Manhattan Diary


Hardline Bishop "excommunicates" Catholic Hospital

Posted on Friday, January 28, 2011 at 12:56 AM

RSS


Recent Posts

Archives

submit to reddit

The hardening of attitudes in our political culture has reached our Catholic hospitals.

Relationships between the hospitals and the increasingly hardline US bishops have become so explosive in recent months they're making national news.

In December the staff of Saint Joseph’s Hospital and Medical Center in Phoenix saw a dispute with their bishop escalate to the point where they were ultimately stripped of their affiliation.

"Saint Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center in Phoenix can no longer identify itself as Catholic," Bishop Thomas J. Olmsted announced during a news conference in Phoenix on December 21, just in time for Christmas.

The hospital was stripped of it's affiliation because it had conducted an abortion to save a mother’s life. The 27 year old woman would have died otherwise, the hospital said.

But the retribution for their fateful decision was as swift as it was unbending. Bishop Olmsted first excommunicated a nun, Sister Margaret McBride, who served on the hospitals ethics committee.

Olmstead's shocking move was seen as an attempt to intimidate the hospital from ever making a similar judgement. But of course it failed.  So that led Bishop Olmsted to press the nuclear button: in effect he has excommunicated the entire hospital - because they dared to make a wrenchingly difficult decision that the rest of us can only hope we never have to confront.

But two distinct things are happening here. Bishop Olmstead is protecting the Church's doctrine; Sister McBride is protecting the patients life.

Should theologians be making medical decisions? Should faith interrogate science? Is the doctrine of the Church worth more than the life of an individual? Those are significant schisms that have opened up; they have been everywhere in Catholicism for decades now. It's past time we confronted them.

You might think, given its recent history, that the conservative forces within the Church would have learned by now that the impulse to protect Church doctrine and the Church itself from scandal can quickly backfire (but you'd be quite wrong about that).

It's not hard to see why. Shining moral absolutes are very hard to give up. Shining moral absolutes stand firm and unbending against the tide of history and the general murkiness of life. They clarify, they stand for something, and they stand against something. In that sense they're just like the Catholic Church itself.

Moral absolutes create a world of black and white. Just like words on a page, just like the words in the bible, they spell things out for you, they give you a framework, and you can learn to overlook their shortcomings, and in fact you'll have to. Because in a world of color, which is where we all live after all, they can quickly run aground.

So the clash we're witnessing is between a conservative mindset that values rules, dogma, sanctity and moral absolutes - and a much more compassionate outlook that refrains from quick judgment and takes the sometimes brutal contradictions of life into careful consideration.

At the moment it looks like there can only be one solution: every Catholic hospital in the United States will lose it's affiliation. It's the only way to protect unbending doctrine from the decisions sometimes taken in American hospitals.

Federal laws protect a patient’s right to receive emergency care, including terminations where they are warranted, and Catholic hospitals cannot invoke their religious status if it jeopardizes the lives of pregnant women. The need to adhere to religious doctrine does not give health providers cover or license to risk someone's life.

So since the rules of this conflict have already been written, there can be no ultimate winner. To protect the Church the bishops must double down, and it looks like they intend to. They will do what they think is best: stand firm and unbending against the tide of history and the general murkiness of life.

But standing on principal can also be a cop out. It can simply mean you haven't bothered getting your hands dirty. You can survey all the sin and suffering in the world, and heave a big sigh, and you can retreat to your ivory tower. In protecting Christ's message you can forget his example. That's dissonance is exactly what so many former Catholics mean when the say the Church left me, I didn't leave it.

In this world it's much easier to be a saint than a sinner, after all. The rule book is mercifully short. You just have to say no and keep saying no. No to complexity, no to the drunkenness of things being various, no to other people's suffering, and ironically enough, no to life.

 



