Money for Mitt Romney but not the nation
By: Cahir O'Doherty | Published Wednesday, July 18, 2012, 9:45 AM | Updated Wednesday, July 18, 2012, 9:45 AM
What's happened is appalling but it's easily explained: the world of Mitt Romney, the world of America's super rich, has simply decoupled itself from the United States.
As the rest of the world develops new technologies, bolsters its space programs and discovers new subatomic particles, here in the United States Mitt Romney's visionary plan for our future involves throwing 30 million people off Obamacare and ballooning the deficit through further unproductive tax cuts to rich people like himself who don't need them.
After that he'll rest presumably.
Then on the eight day he'll probably de-fund Planned Parenthood and commence throwing the gays out of the military, the City Hall's, the Pentagon, the White House and Utah, possibly.
It will be back to the future. What I don't expect from Mitt Romney is any departure from the aims, objectives, philosophies, foreign policies or achievements of the George W. Bush administration. (Yes I just wrote the achievements of the George W. Bush administration).
Meanwhile, commentators are saying it's looking increasingly like Romney paid no taxes at all in 2009. Not one thin dime. And when he does actually pay taxes he pays only 14 percent, which at his level of annual income is next to nothing.
It's standard practice for presidential candidates to release at least six or ten years of back tax returns. They do this to illustrate to the rabble that they are regular citizens, insofar as that goes.
We have never had a richer candidate for the office. We have never had a candidate receive more record funding from billionaires. We have never had a candidate that has thumbed his nose at the ordinary contingencies of the political vetting process in the entitled way that Romney has. Could these things be connected?
Romney lives in an alternative America, the one where even your car has its own dedicated elevator. It's the America where he hasn't answered to the little people in his life. He's not about to start now.
The rich, wrote F. Scott Fitzgerald, are different. They have enough money to sound proof the walls. Shouts of outrage and anger do not reach them. They never have and they never will.
Meanwhile in the real America that you and I live in, you know the one with the working stiffs fighting to get (or keep) a job, balance their bank account, keep the phone connected and the lights on - the nation where more and more people are ruminating darkly about the health and likelihood of a functioning democracy - well against all odds things have been slowly improving for us. There's a sliver of light on the horizon.
But Romney and his cadre of fat cat billionaires want to refinance that silver lining, offer it sub prime loans with the option to renegotiate, then they want to move it offshore to China where they can avail of non-union wage drops and unsafe working conditions to produce it a much lower cost.
We're told there's no money to invest in the nation's economy, in health care, in industry, in infrastructure, in construction, or in our stagnant wages. But there's no limit on the amount being donated to the candidate who will best serve billionaires.
There truly is two America's. They never see each other now. Mitt Romney will never live where the rest of do.
72 Comments
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Switch to the desktop site to post a comment.hollabackgurl | Sep 01, 2012, 08:36 PM EDT
Romney is going to lose the election. All the billionaire oligarchs can't elect him.
lokionline | Jul 24, 2012, 01:08 PM EDT
Commies under the bed?
Has anyone seen "Pleasantville" the movie?
Do people really want to live in a version of the 50s minus the rising expectations and growth that were common then?
That's the vision Romney and the Republican party is offering. It lacks any color but black and white.
McNamara31 | Jul 24, 2012, 10:47 AM EDT
Madeliene "Get the communist out of our house" Really? Try to open a book or a newspaper once in a while;it might open your mind.If that doesn't work look up the definition of a communist.Many Americans are really sick of these stale old Fox-isms and people who intentionally slander in the name of politics should be confronted for it.
eiriamach | Jul 23, 2012, 03:36 PM EDT
Reds under the beds, commie alert! Madeliene has drunk the Kool Aid and has the answer-- Romney-- to keep the govt chasing commies, tailing Talibans, harassing liberals. The hope is to distract us so we lose track of whose Swiss bank accounts and Cayman Island fake corporations the money is flowing into.
seanomelb | Jul 22, 2012, 07:02 PM EDT
Madeliene with the siege mentality.
