Danny Boy


Vatican: Taoiseach, Tanaiste criticisms 'unfounded'

Posted on Sunday, September 04, 2011 at 10:47 PM

RSS


Recent Posts

Archives

submit to reddit


In its long-awaited response to Prime Minister Enda Kenny's firebrand speech in parliament this summer, the Vatican has called 'unfounded' the government's accusations that it attempted to frustrate enquiries into rampant sexual abuse in Ireland, while making a tepid acknowledgement that it 'shares' in and understands the widespread public anger ignited by the damning Cloyne Report.

Archbishop of Dublin Diarmuid Martin has quickly jumped on the PR bandwagon, calling on the Taoiseach to substantiate the allegations of frustrating the criminal process which he accused the powers-in-Rome of earlier this summer, but both Kenny and the government have refused to budge from their original positions.

It's not exactly the stuff of high diplomatic drama, but the weak response from the Vatican - the product of 'consultations' between recalled papal nuncio Giuseppe Leanza and the Holy See - will do little to improve the Vatican's badly damaged image in Ireland, and continues the lengthening cooling off between the two sovereign powers.

Archbishop Martin's call on the Taoiseach to explain the reasoning behind his accusation that the Vatican tried, effectively, to frustrate sovereign criminal investigations, also seems pathetic: the Archbishop surely had access to the Report at the same time the rest of the country did, but only seems to have been able to muster the courage to point out the 'flaw' in the government's response to the document once given the green-light by the puppet-masters in Rome.

A nice analysis of the main soundbites from the Papal response was put together on the Irish Times website, here; the full text of the comminique issued jointly to Gilmore and Kenny was posted on the Vatican's rather amateurish-looking PR website, appears here.

What's unsurprisingly is the near total lack of sympathy with the victims of child abuse documented in the grim report (full text, here).

The Report documented a shocking level of fact-bludgeoning by the Church authorities, and a widespread policy to ignore cases of child abuse when it suited the Church.

Two thirds of abuse allegations between 1996 and 2009 were not passed on to Irish police, while disgraced Bishop John Magee was found to have engaged in widespread misleading of both the government and the HSE, refusing, along with his second-in-command Monsignor Dennis O'Callaghan, to co-operate with a formal Garda investigation in 2006.

The 400 page Report, authored by Justice Yvonne Murphy, also found, as fact that Church authorities were "highly unhelpful" in assisting any bishop seeking assistance in implementing procedures relating to sex abuse cases, while finding that there was effectively no proper system for dealing with complaints in place when there clearly should have.

Unfortunately the Vatican's response, in both its summary and full-text forms, appears as a cold and legalistic refutation of the main concerns raised in the document, citing archaic provisions of Canon law to point out that Church leaders are obliged, by the Church's law, to report all cases of sexual abuse to the national authorities, though missing the main point that in two out of three instances this didn't in fact happen.

The Vatican seems more concerned about picking a bone with a two minute speech in parliament than with assessing how it failed sex abuse victims.

The brief interjections that the Holy See "once again [wishes to state that] it shares the deep concern and anxiety expressed by the Irish authorities" ring fairly hollow in the overall tenor of the document.

Perhaps unsurprising, but disappointing nonetheless.





