77 Comments

• devlenboy | Jul 28, 2011, 10:43 AM EDT

  beck; youre like satan,all over the place.how about rev.charles coughlin,or are you anticatholic too! How odd of God to choose the Jews.Bless them all.

• PRGLASS | Jul 28, 2011, 10:18 AM EDT

  What the hell are you talking about? Glenn Beck is as anti semetic as the Queen of England is Muslim. He is broadcasting from Isreal on an upcoming tour, he is a member of C.U.F.I (Christians United For Isreal. He is one of the most outspoken defenders of Isreal in the American media. What kind of Liberal propaganda are you spreading here? Do you know how you know if a Liberal is Lying? He is talking.

• maloney | Feb 03, 2011, 08:06 PM EST

  Finally a voice of reason. Yo Yo RobinO!!

• RobinOCork | Feb 03, 2011, 04:06 PM EST

  ARTICLE WRITER HAS IT WRONG. Beck is in no way anti-Semitic. The numbers tell the story. Beck is anti-Caucasian, anti-male, and an ageist. | ALL the people he names as being "Most Dangerous" are white, male, and over 50. | I've never seen such a clear-cut case of bias in all my life. My logic is inescapable. Beck is clearly in league with Kanye West on this. I bet Beck's list came straight from the from his controllers on the elite Hip-Hop Right. Case closed with a "Harrumph!"

• maloney | Feb 02, 2011, 09:12 PM EST

  Aren't you the kinky sick puppy undertheouthouse. Leather is the only way. Forget it, even you couldn't handle that much pain.

• downinthebasement | Feb 02, 2011, 01:17 PM EST

  maloney...tell us more about bull whips...have you been bull-whipped? Why do you propose this method? Leather bull whips? what kind of outfit do you wear?

• seanomelbourne | Jan 26, 2011, 05:14 PM EST

  Thanks Maloney. Hancock! running out of steam is that the best you can do?

• maloney | Jan 26, 2011, 01:33 PM EST

  I didn't mean to get you all hot & bothered undertheouthouse. Or is it that you have a problem with bull whipping but don't mind the shooting? Seano...happy rooland day from America.

• downinthebasement | Jan 26, 2011, 10:43 AM EST

  maloney... Are you an advocate of bull whips? bull whips sound very erotic... Tell us who should be bull whipped...

• hancock | Jan 26, 2011, 12:07 AM EST

  You sound like an old woman.

• seanomelbourne | Jan 25, 2011, 05:23 PM EST

  Hancock get it right I'm older than Olberman or Maddow.I saw the light years before they did. I tutored them well!

• hancock | Jan 25, 2011, 01:35 PM EST

  You sound like Olberman, Maddow et al do your thinking Sean.

• maloney | Jan 25, 2011, 12:46 PM EST

  seano..if Piven was pushing the same agenda in Ireland or rooland you would be calling for her head. Riots & blood in the streets is not an answer. I'm not sure what you found but try Naked Emperor News.

• seanomelbourne | Jan 24, 2011, 11:59 PM EST

  Maloney!Maloney!Maloney. I took your advice and found the 11-11-04 video and some more.You completely misrepresented what the prof. said. I found one video where beck blames Piven and other Columbia uni. Profs for the GFC.I agree with Piven that Beck looks for obscure references to Justify his rhetoric.Manic tough it may be (my words).

• maloney | Jan 24, 2011, 07:33 PM EST

  seano, seano, seano...so you think for yourself, you read left & right, Piven wrote 45 years ago. You seem to have missed a little or choose to be very selective. Try finding Piven's videos from 11-11-04 or Feb. 09 or 11-17-10 or 12-24-10 or 12-29-10 & let us not forget a real gem from 12-5-10. You also seemed to have missed articles in National Review & The Nation, just to name a few of her current offerings. Looks to me Beck is not the liar, you are. obama, public discourse, How about punish your enemies or they bring a knife, we bring a gun. If Piven gets whacked, what does that make Beck? A HERO!

• Cranleigh | Jan 24, 2011, 06:05 PM EST

  Perhaps many of the people he admires are Jewish as well? It proves nothing. There is no need to make up silly allegations about Mr. Beck - the truth is quite bad enough.