Madeliene | Jul 22, 2012, 02:43 PM EDT
I hope to God, Mr Romney gets elected, and get's the communist out of OUR HOUSE. This writer is delusional, and is pandering to the left wing liberal jalousy that the liberals are all suffering from. It is a sickness that will destroy their own Freedoms, and then their free food trough will be empty, and when they look up, America will be just a memory.
Madeliene | Jul 21, 2012, 09:29 PM EDT
I would argue the point but then I would be deleted, why bother.
McNamara31 | Jul 21, 2012, 11:25 AM EDT
occassio Well said and a welcome addition to the conversation.
McNamara31 | Jul 21, 2012, 11:23 AM EDT
BrianO and peterson... The "stale" old game of smear and inference, that obama is not one of us, is getting "really old" as is all the other Fox-ism's and will not work in 2012.The only people still using them, are those who don't care about truth or facts, or do not have the ability to determine between fact and the Fox/Roger Ailes/Karl Rove type of smear campaign.
BrianO | Jul 21, 2012, 01:56 AM EDT
@eiriamach, my response to your question and other comments on other articles have been scrubbed, sorry I cannot give a response, so enjoy all non dissenting opinion.
BrianO | Jul 21, 2012, 01:46 AM EDT
seano just repeating what obama said about himself, so how does he get into the best colleges when he's disinterested and on dope?
BrianO | Jul 21, 2012, 01:45 AM EDT
read obamas writings, what you can find pre book and writing in his book, very different styles. It would be similar to my writng as primitive as it is, magically becoming as eloquent as eiriamach.
seanomelb | Jul 20, 2012, 07:54 PM EDT
Briano smoking weed on the roof of the white house when daddy was president is hardly a ringing endorsement.Peterson read Obama's book it's loaded with "stuff"
peterson | Jul 20, 2012, 06:40 PM EDT
Mitt is still a better choice than Obama. How ;come we cannot find Obama's past history ? He must be hiding a lot of "stuff" !!
eiriamach | Jul 20, 2012, 03:54 PM EDT
A comment on "elite" US higher education: whether Elizabeth Warren checked off "Native American" on her application is a moot point. She did not need Affirmative Action help to gain admission. She entered George Washington U at age 16 on academic scholarship and later worked on Rutgers' Law Review. In general, highly selective universities like GWU and Harvard have far more fully qualified applicants than they can admit, they reject many who are highly qualified, so they admit no affirmative action applicants who are not already fully qualified by their high academic criteria. But they pursue diversity vigorously, and they generally succeed in getting it. At less selective universities, AA or Veteran status or a family tradition of contributing to the university fund may give an applicant an edge over other equally qualified applicants, but not at schools like Harvard that can pick and choose from the best qualified. Neither Warren nor Obama needed special help getting in. Warren could have gone to a better law school than Rutgers, which she chose because her husband worked in NJ; later, Harvard hired her to teach in its law school. Did they have any special help? Yes, both being working-class, both got good financial aid. (That's my guess.)
eiriamach | Jul 20, 2012, 03:28 PM EDT
@BrianO, Obama can deliver a rousing speech (yeah, I know you can still comment on his using a teleprompter). Your criticism of his writing skills doesn't bother me. Unlike GW Bush, he has demonstrated that he can communicate without a script. Some people say that the reason to vote for Romney is to oust Obama; on the contrary, I think giving Romney CEO power would court disaster, especially for the rapidly dwindling middle-class and those on lower rungs of the economic ladder, not to mention the rise of wealth-worship as a national ethos. Paul Krugman has sharpened the national debate with a NY Times article on the plutocrats. The battle for the White House is heating up to mid-July temperatures and getting interesting.
BrianO | Jul 20, 2012, 03:10 PM EDT
occassio according to obamas book he dithered during high school getting drunk and smoking weed, how does that get you into a good school especially if you have no connections?
occassio | Jul 20, 2012, 12:36 PM EDT
President Obama had no such lofty connections. He has received his education through study and hard work and not through wealthy family connections. And it is mind-boggling that he is being scrutinized more closely, criticized more vehemently and derided more consistently than perhaps any other president in U.S history – because he is black. Civil Rights historians (both black and white) may tend to agree. There is no other reasonable explanation for the disrespectful treatment he has received since taking office. From how many Presidents have we demanded proof of birth? From how many Presidents have we demanded proof of education? No matter how many sleepless nights he spends trying to set us back on an even keel, no matter how far across the aisle he extends his hands, he will be rejected because of the melanin in his skin. Indefensible, puerile and odious.