14 Comments

See all comments

Ever notice how all these bishops look like demonic old men...ugh! I cringe.
Ignore him McNamara he's full of it.
@2BorNot2B …Once again, you return with the same sick verbiage. Many of us who have been posting with IC for the past few years are familiar with you and I for one have come to believe you are nothing more than a “shill” and not a real IC poster at all. I also found it very strange that you a "born" Obama hater was non existent during his trip to Ireland. Your post just dropped off…Or maybe they assigned you to some other menial task. Now go figure…You who has shown such un Christ like hate and bigotry time and time again has now become the defender of the church. You just can’t make this stuff up!
Anyone of those 'victims' drummed up by the profiteering firm of Anderson, Cheet, Blame, Slaander & Hyde need a bible-thumping lawyer? -- Call 555-McNam31. She'll settle your case with little wailing and gnashing of teeth. Not a cent will be charged to you until she sees 'the riches of the Vatican' distributed equitably among those she thinks are deserving (for instance: ACORN, SEIU, o'Bamavoters, union thugs and any general-purpose entitlement addicted leftwing whiners), and until she sees the CC groveling for mercy at her feet and/or they agree to re-make the Church in her image and likeness.
Anyone of those 'victims' drummed up by the profiteering firm of Anderson, Cheet, Blame, Slaander & Hyde need a bible-thumping lawyer? -- Call 555-McNam31. She'll settle your case with little wailing and gnashing of teeth. Not a cent will be charged to you until she sees 'the riches of the Vatican' distributed equitably among those she thinks are deserving (for instance: ACORN, SEIU, o'Bamavoters, union thugs and any general-purpose entitlement addicted leftwing whiners), and until she sees the CC groveling for mercy at her feet and/or they agree to re-make the Church in her image and likeness.
I expect that the Church will not revise canon law's privileging of accused priests, but Irish civil law is setting things straight. Clerics will have no choice but to accept the primacy of civil law in Ireland. To date, no one has taken a pastoral approach to the Cloyne victims, not Msgr. O'Callaghan, not Bishop Magee, and certainly not the Holy See-- no one except the Irish Taoiseach. In its "Response to the Government of Ireland," the Holy See tragically missed an opportunity to apologize for the role that the Congregation for the Clergy has played in the protracted suffering of, and denial of justice to, victims of sexual abuse in Ireland. Let's hope the Irish state succeeds far better than the Church in achieving justice for both victims and accused priests!
Bishop Magee offered an "apology" for the victims' suffering: "if through my not fully implementing the 1996 guidelines which we had, I have made any victim suffer more, on my bended knee, I beg forgiveness, I am sorry.” He ought to have apologized not only for their suffering, but for his denial of justice to them through the Cloyne cover-ups. Cloyne's Msgr. O'Callaghan's "apology" shows the conflict between canon law, which protects priests, and Irish law, which protects the right of victims to justice: "I acknowledge and I am sorry that, in responding to the allegations of abuse, I, in some instances, became emotionally and pastorally drawn to the plight of the accused priest, to the detriment of the pastoral response I intended to make to complainants" [Irish examiner on line]. In his "pastoral" concern, O'Callaghan opened the gates and threw the lambs to the wolves. His public comments make it clear that he dissented from the Irish bishops' "Framework" policy stating that church authorities "should" report allegations of abuse to civil authorities. Instead, he obeyed Archbishop Storero's 1997 Vatican letter to the Irish bishops and, in accord with 1722 of Canon Law, he protected the "good name" of offending priests. The "apologies" of these two men are all the evidence Enda Kenny needs of interference by the Vatican.
Like the "Response" document, the "apologies" of both Bishop Magee and Msgr. O'Callaghan made no mention of justice denied. Their stated concern was for the "suffering" of accused priests and --only belatedly-- of victims. They make the same mistake as the Vatican's canon law: they think relief from suffering is the same as justice. No, suffering is a burden we often endure for the sake of getting justice, and when victims are willing to take on the suffering of testifying and standing up to challenges to their veracity in court, their cases should go forward. The New Testament calls this hungering and thirsting after justice a "beatitude," from the adjective "beatus," "happy," for justice is a step toward healing the injured (or in the case of the pedophile, corrupted) soul.
"The Response of the Holy See" states that "canon law and civil law" are "not in competition and can operate in parallel" (page 12). But they are in competition in Ireland and in any country that makes sex abuse of minors a crime. Canon law places great importance on protecting the "good name" of an accused priest. Canon law mistakenly calls this protection of priestly reputation a principle of justice equal in importance to the right of victims to justice: the accused is "innocent until proven guilty." That's a stupid mistake: The "innocent until proved guilty" principle requires full investigation and trial that either exonerates or finds the accused guilty as charged. It does not protect him from the media publishing his name and the accusation against him. The victim cannot have justice without investigation and trial, so some disclosure of information about the case to the public takes place, and this publicity, the Vatican argues, deprives the accused of justice. Wrong! Publicity is not punishment, nor does it establish guilt. It's a burden for the accused, just as testifying at trial is a burden for the victim. The Vatican's "law" favors the accused priest and makes justice for victims in practice impossible. Irish law rightly makes the right of victims AND accused to investigation and trial of the charges more important than protecting the accused from publicity that could harm his "good name." Kenny must reject the Vatican's flimsy excuse for obstructing justice.
Angelprecious cannot see the writing on the wall. "theres none so blind----"
@AngelPrecious stated:"BTW, the Murphy Report is a bunch of hogwash" Isaiah 44:18 Comes to mind..."Such stupidity and ignorance! Their eyes are closed, and they cannot see. Their minds are shut, and they cannot think"... Ask the victims parents if they think the report is hogwash or the parents of the children within the grand jury investigations from Boston to Philadelphia.
When will people wake up, YOU ARE AND HAVE BEEN CONNED by that lot of evil scum.
Hmmm, well, have your Taoiseach prove these ridiculous allegations. He can't so he continues to spout his hatred. Devout and respectful??? Hardly! BTW, the Murphy Report is a bunch of hogwash!
I think that this is a massive own goal by the Vatican. The Murphy report written by a highly respected Judge had to drag information from the church and in fact ultimately failed to access the internal files, as the Vatican pleaded diplomatic immunity. The Taoiseach reflected the views of the entire country when he said that the people were getting a bit fed up with the church colluding to hide child rapists. Enda Kenny is a dull sensible schoolteacher. He is almost certainly more devout and respectful than the vast majority of Irish voters. He therefore represents their friend not their enemy. I for one, sincerely believe that they should be charged with conspiracy to pervert the course of justice. If they keep tweaking the nose of their friends, I may get my wish.
 




Log into IrishCentral with your Facebook account


or sign-in directly

E-Mail:
Password:
 Remember me Forgot my password
Not a member? Register Now!
print this article Print
email this articleE-mail