Rome gay priest 'scandal' is politics at its most deadly
By: Cahir O'Doherty | Published Sunday, July 25, 2010, 10:50 AM | Updated Friday, September 9, 2011, 9:45 PM

This week Italian current affairs magazine Panorama ran an expose on a 'scandal' involving two gay Italian priests and one French priest.
Panorama claims the French priest 'celebrated Mass in the morning before driving two male escorts he hired to attend a party the night before to the airport.'
So far, so self-deluded. Closet-cases, like the poor, are always with us.
The story was printed in Panorama, the conservative weekly news magazine owned by
Silvio Berlusconi, the Italian prime minister.
As others have noted, Berlusconi may have an axe to grind, since his own romps with half dressed women half his age were loudly criticized by the Church.
Many critics suggest that Berlusconi's target isn't gay priests, it's really the man in the red shoes, since the
Vatican knows all about its gay priests and had no intention of addressing the thorny issue until Panorma forced them to.
So why is this a story? Because for centuries the Church has used homosexuality to gain traction into everyone's sex lives (gay and straight); and Berlusconi, critics say, is using homosexuality to gain traction over the Church.
These deadly games are played right over the heads of the little people, the gay men that both players condemn. Gay people are just pawns in a much bigger conflict. The real prize is gaining wider influence and scalping your powerful enemy.
Of course they'd never say that, because there's no need.
I have no sympathy for gay priests, in fact I hold them in contempt. They're gay men who oppress other gay men whilst privately practicing what they publicly preach against. There's no shortage of such people, unfortunately.
You can see why they're tempted, too. Homosexual priests want all of the perks of that supremely powerful international men's club, the Catholic Church - and none of the consequences.
Evangelicals like Ted Haggard know all about it, so do quack psychologists like George Rekers. Sooner or later they're all hoisted on the own petards.
The closet breeds pathology, it's undeniable now. Gay men who can't or won't admit the most basic truth of their own existence can be a substantial threat to others as much as themselves. Worse, their hypocrisy makes them vulnerable to scandal, blackmail and coercion.
The surprisingly high numbers of gay priests in the Church highlight an aspect of Catholicism that in our age may have become its defining characteristic: 'omerta,' the official code of silence, as prevalent in the Church these days as it is in the Mafia.
The rules are simple: you must publicly say one thing in order to privately do something else, and whatever you say, say nothing - and for God's sake, don't get caught.
The truth is we'll have to prise homophobia from the Church's cold dead hands, and the same is true for every other venal conservative politician with a grudge. As a weapon it's just too politically useful to both parties.
Meanwhile, Panorama ran this story with a homophobic cover picture that says it all: pink fingernail polish on hands clutching rosary beads. Pink for pansies.
Public antagonism toward gay people is politically useful, just ask the Constitutional Amendment seeking
George Bush, the score-settling Berlusconi or the look-the-other-way when it's wiser Benedict.
It won't stop until the majority of straight people figure out that their prejudices are being manipulated for someone else's gain.
33 Comments
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Switch to the desktop site to post a comment.PhlutiePhan | Aug 18, 2010, 12:00 PM EDT
Obviously, there is a grave problem with gay priests. I agree that politicians both within and without the Church are using the issue for their supposed advantage. JPII would have charged like "Dick Butkus". Benedict is "fumbling the football".
Intercessor | Jul 29, 2010, 11:06 AM EDT
What really got to me about this story, which should come as no revelation to many in the Church, is the FEIGNED Outrage, of the Vicar of Rome, Cardinal Vallini. Immediately upon the repeated accusation that 98% of seminarians in Rome were gay, he sent "an unequivocal message to homosexual priests: Come out of the closet, and get out of the priesthood." Now, the number of 98% is probably more than a little far-fetched, but at this point in time, nothing would surprise me. Cardinal Vallini went on to say that the majority of priests in Rome led holy lives. Now, that is a statement that I would really question, based on the eye-witness reports of friends in Rome, and the stories that I've read in the media. The Vatican KNOWS that it has a problem with homosexual priests and bishops, but simply claims they don't exist, or if they do, it is rarely! Because the Vatican claims that homosexual priests are practically non-existent, we should all believe Her, RIGHT? This story is far from over. The Vatican is now in the hot-seat. I wonder how She is going to squirm Her way out of this one?
hollabackgurl | Jul 27, 2010, 01:03 PM EDT
This is a blog page for current affairs - and he can write about whatever he likes on it, I reckon. Besides, it's not like the CC isn't an issue in Ireland and the U.S. as well as elsewhere.
sully1167 | Jul 27, 2010, 04:20 AM EDT
Siobhan39 is right,I as an Irish Catholic make the same statement. This is "Catholic" news not "Irish" news.