occassio | Jul 20, 2012, 12:35 PM EDT
I apologize for the long post, but I am weary of these inane attacks on President Obama. Whether for his name (after his father and grandfather), his birth (yes, Hawaii is a state) or his education (Columbia, Harvard), every personal attack has been unjustified. Yet, the only legal requirements under the terms of the United States Constitution, is that someone who wants to become the President must be a natural born United States citizen who is at least 35 years old. No other requirements need be met! The world is in turmoil, cities and countries are going broke, people are starving and dying in war in the thousands, yet personal attacks on his credibility and his education continue. George W. Bush’s family connections helped him into Yale in 1964 where he became a member of Yale’s secretive Skull and Bones society, an invitation-only club whose membership contains some of American’s most powerful and elite family members. By the end of the Bush administration, legislated tax cuts reduced revenues and increased the national debt by $1.6 trillion. Mitt‘s father, George Romney, was a well-known figure who had a lot of clout. Mitt benefited from his family background, and may have gotten accepted to Harvard because of his family name.
occassio | Jul 20, 2012, 10:19 AM EDT
irishpjk. Please explain the process whereby workers are in charge of their own social security. I don't understand.
BrianO | Jul 20, 2012, 01:14 AM EDT
Ephraim, She lied about her being cherokee, has had no interaction with the cherokee nation and made up a connection to use affirmative action to get ahead in academia, do not spread the lie that she is a cherokee, her proof is that her mother says she is and a cook book, pow wow chow. you can't make this stuff up, but since she also believes that business people owe their success to government not to their talent, hard work, and sacrifice. You know just sat around and money rolled in because the shop was located on a street. But what do I know I'm just an ignorant racist.
EphraimKibbey | Jul 19, 2012, 11:51 PM EDT
America has only had two Presidents that came out of the business community. Perhaps their records can shed some light on what a Romney Presidency would mean to America. Herbert Hoover left the US with the Great Depression. George W. Bush left the US with the Great Recession, two unpaid for and unfinished wars and an unprecidented assault on civil liberties. Being a CEO and being America's President require very different skill sets. The choice is clear: Forward with Obama or Back to Bush. Romney is surrounding himself with folks from W's administration and his 59 point plan is W's ideas on steroids. @BrianO - Warren is 1/14th Cherokee as is the current CHIEF of the Cherokee Nation. She is proud of her lineage as well she should be. Harvard was lucky to get her as will be the people of Massachusetts.
seanomelb | Jul 19, 2012, 10:36 PM EDT
You'll want to watch your own english Gracie1(your first line)BTW I agree with your article.
Gracie1 | Jul 19, 2012, 06:17 PM EDT
BrianO sounds like and reads like an ognorant biggot whose first language isn't English. That aside, does anyone who posts here read the news? The economic or job loss issues are NOT exclusive to America and no President of the USA can cure world wide economic woes, or even get rid of a healthcare plan the CONGRESS already passed. The ads on TV from Romney are so full of lies and pipe-dreams regarding what he would do if he is elected. The President of the United States does NOT have the power to do most of the things Romney is promising. How many people are too stupid or ignorant to realize that? Of course Romney won't release his tax returns. If the American people - the normal, middle class people who pay at least 25% of their income in taxes - discover how much Mitt made and how little he paid in taxes, it isn't going to endear him to many. That, my frienda, is reality.
seanomelb | Jul 19, 2012, 06:04 PM EDT
"any means to achieve that end is used" Briano sounds like a GOP/Fox channel mantra.
hollabackgurl | Jul 19, 2012, 06:03 PM EDT
If the Romney clan is uncomfortable with providing this information as requested, people simply won't vote for Mitt. It's their call.
BrianO | Jul 19, 2012, 02:22 PM EDT
To those out there who cry out for fairness by conservative outlets, try once to look into obama's shortcomings. It won't happen, for the left's closed minded eye is fixed solely on the ends, and any means to achieve that end is used.
