The Keane Edge


The Keane Edge by Brendan Patrick Keane

Why Mayor Bloomberg handled the "Ground Zero mosque" controversy all wrongly

Posted on Saturday, August 14, 2010 at 11:41 PM

RSS


Recent Posts

Archives

submit to reddit

When Mayor Bloomberg trotted out to the podium in front of the Statue of Liberty to wallop everyone across the face with a new Ground Zero reality, he was doing so to teach the less tolerant among us, a lesson about religious freedom.

His photo-op was not addressing any meaningful controversy. Up to that speech, the cultural center was approved unanimously. If there were rumblings, Bloomberg could simply have issued a statement correcting popular misconceptions.

I wish I had learned of the so-called "Ground Zero mosque" differently. I did not understand that the poorly dubbed cultural center was in fact not at Ground Zero, but two city blocks away, and around the corner, out of sight.

If the mayor had simply corrected people's impressions, he could have nipped the whole false "Ground Zero mosque" meme in the bud before it ever got so out of hand.

Instead he dragged Lady Liberty into the picture and gave everyone a good scolding. His timing couldn't have been worse for the 9/11 community. 9/11 Responders had just lost their hospital money from Congress. Here they were thinking that politicians don't give a damn about them, and what does Mayor Bloomberg do? He begins the 9/11 Commemorations of 2010 with a defense of the rights of rich Muslims to build their version of a YMCA downtown when no decision-making authority was saying they could not. In fact they had full permission.

On 9/11, politicians shed crocodile tears for the Joe Blows, but wail like banshees on behalf of a hundred million dollar organization with 13-story plans in lower Manhattan. I have nothing against Muslims, and wish them all the best with their center which has nothing to do with Ground Zero.

Bloomberg's news conference confused me, to be frank. By the time I understood the Ground Zero mosque was no such thing at all, I wrote this clarification. My first reaction was written up in this essay.

The words that went out across the airwaves were "Ground Zero mosque" and "mosque at Ground Zero."

I absolutely object to a "Ground Zero mosque" or a "mosque at Ground Zero." Any American, including Muslims would, because it would interfere with the monument. It would force one monument on top of another monument. It would create competing narratives on one space, which might be interesting artistically, but would not be right for that reason. Either of those ideas on sacred ground would be inappropriate, and that's what the cultural center is being made to seem like. I support the building of the cultural center two blocks away, out of sight from Ground Zero, because I have no reasonable objection to pre-existing projects on private property which is no way designated as part of Ground Zero.

There was no national controversy until Mayor Bloomberg made this into a cause on behalf of religious freedom. It was not at Ground Zero. The defense he put-up made it seem like it was.

Instead, the defense was itself , the slap in the face. It was as though if you did not come to this already thinking it should go up, you were somehow un-American. You have to work me up to this mosque idea, and make sure I don't get what's happening wrongly. Nope. No such effort was made. It was as though the opposite effect was hoped for--a good big controversy over nothing at all.

The mayor's little galant speech on behalf of religious freedom that was under no threat whatsoever, has sparked a cause. Just before the 9/11 Commemoration next month, a fiery American style debate has erupted about a whole lot of nothing. And right on the heels of a denial of funds for 9/11 Responders by Congress.

Sickened by the pretentious lack of understanding, a movement has been sparked to make sure the speech-makers who were so eloquent on behalf of a hundred million dollar center, don't forget their own---the everyday Americans who not only got slaughtered on 9/11, but were so traumatized by that event that they went off to get slaughtered in Iraq and Afghanistan after that, and soon, amidst all this powder-keg controversy over mosques, off to get slaughtered in Iran.




22 comments

Previous Page 2 of 2 pages
The New York Times described Mayor Bloomberg's motivations as being personally rooted. It's not awful to hold a particular Constitutional right dearly. I for example enjoy freedom of speech especially. Mayor Bloomberg should have told everyone, chill out, it's not a mosque at Ground Zero, it's out of sight, and it's a unanimous decision from the Community Board, it's happening, let's just keep things in perspective. Instead he created a moral issue where sides were to be drawn and now we're going to enter in 9/11/2010 under a cloud of anti-Muslim debate over a Ground Zero mosque that isn't a mosque and isn't at Ground Zero.
Brendan, you come up with the stangest assertions and then to support them you insist on twisting the facts to the point where they are totally unrecognizable. Again, this matter was a "cause celebre" long before the press conference; it was made so by right wingers screaming, inaccurately, that a mosque was going to be built "at Ground Zero" (you joined them, but very, very late in the game). The Mayor made it a "pet" Constitutional issue?? That pet has a lot of other owners who point out the truism that the First Amendment forbids NYC and all other governmental entities from barring the construction of a place of worship. Those owners include the President of the United States and, oh yes....... YOU. So how does it become the Mayor's "pet" issue??? And how, exactly was the Mayor of the City of New York supposed to be able to remain silent?
This non-story has become a yawn. Get over it, Keane, and all your fellow travellers. Grow up and educate yourself.
WE ARE A CHRISTIAN COUNTRY. ALL RELIGIONS ARE GOOD, EXCEPT WHEN THEY TRAMPLE ON THE RIGHTS AND LIVES OF ANY MEMBERS OF SOCIETY. WE ARE SO BUSY BEING "correct" THAT PEOPLE ARE NOT THINKING FOR THEMSELVES.
A tempest in a teapot. We have more important things to address than Mayor Bloomberg's love of the camera.
GanAinm: like I said, Bloomberg could have put everyone in perspective with a memo. Instead he made this mosque a cause celbre of a pet Constitutional issue. The net effect is the predictable anti-Muslim rhetoric leading up in the weeks before 9/11. Completely unnecessary. The project had unnanimous go-ahead. The Statue of Liberty press conference set this whole thing off.
Short reply: Huhhhhhhhh??????? Personal reply: Brendan, why don't you stick to music? This blog is under the "entertainment" section after all. As I pointed out to you back when I was apparently the one who told you that the mosque was not "at Ground Zero", you keep on making the most tortured and connections; they keep coming out like: "Two plus two equals apples." I ask again: "Huhhhhh?????" I don't know where to begin with a deeper analysis. You are blaming the Mayor for starting the mosque controversy by making a statement weeks after it started??? Huhhhhh??? You are implying that the Mayor of New York should not have made a statement over a controversy in his jurisdiction that the whole world was already debating before me made the statement? Huhhh???? I'm no great fan of the Mayor, but his statement was one of his finest moments, greatly heightened, btw, by the presence of the wonderful Franciscan, Fr. Brian Jordan, OFM. Yes, the Mayor can come off as seeiming to hector and lecture the less enlightened sometimes, but guess what? The less enlightened among us who mistakenly think the Mayor or any other branch of government can or should repress whatever is the unpopular religion de jure needed that lecture. I'll finish with a few matters of chronology: the Mayor was hardly beginning what you call the "9/11 Commemorations of 2010 with this statement early in August. In addition, the Mayor's first widely pulbicized statement taking the position that government could not constitutionallyt block the erection of the structure took place on May 28, 2010, when the Know Nothing yahoos were already in full whine.
Previous Page 2 of 2 pages




Log into IrishCentral with your Facebook account


or sign-in directly

E-Mail:
Password:
 Remember me Forgot my password
Not a member? Register Now!
print this article Print
email this articleE-mail