I predict that President Barack Obama will win over Mitt Romney narrowly and here's how
By: Larry Donnelly | Published Tuesday, December 18, 2012, 7:17 AM | Updated Tuesday, December 18, 2012, 7:17 AM
 |
| Barack Obama will be staying on in the White House according to Larry |
Writing a column like this with more than ten days to go is inherently risky. But based on the polling data I’ve been examining, the Electoral College math I’ve been doing and the political instincts I’ve always relied upon, I have a theory of how this year’s extremely close fight for the presidency between
Barack Obama and
Mitt Romney might unfold when the votes are tallied into the wee hours on election night.
The truth is that I never envisaged that the election would be this close. The president’s disastrous performance in the first televised debate, and
Governor’s Romney’s strong showing that night, put paid to my ideas about how things would play out. On that night,
Governor Romney appeared to be presidential and a centrist. He undoubtedly appealed to those Americans who were only then tuning in to the campaign.
I had written and said in a number of different fora that I believed Florida would be pivotal to the outcome this year. Specifically, my view was that, if the president were to win Florida, he would prevail in an Electoral College landslide. On the other hand, if
Governor Romney were to pull off a victory there, then I believed that
President Obama’s path to the 270 Electoral College votes he would need to be re-elected would become less straightforward, yet nearly as certain.
Needless to say, the first debate and the consequential movement in the polls in key battleground states forced me to readjust my calculus. Some commentators, particularly those who favour
Governor Romney’s election, have incorrectly relied on national polls in support of their view that both the first debate and the fuller attention being paid to the candidates and the issues by the electorate wholly changed the dynamics of the race.
The first debate and the broader electorate’s heightened focus unquestionably made things tighter. National polls, however, are inherently misleading in US presidential elections and the wild divergences in these polls reflect this reality. Making predictions as to a result based on national polls verges on the nonsensical.
So where does this lead me? And why do I think that Republican-leaning commentators, many of whom now believe that
Mitt Romney is likely to be the next president, are wrong?
Read more news on the US Presidential Election 2012 here My fundamental starting point is that the following states – in roughly counter-clockwise order from the northeast and followed by their number of Electoral College votes – can still be regarded as “in play”: New Hampshire (4), Pennsylvania (20), Ohio (16), Michigan (16), Wisconsin (10), Iowa (6), Colorado (9), Nevada (6), Florida (29), North Carolina (15) and Virginia (13). The dye is fairly well cast in the other 39 states, and barring something completely unforeseen, will leave President Obama with a 10 vote lead, 201-191, over Governor Romney.
The aforementioned mix of data, math and instinct tells me the following.
Obama will win Pennsylvania and
Romney will win North Carolina. I suspect somewhat less strongly that
Obama will take Michigan and Wisconsin. I have a similarly formed suspicion that
Romney will take Virginia and New Hampshire. That would leave things at 247 votes for the incumbent and 223 votes for the challenger.
And here is where hunches come in. My hunch is that Nevada and Iowa will break for
Obama. On the other side, my hunch is that Colorado and, yes, Florida will break for
Romney. My
Obama hunches are shaped by my sense of Nevada’s demographics and by Iowa’s still strong populist streak. My Romney hunches are a product, especially in Florida, of polling data and numbers I find very surprising, but which are difficult to refute, notwithstanding my contrary instincts.
Governor Romney and his campaign deserve a lot of credit if this is borne out on November 6th.
They recognized, from the earliest days of the campaign, that they would need to win Florida to win the presidency. To this end, and despite tacking hard-right on just about everything else in the Republican primary,
Governor Romney steadfastly defended Social Security. The comments of his primary opponent, Texas Governor Rick Perry, likening the government programme on which so many Florida-based retirees depend to a “Ponzi scheme,” were a gift in this regard. Moreover, the repeated statements of fidelity to Israel and oft-touted friendship with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu were meant to be heard by Florida’s large Jewish community. They lean Democratic, but have never trusted the president on Israel.
If
Romney does indeed win Florida – it is far from certain that he will – it will be by a very narrow margin. And it will be due in no small part to this shrewd posturing on issues that matter to Floridians whose votes were identified at an early stage as being “in play.”
A Romney victory in Florida, coupled with my other hunches being on the money, would put him in the lead by two votes, 261-259. In my analysis, Ohio would then remain to determine who will be the next president.
While polls show the two candidates in a virtual dead heat, I just can’t see
Governor Romney winning Ohio for two reasons. First is the extraordinary ground game and get out the vote operation that the Obama re-election team have put together there. Some elements never really went away after 2008, and media reports are that absolutely everything possible has been done to ensure that their voters, particularly African-Americans, exercise their right to vote. Early voting, which is now in full swing, will be crucial.