• seanomelbourne | Jan 24, 2011, 05:20 PM EST

  I think for myself hancock. I read commentary left and right of the political spectrum and formulate opinion.Your pall beck has just called out a 78yr.old professor(Priven)and quoted an article she wrote 45years ago and deliberately lied insinuating the piece she wrote was written recently. She now receives death threats from Becks teaparty clones,so much for public discourse as explained by Obama.You have O'Reilly the doctor Tiller killer what will we call Beck if Priven is assassinated?

• PhlutiePhan | Jan 23, 2011, 01:20 PM EST

  This is what is called "circumstantial evidence". This would be in the same catgegory as stating that the NBA is prejudiced against women just becuase there are no women playing basketball against such as LeBron James.

• hancock | Jan 22, 2011, 07:53 PM EST

  Who thinks for you?

• seanomelbourne | Jan 22, 2011, 06:15 PM EST

  Anyone who believes Beck is lacking in common sense,or unable to think for themselves. He's just a straight out lia-r.

• maloney | Jan 22, 2011, 09:16 AM EST

  T rexnine...which is it? Is he the idiot or is he the geniuse you discribe in manipulating Fox & the viewers into his high pay & ratings while cleverly lying all the way to the bank? He insists you take his word for nothing & do your own research on what he puts out. His ratings keep getting better so it must be the people who are getting dumber. Is that what you are saying? Olbermann was fired for a reason. Could you enlighten us on that?

• rexnine | Jan 22, 2011, 12:23 AM EST

  Maloney, Maloney, Maloney...soon to be synonymous with "Idiot" on this site. There's a blog on U-tube titled "Liberal Viewer" you really should see; If you don't think FOX news lies. And Glen Beck is simply put "an idiot". He doesn't even believe half of what he says himself..have you ever seen him on O'riley? Beck is a boy getting paid for ratings. And I think even he understands how stupid what he says is.

• downinthebasement | Jan 21, 2011, 11:50 PM EST

  God Save the Queen. Rule Britannia, Never Surrender...

• maloney | Jan 21, 2011, 05:45 PM EST

  Beck tells the truth about people who should be bullwhipped & shot. As Dublinjas said "it's not Beck's fault they were Jews".

• Dublinjas | Jan 21, 2011, 01:10 AM EST

  It's not his fault that they were Jews.

• downinthebasement | Jan 21, 2011, 12:42 AM EST

  Bern, nothing is more controlling and powerful than the Church of Rome. God Save the Queen. (I am not referring to Elton John nor Benedict, either).

• downinthebasement | Jan 21, 2011, 12:41 AM EST

  God Save the Queen. Rule, Britannia, Britannia Rules the Waves!

• downinthebasement | Jan 21, 2011, 12:39 AM EST

  Bern made a funny... He speaks of Jews loving power... From an Irish Catholic, yet? Hahahaha... Just look at the photograph of the Council of Bishops in Rome. With gold all about them...they dither while young lads like Bern got diddled by Father McPheeley in the rectory...for years...and nothing was done. Bern, you are an anti-Semite...no doubt...

• Starlet | Jan 21, 2011, 12:05 AM EST

  If Glenn Beck is one of the spokespeople for the Mormon community of America then he is really not doing them a whole lot of good. He is a polarizing force and will undermine the real attempt of the Mormon church to control the whole American west with their bigotry and constant need to propagate and expand like the vermin that he and his ilk represent. His brand of extreme right-wing propaganda will eventually lead to another massacre like the one in Tucson.

• maloney | Jan 20, 2011, 07:09 PM EST

  It's not Beck. It's anyone who tells the truth about progressives or socialists. When the truth is told they squeeel & attack with lies from any direction.

• mayoman | Jan 20, 2011, 06:38 PM EST

  Beck is a bigot. Plain and simple.

• seanomelbourne | Jan 20, 2011, 05:11 PM EST

  2b chastises eiramach for his "small minded remarks" yet 2B see no problem in using demeaning words or phrases to denigrate the DEMS or the President what hypocrisy.

• eiriamach | Jan 20, 2011, 04:27 PM EST

  I had not heard the word "uppity" hurled at a woman since the 1970s, so I was curious! This usage dates a person for sure. "[L]iterary luminaries now irrelevant"-- which of those I've quoted do you have in mind--my quotations range from Mark Twain to St. Matthew, don't they? Again, I asked for specifics, and you've replied with another herd of generalizations. Nice try, but a C- at best.

