Manhattan Diary


Florida Governor Scott King's plan to disenfranchise minorities voters

Posted on Wednesday, June 06, 2012 at 09:48 AM

RSS


Recent Posts

Archives

submit to reddit

Rick Scott


Florida -- it's the state that seems to set the benchmark for political and social dysfunction in the nation.

From hanging chads to voter roll grabs to face eating drug addicts, working for the Florida Tourist Board must be the loneliest job in America.

It's governor is Rick Scott, a Tea Party Republican who sank more than $73 million of his own money into his election. Not surprisingly it was the most expensive gubernatorial campaign in Florida's history.

If you're willing to invest that kind of money into your own campaign shouldn't voters be a little suspicious of you?

Not in Florida. Republicans hold a two-thirds majority in the Florida Senate and in the Florida House of Representatives. The Republican National Convention will be held in Tampa, Florida.

Florida apparently loves super rich Republicans. Sadly, the romance is one way.  Well, if you're not fabulously wealthy, that is.

In April, in the middle of Sexual Assault Awareness Month, Scott used a veto to cut funding to the state’s rape crisis centers. The state legislature had approved $1.5 million so that the centers could continue to serve the approximately 700,000 women in Florida who’ve been victims of rape.

But Scott decided that the .002 percent slated for the crisis centers was too much. He vetoed the funds, alongside $141 million in other cuts including a psychiatric medicine program for the poor, the Family Care Center of Broward County, Girls Incorporated of Sarasota County, and a state settlement for child welfare case managers who were owed overtime.

In other words, he cut funding to rape victims, the poor, the mentally ill, and children and professionals who care for children; he vetoed the kind of programs that prevent America from becoming a Third World country that leaves its weakest members to languish.

As this election and the last decade have made clear, it's never a terrific idea to entrust your government to billionaires.

But Scott is only getting started. Next on his scorched earth agenda is Florida's voting rolls.

On Monday Scott's administration's defied a federal warning against purging suspected non-citizens from state voting rolls. Scott has denied that the effort is meant to target minorities who will likely vote Democratic, but well he would, wouldn't he?

The Miami Herald cited the statistics behind critics' concerns: "About 58% of those flagged as potential non-citizens are Hispanics, Florida’s largest ethnic immigrant population. Hispanics make up 13% of the overall 11.3 million active registered voters."

That sounds a lot like racial profiling to me. But Scott avows it isn't. On Monday he told reporters the timing had nothing to do with the campaign season.

"We need to have fair elections. When you go out to vote, you want to make sure that the other individuals that are voting have a right to vote. That’s what I care about. If you’re a candidate, you want to make sure that the people that vote in your election are people who have a right to vote. So my focus is in making sure that our state has fair elections," he told the Orlando Sentinel.

Trust the billionaire in the Brooks Brothers suit. I don't.

This is a candidate who will take away your vote to protect it. That way he can scrub the votes of minorities who don't see things his way. But what's a little disenfranchisement if the right candidate wins?

This week I read with interest that Mitt Romney is building another new mansion in California.  He's hired his own lobbyist to push his plans through the approval process because frankly he can. At his proposed California beach mansion, each of the cars will have their own separate elevator. This is the man the GOP believes feels your pain.

If you believe that it's all an innocent coincidence that the majority of those targeted by Scott for voter purges are black and Hispanic, then perhaps you should have your own right to vote purged.

Vote purge campaigns led by Republicans have focused on the key battleground states of Florida, Ohio, Wisconsin, Colorado and New Mexico. Numbers count in close elections.

The intense focus by America's super rich on ensuring that their candidate win at all costs is telling us a story in itself.