Mick10000 | Jul 26, 2010, 11:26 PM EDT
I have studied catholic theology, and it holds that you can be homosexual, you just can't act on it. Now, let's see, what vocation can a devout catholic, who is repressing sexuality, choose where he must not act on his sexual drives? Is this a self perpetuating mechanism? Perhaps we should rethink the whole process of a celibate, male ministry! Sexually adjusted men and women make much better ministers. A protestant friend of mine once said that a marriage counselor priest is like a vegetarian butcher.
S7McCabe | Jul 26, 2010, 09:05 PM EDT
Disgusted with this. With all the great Priests we have in our Church, there will be a few that are gay. As long as I can go to Mass and Receive Jesus in Holy Communion, I will let God sort it all out. I don't believe most of it anyway. A poll here in the States had only 3 % gay Priests. That means there are 97% good ones. Wonder how many gay men, women, and pedophiles they preach to every Sunday. I'd bet it is more than 3%.
Siobhan39 | Jul 26, 2010, 07:24 PM EDT
Why is this an Irish story?
Nicomax | Jul 26, 2010, 01:50 PM EDT
Let's have a schism wherein those with more open minds in the Catholic Church leave Rome and join the Anglicans since they have already allowed gays and lesbians as members of the clergy, as well as, allowing both straight and gay couples to marry. Leave the rest of the Catholic Church to those with 12 century ideas, and declining Western World participation but growth in those countries that have no coins to put in the basket. Not a solid business model.
knowthyself | Jul 26, 2010, 12:53 AM EDT
GAY Men in the Preisthood ??? No way i don't believe a word of it its just nasty slander that satan has created. lol yeah right and i'll sell you the Brooklyn bridge cheap. Hey there has been Gays and Pedophiles in the church from day one.its nothing new, only today its exposed. look up the History of some of the Early Bishops & Popes who had sex with their sisters and Mothers and some of them had children with their siblings . Read the Suppressed Gospel of Mark. it will shock most christians.The Church Burnt most of the copies but a Few have survived. The church is failing because it has hidden the truth for over 1800 yrs It has a very dark History . Jesus said---- what you keep secreat will Destroy you. what you reveal will free you.
LilPaddy | Jul 25, 2010, 10:48 PM EDT
Hey 2BorNot2B....If you need proof of what you outlined in your Jul 25 post here on-regarding IC? call me at 951-264-7103 Lil Paddy... A Dub in Ca. who tells it and likes it told AS IT IS!!!
SteveMD2 | Jul 25, 2010, 10:27 PM EDT
There are so many good gay priests, but they live under the hand of the tyrant bishops and RATZI pope. Who always need a victim to demonize to sell their corrupt brand of love. I have no quarrel with gay priests. What is totally unnatural is expecting adults to live with out sex, and to be in the queerest marriage of them all, married to the church. And the church's need to demonize someone goes back a thousand years to the Jews, Jesus own people. And its ultimate expression of this hatred was when the CAtholic Hitler leveraged that millenium old hatred to gain power, and 50 million died. Gays are just the newest victim of an absolutist regime which in some ways has been the curse of western humanity since its founding. And the people realize the extent of the crimes of the church. Including being at the root of mass murder, the holocaust etc. While pitching their smokescreen about "protecting life" Just in the last 6 weeks, CAtholic Portugal, Argentina, and Ireland and Iceland passed marriage laws for gay people, including actual marriage in Portugal and Argentina, and Civil Unions in Ireland. Amd Lutheran Iceland voted in Marriage by a 49 to 0 vote of their parliment. The world knows about this evil church. It needs to be ripped out by the roots, and replaced with a church that believes for real Jesus 2nd of only two commanments - to love thy neighbor as thyself.