• soccernet | Jan 20, 2011, 02:26 PM EST

  2bornot2b, you sound a bit uppity yourself btw

• 2BorNot2B | Jan 20, 2011, 01:08 PM EST

  @snakehips -- In view of your thoroughly uninformed and biased post, the problem with people like you is that it is obvious you have never seen a single one; or -in order to actually be able to opine with authority on the subject- a string of Beck programs. You seem content with merely parroting talking points the left-wing media provides for you. -- If anything, Beck has pushed millions of viewers to question the prevailing left-wing indoctrinated culture and educate themselves on issues and subjects they had heretofore not been interested in researching; that has the left in a hissy fit.--- The most incontrovertible and palpable evidence is in the results of the vote this past Nov! Refute that if you can. -- It is clear that people awoke and expelled the political careerist leeches who felt entitled to their post and perks -- The ones who managed to keep their seat in the Senate did so due to a massive infusion of funds provided by democRat special interests and the unions; whose future fate, given the continued evidence and learning provided on Beck's programs, will be sealed in the 2012 elections. This is why Reid is opposed to even bringing the issue of oVomit-Care to a vote in the Senate-- He is afraid that those up for re-election will ditch his party. Refute that as well if you can.

• 2BorNot2B | Jan 20, 2011, 12:41 PM EST

  --- Finally, eiriamach, I must compliment you on your ability to project. You seem quite well versed on the ways of expressing rage. I had never stopped to ponder on the possibilities of unloading anger in the manner you describe, eg: driving either to post office or market with a semi-automatic in a diaper bag. That’s rather Loughnerenesque and unoriginal, don't you think? -- Tell me, have you also considered the joys of 'exploding vests' in the middle of a marketplace or even better, in a Christian church? If so, you might be ready to immigrate to the Middle East. I hear there's a demand for 'volunteers' in that region. -- However, I must warn you, unless you swing in ways other than your gender dictates, you'll have to be happy with receiving your heavenly reward in the form of 72 lesbians, which I believe exist even in that repressive culture; though they are not as prominent as in ours. Unfortunately, I don‘t think ‘virgin men' exist in that culture - they have far too many goats.

• 2BorNot2B | Jan 20, 2011, 12:29 PM EST

  As for your following post of 3:56, I'd venture to say you're a poor observer. I do in fact answer specifically to posts/ers I find gratuitously offensive and/or falsely premised. Fortunately, most of these can be easily dismissed with nothing more than what they deserve: a pointed barb. -- By contrast, whenever time allows (because perhaps unlike you, I do have a life!), I have posted extensively on subjects that actually matter to me, when and if I feel I have something to contribute. On many others, there are 2 or 3 posters with a similar philosophy to mine, whose depth of knowledge and interest on the subject matter far exceeds my own. In that case, I wisely defer to them, because frankly, why should I bother?--- Further, despite your unhealthy fixation on my posts, given the number of caustic, small-minded and self-revealing remarks you've directed at me, am I under any compunction to reply to you? Heck NO, I do this mostly for fun! And in your case, except for the infrequent bouts of comedic relief your bombastic prose provides I derive little to no entertainment from it. cont'd...

• snakehips | Jan 20, 2011, 11:03 AM EST

  The problem with people like Glen Beck is that they are devoid of the study of human history and most other intellectual pursuits. They are "bottom feeders" who appeal to the lowest denominator of people who seek simple answers to complicated issues.One of the often used methods is attacking Jews.Guess who else used Jews as a scapegoat for the world's problems in history and look what happened.

• 2BorNot2B | Jan 20, 2011, 10:24 AM EST

  **2B Specifically, what is it in my posts that you find "uppity"?** -- For starters, let's call this "The whine heard around the blog!"--- In a medium frequented by a host of semi-literate and, quite often, even obviously illiterate people armed with little more than a keyboard and an internet account, someone who so pointedly engages in name-dropping of philosopher's names, who feels the need to translate the Latin name, and then explain the meaning of logical fallacies for those she assumes to be 'the little people,' who references obscure quotes from supposed literary luminaries now irrelevant to anyone but pompous elitist academicians from the left.... I'd say that in some 'small manner' evidences either a poorly disguised uppity-ness, or worse yet... a desire for respect and praise.

