Manhattan Diary


The rich get rich and the poor get poorer - it’s the GOP economy, stupid

Posted on Friday, June 15, 2012 at 09:22 AM

RSS


Recent Posts

Archives

submit to reddit

President Ronald Reagan

Once upon a time, well just 40 years ago actually, if you worked hard all your life you'd probably come out better than you started. It wasn't just a line they fed to lure you here.

It was true -- you stood a good chance of making real progress with your life. In those days, which were your parents’ days, a more tightly regulated economy lifted all boats, not just the big yachts at the top.

There used to be a very strong middle class in America who were the envy of the world, and their unprecedented purchasing power drove the dynamo of the American century.

So what happened? Well, first the Ronald Reagan administration happened.

That era saw the mass changeover from productivity to finance, it saw America's rich find more effective ways to grow their own wealth. Instead of producing goods they switched over to playing the markets, private gain trumped public obligation, special interests trumped the common good.

Since Reagan's inauguration in 1980 we've now developed a financial inequality that's so extreme it's actually worse now than any time since the late 1920s (in the years just prior to the Great Depression).

But while ordinary people are struggling to get by our top corporations are enjoying the highest corporate profit margins in the history of this nation, combined with one of the highest unemployment rates in history.

Employers are also paying the lowest wages in history as a percent of the economy. According to an analysis by Moody’s Analytics this week, profitability in non-financial firms surged in recent quarters to fifteen percent, a level not seen since the late 1960's.

So President Obama was correct last week when he said our private sector is doing fine. There's simply no question about that. It's the best of times for the lucky few and the worst of times for the many.

Giving more tax breaks to corporations that are already stuffed with cash is not going to lead to change. It's the lack of demand that's really hammering our economy and impeding investment.
Some conservatives like to tell you that American jobs only exist because “wealth creators” create them. That's nonsense.

Jobs only exist because there are customers that can afford to buy products. But they can't do that if they don't have the cash.

If you're one of the many people who visited a store last week and hesitated to make a purchase whilst you calculated if you could afford it, you participated in a dangerous cycle. If you turned around and walked out things just got worse.

If instead you're one of those people who rarely have to calculate whether you can afford something, well good for you. The problem is there aren't enough of you to save the rest us from the tightening vice. The crumbs from your table aren't going to be enough.

Of course there are different realities in America. It's why I love livening in New York. It's a democratic city that affords you instructive glimpses into the gulf between rich and poor every time you walk a city block.

It's instructive to walk down to Tribeca, the real seat of the city's wealth now, where you can enter the Harry Potter alternate reality of the financial district.  Doormen in white gloves will sweep you into the most expensive looking apartment buildings on the planet.

Upscale lifestyle facilities abound. Yachts bigger than small villages are anchored to the nearby Hudson with immediate access to leafy outdoor restaurants.

If there's a recession on, they haven't got the memo in Tribeca. They live, most of them, in that other America, in Mitt Romney's America, and it's still morning in that America. If you want the next four years to look like the last ten you should vote for him.

To clarify, I don't mind rich people. I don't think rich people are the problem individually. I think that the political party that panders exclusively to them and works against everyone else in the nation is the problem.

I’m not the only one who thinks this. For example David Stockman, Ronald Reagan's director of the Office of Management and Budget who wrote a prescient New York Times op-ed piece in 2010, agrees.

America's increasingly partisan politics is destroying not just the economy and capitalism, but the American dream he wrote. "If there were such a thing as Chapter 11 for politicians, the Republican push to extend the unaffordable Bush tax cuts would amount to a bankruptcy filing. The nation's public debt will soon reach $18 trillion,” he warned.

That kind of debt cries out for “austerity and sacrifice,” he wrote. Instead, Romney and the GOP insist that the nation's richest taxpayers should be spared even a three-percentage-point rate tax increase.

"Republicans used to believe that prosperity depended upon the regular balancing of accounts," Stockman wrote, "in government, in international trade, on the ledgers of central banks and in the financial affairs of private households and businesses too."

No longer. From 2002 to 2006 the top 1% of Americans received two-thirds of the gain in national income, while the bottom 90% got only 12%.

This growing wealth gap is not the market's fault. It's the fault of decades of bad economic Republican policy. It seems unfathomable that we are being asked to embrace it for yet another presidential cycle.




