Manhattan Diary


The rich get rich and the poor get poorer - it’s the GOP economy, stupid

Posted on Friday, June 15, 2012 at 09:22 AM

RSS


Recent Posts

Archives

submit to reddit

President Ronald Reagan

Once upon a time, well just 40 years ago actually, if you worked hard all your life you'd probably come out better than you started. It wasn't just a line they fed to lure you here.

It was true -- you stood a good chance of making real progress with your life. In those days, which were your parents’ days, a more tightly regulated economy lifted all boats, not just the big yachts at the top.

There used to be a very strong middle class in America who were the envy of the world, and their unprecedented purchasing power drove the dynamo of the American century.

So what happened? Well, first the Ronald Reagan administration happened.

That era saw the mass changeover from productivity to finance, it saw America's rich find more effective ways to grow their own wealth. Instead of producing goods they switched over to playing the markets, private gain trumped public obligation, special interests trumped the common good.

Since Reagan's inauguration in 1980 we've now developed a financial inequality that's so extreme it's actually worse now than any time since the late 1920s (in the years just prior to the Great Depression).

But while ordinary people are struggling to get by our top corporations are enjoying the highest corporate profit margins in the history of this nation, combined with one of the highest unemployment rates in history.

Employers are also paying the lowest wages in history as a percent of the economy. According to an analysis by Moody’s Analytics this week, profitability in non-financial firms surged in recent quarters to fifteen percent, a level not seen since the late 1960's.

So President Obama was correct last week when he said our private sector is doing fine. There's simply no question about that. It's the best of times for the lucky few and the worst of times for the many.

Giving more tax breaks to corporations that are already stuffed with cash is not going to lead to change. It's the lack of demand that's really hammering our economy and impeding investment.
Some conservatives like to tell you that American jobs only exist because “wealth creators” create them. That's nonsense.

Jobs only exist because there are customers that can afford to buy products. But they can't do that if they don't have the cash.

If you're one of the many people who visited a store last week and hesitated to make a purchase whilst you calculated if you could afford it, you participated in a dangerous cycle. If you turned around and walked out things just got worse.

If instead you're one of those people who rarely have to calculate whether you can afford something, well good for you. The problem is there aren't enough of you to save the rest us from the tightening vice. The crumbs from your table aren't going to be enough.

Of course there are different realities in America. It's why I love livening in New York. It's a democratic city that affords you instructive glimpses into the gulf between rich and poor every time you walk a city block.

It's instructive to walk down to Tribeca, the real seat of the city's wealth now, where you can enter the Harry Potter alternate reality of the financial district.  Doormen in white gloves will sweep you into the most expensive looking apartment buildings on the planet.

Upscale lifestyle facilities abound. Yachts bigger than small villages are anchored to the nearby Hudson with immediate access to leafy outdoor restaurants.

If there's a recession on, they haven't got the memo in Tribeca. They live, most of them, in that other America, in Mitt Romney's America, and it's still morning in that America. If you want the next four years to look like the last ten you should vote for him.

To clarify, I don't mind rich people. I don't think rich people are the problem individually. I think that the political party that panders exclusively to them and works against everyone else in the nation is the problem.

I’m not the only one who thinks this. For example David Stockman, Ronald Reagan's director of the Office of Management and Budget who wrote a prescient New York Times op-ed piece in 2010, agrees.

America's increasingly partisan politics is destroying not just the economy and capitalism, but the American dream he wrote. "If there were such a thing as Chapter 11 for politicians, the Republican push to extend the unaffordable Bush tax cuts would amount to a bankruptcy filing. The nation's public debt will soon reach $18 trillion,” he warned.

That kind of debt cries out for “austerity and sacrifice,” he wrote. Instead, Romney and the GOP insist that the nation's richest taxpayers should be spared even a three-percentage-point rate tax increase.

"Republicans used to believe that prosperity depended upon the regular balancing of accounts," Stockman wrote, "in government, in international trade, on the ledgers of central banks and in the financial affairs of private households and businesses too."

No longer. From 2002 to 2006 the top 1% of Americans received two-thirds of the gain in national income, while the bottom 90% got only 12%.

This growing wealth gap is not the market's fault. It's the fault of decades of bad economic Republican policy. It seems unfathomable that we are being asked to embrace it for yet another presidential cycle.




