Manhattan Diary


Tramps and millionaires - Mitt Romney’s high rolling fundraisers highlight the gulf between the rich and the average American people

Posted on Thursday, September 13, 2012 at 09:20 AM

RSS


Recent Posts

Archives

submit to reddit

Mitt Romney

On Thursday presidential candidate Mitt Romney is hosting a $50,000 a couple fundraiser in Oyster Bay out on Long Island. Fifty thousand dollars is a rather expensive meal, of course. But surprisingly there are still many, many people on Long Island who can afford to fork over what most New Yorkers would call a good year’s wages just to spend 30 minutes eating canapés in the company of Willard Mitt Romney.

I guess that makes them his job creators. I guess that they'll want something in return for their 50 grand lunches, and I doubt it will be to call for necessary improvements to inner city high schools.

Call me a cynic. Their contributions will more likely be returned in the form of tax breaks, subsidies, and exclusive franchises. Call it change you can believe in.

For months now Romney has been attending more high society fundraisers that a dowager duchess.

But he doesn’t appear for just chump change. In June he appeared at a fundraiser at a country club in Mississippi that raised a record-breaking $1.7 million, for example.

As if anticipating the headlines that would follow that bonanza, he immediately defended the Republican Party against its reputation of being the party of the rich. Really, he said, the GOP's whole focus is on helping the poor (I hope that no one was sipping on their fine champagne just as he said that).

“We’re accused, by the way -- in our party -- of being the party of the rich,” Romney reportedly said.

“And it's an awful moniker, because that’s just not true. We're the party of people who want to get rich. And we're also the party of people who want to care to help people from getting poor. We want to help the poor.”

Perhaps he was referring to the waitstaff? According to ABC, it was Romney's second fundraiser of the day, with his first in Louisiana raising at least $2 million, bringing the day's total haul to $3.7 million.
Some people in America are still doing very well, clearly. But nowadays they tend to live in gated communities that they fly in and out of in their own jets, so I can forgive you if you haven't noticed.

Over the last decade America's rich grew more and more reclusive, after all. According to Mike Lofgren, who served 16 years on the Republican staff of the House and Senate budget committees, America's superrich now live like the British in colonial India -- in the country and ruling it, but no longer a part of it.

“If one can afford private security, public safety is of no concern; if one owns a Gulfstream jet, crumbling bridges cause less apprehension -- and viable public transportation doesn’t even show up on the radar screen. With private doctors on call and a chartered plane to get to the Mayo Clinic, why worry about Medicare?” Lofgren writes.

The burdens of citizenship, like paying taxes or helping to support the welfare state, don't interest America's superrich because they do not benefit from it. That's why the want to stick the middle class with the bill, because they do.

Like everyone else the rich enjoy hearing nice things said about themselves, so they're not fans of Lofgren. They greatly enjoy being praised for their vast wealth, so his economic theories insult them. Since they already have a political party that praises them to the point of idolatry, they're not used to his candor.

We're becoming a nation of tramps and millionaires, Lofgren suggests. The primary purpose of the GOP now is to provide tax breaks and other financial advantages to the billionaires who bankroll them, like the Koch brothers or Sheldon Adelson.

They know that you, Joe Voter, will never willingly pull the lever to comfort the already immensely comfortable, as they simultaneously hit your retirement benefits and axe your health care.

So instead they'll play a little shell game to convince you that they're more American than apple pie or that Muslim Kenyan Socialist imposter in the White House. They'll tell you he raised you're taxes when in fact he lowered them. They'll tell you whatever they believe America's low information voters want to hear.

They'll put a smiling face on it too with a man like Paul Ryan. He'll tell you he wants to “empower” you, and he wants to “empower” seniors.

But what that really means is that he wants to end your entitlements like Medicare and Social Security. Perhaps you'll feel empowered as you mop the floor at Burger King in your late sixties.

What Ryan's especially good at is taking your eyes off the tax subsidies he delivers to the rich as he distracts you with glassy eyed platitudes about self-sufficiency and the American Dream.

But here's the thing -- plutocracy, which is clearly what's on offer from the GOP now, isn't a stable basis for a functioning democracy or longterm economic revival.

We used to know that successful nation states promote the well being of each section of its citizenry, not just the lucky few on the top. When a party is being bankrolled by billionaires, that – along with the wider good of the nation - tends to be forgotten.


6 Comments

See all comments

The fundraisers for President Obama with the Hollywood tramps, druggies and spoiled brats doesn't count? As a late night host said: President Obama said he and Jay-Z have something in common: both have wives who are smarter than they are. According to the host, Jay-Z said yes and neither he nor the President have a plan to turn the economy around. President Obama loves poor people. Just look how many more there are now! He has accelerated deficits making my children, their children and their children's children over $51,000 in debt and said short term debt doesn't matter. Yeah, as long as the short term is his next term he doesn't give a damn. Let the next guy be responsible and act like a man. The President is too busy fundraising, vacationing and golfing. to deal with hard choices. I wish it could be Gary Johnson but since a Libertarian really doesn't have a chance at this point in time I will vote for the other good man with a spine, Mitt Romney.
Romney has actually confirmed the main points of this article in his own words this week.
O'Doherty would have us believe that Obama is being bankrolled by millions and millions of old ladies on social security and blue collar workers (not just union members). Wall Street owns Obama, probably more so than it does Romney. And writers like this one help dupe the needy population to believe the dole and diversity is better than a free market, merit based society. We do have a real choice-rejecting both candidates as the candidates of the rich and Obama as the champion of the dole. Guess who will get screwed in the long run by these two and Doherty, of course ?
I would prefer to be told who is bankrolling the current president than asked who do I think is. I am also curious to know who is bankrolling Governor Romney. We don´t know enough about who will be asking for the return on their investment if he is elected. Perhaps can explain the position and why IA is so important since it only has 6 electoral college votes? Obama/Biden 237 Toss Ups 110 Romney/Ryan 191 If FL goes to the president, is that enough? If FL goes to the governor then I can understand the importance of the smaller states. If the battle for voter suppression is lost, can Governor Romney win? Are women being honest in the polls when asked who they support? With the obsession of Republican men to control female reproductive functions, I am amazed that any woman would vote for them, who is it that conservative women want to prohibit using contraception or having an abortion?
"We're the party of people who want to get rich"-- Yes, that's exactly what "America's low-information voters want to hear." We're still dealing with the fallout from 9-11. I think it set up a kind of subliminal financial panic, in which many people who weren't yet financially self-sufficient became greedy to get there quickly, willing to exploit whomever they needed to, because the future had suddenly become unpredictable in the wake of terrorist attacks. Driven by fear, they could no longer trust to hard work over decades to bring them some financial security. So they identify with millionaires and forget about their struggling neighbors. Meanwhile, the priests and bishops who might help wake up the deluded go astray in the culture wars, blind to our real problems. Never before in my lifetime has an election taken on such clear moral dimensions. Too many of us are still reacting and have forgotten that we always have the power to shape a future for ourselves as a people: greedy for "filthy lucre," covetous, or committed to sacrifice for steady recovery and shared progress.
Who do you think is bankrolling odumbo?
 




Log into IrishCentral with your Facebook account


or sign-in directly

E-Mail:
Password:
 Remember me Forgot my password
Not a member? Register Now!
print this article Print
email this articleE-mail