I predict that President Barack Obama will win over Mitt Romney narrowly and here's how
Posted on Friday, October 26, 2012 at 06:01 AM
RSS 
Recent Posts
- Ireland and abortion - A divided country, an depressing and ongoing debate
- The Boston marathon bombing - absorbing the horror in my home city from 3,000 miles away
- Why I hope Irish American Steve Lynch is the next US Senator from Massachusetts
- Why Irish Americans should save thousands and go to college in Ireland - World class education at a fraction of the cost
- Republican effort to block Chuck Hagel’s confirmation as US Secretary of Defence is a disgrace
Archives
![]() |
| Barack Obama will be staying on in the White House according to Larry |
Writing a column like this with more than ten days to go is inherently risky. But based on the polling data I’ve been examining, the Electoral College math I’ve been doing and the political instincts I’ve always relied upon, I have a theory of how this year’s extremely close fight for the presidency between Barack Obama and Mitt Romney might unfold when the votes are tallied into the wee hours on election night.
The truth is that I never envisaged that the election would be this close. The president’s disastrous performance in the first televised debate, and Governor’s Romney’s strong showing that night, put paid to my ideas about how things would play out. On that night, Governor Romney appeared to be presidential and a centrist. He undoubtedly appealed to those Americans who were only then tuning in to the campaign.
I had written and said in a number of different fora that I believed Florida would be pivotal to the outcome this year. Specifically, my view was that, if the president were to win Florida, he would prevail in an Electoral College landslide. On the other hand, if Governor Romney were to pull off a victory there, then I believed that President Obama’s path to the 270 Electoral College votes he would need to be re-elected would become less straightforward, yet nearly as certain.
Needless to say, the first debate and the consequential movement in the polls in key battleground states forced me to readjust my calculus. Some commentators, particularly those who favour Governor Romney’s election, have incorrectly relied on national polls in support of their view that both the first debate and the fuller attention being paid to the candidates and the issues by the electorate wholly changed the dynamics of the race.
The first debate and the broader electorate’s heightened focus unquestionably made things tighter. National polls, however, are inherently misleading in US presidential elections and the wild divergences in these polls reflect this reality. Making predictions as to a result based on national polls verges on the nonsensical.
So where does this lead me? And why do I think that Republican-leaning commentators, many of whom now believe that Mitt Romney is likely to be the next president, are wrong?
Read more news on the US Presidential Election 2012 here
My fundamental starting point is that the following states – in roughly counter-clockwise order from the northeast and followed by their number of Electoral College votes – can still be regarded as “in play”: New Hampshire (4), Pennsylvania (20), Ohio (16), Michigan (16), Wisconsin (10), Iowa (6), Colorado (9), Nevada (6), Florida (29), North Carolina (15) and Virginia (13). The dye is fairly well cast in the other 39 states, and barring something completely unforeseen, will leave President Obama with a 10 vote lead, 201-191, over Governor Romney.
The aforementioned mix of data, math and instinct tells me the following.
Obama will win Pennsylvania and Romney will win North Carolina. I suspect somewhat less strongly that Obama will take Michigan and Wisconsin. I have a similarly formed suspicion that Romney will take Virginia and New Hampshire. That would leave things at 247 votes for the incumbent and 223 votes for the challenger.
And here is where hunches come in. My hunch is that Nevada and Iowa will break for Obama. On the other side, my hunch is that Colorado and, yes, Florida will break for Romney. My Obama hunches are shaped by my sense of Nevada’s demographics and by Iowa’s still strong populist streak. My Romney hunches are a product, especially in Florida, of polling data and numbers I find very surprising, but which are difficult to refute, notwithstanding my contrary instincts. Governor Romney and his campaign deserve a lot of credit if this is borne out on November 6th.
They recognized, from the earliest days of the campaign, that they would need to win Florida to win the presidency. To this end, and despite tacking hard-right on just about everything else in the Republican primary, Governor Romney steadfastly defended Social Security. The comments of his primary opponent, Texas Governor Rick Perry, likening the government programme on which so many Florida-based retirees depend to a “Ponzi scheme,” were a gift in this regard. Moreover, the repeated statements of fidelity to Israel and oft-touted friendship with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu were meant to be heard by Florida’s large Jewish community. They lean Democratic, but have never trusted the president on Israel.
If Romney does indeed win Florida – it is far from certain that he will – it will be by a very narrow margin. And it will be due in no small part to this shrewd posturing on issues that matter to Floridians whose votes were identified at an early stage as being “in play.”
