Christopher Hitchens was a committed supporter of a united Ireland - VIDEO
Posted on Friday, December 16, 2011 at 03:31 AM
RSS 
Recent Posts
- Good Morning America says Sasha and Malia Obama bored stiff while in Ireland - Schedule heavy on history lectures and searching for ancient roots blamed - VIDEO
- Anti-Catholic rant against Notre Dame is nothing new for the Fighting Irish to face - Ohio State president slammed for “those damn Catholics” comments is latest in long line
- Donald Trump, the gift that keeps on giving to Democrats - Latest delusion about running for president continues the madness
- No U.S Ambassador to Ireland in place until September at least say insiders - No envoy in Dublin for Barack and Michelle Obama trip to Ireland in June
- Sen. Marco Rubio support now makes certain immigration bill will pass Senate - Bipartisan immigration reform now has an excellent chance of becoming law - VIDEO
Archives
![]() |
| Christopher Hitchens |
Rare for British writers, Hitchens was a committed Republican, in favor of ending the monarchy in Britain.
He became embroiled in many arguments on Northern Ireland which he often compared to Cyprus, and stated that partition in both cases was the root of all the problems that the country experienced.
Ironically he often clashed with his brother, Peter, an unabashed royalist and Christian conservative, and a columnist with the Daily Mail who took a very dim view of Irish nationalism.
Peter Hitchens once pursued Sinn Fein leader Gerry Adams across the United States asking him hostile questions at every opportunity,
Hitchens views on partition were informed by his first wife, Eleni Meleagrou, a Greek Cypriot, he married in 1981.
8 comments
Page 1 of 1 pages
Keynyata | Dec 17, 2011, 11:03 AM EST
There will never be an united Ireland,thankfully.
Northern Ireland is a savage place.
Report abuse
Rebelforce | Dec 16, 2011, 12:01 PM EST
I heard Christopher Hitchens speak many times and only once did I hear him mention (in passing) that he could support a united Ireland. What he really seemed to be enthusiastic about was getting the US involved in the disastrous Iraq War. He was one of the media's favorite neo-Con chickenhawk cheerleaders for the bloody Iraq War that wound up killing so many hundreds of thousands of people including 4,800 US troops dead and 30,000 US troops injured (many of them amputees). It is ironic that he should die just as that inglorious chapter in US history is ending.
Report abuse
IrelandNorth | Dec 16, 2011, 08:35 AM EST
Regret to hear of his passing. Admired his incisive intellect, and wasn't aware he was a United Irelander, which raises him even higher in my esteem. As that exceptionally rare breed of English republican, I wish his spirit well wherever it may be.
Report abuse
eiriamach | Dec 16, 2011, 08:29 AM EST
I'm sorry to hear of Hitchens' death. His lively style helped usher in a new era, just gaining impetus now, of debate about religion, human destiny and spirit. One of his colleagues, Terry Eagleton, included Hitchens as a major voice in the debate: "Why are the most unlikely people, including myself, suddenly talking about God? Who would have expected theology to rear its head once more in the technocratic twenty-first century, almost as surprisingly as some mass revival of Zoroastrianism? Why is it that my local bookshop has suddenly sprouted a section labeled 'Atheism,' hosting anti-God manifestos by Christopher Hitchens, Richard Dawkins, and others? . . . Why, just as we were confidently moving into a post-theological, post-metaphysical, even post-historical era, has the God question broken out anew?" --from "Reason, Faith, and Revolution: Reflections on the God Debate" (2009), excerpted in 'Commonweal' online. As a passionate advocate of freedom, Hitchens wanted us to free ourselves from God, the "celestial totalitarian," as well as from mundane political masters like the British. Golly, political freedom would be enough for me.
Report abuse
sirpeter | Dec 16, 2011, 07:48 AM EST
I always liked Christopher Hitchens.He always stated the obvious simple truth to those who had their own self-serving agenda.
Report abuse
alkil29 | Dec 16, 2011, 07:35 AM EST
Yeah and it's almost as if this argument couldn't work the other way also Jonno99, ha ha
Report abuse
jonno99 | Dec 16, 2011, 06:41 AM EST
Christopher was obviously the intellectual and far better informed of the facts regarding Ireland. His brother more than likely adopted diametrically opposed positions in order to convince himself he was his brothers intellectual equal. Classic self delusion!
Report abuse
Page 1 of 1 pages
the Latest #IRISHTRAVEL
-
All Ireland Winners of the 2013 Irish Restaurant Awards...
-
Two Irish chefs launch new All-Ireland Culinary tours business...
-
Irish restaurant critic Ross Golden-Bannon launches pop-up artisan eatery...
-
"First Woman Bishop" elected as one of Ireland's four main church leaders - VIDEO...
-
Irish chefs Zack Gallagher and Wendy Kavanagh start new all-Ireland culinary tour business...
- Good Morning America says Sasha and Malia...
- Michelle Obama and daughters trace their...
- Former church spokesman criticised for using...
- President Obama’s visit to North comes at...
- Sinn Fein deputy leader speaks out against...
- Daily Mail unloads on 'drunken young' Paddys...
- Body of Irish immigrant tossed in medical...
- Dating website for ‘homosensible’ Catholic...
- Michelle Obama and daughters visit Glendalough.
- Shock as Irish priest praises Prime Minister’s.
8 Comments

Report abuse