Manhattan Diary


Vote for Paul Ryan? That’s rich! Romney VP pick most extreme candidate ever to run

Posted on Thursday, August 16, 2012 at 09:14 AM

RSS


Recent Posts

Archives

submit to reddit

Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan

Here they come, Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan. Two grinning robots that want to take your money. And some of you are even going to vote for them.

Romney’s plan is to give record tax breaks to the rich, lowering their tax rate down to 28 percent. Ryan is a little different. His plan is to give the rich even bigger tax breaks, lowering their tax rate down to 25 percent. No wonder billionaires are bank rolling them.

Both of these men understand exactly how to advocate for their own class. If elected it'll be just like the George W. Bush years again, except this time, along with launching exciting new wars overseas, they’ll finally be able get rid of the remaining tax breaks that benefit low-income Americans.

Comforting the comfortable while punishing the American mainstream is now open Republican practice, so the far right have finally stepped out from behind the curtain to watch their candidate Ryan take on the mantel of power in full public view.

The timing is fortuitous because it's become apparent to most observers that the truth about Romney would probably end his presidential campaign.

He cannot sell himself on Romneycare, his signature achievement, because it would be too damaging. He cannot disclose his own income tax returns -- apparently they would be too damaging too.

Enter Ryan and his big toothy grin. But who is Paul Ryan, that’s the question?

Well, tremble now American seniors, because Ryan is the man who genuinely believes in turning Medicare into a voucher program.

Under his budget plan senior citizens would no longer be entitled to comprehensive medical benefits designed to protect them from financial ruin. No more guarantee of benefits, just take a voucher instead, and you know what a voucher's good for, don’t you?

Ryan also believes in ending Medicaid, turning it into a “block grant” instead. It’s estimated between 14 and 27 million low-income Americans would lose their health insurance over it.

Ryan also wants to privatize Social Security. In fact his plan to take a wrecking ball to the New Deal is so radical that even the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops and Bush rejected it out of hand.

So why do very rich people like Romney and Ryan hate government programs like Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid?

Well, the nation’s top earners don’t want the financial burden of the welfare state, since they don’t benefit from it, so their plan is to hand the entire cost of it over to the middle class, who do.

America’s rich no longer feel the need or the responsibility to contribute one thin dime to the upkeep of this nation. Instead they open Swiss bank accounts to hide their earnings from the IRS; they ship jobs overseas while closing companies here; they play Wall Street like a private casino and hand you the bill for their excesses.

I don't know how they can make this fact any plainer. They don’t actually care what happens to America.

Under Romney/Ryan it’ll be tax breaks for the rich and social Darwinism for the poor. These would be the deepest, most biting cuts ever attempted by a sitting government.

Have you noticed all of that crumbling infrastructure from sea to shining sea? Under Ryan’s budget the government would be so starved of resources that by 2050 it wouldn’t have enough money for basic functioning, never mind overdue road works or highway repairs.

Ryan’s massive and historic cuts to government funding would mean debilitating cuts to law enforcement, education, highway repair and even basic even food inspection.

Ryan does want to increase defense spending, however, so while you're watching all the bombs drop on new wars overseas you can try to console yourself that your money's being well spent.

But predictably, Ryan’s most characteristic ambition of all is Robin Hood in reverse.  He wants to preside over the largest transfer of wealth from the poor and the middle class over to the rich in American history.

According to Robert Greenstein, president of the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, the new Ryan budget “would likely produce the largest redistribution of income from the bottom to the top in modern U.S. history, and likely increase poverty and inequality more than any other budget in recent times (and possibly in the nation’s history).”

So that's who Paul Ryan is. Another partisan plutocrat with faraway eyes comes to squeeze the last few drops out of the American century.

A man who has never once in his life had to ask himself, which bill can I afford to pay this week? A man who once used Social Security checks to pay for his education, but who now wants to see Social Security scrapped.

And some of you will even vote for him. Just don’t ever get sick or lose your job, all right?




