Americans bemused by Irish governance in Indo's Wikileaks exposé
By: Daniel O'Carroll | Published Wednesday, August 24, 2011, 2:36 PM | Updated Friday, September 9, 2011, 10:22 PM
Reading the Irish Independent's coverage of the diplomatic cables it received from notorious whistleblowing website Wikileaks over the past few days, you'be be forgiven for forming the impression that the Irish government was being run by a bunch of amateurs.
The overall picture that emerges from the leaks on the whole can probably be summarized as a group of bemused but seemingly very clued-in American diplomats wondering just what was going on across Dublin in Leinster House, why those with the information about the impending economic bust close to hand weren't divulging it to the Irish public, and most pointedly why nobody at the Department of Finance had seemingly formulated a plan for recovery.
------------
Former Finance Minister Brian Lenihan's "turned a corner" speech, in which he claimed - without reason - that the economy had turned a corner, when in fact only the bailout was in store, seems to have come as a particular shock to the diplomats, while the lack of a clear plan as to what to do if a bailout was necessary, and almost total paralysis at the Department of Finance in this regard, were also concepts of Irish misgovernance which seemed alien and incomprehensible to the Americans.
The most worrying thing about the leaks, though, is that the American diplomats seemed to have had a much more realistic of where Ireland was heading, and of what was going on behind closed doors, than the government itself did.
Lenihan's turned a corner speech was instantly spotted as being the stuff of make-believe, while other aspects of the country's finances -- even the provision of near-free education at third level -- came under scrutiny and shown to be incompatible with what Ireland was trying to achieve financially.
The Americans knew that the value of the 'toxic' loans being transferred to NAMA wasn't what the government was claiming it was, and had realized that the State would have to have recourse to an EU/IMF bailout deal even when it was maintaining its charade that it wouldn't be necessary.
If Ahern and Cowen had managed to pull the wool over anybody's eyes with what was truly going on, it certainly wasn't the American diplomats.
5 Comments
-
-
-
-
-
Switch to the desktop site to post a comment.mamaginnty | Jun 05, 2011, 11:29 AM EDT
The Americans are amused...people in glass houses. Not so amused when Julian leaked about America. Aren't they trying to get him extradited to the U.S.
LoyalCitizen | Jun 04, 2011, 11:57 PM EDT
Its funny how excessive financing of American Corporations in Ireland with huge amounts subsidies never caused the crash.
Searlit | Jun 04, 2011, 04:21 PM EDT
The American economists saw the inevitable bubble created by the overvaluation of the housing market. They knew it could collapse at anytime. I think the difference here is that the banks had to pay back their bailout. I don't think that's what happened in Ireland - I could be wrong about that.
Trealach | Jun 04, 2011, 02:28 PM EDT
As IF the Americans had a clue - rofl. They didn't see their crash coming with ALL their hoopla about being "The Best" - or maybe they did, and just let it happen because they hadn't a clue how to stop it. It's time they mind their own business and concentrate on fixing their own economy - IF they know HOW!!
cillowen | Jun 04, 2011, 12:15 PM EDT
dumb and dumber - they are still deemed sweethearts.