Manhattan Diary


An inconvenient truth: Romney-Ryan's radical right agenda exposed

Posted on Friday, August 24, 2012 at 10:01 AM

RSS


Recent Posts

Archives

submit to reddit

The look of irritation on Paul Ryan's face this week as he was confronted over his own radical anti-abortion views was quite instructive.

Until he got tapped by the Romney campaign as a running mate, Ryan was a vocal and absolutist right-to-lifer, even in cases of incest and rape. For him there is no room for compromise on this. The only thing that has changed for Ryan this week is that it has become temporarily inopportune for him to say so.

But against all the odds, Todd Akin and his talk of 'legitimate rape' have had a cold water to the face effect on this easily distracted nation. Ryan, and behind him Romney, have found themselves on the defensive. Suddenly the nation has grasped that they're serious about banning it completely. Suddenly the country is grasping just how far to the right they are on social issues.

Asked point blank if abortion should be available to women in instances of rape, Ryan demurred on Tuesday.

'I'm proud of my pro-life record,' he replied. 'And I stand by my pro-life record in Congress.'

In Tampa, Florida a week ahead of their national convention, Republicans drawing up their party platform didn't share Ryan's uncharacteristic reluctance. They are now seeking passage of a constitutional amendment that would extend legal rights to the unborn, effectively banning abortion. The language in the GOP platform includes no exceptions for rape or incest.

They're serious about banning it completely, too.

But Ryan's own record on this issue is such a matter of public record that it was a little surprising to hear him call for Todd Akin's head, a man whose views on abortion he apparently shares. Akin himself was clearly stung by Ryan's attempt to force him out of the race, ruefully telling Sean Hannity: ''Why couldn’t he run his race and I’ll run mine?'

It's quite true to say that on abortion Akin and Ryan are ideological doppelgängers, having worked together to promote a 'personhood' bill in 2009 which would have declared a fertilized egg a human being.

On Tuesday Ryan also tried to distance himself from the bill he co-sponsored with Akin to introduce the term 'forcible rape' into legislation, in order to limit federal funding on abortions for rape victims.

Sensing political peril ahead, Ryan sidestepped a call to clarify what the term 'forcible rape' actually meant by responding: 'Rape is rape. Rape is rape, period. End of story.'

But it isn't the end of the story. Not by a long shot. And certainly not for women.

The thing to remember about Akin is that he just got hammered for saying something that is completely within his own party lines. The party simply turned on him in a Public Relations move that was as cynical as it was insincere.

But each time it seems this nation is on the verge of an adult discussion about abortion or health care or immigration reform or gay rights the GOP revert to rehearsed demagoguery to quickly shut it down. This keeps happening because the GOP have moved so far to the right that there's no longer any room for debate or give, on any issue, ever. They KNOW the right answer, you're just a speed bump on the way to it.

The Republican platform writers know that their ideal candidates have finally arrived. That's why the New York Times just called their 2012 platform 'more aggressive in its opposition to women's reproductive rights and to gay rights than any in memory.'

These people are serious about living in a word free of abortion or government mandated health care or gay rights or planned parenthood (which Romney has vowed to defund). They're only getting started. You should take them at their word.


