Gay candidates, gay rights win at US polls
Posted on Saturday, November 10, 2012 at 09:19 AM
RSS 
Recent Posts
- Violent attacks on gays in New York up 70 percent in 2013
- Will New York Senator Chuck Schumer ditch gay couples for an immigration deal?
- If nobody's happy, it's working – the abortion debate and Irish politics of stalemate
- Conservative news entertainment complex claim Barack Obama leader of Al Qaeda
- Why Irish grudges are passed on - a long tradition of never forgetting
Archives
![]() |
| Gay rights are no longer political Kryptonite |
Here in New York rising star Sean Patrick Maloney defeated incumbent Nan Hayworth to become the first openly gay candidate elected to Congress from the state. In Wisconsin, Tammy Baldwin made history by winning her bid for the Senate.
Then Maryland voters made history by becoming among the first in the nation to affirm marriage equality at the ballot box. Maine voters followed by reversing a 2009 ban on marriage equality. Minnesota voters followed up on that by defeating proposals to ban gay marriage in the state's constitution. Finally Washington approved a law allowing same sex couples to marry.
How did this happen? How did the issue that was political Kryptonite in 2004 become so triumphant at the polls in 2012?
I think I have an answer. In 2004 when George W Bush was president he publicly argued for a constitutional amendment that neither he nor his wife privately supported. Nevertheless Bush was prepared to gamble his political career on creating a tempting but unlikely second class citizenship for gay people. He did it for the votes. He did it to lure Evangelicals to the polls to re-elect him. But they got nothing for their efforts, only windy platitudes and a sympathetic handshake.
Now in 2012 the gay community has insisted that Barack Obama publicly acknowledge them, believing - correctly as it turned out - the he privately supported full equality for the nation's LGBT citizens, including marriage equality. To his eternal credit, Joe Biden eventually tipped the president’s hand, but the fact is that it was done. The president made history by speaking up in support of marriage equality.
Unlike Bush however, Obama delivered more than platitudes. He ended the insulting Clinton-era farce of Don't Ask, Don't Tell. He signed a hate crimes law that makes it a federal crime to assault an individual because of his or her sexual orientation or gender identity. He supported the right of gay couples to the same federal benefits that opposite-sex marriage couples get. His administration also helped transgender Americans get full protection against discrimination based on gender in employment, Obamacare has provisions that foster full hospital access and equality for LGBT citizens, and last week he wrote a sensitive and affirming letter of support to a 10 year old girl who was being bullied at school for having two dads.
On Tuesday he was re-elected.
The lesson for the leftover let's be prudent Clinton-era middle-way moderates is that sometimes a little leadership is as transformational and rewarding as flying on autopilot.
It's also time we put some cherished right wing myths out to pasture. African Americans, we were told, would defect from Obama over marriage equality for gays. Hispanics would do the same. Hispanics we were told were natural allies of the religious right. But none of this actually happened. In fact all of these groups formed working coalitions to support Obama's re-election.
Then we were told Catholics would defect over Obama's support of abortion rights and his 'war' on the Catholic Church. But 50 percent of Catholic voters voted for him and his platform on Tuesday, according to exit polls.
Then we were told that the Evangelical vote would marshal against healthcare reform and gay rights advances. But although evangelical turnout was approximately the same as it was in 2008, it wasn't nearly enough to tilt the vote in Romney's favor.
And it wasn't only gay candidates that triumphed, our strongest political allies fared remarkably too. New York Senator Kirsten Gillibrand won a full term in her own right. Elizabeth Warren replaced Republican Scott Brown in the Senate, and in Connecticut Chris Murphy trounced Linda McMahon, who has spent over 90 million in two losing senate runs. In Maryland Governor Martin also O'Malley saw his leadership vindicated.
Constituting five percent of the electorate, 77 percent of the LGBT's community's vote went to President Obama. Do the math and that means that the number of LGBT voters who chose to re-elect President Obama exceeded the margin of votes separating him and Mitt Romney. That suggests the LGBT vote helped deliver the election to the President.
So maybe now the culture warriors will finally get the message. They have lost the battles and the war. America is young, diverse, tolerant and uninterested in being carved up by race, gender or sexual orientation. Hate, bigotry and discrimination are not American values.
Take it to the polls.
18 comments
Next
Page 1 of 2 pages
paddyo | Nov 18, 2012, 09:00 PM EST
Cahir-do you think heterosexuals who are offended by gay actions will ever have freedom of speech to say why they are offended without being attacked for their opinion? Yes or No and Why
Report abuse
hollabackgurl | Nov 16, 2012, 12:21 AM EST
What I can't believe is how many young highly decorated gay scouts have the courage to stand up and say they are when they know this blinkered, bigoted organization will run them out on their ear for it. Don't Ask Don't Tell didn't change the military; ending homophobia won't change the scouts (except for the better for all).
