nassau County, Long Island, utterly unafraid to speak out on behalf of the Republican movement in Northern Ireland at a time when they were about as popular as Genghis Khan.
It took bravery to do that, and Pete was certainly brave.
Like many Irish Americans, he saw the hypocrisy of the American position, seeing no evil on one side in the North and all on the other.
He was the highest ranking elected official in the U.S. to speak out.
As the peace process began and Sinn Fein came in from the cold Pete, by now a congressman, continued to play a very large role.
Alone among American politicians, he had the ear and confidence of Sinn Fein because of his past association with them. Having a trusted political figure in Washington was very important for them.
They felt they could trust his advice on the American role in the peace process, and that he would not abuse the trust as he was no Johnny Come Lately.
The success of the peace process was a huge boost for King, who was first and was right on the issue of keen concern to millions of Irish Americans.
He had put himself out on a limb, yet refused to back off because what he saw was right.
It had to hurt because of the odium it attracted from "respectable" circles.
There was the time that President Reagan was coming to Long Island and King, an elected official, was essentially branded a terrorist and ordered to come nowhere near him.
Such incidents only enhanced his stature with Irish American activists, however, and it was no surprise when King was elected the grand marshal of the St. Patrick's Day parade in New York City in 1985.
He had the last laugh with the success of the peace process, and he was loyal to those who stood by him.
When President Clinton was threatened by impeachment in 1998 King was one of five House Republicans who refused to vote in favor.
King said it was because of Clinton's stance on the Gerry Adams visa and his support for the peace process.
Something changed for Peter King soon after, and it was undoubtedly 9/11.
He was always an uncomfortable fit as a revolutionary supporter, but 9/11 seemed to trigger some latent streak in him that made him rethink his entire philosophy.
He drifted away from the Irish community, especially over the issue of immigration which is a major concern with so many Irish undocumented.
King opposed every attempt to remedy their situation, despite defending many Irish men over the years that the U.S. government wanted deported.
His stance was difficult to understand, but it has become clear since he has resumed his position as head of the Homeland Security Committee in the House.
He has now become the biggest hardliner in Congress against Muslim Americans and alleges that some have ties to Al Qaeda.
His hearings this week probing Muslim Americans have drawn great controversy.
On Sunday, in Times Square, 500 protesters marched against them.
The New York Times accused him in Tuesday's newspaper of leading a 'show trial' writing ".. he is focusing on one group that appears to have obsessed him since the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, resulting in slanders and misstatements that might have earned him a rebuke from his colleagues had they been about any other group. "
"The Washington Post" among others highlighted King's strange dichotomy between his past support for the political wing of the IRA, and his obsession with Muslims and radicals.
His efforts come at a time when, ironically, there are signs that Muslims are beginning their own journey towards a political enlightenment similar to America in 1776 and France in 1789, and indeed Northern Ireland in the 1990s.
The scenes from Egypt, Tunisia and Libya all show Muslims embracing the concept of democracy that seemed impossible just a few months ago.
That is the greatest threat of all to Al Qaeda -- not a hearing in Washington seeking Muslim radicals under the bed.
Strangely, given Sinn Fein's journey towards their own political awakening, King is uniquely poised to understand that shift in the Arab world.
Alas, he finds himself on the bully pulpit espousing a very different take on Muslim Americans.
It is a very strange situation for a great advocate of democracy in Ireland.
I'm glad to still call him friend, but hope he sees sense one of these days. Demonizing a group of people never works. It only leads to further fear, hate and suspicion.
I think given the reaction to his hearings that King is able to see that clearly now.
88 comments
Realist | Mar 29, 2011, 03:50 PM EDT
maloney: What age are you? 12? Lol....let me get this straight....are you proposing that the descendants of the original English, Scottish, Welsh, and Huguenot settlers from the late 16th and early 17th centuries now pack up their things and "go home"? After over 400 years? I tell you what, if you can persuade the entire non-indigenous population of the United States to leave North America (having been there for a shorter period), maybe the Unionists of Northern Ireland will consider it too. As for running like "b*tches"....don't you mean President James and First Lady Dolly Madison who did just that when the British burned Baltimore, Washington, and the White House in 1812....lol? I suggest you look up the Bladensburg Races in your school history book and have a grown-up read it to you. Therefore I return to my question and for the 3rd time of asking...why do you describe the British/Unionist community of Northern Ireland as "trash"?