61 comments

Next Previous Page 3 of 5 pages
There are as many contradictions between conservative postings here as between Romney/Ryan's recent statements and their records. BrianO writes, "The stigma of one's life ending due to an out of wedlock pregnancy has changed." But then katiemac complains, "Women giving birth out of wedlock are actually rewarded by our welfare system which further erodes the family structures, especially in minorities." Can conservatives ever get together on their vision for our shared society? As for katiemac's assumption about race and the downfall of our society, Child Trends Research reports that between 1970 and 1988, the "non-marital birth rate among black women declined by almost one-quarter" while the non-marital birth rate among white women "more than doubled" during the same 18 years. Also, white women cohabiting with men had the "greatest increase in non-marital births," which reached 50 percent in the 1990s. Almost 40 percent of all women giving birth outside marriage cohabit with their babies' fathers. katiemac can find these statistics in a 2001 publication "Births Outside of Marriage: Perceptions vs Reality." Contact with social science can help us understand trends.
You can't be a follower of Ayn Rand & be Catholic (or any other religion). Ayn Rand was an atheist and her philosophy of rational self-interest runs afoul of the Judea-Christian values of charity and taking care of others.
I find no differenc in reading your columns and reading the Radical NYSLives, Wash Post, LA Times.....and Provda....
Why do I keep seeing the words "religious right?" Why not call it what it is, the Catholic Right!
Writing in the Ny Times, Paul Krugman noted that Paul Ryan takes his social "philosophy" and his fiscal policy from the novels of Ayn Rand. Then he asked a question that should generate some re-thinking: "And, beyond that, consider the fact that Mr. Ryan is considered the modern G.O.P.’s big thinker. What does it say about the party when its intellectual leader evidently gets his ideas largely from deeply unrealistic fantasy novels?"
Doherty's article is factually correct, and so I have to wonder why the right-wingers here are so upset? And I also wonder why they always feel its necessary to drag President Obama into every debate? How is Irish Central biased if it correctly reports the legislative actions taken by Paul Ryan? How it is slanting anything by reporting what Mr. Ryan and Congressman Todd Akin actually said? Do the righties posting here not recognize that the proposed GOP platform is clearly an all-out assault on the reproductive rights of all American women? Has Mitt Romney not said repeatedly that he intends to defund WIC (a program that provides nutritional food to predominately poor women, infants and children), as well as defunding, and thus crippling Planned Parenthood; an organization that advises and performs many useful medical services for women and families, (e.g., PAP smears, cervical exams, counseling, and birth control distribution), of which abortion is only one service? Who are Paul Ryan and Mitt Romney to tell a woman what she can, or cannot do, with her own body? Paul Ryan has long praised the writings and philosphy of Ayn Rand; a woman that has preached that government must be small and unintrusive, and should never hamper or obstruct the enjoyment of individual freedom. Yet Ryan and the GOP platform is all about Big Government. They not only want to hamper a woman's reproductive rights, they want to take them away entirely. Ryan is steadfastly opposed to a woman's right to have an abortion for any reason, and he would also like to see an end to gay marriage. Additionally he has stated that he would like to see a return to the failed and regressive policies of DADT. Ryan wants small government when it suits his myopic needs, and large government when he wants to accomplish other goals. Romney will embrace anything that will get him elected President.
ColleenMcVeety: “I'd like to see Roe v. Wade overturned and allow the states and the elected representatives of the people, and the people themselves, have the ability to put in place pro-life legislation.” Mitt Romney 5 June 2007, Republican Presidential Debate (Manchester, New Hampshire)
Reported by the NY Times, Oct. 8, 2011: Romney promised in his speech to the Values Voter Summit, "And I will nominate judges who know the difference between personal opinion and law. It is long past time for the Supreme Court to return the issue of abortion back to the states by overturning Roe v. Wade.” Is that clear enough for you, Colleen McVeety? Romney promised to nominate Supreme Court justices who would overturn the 1973 abortion decision. Check it out; don't just take my word for it. National news sources reported on the speech.
Youse liberal omadhauns love to polarize the electorate in the USA. Why not try writing constructive, helpful articles, that might help bring Americans together in a common cause? Or would that break your delicate brain and hands?
More left wing garbage from Cahir O'Doherty, are you supposed to be a journalist or just an ass kisser for Obama !!
No he did not hollabackgurl. He has said again and again that he would NOT ever look to overturn Roe v, Wade. Not good to write things on here that are not true. You did not hear it AS HE DID NOT SAY IT. Shame on you.
In a Monday night interview with ABC’s “World News with Diane Sawyer,” likely Republican nominee Mitt Romney again repeated his call for overturning the Roe v. Wade decision that has resulted in more than 55 million abortions. (You should research your candidates before you vote for them ColleenMcVeety).
hollabackgurl, Please show us your resources. The fact is....the words you wrote about Romney and the the Supreme Court future nominations was never stated by Romney or anyone supporting him. Ever. The ignorant senator's remark. That was one man's extreme view....PERIOD. Do you see any Conservatives standing behind him? Best to move along on that one and stop listening to Liberal talking points only.
From Rupert's mouth to your ears. I see they're hear with their message of hate and their dearth of facts. Scream LIBERAL all you want, the truth is the truth, whether you choose to believe it or not. If Romney were to win and put somebody with a tin foil hat on the court, abortions will still happen. The genteel people in Fairfield County will arrange little weekend visits to Canada for their daughters. And so it goes.
This article takes issue with people who talk about 'legitimate' and 'forcible' rape. If that's not meant to divide what is?
Next Previous Page 3 of 5 pages




Log into IrishCentral with your Facebook account


or sign-in directly

E-Mail:
Password:
 Remember me Forgot my password
Not a member? Register Now!
print this article Print
email this articleE-mail