Report abuse
paddyo | Nov 14, 2012, 01:04 PM EST
Now with their new found power, they go after the Boy Scouts of America by getting 81000 petitioners to get UPS to stop giving large donations to them until they stop discrimination against homosexuals. They succeeded in getting UPS to stop. The BSA are a private organization that have every righrt to make their own rules and regulations; They do more public service than any other group in the USA and are a threat to nobody. This is a mean spirited act that will bring backlash and hatered of homosexual activists. I couldn't believe it, but at the 2008 Democratic convention they booed the BSA honor guard .
Report abuse
hollabackgurl | Nov 13, 2012, 08:36 PM EST
What does the Bible say about keeping slaves? It's perfectly fine. What does the Bible say about adulterers? Stone them. What does the Bible say about rapists? They must marry the raped woman. What does the Bible say that isn't 4000 years old? Nothing.
Report abuse
peterson | Nov 13, 2012, 01:43 PM EST
What does the Bible say about being gay ??
Report abuse
hollabackgurl | Nov 11, 2012, 01:23 PM EST
You still don't realize your political opponents aren't handy stereotypes for you to bully and dismiss, BrianO. At your age you never will. We're all sick of you and your parties divisive rhetoric, that seeks to isolate and shame everyone it doesn't agree with. How does it feel to be a minority now, BrianO? I see it hasn't yet taught you any perspective. Snide condescension isn't compassion is it?
Report abuse
BrianO | Nov 11, 2012, 11:12 AM EST
Hollabackgurl, time to be less angry, you have won, the government will provide for all your desires, good luck.
Report abuse
hollabackgurl | Nov 11, 2012, 09:50 AM EST
Seanmor, do you fear that "all creatures male or female" will stop reproducing if gay marriage equality is enacted in the US? Almighty God has been giving Canada a notable pass since 2005 so I think we can safely say it doesn't bother Him.
Report abuse
Seanmor | Nov 10, 2012, 09:19 PM EST
There is a higher power than the governor and the cardinal to whom both have to answer: Almighty God, who made all creatures male or female for a very obvious purpose.
Report abuse
eiriamach | Nov 10, 2012, 04:44 PM EST
In 10 days the US Supreme Court will decide whether to review six gay rights cases, including four challenges to the constitutionality of DOMA, the Defense of Marriage Act. If SCOTUS declares DOMA unconstitutional, same-sex couples will be closer to equal protection of their spousal rights. With more states accepting marriage equality, this would be a good time for SCOTUS to remove federal obstacles.
Report abuse
alisaann | Nov 10, 2012, 04:26 PM EST
it's been a GOOD YEAR for GAY RIGHTS....however, there is STILL alot of work to do, before same-sex couples are NO longer treated like "2nd class" citizens.....GOD MADE EVERYONE, AND THAT INCLUDES "GAYS"....and weither you get married in a church or at the court house, you HAVE to HAVE a MARRIAGE LICENSE from the state...which gives you LEGAL RIGHTS & PROTECTIONS....something same-sex couples DON'T have totally....especially on the FEDERAL LEVEL.
alisa
Report abuse
Rebelforce | Nov 10, 2012, 01:18 PM EST
Sooner or later the Republican party will have to wake up to the fact that it's not a politically smart idea to hand 5 to 10% of the electorate who are gay, lesbian or bisexual to the Democratic party. You don't win elections that way. President Obama has been without question the most gay friendly president in US history. The gay community rewarded him by voting overwhelmingly for his re-election. In an evenly divided electorate, that can be the difference between victory or defeat.
Report abuse
EphraimKibbey | Nov 10, 2012, 01:04 PM EST
The new Right WingNut GOP lost because it fielded BAD candidates who espoused its BAD policies and over half of voting Americans were not deluded by Republican attempts to hide themselves in their lies. It is as simple as that. Power to the people.
Report abuse
eiriamach | Nov 10, 2012, 12:42 PM EST
The religious right does not understand why they lost. Catholic bishops and evangelical leaders are citing the increasing secularism of American society. They're wrong! The Catholics, and also the religiously-UNaffiliated young people, who voted for marriage equality are NOT "secular society." According to Pew Research, many unaffiliated pray every day, they believe in God and value the Gospel of social justice while they reject religious leaders' efforts to control the choices of women and gays. They voted for equality--the most fundamental tenet of natural law-- not for some secular libertinism or anarchy. But I suppose that the most difficult thing for a religious leader to do is to stop and ask himself whether God really is on his side.
Report abuse
Next
Page 1 of 2 pages
18 Comments

Report abuse