BrianO | Jul 19, 2012, 01:16 PM EDT
343. Staples Get Quote: SPLS Financials: Latest Results Rank: 343 (Previous rank: 397) CEO: Ronald L. Sargent Employees: 72,622 Address: 500 Staples Dr. Framingham, Massachusetts 1702 Country: U.S. Hollabackgurl 72,622 employees but not your kind of people.
McNamara31 | Jul 19, 2012, 01:12 PM EDT
@Fran Connor: A bit more about smear and inference..... Both Ed Rollins and John McCain came out yesterday about the smear that is so rampant in the GOP. Rollins said the attacks on Clintons aid, Huma Abedinr: “These allegations about Huma and the report from which they are drawn are nothing less than an unwarranted and unfounded attack on an honorable woman, a dedicated American and a loyal public servant." The Republican Party, which John McCain led as our nominee in 2008, is going to become irrelevant if we become the party of intolerance and HATE. The party founded by Abraham Lincoln was a party that fought slavery and intolerance at every level. I can assure Mrs. Bachmann, that Ms. Abedin has been thru every top clearance available and would never have been given her position with any questions of her loyalty to this country. As a member of Congress, with a seat on the House Intelligence Committee, Mrs. Bachmann you know better. Shame on you, Michele! You should stand on the floor of the House and apologize to Huma Abedin and to Secretary Clinton and to the millions of hard working,loyal, Muslim Americans for your wild and unsubstantiated charges. As a devoted Christian, you need to ask Forgiveness for this grievous lack of judgment and reckless behavior.(Finally GOP leadership is speaking out against FOX style slander that has gone on since 2008)
Maggie47 | Jul 19, 2012, 12:15 PM EDT
Rebel, do you have proof? those are serious charges. My question to you is why is Bain funding the Obama campaign?
rebel999 | Jul 19, 2012, 11:12 AM EDT
Romney created Bain on a model that required it to take over companies with pennies on the dollar. Romney then loaded the cost of the loan onto the books of the companies that he took over. Then Romney and Bain paid itself millions of dollars in operating fees as Romney and Bain cut wages, benefits, health care benefits, retirement benefits and other benefits. Then Bain and Romney didn't invest any money to improve the company and didn't improve sales. Then Romney and Bain drove the companies into bankruptcy as Romney and Bain walked away with millions of dollars which they hid in overseas accounts so that they didn't have to pay taxes on them. Romney set Bain up to operate this way while he was there and to operate this way after he was gone. Romney is making money off of Bain to this day as they still follow the model that Romney created.
hollabackgurl | Jul 19, 2012, 10:56 AM EDT
Oh God, Staples? With its low-paid, high turnover employees? They fired the entire management staff at our location in 2009. All electronics associates are on month-to-month probation. If over the course of a month an associate does not average at least $200 then they are to be immediately reassigned within the store, most likely at a lower pay rate. Staples technicians receive precisely zero industry recognized training in order to perform their job.
BrianO | Jul 19, 2012, 10:26 AM EDT
Hollaback ever heard of a company called STAPLES.
hollabackgurl | Jul 19, 2012, 09:31 AM EDT
Poor old Mitt. Conservatives can't find a damn thing in his record to support hm over. Romneycare, his signature achievement, is off the table. So is his job creation record, since they mostly happened in China and Burma.
BrianO | Jul 19, 2012, 09:04 AM EDT
Want to have some fun, compare obamas writings what you can find to his first book, very different styles, almost like 2 different people.
BrianO | Jul 19, 2012, 09:01 AM EDT
Eiriamach, EXample Elizabeth Warren Harvards first native American profeseur, don't check the authenticity she must really be a cherokee. To Obama, he is credited with the one unsigned letter to the review ***Obama's tenure at the Review has been chronicled at length in the Politico, the New York Times, and elsewhere. But Obama has never mentioned his law review piece, a demurral that's part of his campaign's broader pattern of rarely volunteering information or documents about the candidate, even when relatively innocuous. When Politico reporters working on a story about Obama's law review presidency earlier this year asked if he had written for the review, a spokesman responded accurately - but narrowly - that "as the president of the Law Review, Obama didn't write articles, he edited and reviewed them."