• seanomelbourne | Jan 19, 2011, 05:49 PM EST

  eiramach is correct.Beck rewrites history to suit his twisted agenda of lies and innuendo.I suppose you can fool some of the people all of the time.Just read a poll that 13% of teapartyers want an armed insurrection against the government. So much for the rantings of Beck,Palin and the rest of the Fox clones.

• eiriamach | Jan 19, 2011, 03:56 PM EST

  Oh, you can pour invective onto the page, but you do not answer questions, and you do not post specific replies to the people you hurl your anger at. You do not seem capable of dialogue or debate. But rant on, 2B; better that than letting your rage drive you to a supermarket or post office with a semi-automatic in a diaper bag.

• eiriamach | Jan 19, 2011, 03:50 PM EST

  2B Specifically, what is it in my posts that you find "uppity"?

• 2BorNot2B | Jan 19, 2011, 02:07 PM EST

  @eiriamach: your posts invariably show where your uppity 'more wise than thou' sympathies originate. A Jr College CUNY teacher? That's an inviting speculation, given the rhetoric and the time she wastes online -- I mean, you don't find a tenured prof, say like Krugman, rant.. I mean, OPINING on every shallow thread that appears on this bigoted, beyond-left leaning cyber rag. Although the latter part would no doubt be to his liking. This is a guy who, when it suits him, follows the 'Napoleonic code' of law, as evidenced after the AZ incident. --- So, what would Lippmann say about Beck? That's an easy one teach.. no doubt that he does not serve his liberal agenda; therefore he must be DEMONIZED!--- Beck's arguments, deliberately misconstrued by the left-wing media as 'anti-Semitic, rather than be addressed with 'civil debate' -to which he has invited those against whom he has presented plenty of visual, verbal and written evidence- are IGNORED. The accused are obviously AFRAID and unable to respond! They lack a defense! --- In this litigious times, why exactly haven't they sued him for libel? Their wet dreams would be realized, not only shutting the gadfly, but leaving him simultaneously pennyless and jobless!--- Silence in this case is clear evidence of indefensible guilt.

• pacifist | Jan 19, 2011, 12:40 PM EST

  He may very well be, but then the Roman Catholic Church and her daughter churches of the Protestant Reformation fermented and fostered anti-Semitism from at least the time of Constantine almost up to the present day - and perhaps retains a residue on tha attitude. Anyone doubting this should research the history of this pnenomena. Glen Beck, if he is so, isn't alone as anti-Semitism is widespread all over the world.

• eiriamach | Jan 19, 2011, 03:38 AM EST

  What would Walter Lippmann say about Glen Beck if Lippmann were alive today? Lippmann warned often about the demise of democracy at the hands of people like Beck, who wield the power of the media to generate lists of "enemies" rather than civil debate: "The private citizen, beset by partisan appeals for the loan of his Public Opinion, will soon see, perhaps, that these appeals are not a compliment to his intelligence, but an imposition on his good nature and an insult to his sense of evidence." And my favorite Lippmann quotation: "For in the absence of debate unrestricted utterance leads to the degradation of opinion. By a kind of Gresham's law the more rational is overcome by the less rational, and the opinions that will prevail will be those which are held most ardently by those with the most passionate will. For that reason the freedom to speak can never be maintained merely by objecting to interference with the liberty of the press, of printing, of broadcasting, of the screen. It can be maintained only by promoting debate."

• hancock | Jan 18, 2011, 02:49 PM EST

  Not on this site if your name is Palin, Beck, or O'Reilly.

• soccernet | Jan 18, 2011, 08:59 AM EST

  This is silly. Can't a man express his opinion. he has pointed out who he feels is dangerous, and he apparently gives pretty good reasons for this, propagandists, human testing, etc. The author has sadly been led down this overly sympathetic regard towards the Jewish elite community, who are blatantly committing crimes against humanity. This comment even had the trademark reference to the Nazis, educate yourself guy.

• Irishlassred | Jan 17, 2011, 06:21 PM EST

  The publisher of this site keeps asking for suggestions for news articles and I keep saying "stop talking about Glenn Beck." So why doesn't anyone hear listen and pay attention? This guy is so old news, he's an embarrassment to his family. PLEASE~!Stop talking about him and maybe he'll crawl back from whence he came.

