The Keane Edge


The Keane Edge by Brendan Patrick Keane

Pulling up Barack Obama's roots, Newt Gingrich endorses British colonialism

Posted on Tuesday, September 14, 2010 at 11:03 AM

RSS


Recent Posts

Archives

submit to reddit


Academics are often compared to masterbators--especially the ones on TV.

The porn that gets social science academics 'off,' is race. If there were a moratorium on race-talk in America for a month, academics and TV pundits would just stare at the camera like sex-starved prostitutes.

Newt Gingrich is both academic and politician. This week, his tactic against Barack Obama is to amplify the Forbes essay that professor Dinesh D’Souza wrote while wearing Kenya-goggles. The piece is called “How Obama Thinks," and it is just another academic fantasy about the inner psychology of a distant public figure.

The conclusion that Barack Obama is anti-colonial, or anti-British colonial is laughable, considering that his policies push war for American military colonies in Iraq and Afghanistan. His policies are pulled right out of unfulfilled British Empire doctrine.

Watching a Black president press war on Arabs should be enough to eradicate the American moral pretense which makes everything about race.

Race is the vehicle that academics drive into the "mind of America." By boiling Americans down into a few insanely generalized racial categories, the academic reduces America into typical persons. The academicky pundit then psychoanalysizes his racist cartoon in segment after segment until your eyes and ears bleed.

This happens so we don't ever actually have time to talk about colonization, sweat shops, the globalization of slavery or puppet regimes.

War is fine in this culture of racist theorizing. The details of economic deterioration are secondary to race angles on the phenomenon. If the "issue" can be dissected with race, American media will illustrate the hell out of it with every racial filter available.

Politicians swim in this identity-politics environment and look for more and more clever ways to trigger factional fears based on race.

That's why Newt Gingrich has endorsed this fringe academic interpretation of Barack Obama as an anti-colonial nationalist. It allows more racial deconstruction, under the less obviously racial category of "Kenyan."

Everything that can be said about the "black president" has been said. Kenya is a new way to say the same shit all over again.

The irony is that Barack Obama is anything but anti-colonial. This Black president is perfectly willing to go along with whatever you want to call the building of green-zone-emerald-cities in the Middle East.

The meaning of permanent American military bases aside, the fact is that Barack Obama's father was Kenyan. Kenyan nationalism, however, does not register on Obama's political spectrum. Kenyan nationalism is the furthest thing from his mind.

In America, Obama is allowed to have Kenyan heritage, minus its political obligations. He is allowed to claim Kenyan roots without having someone accuse him of disloyalty. America is a big stew with everything thrown in.

America is like the scene at Thanksgiving, where a Swedish smorgasborg is administered under Dutch rules of tolerance with neighbors bringing-over pot-luck made by English and Wampanoag mothers. To be multicultural, to be American, we celebrate each other, grateful we all got a place at the table. There is nothing so un-American as to scold others for retaining their heritage.

Barack Obama offers a little bit of Kenya at the American feast. Our Iraqi-American and Afghani-American neighbors might argue, as they pass the kebabs, that he has not brought enough.

It's sad that Barack Obama will now have to distance himself from his Kenyan heritage in order to seem more American. Kenyan liberation against British rule owes much to the American revolution. He might think to reflect on Kenya when he visits Ireland.

Newt Gingrich's endorsement of colonialism should be the real story. It is not, because the scandal in America is rarely economic. Colonialism is economic vampirism much like our own global sweat shop system.

Colonial elites at home and abroad, come in all shades of race. Obama may dream of his father, but his vision for the world comes from Queen Victoria, who also dreamed of Aghanistan, Iraq and Iran.