eiriamach | Jul 19, 2012, 07:19 AM EDT
Briano, you'll find an article by Obama on page 823 of Volume 103 of the "Harvard Law Review." I must say, however, that your insistence on having Obama's education records is ridiculous. Once a person has a post-grad degree, no one bothers to look at his or her earlier GPA or SATs. Universities cannot afford to admit unqualified people for law degrees or other post-graduate studies: they would be liable in cases like Obama's to reverse discrimination lawsuits and in any case to loss of accreditation if they were guilty of the kind of irregularities you hint at. Accrediting agencies scrutinize records, and the consequences of arbitrary admissions can be dire. The plain, perfectly obvious fact is that Obama's a smart guy who is well educated. There's no reason to doubt the authenticity of his records. Now if he were an intellectual mediocrity like Romney, you'd have cause for curiosity about his credentials. He has a law degree but never practiced or taught law? Did he pass a bar exam? Romney's good for nothing except making his own money, and no way will he show you the records on that "achievement."
seanomelb | Jul 19, 2012, 12:23 AM EDT
Loosing it schon.Had a Freudian slip or some other psychological blackout moment,dear dear.
BrianO | Jul 18, 2012, 11:50 PM EDT
Hollabackgurl still waiting for Obama article from harvard.
BrianO | Jul 18, 2012, 11:46 PM EDT
Mac31 what are the special circumstances?
Schon | Jul 18, 2012, 10:45 PM EDT
Sorry folks. Got carried away below. My rant was for another thread.
Schon | Jul 18, 2012, 10:42 PM EDT
The Irish git is from Belfast; you can tell from his accent. He sounds just like me and I'm from West Belfast. He is not wearing a bowler hat like what the Orange men wear. Claire2... Look at the hat. Why do you suggest that it is a bowler hat, which it obviously is not, and from this infer that the git is an Orange man? Its the type of hat you see on little Irish souvenir dolls wearing a waist cost, with ginger hair and beard, stub upturned nose and the hat you see in the video. I believe it is, appropriately enough, a Coachmans hat. Usually there is a shamrock sitting on the hat brim. The doll might be representative of a leprechaun. Does this sound representative of the wicked Northern Protestant, do you think? Are you a progagandist for republicanism, sullying an organisation, blackening its name to the uninformed? Are you a syncopantic sterotypical republican or just plain ignorant?
rpbrown | Jul 18, 2012, 09:45 PM EDT
Actually I want to correct my previous statement. The problem is not rich people or poor people. The problem is YOU. Always has been with democracy always will be. The power is in your hands to crush poor people if that is what you see fit (it seems like many people simply hate the poor and think they have all the power in this country, which is comical) or to level the rich if you think they too are wicked. Or maybe you can show some compassion and step up for a fair solution that YOU see to be true. This is what we need for democracy to work. I write emails, make calls and sign petitions every day, what the hell are you doing?
seanaci | Jul 18, 2012, 09:28 PM EDT
Romney inhabits an alternative America only in the sense that wardens and jailers inhabit an alternative environment to prison inmates. Without inmates there would be no need of warders and jailers and without ordinary Americans Romney and his ilk would not exist. However, as long as our politicians can be bought and a significant number of the electorate remain dumber than fence posts the people who really run this country and by extension its empire need not worry about a thing. They don’t care who wins the election because they know they’ll own the winners.
rpbrown | Jul 18, 2012, 09:26 PM EDT
It is fascinating to me that poor and middle class Republicans would ever vote Republican. If you fit that description, notice that you are voting in that way because you distracted by the age-old scare tactic: poor people! To them it is the supposed legions of poor, lazy people in America that you claim to know that are ruining it all! GET A CLUE, POOR PEOPLE ARE POWERLESS. IT IS THE PEOPLE WITH MONEY WHO ARE MAKING BAD DECISIONS FOR YOU AND ME, KEEPING AS MUCH MONEY AS THEY CAN AND MAKING MORE AND STIFLING BUSINESS AND CREATING TAX ADVANTAGES TO GO OVERSEAS.
hollabackgurl | Jul 18, 2012, 08:12 PM EDT
Romney has a Swiss bank account - unprecedented for a presidential candidate - it adds to the image of a wealthy man unfamiliar with ordinary people's limitations. Bain filings also show its companies set up shop in Bermuda and the Cayman Islands, places known as tax havens. I doubt he paid a cent to the US some years.