• moygannon | Jan 17, 2011, 01:32 PM EST

  It's getting considerably boring listening this anit-semitic nonsense - every time someone passes wind it's an anti-semitic insult. Time for the media to put this crap to sleep.

• donal1951 | Jan 17, 2011, 09:50 AM EST

  First, Glenn Beck is an idiot. Secondly, Edward Bernays was indeed a propaganist and ad man, but who did he work for? Large American corporations as a rule, the NAACP being a notable exception. Freud, whose theories of psychoanalysis are rightly out of favor now, was, for his day, a pioneer in treating mental illness. And, I could go on. Up until today, I had no idea Gov. Rendell is a Jew and could care less. He is, to me, a rare Democrat who makes sense.

• sixtyfive | Jan 17, 2011, 07:09 AM EST

  Is there a law which says you have to be pro-semitic? I can see why being anti-semitic in Israel could be a problem, but in our own country?

• strokestown | Jan 16, 2011, 09:20 PM EST

  I totally agree with S7McCabe. We need Glen Beck to expose the Left for the Biased Bull they continually present and represent!!

• seanomelbourne | Jan 16, 2011, 09:19 PM EST

  s7McCABE as a card carrying atheist I do not care.BTW can you give me the figures on how many Jewish/Christian or other religious denominations who are ACLU lawyers.Why are you worried about Jewish lawyers are they not entitled to practice law.are you a little bit bigoted.please do not reply with the old standard "I have friends who are Jews"

• eileenkny | Jan 16, 2011, 06:58 PM EST

  I guess I'm part of the "bewildered herd". Interesting how Mr. Beck makes these claims against others. I wonder what his "solution" would be? It's very sad how those who disagree with Mr. Roberts all sound just as anti-semitic as Mr. Beck. People, even Speaker Beiner(sp?)is calling for more civility. Give it your best shot!

• S7McCabe | Jan 16, 2011, 05:48 PM EST

  Would you have been as upset if all had been Catholics? Methodists? Non-Denomincal Christians, New Agers? I doubt it. Glen tells the truth and if you don't like it, change the channel. You can get real HUGE bias and lies on MSNBC. BTW, Check out who the lawyers are in the ACLU. Many just happen to be Jews and I can't figure out why.

• seanomelbourne | Jan 16, 2011, 05:14 PM EST

  It's rather ominous that there are no Christians in his top eight. Not bad for a reformed drunk/addict.What underlying paranoia does he harbor from those cocaine sniffing drunken days? and he being such a good Mormon.

• just4fun | Jan 16, 2011, 04:08 PM EST

  Just what one would expect from a moron. The most dangerous man in the USA is Glen Beck who tries desperately to lead the "bewilderd herd". The only reason he keeps his biggotery up is to line his pockets with the good ole grreen stuff.

• bern1952 | Jan 16, 2011, 03:13 PM EST

  If they were Irish, I suppose he would be anti-Irish etc, etc. How sad it is that they are Jewish! They have chosen power over everything.

• jamthecat | Jan 16, 2011, 02:17 PM EST

  I wish I could say I'm surprised, but I'm not. I wish I could say that those who still support this creature are merely blind fools, but I can't; they clearly agree with his hatreds and lie. So all you can do is keep pointing out the obvious -- that Glenn Beck is an evil man who is leading his followers straight to hell. Maybe one or two of them will wake up and pay attention. Maybe reminding them of Matthew 7:15-16 will help...but I doubt it.

• Searlit | Jan 16, 2011, 01:43 PM EST

  I don't watch Fox news network. There's too much hyperbole. I have read about Edward Bernays and Sigmund Freud and I don't consider them liberal. Anyone who seeks to control other people, to me , is not liberal- they are people obsessed with control. To be Liberal, is to be non-judgmental. That doesn't fit with trying to control the populace. That would be a Totalitarian. Neither extremes, of the right or left make any sense.

• pilib04 | Jan 16, 2011, 01:09 PM EST

  Why is this a surprise. Try watching Beck. You will for sure turn him off in less than an hour. Beck is anti-everyone.

• brondell | Jan 16, 2011, 12:15 PM EST

  Keep it up Patrick, the Copperheads' hissing at you brings their cognitive dissonance out of the darkness into the light. Lux fiat!

• bunchesofun | Jan 16, 2011, 12:13 PM EST

  There being Jewish has nothing to do with why they are on the list. They are liberals!

