The Keane Edge


The Keane Edge by Brendan Patrick Keane

Funding for the Ground Zero mosque is a big secret, Saudi oil money likely needed

Posted on Saturday, August 21, 2010 at 01:32 PM

RSS


Recent Posts

Archives

submit to reddit


Funding for the Ground Zero mosque is a big secret that organizers are keeping locked-up, while telling everyone this mosque is about dialogue and healing.

In mystery, the mind conjures. I am left only to piece together what this mosque could mean, from what I've learned about Saudi Arabian Big Oil money and Wahhabi Islam and 9/11. All that post-9/11 traumatic stress that went into research was reawakened with news of this mosque.

Demanding privacy and secrets about funding is puzzling and maddening to anyone who cares about what happened to people on 9/11.

When all is said and done, $100 million is going to buy a secretive oil tycoon in Saudi Arabia a victory mosque on what is technically and literally Ground Zero. That is my biggest fear.

Everyday-Muslims may be hurt by that statement, but everyday Muslims don't seem to care that their identity is going to be represented by Saudi Arabian aristocrats who will make Imam Faisal's dream a reality but only as they see fit. Money will decide the final shape of the mosque.

Building a mosque on ground so intimately associated with the hijacking is highly symbolic. The plane only hit a few buildings directly. Burlington happens to be one of them and so has become the ferverent choice on which organizers must build no matter what.

Does moving the site to a less symbolic locale reduce its funding potential? Is the symbolism of the site the deal-breaker?

Although the Sufi mysticism taught by Imam Faisal is wonderful, and everyone should know Rumi, the $100 million is not coming from Sufi collection plates, but from Wahhabi-promoting regimes. It is irresponsible to define this project before the money has come in, and before the funders priorities are understood and incorporated into the final plan.

It is disrespectful to demand that those in the 9/11 community be made feel unAmerican because they're not so enthusiastic about defending the Constitution in the name of Saudi Arabian religious visions on Ground Zero. Financiers of this project will demand that their Wahhabi-predisposition be represented somehow in the monumental edifice.

By the time the billionaires have made their changes, this mosque will be a skyscraper over-looking the 9/11 Memorial. We are told it will 15 stories, but add three more, and it will pop up above the two buildings between it and the WTC site. There are no guarantees that this won't happen. Why would anyone be enthused to fight for this right?

The sad fact of Islam is that it is a religion under attack by Big Oil money. Saudi Arabia actively promotes Wahhabi Islam, which is the extremist (and popular) violence-promoting ideology favored by big money and many in the aristocracy of Saudi Arabia.

Jon Stewart warned about lumping all Saudi Arabians together on his August 19, 2010 show in a segment he called Six Degrees of People Who Eat Bacon. He warned about making faulty connections between Saudi Arabian aristocrats, everyday Saudi Arabian people and Saudi Arabian terrorists.

If we live by that rule too absolutely, we may over-compensate, and fail to ever scrutinize aristocrats who use Islam and the Islamophobia to hide.

Saudi Arabian billionaires have gotten away with more than they should have on 9/11, and New Yorkers--real New Yorkers--don't have to feel ashamed for resisting the PC cult that must diminish the feelings of 9/11 in order to champion the rights of rich Saudis to gloat.

No one would make these sweeping (and maybe unfair) connections if the organizers would make assurances about financial backers on this project.

Islam is a religion with militant sects, heavily funded by oil money. That may sound like a slander on Islam, but it is really a crisis that faces all of us.

Muslims should not rally around a project built in their name, when they don't know about the project's money or the priorities of the financiers.

By the time it goes up, the Ground Zero mosque could become a Saudi Arabian skyscraper, with a mosque on the 18th floor, overlooking the 9/11 Memorial, while New Yorkers grieve their family below.


19 Comments

See all comments

hello.i am farhan from pakistan.just want to say that i am amazed to know about your thinking about us.your hatered about us can never be changed i know so i dont want to give any argument here.thankyou
Brendan, I'll paraphrase Einstein here - the same thinking that got us here is not going to get us out. We've actually reached a kind of cul-de-sac. For at least 15 or 20 years the American government has demonized Muslim leaders throughout the world and created al Qaeda. Now that we're turning to Muslim moderates to help dig us out of the mess in Afghanistan, there aren't any Muslim moderates to turn to . . . . just opportunists like Hamid Karzai.

I blame the Bush administration for the spread of "magic thinking" - the notion that a guy you'd like to have a beer with could pluck right decisions out of his hat. After September 11th we should really have responded the way America did after Sputnik, that is, learn exactly what went wrong and prevent it from happening again. Instead, Bush told us that September 11th was caused by bad people who were jealous of our freedom. In the nine years since then, Americans are still speaking in all-or-nothing terms like good guys and bad guys.

We are seeing the fruits of that naivete. These expensive wars are going nowhere, and we're still clueless about developing a foreign policy that workins in our own interest.

The Wahhabi angle doesn't have legs, except among people who don't live in New York but only visit from time to time. They're the ones who worry about the alleged sacrilege of a Muslim community center near the World Trade Center. New Yorkers don't care. If you do a telephone survey you might get a majority of New Yorkers to say they'd rather Park 51 moved the location, but that is the extent of New Yorkers' concern. However, New Yorkers will not tolerate an outbreak of thuggishness that will almost certainly develop if these auslanders keep escalating their rhetoric.

The Wahhabi thing won't fly, Brendan. It hasn't, and it won't.
DennisQ: I wish you cared about the thuggishness of Wahhabi militants.
It's not about money, it's about thuggishness and the willingness of the right wing to stir up working class resentments. There's plenty of Muslim money all over the world, and Park 51 won't have to crawl to the Wahhabis for funding. There's actually plenty of Muslim money in New York.