82 comments

Next Previous Page 2 of 6 pages
sirpeter, of course, a Yank taking social security, medicaid, social welfare,foodstamps. Left Ireland in the 80's for the good old US welfare payouts. Lazy loafers.
jamieLM, what Socialist system in Europe? What are you talking about. There are 27 countries in the European Union, which ones are Socialist and what have you based your usual derogatory anti-Europe comment on? You've never even been to Europe.
Nicely said Brian0. I will respectfully disagree with you when I do disagree with you. Respect is earned, if you know what I mean.
Proudcanadian, there is no growth without discussion, one will not agree totally with another, what many accuse me of ie. "incapable of logic or common sense" I take as a pat on the back from the closed minded, Seano, socialist security is forced savings, that isn't in the control of the individual but in the hands of government. Over your lifetime that control will be under government entities you will support or despise, I like control of my destiny, not hoping for a change in regimes to maybe return my retirement money. And thank you for the compliment. McNamara31 in the famous words of American philosopher bart simpson, It wasn't me I didn't do don't blame me--or was that Obama, eventually (31/2years) you have to be a man and accept resposibility.
"there should be forced savings" try telling that to those trying to feed/clothe and educate their families. Briano is just another clone of the discredited Fox/Newscorp/GOP talking points and poor old Briano is incapable of logic or commonsense.
Americans have lost 40% of their wealth (and security) not because of hand outs to the poor, but because of the financial crisis left at Obama's doorstep by the Bush administration. The GOP is for deregulation of banking, of the EPA, of business...Why.. because it means greater profits for the corporations which they represent. If you think the GOP represents American people you are beyond hope.What the GOP can't win in votes, they will buy with the money flooding into their super pac's by the corporations purchasing future deregulation.
BrianO, I am being taxed at a higher rate than the billionaires. Worker's are paying about 14% of their incomes to Federal, State, SS & Medicare. Many millionaires & billionaires are paying 10% to nothing, once they use all their tax shelters.
BrianO are you the same person that has been on here and I have disagreed with you? You have been dead on about this subject. They could do away with social welfare if employers were not so greedy and wanted the moon. There would be more people working if they would be satisfied with what they have rather than telling the poor worker to be satisfied with what they have. Equality, or atleast a bit more of the pie than what he gets so he can live and provide a decent life for himself and family, that is all the little man has wanted forever. Thanks also Brian for your achnowledgement of my previous post.
BrianO. So you want to do away with social security?Like medicaid,social welfare,foodstamps ect? And that makes perfect sense to you? You like the smell of burning cities do ya?
I'm all for doing away with socialist security. If there must be forced savings it should be self directed. Your premise is false about percentages,and yes government is stealing us blind, so why not strive for smaller government? When you tax one person more to tax another person less that is theft. You can paint the pony any color it will still be a pony.
BrianO, Republicans are stealing us blind. My paychecks have had Social Security taxes taken out from day one. Why should I pay taxes on 100% of my income while the wealthiest pay less than 1%? "Never fair to steal" - if only you would live by your own words...
@seano, if you mean rely on me me me to strive to achieve you would be right. I like a man to fish rather than giving him scraps of fish, you know self reliant folks, rather than government serfs.
searlit it is never fair to steal.
Cahir, you're a good writer my friend but you couldn't be more wrong with this article. It is the Dems who have killed this country, simple as. Generations after generation of hand outs have perpetuated just that. Almsot every welfare program the Democrats have ever proposed has cost money to the taxpayer and has not achieved its goal, like getting people off assistance. Remember Ireland back in the 80's when there was about 18% unemployment and there were married men with kids out of work for years. That was because the government had taxed the behinds out of the rich to pay for the poor or unemployed. You'll see what will happen in America if they continue to tinker with the rich, the'll take their money and go elsewhere and all we'll be left with is the poor. But it's heading that way anyway. Anyone who criticizes the rich and the corporations really doesn't no economics. You need the rich or there's no jobs, no nothing. Time to vote Romney in.
What's this Cahir, something we actually see eye-to-eye on? Hahaha! I totally agree with this article you wrote, so something must have happened! :) My comments on your other article titled "Good News or Fox News, which is it Cardinal Dolan?" would fit right in here! Just a request: perhaps you could also post links to the data you obtained? That way ppl can investigate for themselves. Thanks.
Next Previous Page 2 of 6 pages




Log into IrishCentral with your Facebook account


or sign-in directly

E-Mail:
Password:
 Remember me Forgot my password
Not a member? Register Now!
print this article Print
email this articleE-mail