2BorNot2B | Jul 25, 2010, 05:23 PM EDT
Hey hollaback.. I think you need a dollar's worth of reading comprehension. Where can I send you my contribution? -- The premise of the article is that in some surreptitious way the CC hierarchy, and particularly the present Pope, know about and CONDONE the existence of a 'lavander mafia' within the Church. It says nothing about whether the Church is, or has historically been against the practice of and promotion of promiscuity and homosexuality; to which the answer is UNEQUIVOCABLY YES to the latter, and NO to the former.-- One more time... Catholic Christianity has ALWAYS abhorred the sin, and will forever accept and embrace the repentant sinner.-- The biblical precedent on this goes back to the Old Testament. -- As to whether there are corrupt and sinful men within the Church the answer is also YES! Always have, always will be. Who the H ignores that? -they even surrounded Jesus!- but fortunately they are a negligible minority, and those of us who know the incalculable number of good works performed by the Church, and the dedication, good character and even saintliness of the great majority of priests will forever defend the Church against malevolent attacks such as yours, and deliberate misinformation spread by the likes of the majority of writers at IC who love to throw out juicy bones to dogs in order to get more hits, and fire up interest to their sensationalist website. They aspire to be the ethnic equivalent of a supermarket tabloid… without the public, the exposure, the money and the ‘intellect’ of those rags.
hollabackgurl | Jul 25, 2010, 04:26 PM EDT
The Church knew about the abuse crisis in Ireland for 60 years and let it fester, so yes, I think we have all the proof we need.
hollabackgurl | Jul 25, 2010, 04:23 PM EDT
How can you not know your own Church history? In the 6th Century, Justinian wrote new laws that were especially harsh against homosexuals. In the 14 century, the first written prohibition to gay sex was set down in England with a punishment of the death penalty. In most cases though the offender was turned over to a church court. The CC has been anti-gay since the 6 century.
2BorNot2B | Jul 25, 2010, 04:16 PM EDT
Bottom line, what is the end game of the author of this screed since it really lacks a compelling message (as do 98.9% of the pieces presented once or twice per week herein)? -- Is this guy O'Doherty a sore gayman who resents his lack of accessibility to pervert pseudo-priests who have no business being in the priesthood anyway, or is he just contending the CC knowingly and willingly accepts there's a 'lavander culture' within the Church and simply winks and nods hoping no one notices?-- I for one would stake my life on the former, rather than the latter.
2BorNot2B | Jul 25, 2010, 04:03 PM EDT
Next paragraph: "... for centuries the Church has used homosexuality to gain traction into everyone's sex lives (gay and straight)..." -- REEEEALLY?? In which way can you prove there is an inkling of evidence for this outrageous claim? -- I grew up in one of the strictest Catholic countries, went to Cath schools, three of my brothers went to seminary, I have lived all over the world, in and out of Catholic communities; been close to Bishops, priests, nuns, monks, deacons and 'Church ladies' who spend their life serving the Church and their fellow-man without remuneration... and I have NEVER been exposed, experienced myself or known of anyone to complain of such an egregious accusation.-- In fact, the probability of such behaviour is more likely within protestant churches and sects. Because those communities are so small their pastors have more time to know the members personally and get involved in their lives.-- Cath churches, even the smallest tend to 3 or 4 hundred families. That translates into over a thousand people, and as overworked and lacking in help as priests are the last of their concerns is getting involved in their parishioner's sex life!--The only time they might chance to hear about that is in the confessional. However, the confessional, in the last 30 years at least, is the lonliest place in the parish. People nowdays think they are ENTITLED to participate in Communion, no matter what type of life they lead!
