Manhattan Diary


Obamageddon coming for your guns, gold and garters - GOP playbook goes off the deep end

Posted on Wednesday, August 08, 2012 at 09:48 AM

RSS


Recent Posts

Archives

submit to reddit

The far right doesn't like Mitt Romney, at all. That presents them with a problem, since he's the GOP candidate and despite their misgivings they still want him to win.

How to motivate all those conservative voters to show up at the polls for such an uninspiring candidate?

The answer is always the same: create a cycle of irrational hysteria. Trust in terror to get them to the polls. The GOP are masters at that. Call it the theater of the not-at-all-oppressed.

It goes like this: they're coming for you. They're coming for your guns, wives, bibles, children, faith, fried chicken, freedom.

It doesn't matter who THEY are. They're a Russian doll of liberal avatars. They will never be a shortage of THEM.

But it's hard to maintain all that bed-wetting terror year after year, just ask Stephen King. You can run out of tricks. That's why in each election cycle the GOP theatre-makers have to top themselves to create a new level of threat.

This year they have succeeded to the point where they have apparently fallen for their own fables. Or at least, that's the impression any sensible person gets when wading through the paranoid and increasingly irresponsible articles they're publishing online to terrify their owns ranks into voting.

What are the far right afraid of this election season?

Well, in no particular order, Sharia law, the confiscation of their firearms, President Obama's Muslim Brotherhood conspiracy to turn Washington DC into Baghdad, the ACLU's plan to ban the Bible, Hilary Clinton's plan to force America's womenfolk into burqas, the gay marriage thugs manifesto to pilfer your husbands and redecorate your homes, Nancy Pelosi's Drive-thru abortion clinic plan, non-white people's plans to become your neighbors, Mexico's nefarious plan to repatriate the entire country in Arizona, big media's plan to sell socialism to the suburbs, and on and on.

I'm not exaggerating. This week Breitbart.com, that Tea Party oasis, claimed that President Obama's administration is paving the way for Sharia law in the United States.

'The most terrifying danger Americans face from a second Barack Obama term isn’t the economy, which is scary enough…Now there is strong and open evidence of the Obama administration collaborating with Islamist activists to ensure the path toward sharia law is accelerated.'

It must have been how-stupid-can-we-be night over at Breitbart. But this kind of spurious nonsense finds traction among the paranoid and the fearful.

Only one man can save the nation's Anglo Saxon heritage from Obamageddon, of course. You know who he is. It's a measure of how desperate the GOP and Tea Party rank and file have become now that they have to frame their political opposition with such blatantly racist dog whistles.

Before you think it's just the Muslim-bashers who fear for the future, check out another old reliable on 24/7 terror alert.

Just three days after the Aurora, Colorado shooting the National Rifle Association (NRA) sent out a mass mailing that claimed President Obama's re-election will lead to the 'confiscation of our firearms.'

Cue freakout.

Signed by NRA executive vice president Wayne LaPierre, the letter claimed the 'future of your Second Amendment rights will be at stake… And nothing less than the future of our country and our freedom will be at stake.'

Talk about a case of the vapors. It's as infuriating as it is mendacious.The truth is crazy people keep getting the guns, they have unrestricted access to tons of them in fact.

All of this might be funny, after a fashion, if it weren't for the eye-popping comments made by Tea Party supporters on FreeRepublic.com, another far right watering hole, where reactions to the bogus Sharia story included:

'There is no reason that Obama should not support Sharia Law. Considering he is a Muslim. His father was one and it is passed on to his son whether he likes it or not. This is a club that you can’t resign from, because the penalty is death.'

Another wrote:'There is strong evidence that he and Hillary are working with the Muslim Brotherhood…'

"I am far more afraid of the Muzzies than any Latino illegal,' wrote another.

It went on like this, fallacy after paranoid fallacy. They are coming. They want our guns, gods, gold and garters.

Fed on a diet of freak-out, can we claim to be surprised if delusional far right us-or-them types pick up their rifle to fire the first shot? Everywhere they look they are being told their world is under threat of extinction. 