McNamara31 | Jul 18, 2012, 08:06 PM EDT
@BrianO I gave you an answer...You choose not to like it. College admissions is not a horse race where only the highest scores "get in" it's a subjective decision made by the admissions officer.Often times community service, internships, special achievements trump SAT or ACT scores. Or there's the other case of legacy and the old boys network which has been around for years ie Bush at Yale.
seanomelb | Jul 18, 2012, 07:26 PM EDT
Briano it's so sad to see so many middle class republicans willing to pay more than Money[r] and finance his life style.BTW where are Romney's academic records and entrance was not a problem daddy was governor.
BrianO | Jul 18, 2012, 07:01 PM EDT
Where's the article about Obama's view on small business or business in general only succeeding because of government. Those wacky entrepreneurs, they think they got ahead on risk, hard work, sacrifice.
BrianO | Jul 18, 2012, 06:58 PM EDT
Hollabackgurl, could you give me an article submitted by obama for the harvard law review?
BrianO | Jul 18, 2012, 06:54 PM EDT
Mac31 you didn't answer the question. columbia and harvard are some of the hardest colleges to get into so what were Obamas grades, the essays, and recommendations? if you could give me his sat occidental GPA, anything I could judge him more fairly.
irishpjk | Jul 18, 2012, 06:15 PM EDT
wtf What Mitt Romney wants to do is go back to the American way, work hard and make a better living for you and yours. What Obama is doing is telling workers to work harder and give more of that hard earned money to the people who are too lazy to get up and go out and make a living for them self’s. By the way when Obama was asked about fraud in the giveaway programs he said the figures were so small that it was not worth the effort. In today’s paper there is a story about Medicaid people ripping of the system for $500 million and then selling the drugs back to the pharmacies to be resold, now that might not be a lot of money to Obama but it’s only the tip of the iceberg. If you are a worker you need Romney to protect you. Another by the way, George W Bush wanted the worker to be in charge of his own social security the liberal wants it in a place where he has control over it, who do you trust yourself or the pollination in Washington.
McNamara31 | Jul 18, 2012, 04:51 PM EDT
Fran Connor "Kool Aide" you say? Just another stale, old (Hannity) Fox-ism. Tell me one thing in my post that is not factual as compared to your inference, smear and innuendo?
EphraimKibbey | Jul 18, 2012, 03:49 PM EDT
Romney explained having HIS money in a Cayman Island account and could not understand the big fuss over it. He said that the account was set up so that foreign investers could invest in American companies without paying American taxes. I guess that makes him UN-AMERICAN since he has HIS money in that account! Forward or Back to Bush!
Nicomax | Jul 18, 2012, 03:34 PM EDT
The core belief of the swells is that not only should they not pay taxes at the level proscribed in our progressive tax code, but since they are the 'swift & clever' amongst us, they should be rewarded with a lower tax rate, even if it drops to ZERO.
Fran Connor | Jul 18, 2012, 02:24 PM EDT
Thanks, Mac31, I knew someone would get around to it. Keep drinkin' that kool aide.
hollabackgurl | Jul 18, 2012, 01:19 PM EDT
No one is denying that Romney doesn't have an agenda except further tax cuts to balloon the deficit and further line the pockets of the already rich.
hollabackgurl | Jul 18, 2012, 12:51 PM EDT
McNamara31 - that's not to mention the fact that editor of the Harvard Law Review is not a post given as a consolation prize to their worst students.