Report abuse
maloney | Mar 21, 2011, 11:10 PM EDT
realist...you said it yourself, "british/unionist in Ireland" nuf said. Oh hell, the british have been running rufshod around the world for hundreds of years. They are real terrors when fighting out manned and out gunned peoples. They ran like b*tches twice from America. My family lost lives and land because we didn't have the guns. It's not yours, go home.
Report abuse
Aughavey | Mar 20, 2011, 12:34 PM EDT
9/11 changed his mind and perhaps the advent od the internet exposing Sinn Feins anti American marxist rhetoric used in Ireland whilst courting US dollars on St Pats. The increasing awareness that there was a terrorist network will also have influence , the IRA worked and trained with ETA in Spain, FARC in Columbia, PLO in Palestine, Fidel Castro and Colonel Gadaffi of Libya. Sinn Fein The Workers Party (connected to but not the same as Gerry Adams Sinn Fein party) was involved in the North Korean Super Dollar plot
Report abuse
Realist | Mar 20, 2011, 07:13 AM EDT
maloney: I ask again....why do you describe the British/Unionist community of Northern Ireland as "trash"? What part of the question do you not understand?
Report abuse
maloney | Mar 17, 2011, 10:57 PM EDT
I, for one, never said they were equal. Ireland will be equal when they are gone, realist. Go home, it's not Ireland.
Report abuse
Realist | Mar 17, 2011, 10:36 AM EDT
maloney: Why do you describe the British/Unionist community of Northern Ireland as "trash"? So much for an 'Ireland of equals'. Shame.
Report abuse
maloney | Mar 15, 2011, 02:45 PM EDT
realist..how long the crime has been going on is not justification that it should continue. Kick out the trash whether it's the brits in Ireland or the liberals in America.
Report abuse
hancock | Mar 15, 2011, 10:53 AM EDT
Great congressman.
Report abuse
Realist | Mar 15, 2011, 04:32 AM EDT
That interview was nothing short of embarrassing. King is a poor choice for this role. He is 'poacher-turned-game-keeper'. His IRA terrorist supporting past will be thrown in his face time and time again. I think he knows it too.
Report abuse
Realist | Mar 15, 2011, 04:20 AM EDT
Lol....Sir Ronald, Sir Rudy, Sir Teddy....
Report abuse
sully1167 | Mar 14, 2011, 04:13 AM EDT
GeorgeDillon, Don't forget Ronald Reagan. He kissed The Queens ass and Margaret Thatchers ass.
Report abuse
hancock | Mar 13, 2011, 04:35 AM EDT
As are the English.
Report abuse
Realist | Mar 13, 2011, 03:24 AM EDT
maloney: To quote John Hume, "....Nationalists need to accept that the Unionists have been in Ireland longer than the white man has been in America...." Also, King, as any blind man could see, is little more than a discredited hypocrite.
Report abuse
maloney | Mar 12, 2011, 12:39 AM EST
ulsterboy...That time machine should send Americans back to Ireland at the beginning of the troubles, then there wouldn't be any brits in Ireland. Go get em Mr. King.
Report abuse
- Good Morning America says Sasha and Malia...
- Michelle Obama and daughters trace their...
- Former church spokesman criticised for using...
- President Obama’s visit to North comes at...
- Sinn Fein deputy leader speaks out against...
- Daily Mail unloads on 'drunken young' Paddys...
- Shock as Irish priest praises Prime Minister’s.
- Body of Irish immigrant tossed in medical...
- North’s Minister for Finance accuses Republic...
- Dating website for ‘homosensible’ Catholic...
88 Comments
Report abuse