The young toughs who make up the English Defence League and their counterparts in France and Germany are quite delighted that somebody is seeking their approval. What a novel experience for the hooligans and rowdies who are being actually courted by unscrupulous politicians.

Republicans are doubling down. Lacking an economic program, they're going all out to market themselves as the bigots' choice. Neither Sarah Palin nor Newt Gingrich has an actual chance of being elected president, but they're getting press attention for their support of the American version of young bullies claiming "patriotism" as their motive.
News Corporation is not a "partnership." It's a PUBLICLY-TRADED COMPANY, of which the Saudi prince is a shareholder. It's a profitable investment for him, no doubt. But the facts are that he's not on the board of the directors or the management team. Why do facts and figures confuse and upset Lefties so much?
Last year I posted several times the connection between "Fox New's, Murdoch" and his largest investor and part owner of FOX News Corp. Saudi Prince Alwaaleed bin Yalal. This is the same Saudi Prince whose donation to rebuild the Trade Towers was rejected by the City of New York, because he had also blamed the attacks on U.S. policy even though he remained a close friend of the Bush family.Now this same Prince is being accused as the "nameless" Saudi "terrorist" funding the Mosque. My question is, why is FOX News in partnership with someone "they are reporting" as suspect, or terrorist related, and does all their "conservative rhetoric" go out the window when millions in investment dollars grease their palms?
I think he is Helen Thomas.
@DennisQ...You're misusing the word "apartheid" and that's intellectually dishonest. You're misrepresenting the position of opponents of Cordoba House and that's intellectually dishonest. Opposition to Cordoba House is not in itself "racist" at all. You can repeat that word as many times as you like and it still doesn't make it so. But I know you're kind can't help it because you're running on empty otherwise... You're also mistaken in stating that opposition to Cordoba House is a "white, neocon" thing. It's not. Why is reality so uncomfortable for you? Are you related to Helen Thomas?
Here is what's happening, boys and girls: In case it slipped your mind, there is an election coming up in November. In the last few months the Republican party has been in the process of imploding (and it's been so much fun to watch, too!) As was I predicted over a year ago, the so-called "Tea Party" would end up being an albatross around their collective neck. Sure enough, the mindless extremism of these nitwits is starting to scare the hell out of that mysterious segment of the electorate who describe themselves as "moderate". What to do? Find an issue - any issue - that will distract the people. After a desperate search that must have taken them weeks, they finally found that issue last week in - of all places - lower Manhattan. THE MUSLIMS ARE COMING! THE MUSLIMS ARE COMING! They grabbed this non-issue and ran with it. Then the corporate media (you shouldn't be surprised) decided to play this story to death like Hotel California and Stairway To Heaven. And it worked like a charm. Very few of us are at present thinking about the utter mess that six years of Republican control of the executive and legislative branches of our government made of this country. Instead we're wasting precious time thinking about a non-issue. Just for a moment let's put our minds on the things that really matter: The economy War in Afghanistan Massive unemployment A multi-trillion dollar debt The plunder of our national treasure by Wall Street An environmental catastrophe in the Gulf of Mexico.... ....and what the hell are we talking about? A non-existent "mosque". http:www.tomdegan.blogspot.com Tom Degan
There's nothing baseless about seeing racism in demands for apartheid zoning. We're told that Muslims aren't good enough to put up a community center near Ground Zero, because their presence defiles a holy place. That's not just a little bit racist, it's extremely racist.

I'm certainly not the first to note the ethnicity of the neocons - the people who pushed for war against Muslim countries that had nothing at all to do with September 11th. The word "sectarian" doesn't do the job - the word to describe American policy over the past 20 years is racist.

The very same people who promoted these wars are now promoting apartheid as the natural order of things.
@DennisQ...As I've said before, the off-topic rants and baseless, knee-jerk screams of "racism" and "bigotry" seem to come from the same people who think "the Jews" are behind everything. Is that what you think DennisQ? Is it "the Jews?" DennisQ, are you related to Mel Gibson? lol Or maybe Jeremiah Wright...
Brendan, You're going with a smear for which you have no evidence. Because the Park 51 people aren't saying where they are getting their money, you conclude that it has to come from some objectionable source.

There are lots of Muslims around the world, and Imam Rauf is currently on a good-will tour paid for by the State Department. It seems quite possible that everywhere he goes, they hand him a fat check.

You sound convinced that all Muslims are the same, and that they all want to dance on the graves of the victims of the September 11th attack. Are you willing to consider the possibility that there's no Muslim monolith? Let's start with simple questions first. Do you even know any Muslims? Have you traveled to a Muslim country? I'm having difficulty with your certainty. You're a bright fellow, a graduate of Bronx Science . . . what gives you your unique insight into these matters?
I would prefer that Saudi Arabian billionaires didn't feel so cocky on Ground Zero.
This bigotry is starting to look like an attempt to bring Israeli-style apartheid to New York. The Israelis dcn't call their two-tiered social arrangement by that name, but it's clear that Muslims in Israel are second-class citizens.

The "sensitivity" issue that we're hearing so much about seems to arise from the fact that New York Muslims act like, well . . . New Yorkers! Muslims should know their place in New York the way they do in Israel.

It's no coincidence that the anti-Muslim rallies are lily-white. The cause draws its energy from nativism and fear of foreigners.
I wish you were with Petraeus and would switch places with some poor guy on the eighth year of his third stop loss.




Log into IrishCentral with your Facebook account


or sign-in directly

E-Mail:
Password:
 Remember me Forgot my password
Not a member? Register Now!
print this article Print
email this articleE-mail