42 comments

Next Previous Page 2 of 3 pages
You "heard testimony" from "doctors" that contradicts the actual doctors decisions? Cite your sources for these claims. The real facts, which the article reproduces, are that the woman would have died. The article makes clear that the tensions between the bishop and the hospital were long simmering. You don't read the articles you criticize and you make stuff up when you don't like the facts.
2BorNot2B is making it up as he goes along....he should tell us ''the truth''... where is the ''testimony from doctors familiar with the case saying the mother's life was never in danger''? Do tell us and let us get our ''facts straight''!
@Cahir -- Get your facts straight Mr(?) columnist! You are skewing and spinning! -- The 'conflict' did not 'escalate' from December, it had been simmering and ONGOING. --- The excommunication was not product of a single incident, it was the result of a deliberate disregard and provocation to the authority of the bishop by the secularized nun-administrator, going back to the time of Olmstead's predecessor. Tell the truth! The violations to the 'Code of conduct' established for an institution billing itself as "Catholic" were MULTIPLE, as well as the warnings from the bishop to the effect that if they continued defying the Diocese the charter would be removed. The abortion performed on this woman was only the last straw. --- Further, it is patently untrue that it was done to save the woman's life, I heard testimony from doctors familiar with the case saying mother's life was never in danger.
Katiemac; The woman was so close to death that there was no time to even move her to an O.R. to perform the abortion. So there was certainly no time to move her to a non-Catholic hospital.Had the doctors not aborted the 11 week embryo,the woman would have died and so,of course, would her embryo. St. Joseph's has never received any financial support from the Catholic Church. The hospital accepts Medicare and Medicaid patients and payments-paid by taxpayers, (most of whom are not Catholic) and therefore must by U.S. law follow accepted best practices medical standards. These standards in the circumstances of ectopic pregnancies and other troubled pregnancies are sometimes in direct conflict with Catholic Directives. The U.S. laws must be followed or doctors are prosecuted and imprisoned. Catholic hospitals are not little ''R.C. Kingdoms'' that can do whatever suits their immoral theology to whomever is brought to their E.R.s. By law,patients must be stabilized before being transferred to another hospital. U.S. laws do not give equal legal standing to embryos and fetuses with already born human beings- thus the term ''birthright''. Also, in many parts of the U.S., Catholic hospitals are the only hospitals for miles around. I've been treated at Catholic E.R.s. Believe me, the hospitals do not communicate their Directives to their non-Catholic patients. I wonder how many women have already died in Catholic hospitals that followed the Directives?
olovely..an abortion is OK as long as you don't say you were killing your offspring. Get a life.
Everyone is an opinion mongerer except 2bornot2b. He's a self righteous hypocrite telling the rest of us we are wrong. Olmstead is wrong he should keep his false doctrines to himself. I bet he's a card-carrying member of OPUS DEI and the rest of the right wing fascists who have hijacked the Catholic Church.
Yes, "life and death" is a moral absolute that you cannot have contained a "gray area". Since this is an Irish blog, why not do some research on the newly "minted" Cardinal Raymond Burke and how he was "run out of town" in St. Louis by the political maneuvering of pro-abortion forces in the Chancery?
I always thought that Catholic Theology would allow the death of an infant in deference to the saving of the life of a mother. I guess since the procedure involved abortion, the Church believes it can not yield. What does excommunication mean in today's World anyway? The Church in today's World should work on how to keep their faithful instead of hacking them away. The Church is throwing a party and no one is attending. Shall we excommunicate the bishops who moved perverts and abusers from parish to parish and diocese to diocese. I believe the children who were molested and abused suffered more than the poor child who sacrificed to save a mother's life.
2BORNOT2B: what is your claim that "anyone needing to kill their offspring should simply apply to" other hopitals if not explosive language? You commit the very sin you're chiding. That makes you no better or worse than anyone else. That's the point you see - you should grant other people the maturity and conscience you grant yourself.
cont'd -- The problem in this case is that some US 'interpreters' of Vatican II decided on their own that the Council intended for the Church to ditch its moral moorings, adjudicating to themselves the 'authority' to build 'a new Church' according to their lax morals and sinful image. The result was the decay we are presently witnessing which, btw, IC cannot tire of describing for us. From that frame of mind we got Bishops like the corrupt Rembert Weakland of Wisconsin who was eventually booted out; seminaries full of homos who brought about the supposed pedophilic -but in reality homosexual- scandals; orders of nuns who had previously given their life to serve God and their fellow-man in hospitals, now abandoned convent and cloister to conveniently live in 'community apartments' with other women of like mind as 'single spinsters,' undistinguishable from the secular population. Some 'coming out' as masculinized professionals of dubious sex, and even as lesbians, eager to co-opt the dictates of the secular world. I have seen this Sister Margaret, and she could be a poster child for what I described above. -- Radicalized Ex-priests and nuns alike have used the education the Church provided for them to turn their menopausal anger against it.
@ Cahir -- **Relationships between the hospitals and the increasingly hard line US bishops have become so explosive in recent months they're making national news.** --- That's right Cahir... just insert a few incendiary words to set the mood and attract the usual bomb throwers: "increasingly hard line US bishops...become so explosive.." -- The reality is: The moral guidelines for Catholic institutions have ALWAYS been the same... the problem was a change in personnel!; not only among the board or directors and trustees of hospitals, but among the bishops themselves. --- It is a fact that Catholic hospitals were founded for the same reasons as Catholic schools: to serve the needs and moral conscience of Catholic patrons, not to accommodate to the whims of secular patrons and their needs. There are plenty of hospitals in the US where pro-life qualms are non-existent. Anyone needing to kill their offspring should simply apply to them, not to the ones that have a Catholic charter --- cont'd
2BorNot2B - That is your OPINION, and you are quite entitled to it. Just don't expect others to always agree, as they are equally entitled to their OPINION. You live my your conscience, and allow others to live by theirs.
Wouldn't the church have just loved to see the nun in prison for refusing lifesaving treatment to the dying pregnant woman.
@ Cahir -- **The hardening of attitudes in our political culture has reached our Catholic hospitals.** -- Just in case you were wondering: The application of Catholic doctrine has NOTHING to do with 'our political culture,' the teachings of the Church are the teachings of Jesus in the bible and they are meant to be perennial -not adjusted to the prevailing cultural climate of the times- therefore they are not 'hardened,' they are unchangeable. So... wrong on the first count!
One statement you made was very personal to this former Roman Catholic: "...the Church left me. I didn't leave it." Now I am happy, fulfilled and catholic involved in ministries.
Next Previous Page 2 of 3 pages




Log into IrishCentral with your Facebook account


or sign-in directly

E-Mail:
Password:
 Remember me Forgot my password
Not a member? Register Now!
print this article Print
email this articleE-mail