2BorNot2B | Jul 25, 2010, 03:25 PM EDT
Probably the best way to counter articles like this one is to rubut them paragraph by paragraph because the authors, while they engage in innuendo and supposition with a definite agenda against the CC and the Pope, they provide not an iota of proof for their reckless and definitely biased claims. -- For instance, this guy O'Doherty says: "Many critics suggest that Berlusconi's target isn't gay priests, it's really the man in the red shoes, since the Vatican knows all about its gay priests and had no intention of addressing the thorny issue until Panorma forced them to." -- Sir, is your claim that the Pope knows about the behaviour of these despicable and ungodly men, and he just lets the situation fester??? -- If you have a shred of evidence for your claim then provide it; if NOT, then you should not pretend you are reporting but just simply attacking and providing an outlet for all Catholic haters who visit this website to pile it on!
ThomasCoolberth | Jul 25, 2010, 03:19 PM EDT
This is wholly about doctrine. The priests need to accept doctrine and live it out or reconsider their vocation. The Church is the Bride of Christ and in the same way, priests are married to her (too.) So, there's a basic fidelity issue there. St Paul Letter to the Romans and other Old Testament tracts clearly lay out what the Church's only possible position is. The bottom line, tow the line, or take a hike.
glorybe1929 | Jul 25, 2010, 02:45 PM EDT
I have read some of the best explanations about the RCC in these comments. Good for all of you for coming forward. It( the RCC) is and always has been NOT of Our Lord Jesus Christ. We are no longer fooled by these evil men in sheeps clothing,"The fox guarding the hen house"so to speak. The "holey" people. The narcisists in long flowing robes. We really fell for this line of the Devil. When you put yourself first, before the Lord, you're bound to be following anything but the LORD JC.
lwhayer | Jul 25, 2010, 02:01 PM EDT
To me, sexual orientation should be viewed as irrelevant. Celibacy (and chastity) in the Roman Catholic Church started as an economic issue about widows of priests inheriting church property. Somehow it became religious. Pedophilia is a separate issue and should be treated as any other child abuse.
Ms.Gail | Jul 25, 2010, 01:37 PM EDT
It is no one else's business what a priest's sexual orientation as long as he is celebate.
MaryM232 | Jul 25, 2010, 01:22 PM EDT
This issue shouldn't be exploited for agenda, ideology isn't a human being, and it's a cold and bloodless one that isn't in aid of human rights, but in exploiting them. Let's make something very clear. These gay priests, and gay activists demanding to control the discussion aren't any different. I used to support gay rights, until I woke up to the extremists in the gay "rights" movement who are demanding what they would decry if the shoe was on the other foot, that everyone conform to their desires. Gays have no business in the Catholic priesthood, because they do not believe in Christ's teachings, it's as simple as that. There is no right to enter religious orders. Gay activists attack the church to force it to sublimate itself to extremist gay ideology. These gay activists have acted shamefully, since the sex abuse scandal began. In Boston, one has funded suits against the church, exploiting the suffering of children who had been molested, and only did so to use the suits to attack the church when it brought up the problems of same sex child molestation coming about because of homosexual pedophiles who have entered the priest hood. These activists lie, claiming that homosexuals can never be pedophiles, which flies in the face of science. In fact, the only pedophile activist groups are homosexual. There is NAMBLA, and their lesbian counterpart, though I won't type it's name because it's offensive, though you can google to find it. The newest is from Brazil, where the homosexual community are demanding a universal "human" right to molest little boys. Gays and lesbians have an obligation to speak out against gays and lesbians who seek some false right to rape and molest children, if they are incapable of recognizing that fact, and unwilling to do so, what they reveal is there is something unnatural about them, because no decent human being condones the exploitation of children.
AmAncINED | Jul 25, 2010, 01:15 PM EDT
My great-aunt has been a life-long nun. She tells me that there was always lesbian activity in every convent she ever lived in - sometimes rampant. Everyone pretended not to know about it. The nuns thought there was gay activity going on inside rectories among priests. I also knew a 19 yr. old girl who was "dating" a 33 yr. old priest on the sly. When she got pregnant, the priest disappeared from her life. Then there was the priest who rented a room at the Y every Tuesday from noon to 1:00. Within minutes a man arrived and went to that room. My mother-in-law worked there and recognized them as priests from parishes in the city - not hers. It seems like there's been "activity" going on, both straight and gay, among priests and nuns for a long time. The Church can make laws but they don't seem to be able to enforce them when it comes to sex among the hierarchy. The course of action has been to deny, deny, deny. As an RN, I know that many women are getting Aids & STDs from their husbands who are on the "down-low."
