Why Mayor Bloomberg handled the "Ground Zero mosque" controversy all wrongly
RSS 
Recent Posts
- Exorcism of my inner Peter King
- Gas question: why give Ireland's enormous wealth away? the Norweigan alternative
- Bashing the Irish -- a break neck run down on Ireland's history of betrayal
- Stephen Fry to appear on Gaelic soap opera Ros na Rún
- Stolkholm Syndrome infects Dublin
Archives
When Mayor Bloomberg trotted out to the podium in front of the Statue of Liberty to wallop everyone across the face with a new Ground Zero reality, he was doing so to teach the less tolerant among us, a lesson about religious freedom.
His photo-op was not addressing any meaningful controversy. Up to that speech, the cultural center was approved unanimously. If there were rumblings, Bloomberg could simply have issued a statement correcting popular misconceptions.
I wish I had learned of the so-called "Ground Zero mosque" differently. I did not understand that the poorly dubbed cultural center was in fact not at Ground Zero, but two city blocks away, and around the corner, out of sight.
If the mayor had simply corrected people's impressions, he could have nipped the whole false "Ground Zero mosque" meme in the bud before it ever got so out of hand.
Instead he dragged Lady Liberty into the picture and gave everyone a good scolding. His timing couldn't have been worse for the 9/11 community. 9/11 Responders had just lost their hospital money from Congress. Here they were thinking that politicians don't give a damn about them, and what does Mayor Bloomberg do? He begins the 9/11 Commemorations of 2010 with a defense of the rights of rich Muslims to build their version of a YMCA downtown when no decision-making authority was saying they could not. In fact they had full permission.
On 9/11, politicians shed crocodile tears for the Joe Blows, but wail like banshees on behalf of a hundred million dollar organization with 13-story plans in lower Manhattan. I have nothing against Muslims, and wish them all the best with their center which has nothing to do with Ground Zero.
Bloomberg's news conference confused me, to be frank. By the time I understood the Ground Zero mosque was no such thing at all, I wrote this clarification. My first reaction was written up in this essay.
The words that went out across the airwaves were "Ground Zero mosque" and "mosque at Ground Zero."
I absolutely object to a "Ground Zero mosque" or a "mosque at Ground Zero." Any American, including Muslims would, because it would interfere with the monument. It would force one monument on top of another monument. It would create competing narratives on one space, which might be interesting artistically, but would not be right for that reason. Either of those ideas on sacred ground would be inappropriate, and that's what the cultural center is being made to seem like. I support the building of the cultural center two blocks away, out of sight from Ground Zero, because I have no reasonable objection to pre-existing projects on private property which is no way designated as part of Ground Zero.
There was no national controversy until Mayor Bloomberg made this into a cause on behalf of religious freedom. It was not at Ground Zero. The defense he put-up made it seem like it was.
Instead, the defense was itself , the slap in the face. It was as though if you did not come to this already thinking it should go up, you were somehow un-American. You have to work me up to this mosque idea, and make sure I don't get what's happening wrongly. Nope. No such effort was made. It was as though the opposite effect was hoped for--a good big controversy over nothing at all.
The mayor's little galant speech on behalf of religious freedom that was under no threat whatsoever, has sparked a cause. Just before the 9/11 Commemoration next month, a fiery American style debate has erupted about a whole lot of nothing. And right on the heels of a denial of funds for 9/11 Responders by Congress.
Sickened by the pretentious lack of understanding, a movement has been sparked to make sure the speech-makers who were so eloquent on behalf of a hundred million dollar center, don't forget their own---the everyday Americans who not only got slaughtered on 9/11, but were so traumatized by that event that they went off to get slaughtered in Iraq and Afghanistan after that, and soon, amidst all this powder-keg controversy over mosques, off to get slaughtered in Iran.
22 Comments
See all comments
Report abuse
Report abuse
It is silly to squawk about an Islamic cultural center going up in that blighted area. At least somebody is interested in locating there besides seedy bars and discount retailers. A new building in that location represents some sort of urban renewal.
Like everywhere else, New York is on a downward curve. The "99'ers" - people who've exhausted their 99 weeks of unemployment benefits - held a rally last week to remind the rest of us how many of them there are. These people are not sitting around refusing work because they're finicky. They are the working class who have been pushed to the margins by economic collapse.
Mayor Bloomberg deserves credit because he doesn't want to contribute further to New York's downward spiral. The last thing we need is the perception that foreigners are unwelcome in New York. This is a port city; it's always been a port city. The area around the World Trade Center is already depressed, but at least it's not full of criminals. New Yorkers don't dismiss the real possibility that those days will return.
The Islamic cultural center will help stabilize an area that is sliding. People who squawk about the insult to the memory of the dead are generally tourists from nondescript little places west of the Hudson.
Report abuse
Report abuse
Report abuse
Report abuse
Report abuse
Report abuse
Report abuse
What's left? We can still stand foursquare against Islam, as if that were a worthy response . . . and it's not. As a people we don't stand against anyone's religion - we don't do that. It's not our values, nor is it a good idea to become like the enemies whose values we disdain. As difficult as it is, we either respond directly to the September 11th attacks, or we do nothing. An indirect response, or an attack on people who neither attacked nor threatened to attack us, is an inappropriate response, and it's unAmerican.
The Moslems want to take possession of an old building in a blighted area and build an information center. Stopping them from doing that does not lessen what happened on September 11th; if anything, it adds to the evil of that day. I'm glad that Michael Bloomberg has the guts to do what's currently unpopular and say what needs to be said. We do not suppress other people's religious freedom. That is not what America is about.
Report abuse
Report abuse
Report abuse
Report abuse
Report abuse
22 Comments
Report abuse