• allentown | Jan 16, 2011, 12:02 PM EST

  Wait a minute here ------ did Beck, or Patrick Roberts say they were Jews?

• cillowen | Jan 16, 2011, 11:57 AM EST

  having no interest in whatever beck is about but shame and blame suppression of thoughts/facts of anyone is not being fair and balanced. Ferrets needs muzzling fore putting em in rabbit holes.

• jdi2269 | Jan 16, 2011, 11:50 AM EST

  HOW MANY OF THESE ARE IN THE LIBERAL MEDIA??? MANY!

• kevinhayes | Jan 16, 2011, 11:38 AM EST

  Suffer through an hour of Beck on FNC and it is obvious what a SILLY and unserious person he really is.

• FatherVol | Jan 16, 2011, 10:59 AM EST

  @briddy29: Bravo or Brava, as your gender dictates.

• briddy29 | Jan 16, 2011, 10:05 AM EST

  Give me a frickin' break. By painting everyone as either a racist or anti-Semitic makes your point meaningless. Add in the last statement that the "Nazi would be proud" and you just sunk in the same hole you tried to put Glenn Beck in.

• colkelley | Jan 16, 2011, 09:45 AM EST

  Coincidentally all of the people mentioned actually ARE people dangerous to the traditional capitalist American way of life. Being opposed to socialism or all-powerful government does not make anyone an anti-Semitic. This article is just further proof that Patrick Roberts is a moron and hysterical anti-American who himself engages in cheap propaganda. What I always love is when liberals label someone as a "right-wing Nazi" since "Nazi" refers to the "National SOCIALIST Party" and socialism is a left-wing philosophy.

• Irishphotograph | Jan 16, 2011, 09:41 AM EST

  Seamus Moore please dont speak for the Irish or Ireland. How little you know of Israel and the Territories..and why the Irish people would speak up for the Oppressed, Proverbs 31:8-9 I have lived with both Jews & Arabs, David Hayes descendant of John Devoy (IRB) One of Irelands greatest!

• SouthBendNative | Jan 15, 2011, 08:52 PM EST

  Patrick Roberts revealed as non intelligent for the thousandth time. Since you are going to make a driveby accusation, why don't you back it up with some facts to refute what Beck is saying. He has valid reason to label Bernays, Soros, Sunstein, Piven and Rendell as dangerous and showed why. A little effort on your part might help support your POV or convince you that your knee jerk reaction was baseless.

• manhattan | Jan 15, 2011, 03:19 PM EST

  Because the people he mentioned are jewish, thats real slander on your part accusing him of being anti semitic. What's funny about the left like Roberts is they accuse the right of saying incendiary things but Robert's can say the 'Nazi's would be proud of him" Robert's stop watching fox news it upsets your sensitive soul.

• antoman | Jan 15, 2011, 12:32 PM EST

  @Seamusmoore..he will immediately be called a nutjob...a headcase.

• seamusmoore | Jan 15, 2011, 10:57 AM EST

  Mr. Roberts: Beck needs to go over to Ireland and announce that Israel has a right to exist and he will immediately be called a "Jew lover"(it has happened to me half a dozen times). Ireland's hatred of Israel is Mary Robinson's real legacy; although The Curse of Mary Robinson (Mayo will never win an All Ireland in gaelic football while she is alive) is a close second.

• antoman | Jan 15, 2011, 09:24 AM EST

  Surely the people in America know its a show,no different to Saturday Night Live.Its one comedian on stage doing variations of the same tried and tested routine.Like Glenn Beck.Its one mans or the producers variable rant.The more vehement the better,more viewers means more revenue.Problem is some folk in America may be taking his rants to heart.

• McNabb1966 | Jan 15, 2011, 12:51 AM EST

  What a silly article! And especially since the latest fashionable trend among Leftists is to call Jews "Nazis" when they defend themselves against terrorist threats. No, an actual anti-Semite is Lefty heroine Helen Thomas. Furthermore, Soros has done more harm to his fellow Jews than anything Beck could dream up. But of course this is all just smoke and mirrors. The fact of the matter is that while the "eight Jews" have Judaism in common that's not why they made the list. Rather, it's the other thing they have in common: their political ideology. Next at least TRY to put some thought into your diatribe.