Maggie47 | Jul 18, 2012, 12:42 PM EDT
I just can not believe what I am reading here. Who is funding Pres. Obama's? last check Bain is pouring money into his account. I can see that most of you do not believe in capitalism. I worked hard for my money I have no plans on handing it over to lazy people who sit home watch tv and talk on their cell phones
Dompedro | Jul 18, 2012, 12:35 PM EDT
What gives, Neil? today's issue has a dozen articles, all of which but one have title, introductory sentence or paragraph and author's name on your front page. All but one. What gives, Neil? And read seanfer7 - thought he was talking about GE and Solyndra for a while.
seanfer7 | Jul 18, 2012, 11:49 AM EDT
What is required from citizen in time of war? Should they volunteer to fight join the core If they can not fight What position would be right Collecting cans was once a way To help the army pay Joining like minded groups Honoring men and women wearing the suit Coming together to defeat the foe American continue to grow But skirting paying your fair share Hiding income without a care Sending money off shore Destroying jobs maybe more Tax shelters and bets on the other guy Please Mitt tell us why
hollabackgurl | Jul 18, 2012, 11:42 AM EDT
Vote for Mitt and you'll be living without welfare shortly too Bhrigde, but sure you can dream you're rich eh?
Bhrighde | Jul 18, 2012, 11:22 AM EDT
I live on welfare but I'm voting for Mitt because I want the chance to someday be a millionaire too, and you only have that chance in America. Raising taxes and providing healthcare for everyone only decreases our chances to become millionaires. Keep the dream alive, vote Mitt!!!
McNamara31 | Jul 18, 2012, 11:22 AM EDT
Have you ever visited Columbia or Harvard? Are you the least bit interested in the admission process? Grades, Essays, Recommendation all factor in. How about Palin who (bounced through) her "5" colleges (some requiring the lowest SAT scores in academia) before she received a 4 year degree. But that ok right?
BrianO | Jul 18, 2012, 11:13 AM EDT
@Mac31, By self made, could you state how. As in how did he get into columbia? How did he get into Harvard? simple questions any answers?
McNamara31 | Jul 18, 2012, 11:01 AM EDT
@Fran Connor I'd rather talk in terms of reality rather than FOX style lowly smear. Unlike Mitt, Obama is a self made man who got himself into Columbia and Harvard went on to do some social justice(God forbid!....Help the poor people)ran for office, and achieved the real American Dream; one earned, not bought by multi billionaires floating your campaign (like Mitt). In 2008 the majority of Obama money came from "We the People" not "We the Corporation" who Mitt serves and represents so eloquently, even having his own Swiss accounts to boot.And as for a record, Obama ended the life of the murderer of 3000 New Yorkers, did save the American car industry and its feeder companies, and has passed a healthcare plan that would give American the moral right to healthcare. But guess what; the birther style crapola is looking a little stale and dated this time around, just like the dinosaur who runs Fox News (Ailes)and puts out this stale old messaging instead of dealing in reality based news.
hjfarmer | Jul 18, 2012, 10:55 AM EDT
Agree with Fran. Obama "leaks" national security items but not anything regarding any of his education or health records. And responding to the title of your article; Obama has money for Solyndra, GE (who by the way paid zero taxes) and other cronies, but not the nation.
hollabackgurl | Jul 18, 2012, 10:53 AM EDT
Romney is Wall Street's pick. And by God who could question Wall Street's judgement? Billionaires love him to. You know that has to mean great things for the rest of us peons too.
jamieLM | Jul 18, 2012, 10:44 AM EDT
I hope you don't think you're going to change anyone's mind with your political columns. For the Obama crowd, you're preaching to the choir, and for the Romney crowd, they've already made up their minds because they don't like what they see after almost 4 yrs. under Obama - $$$$ debt and growing, cities going broke, high unemployment, etc. I don't think anyone who reads your columns get an objective view of either candidate. You've raised Obama to sainthood status and sent Romney to Satan-on-earth status. Hardly a fair and balanced view for Independents like me. And yes, I blame Congress, too, for many of our problems.
wjb1tex | Jul 18, 2012, 10:24 AM EDT
I think this transparent President should have the Attoney General release the records from the attempted sale of Obama's senate seat that sent the Governor to jail. The Attorney General has blocked access to the records which contain information that may or may not show collaboration between the administration and the Governor.
1661996usmc | Jul 18, 2012, 09:49 AM EDT
We can survive Mitt Romney, but we'll be worse off that we are now.
Fran Connor | Jul 18, 2012, 09:44 AM EDT
I think Mitt should hold out until Obama releases his college records - or at least explains how he got a Connecticut social security number. Now, since you have no answers to these legitimate questions, you can start calling me names (ie "birther", etc.)