Manhattan Diary


Florida Governor Scott King's plan to disenfranchise minorities voters

Posted on Wednesday, June 06, 2012 at 09:48 AM

RSS


Recent Posts

Archives

submit to reddit

Rick Scott


Florida -- it's the state that seems to set the benchmark for political and social dysfunction in the nation.

From hanging chads to voter roll grabs to face eating drug addicts, working for the Florida Tourist Board must be the loneliest job in America.

It's governor is Rick Scott, a Tea Party Republican who sank more than $73 million of his own money into his election. Not surprisingly it was the most expensive gubernatorial campaign in Florida's history.

If you're willing to invest that kind of money into your own campaign shouldn't voters be a little suspicious of you?

Not in Florida. Republicans hold a two-thirds majority in the Florida Senate and in the Florida House of Representatives. The Republican National Convention will be held in Tampa, Florida.

Florida apparently loves super rich Republicans. Sadly, the romance is one way.  Well, if you're not fabulously wealthy, that is.

In April, in the middle of Sexual Assault Awareness Month, Scott used a veto to cut funding to the state’s rape crisis centers. The state legislature had approved $1.5 million so that the centers could continue to serve the approximately 700,000 women in Florida who’ve been victims of rape.

But Scott decided that the .002 percent slated for the crisis centers was too much. He vetoed the funds, alongside $141 million in other cuts including a psychiatric medicine program for the poor, the Family Care Center of Broward County, Girls Incorporated of Sarasota County, and a state settlement for child welfare case managers who were owed overtime.

In other words, he cut funding to rape victims, the poor, the mentally ill, and children and professionals who care for children; he vetoed the kind of programs that prevent America from becoming a Third World country that leaves its weakest members to languish.

As this election and the last decade have made clear, it's never a terrific idea to entrust your government to billionaires.

But Scott is only getting started. Next on his scorched earth agenda is Florida's voting rolls.

On Monday Scott's administration's defied a federal warning against purging suspected non-citizens from state voting rolls. Scott has denied that the effort is meant to target minorities who will likely vote Democratic, but well he would, wouldn't he?

The Miami Herald cited the statistics behind critics' concerns: "About 58% of those flagged as potential non-citizens are Hispanics, Florida’s largest ethnic immigrant population. Hispanics make up 13% of the overall 11.3 million active registered voters."

That sounds a lot like racial profiling to me. But Scott avows it isn't. On Monday he told reporters the timing had nothing to do with the campaign season.

"We need to have fair elections. When you go out to vote, you want to make sure that the other individuals that are voting have a right to vote. That’s what I care about. If you’re a candidate, you want to make sure that the people that vote in your election are people who have a right to vote. So my focus is in making sure that our state has fair elections," he told the Orlando Sentinel.

Trust the billionaire in the Brooks Brothers suit. I don't.

This is a candidate who will take away your vote to protect it. That way he can scrub the votes of minorities who don't see things his way. But what's a little disenfranchisement if the right candidate wins?

This week I read with interest that Mitt Romney is building another new mansion in California.  He's hired his own lobbyist to push his plans through the approval process because frankly he can. At his proposed California beach mansion, each of the cars will have their own separate elevator. This is the man the GOP believes feels your pain.

If you believe that it's all an innocent coincidence that the majority of those targeted by Scott for voter purges are black and Hispanic, then perhaps you should have your own right to vote purged.

Vote purge campaigns led by Republicans have focused on the key battleground states of Florida, Ohio, Wisconsin, Colorado and New Mexico. Numbers count in close elections.

The intense focus by America's super rich on ensuring that their candidate win at all costs is telling us a story in itself.