Second is
Governor Romney’s past as a venture capitalist with Bain Capital. Hard-hitting and evidently relentless ads in Ohio highlight his complicity in the demise of companies and the concomitant loss of livelihoods of thousands of working men and women. This makes garnering the votes of blue collar workers and ethnic Catholics, whose support Romney will need to win the state, a far more difficult task.
Accordingly, as of now, my prediction is that President
Obama will win 275 Electoral College votes and secure a second term. I may well be wrong. I believe, however, that my error could just as likely lie in underestimating the scale of the president’s triumph as in picking the wrong winner. We shall soon see.
- - - -
I’ve also recently joined Twitter. If you enjoy what you read here about politics and other topics, follow me here.
18 Comments
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Switch to the desktop site to post a comment.McNamara31 | Dec 13, 2012, 09:25 AM EST
EamonnDublin I keep telling you...you have to turn off FOX
jetsnoone | Nov 04, 2012, 09:47 AM EST
frosty remember what the jews did to the ukranians in the 1930s....learn something on your own rather than re-gurgitate mass media
Frosty38 | Nov 02, 2012, 03:55 PM EDT
Why do you think 1 He picked a Congressman 2 He picked and irishman?? questionable. remember the Germans what they did to the Jews. Paul is the Irish on his Dad but he is a German on his mom
johnshiel | Oct 30, 2012, 09:25 AM EDT
Eamonn in Dublin, you are brief, concise, and authoritative. Also correct, sez me, and here's an early and whiteknuckled toast to our mutual clairvoyance...
BippyBellito | Oct 28, 2012, 06:23 PM EDT
The Only thing worse than Obama winning The United States presidency would be if Ted Kennedy came back from the dead. May God forbid both.
bonjouryall | Oct 28, 2012, 10:37 AM EDT
I thought it was a thoughtful prediction on the author's part even if I don't like Obama and hope he's wrong.
VernonC | Oct 27, 2012, 02:31 PM EDT
I don't think anything, the author is just another wishful thinker, Obama has become desperate, he's turned to personal attacks and lies, he has nothing else to offer, his tenure is a failure. Americans fell for hype and hip and that hasn't turned into leadership.
EamonnDublin | Oct 27, 2012, 12:03 PM EDT
Hey, Larry! And what would YOU know about it? My prediction? Romney, easily. Why? Because I said so. Éamonn, Dublin, Ireland.
Smyrnian | Oct 27, 2012, 08:44 AM EDT
Romney is going to take the election. He has the momentum and nobody wants 4 more years of the same.
tievemore | Oct 27, 2012, 02:17 AM EDT
It's down to Ohio and Wisconsin. Tough to say how this is going to break. I like Romney's chances at this point. Perhaps the next ten days will paint a different story. If Obama doesn't get a 2008-like turnout, put my nickel on Romney.
jetsnoone | Oct 26, 2012, 10:31 PM EDT
It's all in the demographics, Larry. Ohio: does Obama have enough blacks, jews, gays and abortion-ists to get him over the top. Probaboy not but ...Nevada is differant: union members who put their job over country will probably go Obama.
olovely | Oct 26, 2012, 07:46 PM EDT
krisdaly, strange to say, the Almighty doesn't give to figs who wins because a) he has a universe to run and b) your desires are very small to him. it looks like Obama will win again in any case.
Towngate | Oct 26, 2012, 07:33 PM EDT
Larry: He may justscrape back in .. but will be an even more diminished President as a result.
krisdaly | Oct 26, 2012, 01:44 PM EDT
You prediction is incorrect sir, as the Almighty will step in and Romney will be the new US President!!!!
Madeliene | Oct 26, 2012, 11:46 AM EDT
Listen up, lib. Mass./ WE THE PEOPLE want OUR COUNTRY Restored to US! NOBAMA2012 or NO AMERICA 2013! FOOL!
jerrydonovan | Oct 26, 2012, 11:28 AM EDT
Ohio and Nevada will settle the issue and I believe that President Obama will be re-elected.The Democrats will retain the senate with a slight increase and the Republicans will retain the house with a reduced majority.
tony whelan | Oct 26, 2012, 11:01 AM EDT
Larry, i agree its going to be a very close election. Obama is going to win because of Ohio . Obama wins Ohio because of the auto bail out. He will win Iowa, Nevada, and either Wisconsin or Colorado or both. Wisconsin is going to be close because it's the home state of Paul Ryan. it will be over rather early by midnight on the east coast that by 5 am your time. You will be getting up to feed the baby around that time anyway.
michaelidaho | Oct 26, 2012, 09:26 AM EDT
Larry, I enjoyed reading your analysis, although I think it is a bit complicated. The election all depends on three states - Ohio, Wisconsin, and Iowa. Obama needs to win Ohio and one of the other two. If Romney wins Ohio or both of the other states he will be president. I believe the social conservatives in Iowa (they really dislike Obama) and the failed Gov. Walker recall effort in Wisc. indicate that the scales will tip towards Romney. Romney 275, Obama 263.