Bonniekara | Jul 25, 2010, 11:14 AM EDT
Makes the whole "Impure Thoughts" and "Secret Hateful Thoughts Regarding Sister Mary Clara's Veil Coming Loose in the Wind and Showing the World She's Really Bald" sins seem pretty tame. re: the Catholic Church and Gay Priests. The sin is the LIE, not the being born a Homo.
mrkennedy | Jul 25, 2010, 11:00 AM EDT
I see so many articles say "the high numbers of gay priests. What is high, 1 out of a hundred, 10 out of 10,000 or 1,000 out of 100,000? I would like to see a poll taken of how many heterosexual priests vs homosexual priests are in the Catholic Church. I would also like to see the numbers for Protestant clergy or Jewish rabbies.
hollabackgurl | Jul 25, 2010, 10:54 AM EDT
The homophobic comments that are clearly unrelated to this article have been flagged for removal.
Intercessor | Jul 25, 2010, 10:50 AM EDT
The Church has intentionally constructed a model whereby it is acceptable for 2, 3, or 4 men to live together in a rectory, without any questions being asked in regard to the morality of the situation or whether or not these men are really living out a celibate promise. As a result, homosexuality is probably rampant. In one specific parish in which our family worshipped, it was revealed that the head priest was having affairs with teenage girls and his associate was diddling young boys. All these priests had to do was "to confess to each other!" Presto! The problem was solved! Both sins were covered under the Sacrament of Confession, which meant that they were assured that one wouldn't "turn the other in" or tell the bishop. And it was another form of mutual blackmail, which effectively kept the secret within the parish family and allowed for other children to be abused. The Roman Catholic Church has purposely constructed an open platform for both homosexuality and other sexual sins to flourish. It was no accident. The bishops knew what they were doing from the start: Protecting the priesthood but denying all forms of being complicit in the problem.
SingleDonald | Jul 25, 2010, 10:11 AM EDT
A sensitive subject, to be certain! I must agree with Southernpride. Every year I donate blood, where I work. A question always asked, on the form, is whether you are a man, who has had sex, with another man. Homosexuals are clear health risks, and thus are barred from donating blood. I don't feel that gays should be discriminated against, in jobs, housing, or be subject to homophobic taunts. However, I concede that their behavior, in private, disgusts me. Tolerance should be given to them, but I believe they will never be accepted into mainstream American, or any society. Maybe gay centers, such as San Francisco, or Madison, Wisconsin are the answer. If gay people go there, they can likely be accepted, much more so than in regular communities. I understand that straight people are NOT resented there either, so everyone can live in harmony. That is, if you are a heterosexual who can accept open displays of homosexual and lesbian affection.
JimThompson | Jul 25, 2010, 10:00 AM EDT
Always thought that priests should be aqble to marry. Perhaps more hetrosexual men would join the priesthood if they did. A man's religious beliefs should not forbid him from being normal in hias sex life.
CitizenWhy | Jul 25, 2010, 09:47 AM EDT
The moral dividing line today is: defense of human right versus religious opposition to human rights. The Church is on the wrong side in regard to women and gays.
JoMichael | Jul 25, 2010, 09:24 AM EDT
And, Hollabackgrl, your post has been flagged (as personal attack). The CDC's stats are well known but often denied from people like you who do not want to face reality.
hollabackgurl | Jul 24, 2010, 09:09 PM EDT
Homophobic garbage. The gay population does NOT significantly higher incidences of a large number of diseases. Your post has been flagged Southernpride.
Southernpride | Jul 24, 2010, 09:05 PM EDT
In regards to homosexuality and health, the homosexual population has a significantly higher incidences of a large number of diseases. One of the reasons for homosexual population having higher incidences of diseases is the significantly higher incidences of promiscuity in the homosexual population. In addition, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) from 1994 to 1997 the proportion of homosexual men stating they had anal sex increased from 57.6 percent to 61.2 percent.[1] Although homosexual men may engage in sexual practices which may put them at risk, studies report that anal sex can be an important risk factor for the relay of many diseases.[