35 comments

Next Page 1 of 3 pages
corection of premise, tea party rose organically to expose the government stay in its bounds as stated by the U.S. constitution.
Thank the anarchists and hopeless all you want, call the kettle black all you wish, but normal people can see the occupy rabble for what they are
McNamara31, thanks for that background info on Tea Party. It's useful information that tells us plenty!
BrianO...The real difference between the Tea Party and Occupy Wall St is that one was real and the other manufactured. One started with real life college students and unemployed youth the other by Freedom Works. Tea Party events were organized (by professionals) and financed by the conservative wing of the Republican Party. Taking lead was former House majority leader Dick Armey, whose group FreedomWorks helped coordinates Tea Party rallies across the country. A succession of Republican Party insiders and money guys make up the guts of FreedomWorks: Its key members include billionaire Steve Forbes and former Republican National Committee senior economist Matt Kibbe. Prior to the Tea Party phenomenon, Freedom Works had lobbied on behalf of corporations against regulation. The organization's sights were set in the wake of a economic crash caused by grotesque abuses in unregulated areas of the financial-services industry, FreedomWorks — which took money from companies like mortgage lender MetLife — had the opportunity to persuade millions of ordinary Americans to take up arms against, among other things, Wall Street reform. Joining them was, Americans for Prosperity, which was funded in part by the billionaire David Koch, who’s Koch Industries is the second-largest privately held company in America. He also has a major stake in pushing for deregulation, as his companies have been fined multiple times by the government, including a 1999 case in which Koch Industries was held to have stolen oil from federal lands, lying about oil purchases some 24,000 times.
Mac31, When the tea party had their event in Boston, they were required to pay for a permit, hire a police detail,finish by a certain time. When they dispersed the area was cleaner than when they got there. The Occupty group squatted, illegally set up a tent city caused millions of dollars of damage. the young idealistic ones (who I feel bad for) were stolen from and there were many complaints of molesting women. they defecated in public, and they really pissed off the local Bums who said they were bringing down the neighborhood. But i suppose this is your average liberal, right Mac.
what a concept spending your own money instead of other peoples, the dues is not voluntary it is mandatory, just like the mandatory volunteerism in the public schools these days, both are oxymorons. Total the amounts of the direct money against walker, the union contributions, the other democratic candidates who used the recall as their main point and attacked walker and you will find that both large institutions spent very equally, you will have to dig a little bit and it will take some effort, which I know is anti democrat. The fact is that if the public sector unions were not so out of control the recall would have won by a large margin, but they are out of control, evidenced by the amount of rank and file union members who voted to keep walker in as governor to get their fiscal house in order.
BrianO, where is your news source for the claim "Oh and Eiriamach you might want to check those numbers again as the pinky ring leadership and walker forces spent equally"? I cannot find any factual evidence of equal spending. In any case, the Walker forces spent the Koch brothers' money, along with hefty contributions from three other billionaires, while the middle-class recall forces spent their own hard-earned money and union dues, as well as hitting the pavement and phone lines with the energy of the people. Cahir's question is still there, unanswered: "If you're willing to invest that kind of money into your own campaign shouldn't voters be a little suspicious of you?" Rick Scott spent $73 million of his own while Walker spent about half that sum-- of mostly other people's money. What do the other people expect in return-- just a "We Won" victory party? I cannot swallow that, and time will surely supply the answer . . . when it's too late to undo the harm.
BrianO says "Occupy wall street is your example of citizen protest, The dregs of society" Now... Would that be your "Fair and Balanced" opinion?
Occupy wall street is your example of citizen protest, The dregs of society who couldn't even co exist without stealing each other blind. The pendulum swings at times to the edge, the unions have over stepped their bounds and are now their own fiefdom, Wisconsin citizens many union workers voted to reign the unions in. Oh and Eiriamach you might want to check those numbers again as the pinky ring leadership and walker forces spent equally.
The results of the bought-and-paid-for Wisconsin recall election suggest that BytheBay is right. Scott Walker spent $3,500,000 MORE than the unions and Dems who tried to recall him; he spent millions to keep a job that pays peanuts by comparison. The billionaires who bankrolled him and set him up with a legal defense fund to avoid criminal indictment (15 of his staff are under felony indictments) have something more in mind than just being nice to Scottie. The Occupy Wall Street protests were an early warning signal. State legislatures that are passing voter-suppression laws did not get the OWS message. When democratic processes are suppressed, people tend to remember Jefferson's advice: "That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends [rights to life, liberty, pursuit of happiness, and the right to CONSENT to/vote for government representatives], it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it.... it is their right, it is their duty."
It's now a case that the US Presidency is being bought by whoever the richest is or whoever can raise the most money. Certainly not democratic and incredible that so many so called Irish-American Nationalists in the US see nothing wrong with it.
I should also note: the first of the two 'IrishAndProud' comments below this one (the one talking about Romney loving to be a billionaire) is not mine, though I must say the individual does think similar to me. I didn't know two different people could have the exact same on-screen name, on this site. Oh well, now we have two proudly Irish, proudly conservative individuals (in addition to the many other conservatives, posting here).
hollabackgurl, you have truly got to be one of the most uncreative and unimaginative posters here (along with Cahir, himself)...nothing but repeating the same old class-envy, class-warfare bee s. Americans don't care about Romney's wealth; in fact they see that as an asset because he clearly knows how to raise money and grow business. If they DIDN'T see it that way, then Romney wouldn't be surging virtually everywhere and Obama sinking. Your guy's in deep trouble, kiddo - and your rather awkward and embarrassing bitterness about that (ditto with poor Cahir) is showing.
I think Romney would love to be a billionaire as would I, it would mean I provided a product or service the rest of the world thought was important enough to pay their hard earned money for. Hollabackgurl you are wasting your talent trying to find some good in the communist utopian model it only leads to statism and dictatorship. Time you start a business and do with the profits what you choose.
$73 million dollars is a lot to spend on an election if you're not expecting a handsome return on the investment, isn't it? I'm just saying. Billionaire GOP plutocrats like Romney aren't selfless patriots working for the betterment of the nation, they're exactly the people the Founding Fathers warned us against.
Next Page 1 of 3 pages




Log into IrishCentral with your Facebook account


or sign-in directly

E-Mail:
Password:
 Remember me Forgot my password
Not a member? Register Now!
print this article Print
email this articleE-mail