82 comments

Next Previous Page 3 of 6 pages
Searlit a fair society does not exist in BrianO's dictionary Its all me me me
Searlit Your points make perfect sense. Instead of serfs, Mitt and Co. would like to see us all working for the corporate plantation with low wages, no safety net or healthcare in old age, while the masters reap all the profits.If elected (God forbid) Mitt will be the first president who followed the Gordon Gecko business model.
BrianO, I don't want to take it all, I don't even want half or a quarter. Just some fairness restored to the system would be nice.
Searlit just get to your end game, take it all and make serfs of us, we can bow to the king.
The funding deficit of Social Security could easily be restored forever, if the cap was taken off the tax. Right now you're only taxed up to about 92,000 dollars of income. If all income was taxed to the full amount there would be plenty of surplus income.
Oh i agree with pat he is so wonderful, oh no mac it is you who iswonderful, oh no pat and mac you are lovely says eira, oh we are all such caring humans. --YOU caring leftist I'll listen once you redistribute your own wealth to the masses, spend it all on the less fortunate than you, until it is completely gone.
It's not the Republicans stupid! It's not the Democrats either. They are both a bunch of whores, with the only difference being their clientele. Johnson's Great Society programs, and Clinton's trade deals with China, are at least as significant as the Reagan-Bush corporate give-aways in any cause-effect analysis of the moribund U.S. economy. It has been a long time since "representatives" represented their constituents. They serve their contributors with the result that public policy reflects the sum of special interests, not the common good. Our goal should not be changing Madams at the national brothel, but shutting down the red light District of Columbia altogether. The time has come for direct Democracy! We can petition for referendums to replace representative government with one person, one vote, majority rules, direct democracy. Once "We the People" take power, we can vote for a "Jubilee", the cancellation of all debts. A fresh start for everyone! Power to the People!!!
Free market economics is the cause of all this, because there is no such thing as a free market (except for poor people). Those who control the capital corner markets and use capital as leverage to extract more money from those who do not in the form of work and high prices for assets such as housing.
I agree with sirpeter that Seano is right. Seanomelb has a knack for coming into a discussion that's already underway (35 comments) and summing up the delusions and the realities of the commenters in a pithy few words! Keep going, Seano.
Are the rich the heart of the problem or should out of control entitlements be the main concern? In my view, government's function is to regulate not manage the economic sector. Where were those eminent New England liberals and financial watch dogs Barney Frank and Chris Dodd when the rich were stealing us blind? There is no easy panacea for keeping our country and its economy healthy.Here is an email sent by a friend that targets the single biggest problem faced by ourselves and our children, the deficit. "The fact is that in FY2012 and for every following year, entitlement payments (Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, food stamps, etc.) plus interest on the Federal debt will exceed tax collections. The result is the government must borrow 40 cents of every dollar it spends. Expressed another way, the US Government would run a deficit even if it laid off every employee and disbanded the military. It will get much worse because less than 20% of the 77 million baby boomers are currently retired. The rest will retire over the coming decade. This problem is so big that none of the currently proposed solutions will work. We cannot tax our way out of this problem as one party suggests. A tax rate of 100% of the earnings of everyone with a job would still not raise enough revenue. We cannot grow our way out of this problem as the other party suggests. GNP would have to grow at a 5% plus rate for over a decade. By my calculations, the USA only has another two or three years of credit left. After that it will be: borrow, from whom? We will have already borrowed all of the world's pool of savings. We also cannot cut discretionary spending as the Tea Party suggests. As I said earlier, we could disband the entire Federal government plus the military and we would still run a deficit. See hemason67 on YouTube.
jamieLM, Thank you for your inciteful, well-balanced and non-partisan commentary. Cahir could certainly use your help.
Seano you are spot on.They still believe that anyone can make it in the USA.The American Dream is over 25 years ago and they don't even know it.And it's not coming back.The reality is it was the changeover from manufacturing to finance that is eating away at the middle class.But Americans still have this strange idea that if you work hard you'll get ahead and if you are not getting ahead it's either your own fault or it's the "lazy people" that you are supporting.I remember the 80's in Ireland and the bullsh*t in the media and radio that people didn't really want to work.Well that was a crock of sh*t when Ireland had full employment.Been lazy is not a natural trait in humans.Apathy can be when there is too much of a sacrifice for the reward.It makes a stone of the heart.Take Mike's comment below about Cahir.He calls him a jealous, gay, angry, disenfranchised socialist.Take each word and you know the chances are they don't fit him.But Mike the Rock doesn't put up an argument either.Apathy Seano.Pure Apathy and depression.Thousands of Americans living in tents and in their cars all over the states and still waving the American flag saying WE ARE STILL!!! NUMBER ONE!!USA!! USA!! USA!! LOL.Your right they can be fooled.
seanomelb: Thank you for you sane and on-the-target analysis.
The homophoic PhlutiePhan shows his ignorant, bigoted stripes again. Grow up, sonny.
What is the Republican National Healthcare proposal. LET THEM DIE!
Next Previous Page 3 of 6 pages




Log into IrishCentral with your Facebook account


or sign-in directly

E-Mail:
Password:
 Remember me Forgot my password
Not a member? Register Now!
print this article Print
email this articleE-mail