41 comments

Previous Page 3 of 3 pages
More scare tactics. Senior citizens would not be denied medical coverage. They could choose to keep Medicare as is or choose the voucher system. By the way, the voucher system is exactly the same as members of congress get and I thought we all wanted the same great coverage they receive.
Oh, please, C. O'D. Let's get real here. There isn't one person in the world that Romney could have chosen that would've met with your approval. You'd find faults with him/her, no matter who Romney chose. You're hardly an objective voice who's able to judge any GOP candidate fairly, since you write as if you're on the Saint Obama/Biden campaign team. This is America and you're certainly entitled to your opinion, as everyone is, but the fact is, you're completely biased. Btw: I'm not endorsing any of the candidates. Everyone can decide for themselves who to vote for.
Ribbett, ribbett, the frogs are croaking. O'Dumberty has no clue.
Checkout Cahirs source The Center for Budget and Policy Priorities, as I did, The blog entries tell the agenda of this website that exists on government grant money.
Cahirs ignorance is only outweighed by his arrogance. The super rich do not pay into social security for their full income by law, they do not receive the full social security benefit by law. the social security system is weighed toward the lower earners as it is perceived they will need it the most. What bothers me the most is he talks about other peoples money like it is his. Sometimes being brilliant and industrious pays off. Meaning you go out into the marketplace and offer a service and people give you money for it. When you wish to take this money from one person to give to another person it is theft. This is the starting point, from here most reasonable people can agree to certain costs that must be born by ALL citizens. These costs should be a constant percentage to be fair to ALL.
Here's a real surprise - Cahir doesn't like a conservative candidate. By the way, Cahir, it's Obamacare that wants to steal $700,000,000,000 from medicare, some of which will go to cover illegal aliens. Nice try on the scare tactics though.
Paul Ryan's budget plan is (1) give even more unnecessary tax breaks to the rich. (2) Poor people can look for food in the woods.
income is produced by people, it is not produced by government. Once you have part of your income taken by a third party, government, then we argue about where the third party, government, redistributes it. Government produces no income or wealth, the best thing for someone on the bottom to do is rise to a higher level and control their own destiny. I am insulted by the many who think that being born poor or black, or hispanic, or Irish means you are to stupid or lazy to get ahead, you are not. The class argument from the marxist is used to enslave the a working man to government handouts and pointless existence. If you want to help out your fellow man/woman cut the percentage government spends or redistributes to 20% or less and prosperity and optimism will result, currently it is approaching 25%
two words; VOTE OBAMA!
All these economic claims and counterclaims confuse the hell out of me, and I dare say for most people. But the one thing that impresses me about the Ryan plan objectives is that it plans for the debt to be erased in 14 years. This is a modest, sober and probably realistic projection. It is attacked by both sides as too long term (another example of American impatience). The fact remains is that Ryan plan is the only (serious) one out there and is based on the Simpson-Bowles commission that Obama commissioned but disregarded their findings. Re Medicare: Despite left-wing predictable attacks, Ryan's plan DOES NOT cut benefits for seniors or future seniors unless the latter so designates to enter a contributory plan that Ryan proposes. Three years have gone bye without a budget from Obama and his Democrat senate. Oh by the way, Cahir, I would think that the Moscow-backed Henry Wallace was the most radical to run as VP and President during the late 30's and 40's.
Ryan's budget would redistribute income from the bottom to the top and would "increase poverty and inequality more than any other budget in recent times.” And for what purpose? It would not reduce the deficit by a penny! It would cut Medicaid in half and limit Medicare-by-voucher to a fraction of current rates. The only visible outcomes of these cuts in govt commitments are reduced taxes on corporations, untaxed capital gains, and a token tax on millionaire incomes. As Krugman points out (and more economists see it every day), "These concrete proposals would, taken together, actually increase the deficit for the first decade and beyond." If there's any deficit reduction in Ryan's plan, it's the great invisible, unexplained mystery!
Previous Page 3 of 3 pages




Log into IrishCentral with your Facebook account


or sign-in directly

E-Mail:
Password:
 Remember me Forgot my password
Not a member? Register Now!
print this article Print
email this articleE-mail