31 comments

Next Previous Page 2 of 3 pages
Isn't GeoDillon clever? We REALLY need someone like him to translate "reason" as posted by SouthBendNative, and turn it into politically correct, multiculturalist idiotic left-wing speak, as propounded by BPKEANE and the rest of the libtard opinion-contributors to IC. -- We, the poor, uneducated and huddled masses of right-thinking folk so need the perspective provided by the likes of Brendan and, on this dialogue part of this particular screed, of Dennis Q, Mokurai, et al, to enlighten us on how the leftward experiments of the last century in various parts of the world so wildly succeeded in taking people out of the misery they lived in...mainly by forcing upon them the glorious benefits of famine, repression and the gulag options (when lucky). Or otherwise putting the bodies of the 'occasional pesky contrarian' in comfortable mass graves that collectively held upwards of half a billion people.--- Don't know about you peeps, but I can't wait for Ovomit to usher a similar 'golden era' upon America!
Gingrich is a professor of American history and a true American. Obama is not a true American,and hope we wake up and see his real agenda for America. Socialism.
Newt was always too smart for his own good.
mmcreedy -- so being proud that you are of Irish, Scottish, British, Scandinavian, Russian, Baltic heritage and heritage, you're not "white people?" Typical bent thinking of you right wing nuts.
Multiculturalism is not an American tradition. It is a recent liberal trend that "Balkanizes" people into groups and sub-groups and creates an us versus them mentality. Multiculturalism leaves out the majority of the population, in this case "white people" to favor the minority. The United States was NOT founded on this principle, rather, it was founded on the principle that all men were created equal. Big difference. I do not expect extreme liberals to understand this concept, as they are pretty much incapable of understanding anything except what Marx or Engles (or Fidel) have written or said. And by the way, Newt Gingrich is a professor of American History, something this writer has no concept of.
Okay, I get it; the Keane-Edged conceit here was to combine "master" and "debater" to achieve the (dubious)climax of a witticism. However, I must challenge Afghan(i)-American. The correct appellation would rightly be "Afghan-American" without the superfluous "i". I actuality, any reference to the "Afghani" is to that of the official currency of Afghanistan. Just sayin'...carry on.
Eh?
SouthBend: You show your ignorance. "Check out the brilliant results of your socialistic compadres in Europe before you write off those on the right". You don't even understand the words you use. I am an isolationist conservative--these American neocons are not of the conservative right. In fact most of them are erstwhile liberals, one or two were even in "socialistic" groups when younger. On issues such as border security, taxation etc., they are fully in the liberal camp. Their only difference with some of their liberal ex buddies is that they are even more obsessed with putting Israel's interests before America's. True conservatives don't look to start foreign wars--we mind our own business in the world unless directly attacked; the neocons butt their ugly snouts in all over the world and have started or supported wars on several occasions now.
The guinness make them sad and feeling like 'oppressed' victims
This site needs some balance, every blogger is liberal, every article has a leftists/socialists/bush hating slant....Sure brendin you did actually criticize someone on the left, what was it twice out of 100 articles? But you are par for the course here. What's wrong with the bunch of you? Are you afraid to have some alternative intellectual firepower like a Pat Buchanan type, you would all shrink from him....I thought liberal meant fair minded and everything should be "equal", you certainly don't show it here....And while I'm at it, how come you don't have any black Irish writers, (I mean negro), don't they rate? You say obama is part Irish I am sure you can find a nice conservative African/Irish blogger to counter the rest of the 50 of you liberals. How about Star Parker, I am sure she is just as Irish as Obama is.
Perhaps the dumbest article ever posted on this site. Leave it to liberals..the very people who instinctively categorize everyone they encounter and attempt to pit them against others, to try to label Gingrich and D'Souza as race baiters. The left invented it and continues to perpetuate it. When you address the hate that is Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton and the other poverty pimps on the left, you may have some credibility. Until then, you are simply empty headed shills. As for the dunces below who say that all neocons are bad. Check out the brilliant results of your socialistic compadres in Europe before you write off those on the right. Your leftist echo chamber may be comfortable here, but your schemes have repeatedly failed...every time someone is dumb enough to let you employ them.
Newt Gingrich hit on the idea of taking Republican resources from the Deep South where they weren't needed and using them in contested races where they helped get Republicans elected. This was the famous "Contract With America" that resulted in a huge Republican victory and got Gingrich elected as Speaker of the House.

It has been all downhill for Gingrich since. He's not really a brilliant strategist; he just has that reputation. Some of the things Gingrich did were completely boneheaded. For instance, his refusal to compromise with President Clinton shut down government because agencies couldn't pay staff. It was rumored that Gingrich did this for spite, because he was angry about having to sit in the back of Air Force One. Gingrich is also notorious for poor judgement in his personal life as well.

Gingrich believes that 2012 is his best shot for the presidency, especially if Republicans are able to sustain this "Obama is a Muslim" canard.
Mokurai: I don't blame Obama for inventing neo-conservative policy. I blame him for pushing it forward.
We must be clear. D'Souza and Gingrich are calling President Barack Obama a Mau Mau, with all of the hyped-up Imperial baggage that goes with the name. (The so-called Mau Mau rebellion was violent, but not in the murder-us-all-in-our-beds manner that the press at the time screamed about. Only 32 whites died as a result.) Just as the British Empire called moderate patriot Jomo Kenyatta a Mau Mau, convicted him in a kangaroo court, and sentenced him to eight years hard labor. It is incorrect to blame Obama for all of the Neo-Conservative delusions of the Bush administration. He is attempting to extricate the US from Iraq and Afghanistan, against the ferocious opposition of the current Republican Party of No. Not that I agree with everything the Obama administration has done. But he clearly would have done more toward peace and justice, given the opportunity.
apologies to those masterbators who were offended by my spelling
Next Previous Page 2 of 3 pages




Log into IrishCentral with your Facebook account


or sign-in directly

E-Mail:
Password:
 Remember me Forgot my password
Not a member? Register Now!
print this article Print
email this articleE-mail