35 comments

Next Previous Page 2 of 3 pages
Florida's voters were disenfranchised in 2000 when people weren't allowed to vote who were eligible to and tried to and when ballots weren't counted when they should have been. It resulted in Bush being elected US President and starting an illegal war which is still ongoing. Florida has a history of disenfranchising voters.
to: cahir O'Doherty. Boy o Boy, you sure know how to write a mess of lies and make it sound like the golden truth? I know you like to be called a liberal,and lies are ok, but in fact your a Communist and lying about facts is no longer tolerable, so find a real job like cleaning horse stalls, Your pretty good at it.
ACORN, do I need to say more.
When in doubt...they play dirty....Back in 2000, 12,000 eligible voters – a number twenty-two times larger than George W. Bush’s 537 vote triumph over Al Gore – were "wrongly identified" as convicted felons and purged from the voting rolls in Florida. The Presidents brother Jeb Bush attempted a repeat performance in 2004 to help his brother win reelection but was forced to back off in the face of a public outcry. So with another close election on the horizen in Florida Republicans have returned to their dirty tricks once again.
we agree on 99% of the issue, my guess is the veteran who won the bronze star is the last person a governor would want to inconvenience, conversely my guess only, The veteran who fought for his country would want those that vote in it to be citizens. Not seeing your veteran referenced in this story I started reading other articles and it seems that the federal homeland security office has been asked to verify and has not been cooperative with the state agencies. If they delay long enough this would nullify the states effort and allow non citizens to vote.
I have to show my driver's license every time I vote (I even had to go back for it, once) and I have no problem with that at all. This way, only legal residents can vote -- which is a right of legal residents only, which the aforementioned WW2 vet fought for. Voting is not a right to be given to just anybody; only legal citizens have it. To just let anyone else vote would be to SPIT on the vets who fought in our wars. There is no logical argument against this.
Actually, BrianO, I don't care who is corrupt and who is pure, as long as no one who is eligible is barred from voting. It hurts my sense of democratic fair play to think that the WW II vet who won the Bronze star for bravery at the Battle of the Bulge is required to prove his citizenship. I believe, though I can't claim to know, that it would be quite possible for Rick Scott's assistants to check out the citizenship status of all the people on the list via Motor Vehicle Registrations, Social Security Admin, federal Immigration, and birth records (on the basis of birth dates/places entered on other records). If there is reason to suspect a significant amount of voter fraud, government has an obligation to get the evidence before taking punitive action against people. I'm innocent until there's evidence to the contrary, and once I meet eligibility criteria and am registered, I should not have to prove my eligibility again. Fair is Fair. And if IC needs a proofreader, I could be available. Thanks for the recommendation!
First off eiriamach you should be the proofreader for IC. Second either someone is legal or not, they are citizens or not, it matters not if they have lived their entire lives as non citizens in a country they can not be allowed the vote unless they are citizens. Third cahir assumes that scott is corrupt and only eric holder is pure, people are allowed their opinions, this is a state issue and scott is the governor of the state.
Florida would be better off with dead people voting than the voters who elected Mr. Scott! Seriously, this isn't about changing the requirements for registering to vote, and it isn't about bringing a photo ID to the polling place to prove you're not a dead person; it's about deleting names from the lists of those who have already met the eligibility requirements for voting and who have been voting, some for many years. We don't change the rules of the game after we've begun to play.
Let's look at this from the other side of the fishbowl. There are rules on eligibility for voters. The Democrats use the Cook County method of the dead voting at least twice. The proper thing is look at the rolls and act accordingly. Governor Scott may be out to eliminate those who are eligible. However, there has to be common sense. Voters should also have to produce an i.d. Democrats have an agenda just as Republicans do. The voting boards are under the control of the Secretary of State. He may be Republican but he wsa selected by the voters. The Department of Justice and Eric Holder are hanging out behind the woodshed. Liberals say that the Supreme Court is biased. When will it all end? There are rules and you go by them even if the legislature is controlled by Republicans. They were elected. Read it and weep. You just cannot have dead people voting.
Btw, what's the name of Florida's governor-- Scott King or Rick Scott? Isn't naming him "King" in the article's title a little premature?
Federal officials to deem who is a citizen of Florida? I wouldn't go down the road of voter fraud, do we remember Acorn, the new black panthers, non counting of deployed soldiers. Regardless of this tangent argument if I was targeted as being an illegal alien and it was not so, I would go to my town hall and resolve the problem. If the state purges all non citizens from the 2700 who received letters then the voting process would be more accurate. The only problem I see is it doesn't go far enough and I agree that all that vote should be citizens, maybe a voter ID with a picture, obtained with a birth certificate or proof of citizenship.
Sorry, BrianO, but the facts of this case are too clear already. IF Florida voting officials had any EVIDENCE that illegal immigrants are registered to vote, wouldn't they be legally bound to do more than just purge them from voting lists? Let the federal immigration officers handle it! If the state purges only one-fifth of the 2,700 who have received letters demanding that they prove they're citizens, more than 537 votes are lost, and that's the number of votes that decided the 2000 election in favor of Bush-- enough to "fix" an election in Florida. "Stinking fish!" I say.
it is a little hard to disseminate the facts as they are surrounded by cahirs assumptions and accusations. You would have to know what the criteria for making the list was, maybe a news reporter could find that out and get back to Cahir.
Why does nearly everyone ASSUME that the people on the purge list are not citizens? A World War II veteran in his nineties is on that list. Are you assuming that anyone with a Hispanic name is likely to be an illegal? Isn't that how racial profiling works? Are you throwing away the great cornerstone of American jurisprudence, "innocent until proven guilty"? It's one thing for the state to adopt stricter rules for voter registration, but when Florida deletes people who are already registered, state officials ASSUME they're guilty of fraud. The burden of proof is NOT on people who have registered according to the rules.
Next Previous Page 2 of 3 pages




Log into IrishCentral with your Facebook account


or sign-in directly

E-Mail:
Password:
 Remember me Forgot my password
Not a member? Register Now!
print this article Print
email this articleE-mail