Conservatives call themselves the true patriots of real America. They scoff at everyone else. But do true patriots rip apart the fabric of the nation just to win an election?

On November 6 you can be judge.




69 comments

Next Previous Page 2 of 5 pages
Seano achievement has no color.
very frustrating, as I have tried before when asked for facts the comment wont be accepted, I'll try a shorter version. !. holder and the black panthers. 2 holders speech to the black churches. 3 the us is a coward about race, which is funny coming from a black AG working for a Kenyan American president. Release of Marilyn Buck of the Black liberation Army from her 80 year sentence. There's more, but thats good enough for now
Briano you may not be racist but you defend those who are. Doe's that make you a racist???
BrianO, I assume you refer to AG Holder as "racist ... in charge of the legal system." You have an obligation to supply evidence when you make a charge of racism against anyone. I've cited evidence on the tea party rabble rousers I named, and I quoted poster slogans and comments voiced at tea party meetings directly from videos widely available through media news and You Tube. What is your evidence for charging the Attorney General with racism?
Seano as we discuss the different sides of arguments I am what you consider part of the right, I took no insult from that, I was only disappointed by the argument that members of the right dislike obama because he is black, I being from what you describe as the right dislike obama for his agenda, one I feel fights against the Constitution of the United States. One of my fondest wishes is for a conservative democrat to arise from the cesspool of the democratic party, it matters not to me what party, color, sex, sexual tendency, a person be as long as they uphold the Constitution.
Eiriamach which one of your racist is in charge of the legal system of the USA, you know the department of justice. What does it say about a president that appoints such a racist to a cabinet position, and we could go on, remember vance jones? Yes war mongering neo nazi groups try to infiltrate and recruit th tea party thinking like you they are extremist, They are disappointed as the tea party is made up of mom and dads who believe in the Constitution of the United States.
BrianO, you're playing a game of one-upsmanship on racism in the political parties. 'Looks like you know you have a gang of low-lifes in the tea party, but it seems not to matter. Tea party activists include Billy Roper, who took part in White Revolution's 2004 Topeka Rally to protest the 1954 Brown vs the Board of Ed decision, which struck down segregation in public schools. SPLC calls him "the uncensored voice of violent neo-Nazism.... [He] isn't afraid to celebrate genocide and mass murder." He orders White Revolution members to distribute racist pamphlets at "Tea Parties from North Carolina to Arizona" and "to do your part for our race and nation!" Erich Gliebe, who heads the WV Neo-Nazi group National Alliance, uses the Internet to recruit the tea party: "a number of those who turned out [for a tea party meeting] on April 15th are ready to embrace the National Alliance's message." As a result, the tea party mainstreams racist agendas. NAACP Pres Ben Jealous warned the GOP, "You must expel the bigots and racists in your ranks or take full responsibility for all of their actions." Their actions include shouting "He's too black to be President," in a tea party video on You Tube, and "I'm a proud racist. I'm white." TP posters depict Obama in Muslim headscarf and Hitler moustache; they declare "White people are p*ssed." A TP teeshirt reads "YUP. I'm a racist." As the Irish would say, an té a luionn le madraí éiríonn aníos le dreancaidí.
When conservatives tell gay people they're lucky not to be living in the Middle East they unconsciously reveal their own barely suppressed fundamentalism. It's very telling.
Just to be clear I stated 'The right will never forgive" etc,etc.
It was not an attack on you Briano are you deliberately mis-quoting me or just self centred.
The constitution of the US was created to limit the power of government. The history of the US is bound to it's break away from the forces of the crown. Government is a necessary burden of society, responsiple for national defense, border control, inter-state commerce. Your reference to the patriot act assumes it was to control the citizenry, I would think FDR's encampment of japanese american citizens would be a more outrageous treatment of rights but he was a progressive so I guess it was right.On Holder******The Obama administration won a default judgment in federal court in April 2009 when the Black Panthers didn't appear in court to fight the charges. But the administration moved to dismiss the charges in May 2009. Justice attorneys said a criminal complaint, which resulted in the injunction, proceeded successfully.***** Now when you don't show up to court you get released of all charges? only in the bizarro world of the Eric holder DOJ. R