A Romney victory in Florida, coupled with my other hunches being on the money, would put him in the lead by two votes, 261-259. In my analysis, Ohio would then remain to determine who will be the next president.
While polls show the two candidates in a virtual dead heat, I just can’t see Governor Romney winning Ohio for two reasons. First is the extraordinary ground game and get out the vote operation that the Obama re-election team have put together there. Some elements never really went away after 2008, and media reports are that absolutely everything possible has been done to ensure that their voters, particularly African-Americans, exercise their right to vote. Early voting, which is now in full swing, will be crucial.
Second is Governor Romney’s past as a venture capitalist with Bain Capital. Hard-hitting and evidently relentless ads in Ohio highlight his complicity in the demise of companies and the concomitant loss of livelihoods of thousands of working men and women. This makes garnering the votes of blue collar workers and ethnic Catholics, whose support Romney will need to win the state, a far more difficult task.
Accordingly, as of now, my prediction is that President Obama will win 275 Electoral College votes and secure a second term. I may well be wrong. I believe, however, that my error could just as likely lie in underestimating the scale of the president’s triumph as in picking the wrong winner. We shall soon see.
- - - -
I’ve also recently joined Twitter. If you enjoy what you read here about politics and other topics, follow me here.
18 comments
Next
Page 1 of 2 pages
jetsnoone | Nov 04, 2012, 09:47 AM EST
frosty remember what the jews did to the ukranians in the 1930s....learn something on your own rather than re-gurgitate mass media
Report abuse
Frosty38 | Nov 02, 2012, 03:55 PM EDT
Why do you think
1 He picked a Congressman
2 He picked and irishman?? questionable. remember the Germans what they did to the Jews. Paul is the Irish on his Dad but he is a German on his mom
Report abuse
johnshiel | Oct 30, 2012, 09:25 AM EDT
Eamonn in Dublin, you are brief, concise, and authoritative. Also correct, sez me, and here's an early and whiteknuckled toast to our mutual clairvoyance...
Report abuse
BippyBellito | Oct 28, 2012, 06:23 PM EDT
The Only thing worse than Obama winning The United States presidency would be if Ted Kennedy came back from the dead. May God forbid both.
Report abuse
bonjouryall | Oct 28, 2012, 10:37 AM EDT
I thought it was a thoughtful prediction on the author's part even if I don't like Obama and hope he's wrong.
Report abuse
VernonC | Oct 27, 2012, 02:31 PM EDT
I don't think anything, the author is just another wishful thinker, Obama has become desperate, he's turned to personal attacks and lies, he has nothing else to offer, his tenure is a failure. Americans fell for hype and hip and that hasn't turned into leadership.
Report abuse
EamonnDublin | Oct 27, 2012, 12:03 PM EDT
Hey, Larry! And what would YOU know about it? My prediction? Romney, easily. Why? Because I said so. Éamonn, Dublin, Ireland.
Report abuse
Smyrnian | Oct 27, 2012, 08:44 AM EDT
Romney is going to take the election. He has the momentum and nobody wants 4 more years of the same.
Report abuse
tievemore | Oct 27, 2012, 02:17 AM EDT
It's down to Ohio and Wisconsin. Tough to say how this is going to break. I like Romney's chances at this point. Perhaps the next ten days will paint a different story. If Obama doesn't get a 2008-like turnout, put my nickel on Romney.
Report abuse
jetsnoone | Oct 26, 2012, 10:31 PM EDT
It's all in the demographics, Larry. Ohio: does Obama have enough blacks, jews, gays and abortion-ists to get him over the top. Probaboy not but ...Nevada is differant: union members who put their job over country will probably go Obama.
Report abuse
olovely | Oct 26, 2012, 07:46 PM EDT
krisdaly, strange to say, the Almighty doesn't give to figs who wins because a) he has a universe to run and b) your desires are very small to him. it looks like Obama will win again in any case.
Report abuse
Towngate | Oct 26, 2012, 07:33 PM EDT
Larry: He may justscrape back in .. but will be an even more diminished President as a result.
Report abuse
krisdaly | Oct 26, 2012, 01:44 PM EDT
You prediction is incorrect sir, as the Almighty will step in and Romney will be the new US President!!!!
Report abuse
Madeliene | Oct 26, 2012, 11:46 AM EDT
Listen up, lib. Mass./ WE THE PEOPLE want OUR COUNTRY Restored to US! NOBAMA2012 or NO AMERICA 2013! FOOL!
Report abuse
Next
Page 1 of 2 pages
18 Comments


Report abuse