@Eiria "Mindful of how Democrat opposition had forced the Republicans to weaken their 1957 and 1960 Civil Rights Acts, President Johnson warned Democrats in Congress that this time it was all or nothing. To ensure support from Republicans, he had to promise them that he would not accept any weakening of the bill and also that he would publicly credit our Party for its role in securing congressional approval. Johnson played no direct role in the legislative fight, so that it would not be perceived as a partisan struggle. There was no doubt that the House of Representatives would pass the bill. In the Senate, Minority Leader Everett Dirksen had little trouble rounding up the votes of most Republicans, and former presidential candidate Richard Nixon also lobbied hard for the bill. Senate Majority Leader Michael Mansfield and Senator Hubert Humphrey led the Democrat drive for passage, while the chief opponents were Democrat Senators Sam Ervin, of later Watergate fame, Albert Gore Sr., and Robert Byrd. Senator Byrd, a former Klansman whom Democrats still call "the conscience of the Senate", filibustered against the civil rights bill for fourteen straight hours before the final vote. The House of Representatives passed the bill by 289 to 126, a vote in which 79% of Republicans and 63% of Democrats voted yes. The Senate vote was 73 to 27, with 21 Democrats and only 6 Republicans voting no. President Johnson signed the new Civil Rights Act into law on July 2, 1964.
Cont'd: BiranO, We are all aware of the segregationist history of the Democratic Party. We are also aware that Democrats worked tirelessly to draft, pass, and enforce the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and subsequent Voting Rights acts. Tea Party candidates have advocated repealing ALL of that progress, along with the 14th Amendment to the founding document known as the US Constitution. Nothing in the Constitution limits the SIZE of government or expresses a preference for small government. For a nation with the geographic reach, population, and regional diversity of the USA? The "small government" meme is ludicrous! When classic libertarians like Henry David Thoreau and Rbt Paul Wolff advocated a diminished role for government, they mean keeping government out of the private moral choices of citizens! They mean that government must learn to respect individual autonomy, and protect, rather than limiting, "inalienable" rights. That is the libertarian and classic liberal view of LIMITED government, not "small" government as the Tea Party misreads it. BTW, no US President has done more to damage privacy and extend government surveillance into our lives than G.W. Bush. See "The PATRIOT Act."
BianO, the New Black Panther Party has been on SPLC's list of hate groups for a long time. The media follow activities of these groups closely. SPLC's description: "The New Black Panther Party is a virulently racist and anti-Semitic organization whose leaders have encouraged violence against whites, Jews and law enforcement officers." Why did no one, neither Holder nor any state agency, prosecute two Black Panthers for the 2008 intimidation at the poll? The simple fact is that no voter, white or other, would file any complaint against them! Holder issued an injunction, but without complaints or testimony, could not prosecute individuals. The media folks who keep returning to this event apparently think we should discard "innocent until proven guilty" and just throw people in jail without benefit of trial. Ronald Reagan appointed Eric Holder as judge to Superior Court, Washington DC. Later, Holder prosecuted Democrat congressmen John Jenrette and Dan Rostenkowski. His career has been demonstrably non-partisan and non-racist. BUT what if that were not true? Would racism in the Obama Cabinet excuse racism in the GOP? What is your point? My guys are as bad as your guys? That's not a realistic way to deal with racism. Fact is, no one in the GOP will denounce the racism of those who hate Obama to the point that they grossly misrepresent (lie about) his personal life, decisions and policies.
Eiriamach, I believe the race card was in reference to @seanomelb saying that I will never forgive the majority for voting for a black president, his implication is that I disagree with Obama because he is black. Childish argument, I don't agree with something it must be because the president is black
Next Previous Page 2 of 5 pages




Log into IrishCentral with your Facebook account


or sign-in directly

E-Mail:
Password:
 Remember me Forgot my password
Not a member? Register Now!
print this article Print
email this articleE-mail