An inconvenient truth: Romney-Ryan's radical right agenda exposed
Posted on Friday, August 24, 2012 at 10:01 AM
RSS 
Recent Posts
- Violent attacks on gays in New York up 70 percent in 2013
- Will New York Senator Chuck Schumer ditch gay couples for an immigration deal?
- If nobody's happy, it's working – the abortion debate and Irish politics of stalemate
- Conservative news entertainment complex claim Barack Obama leader of Al Qaeda
- Why Irish grudges are passed on - a long tradition of never forgetting
Archives
The look of irritation on Paul Ryan's face this week as he was confronted over his own radical anti-abortion views was quite instructive.
Until he got tapped by the Romney campaign as a running mate, Ryan was a vocal and absolutist right-to-lifer, even in cases of incest and rape. For him there is no room for compromise on this. The only thing that has changed for Ryan this week is that it has become temporarily inopportune for him to say so.
But against all the odds, Todd Akin and his talk of 'legitimate rape' have had a cold water to the face effect on this easily distracted nation. Ryan, and behind him Romney, have found themselves on the defensive. Suddenly the nation has grasped that they're serious about banning it completely. Suddenly the country is grasping just how far to the right they are on social issues.
Asked point blank if abortion should be available to women in instances of rape, Ryan demurred on Tuesday.
'I'm proud of my pro-life record,' he replied. 'And I stand by my pro-life record in Congress.'
In Tampa, Florida a week ahead of their national convention, Republicans drawing up their party platform didn't share Ryan's uncharacteristic reluctance. They are now seeking passage of a constitutional amendment that would extend legal rights to the unborn, effectively banning abortion. The language in the GOP platform includes no exceptions for rape or incest.
They're serious about banning it completely, too.
But Ryan's own record on this issue is such a matter of public record that it was a little surprising to hear him call for Todd Akin's head, a man whose views on abortion he apparently shares. Akin himself was clearly stung by Ryan's attempt to force him out of the race, ruefully telling Sean Hannity: ''Why couldn’t he run his race and I’ll run mine?'
It's quite true to say that on abortion Akin and Ryan are ideological doppelgängers, having worked together to promote a 'personhood' bill in 2009 which would have declared a fertilized egg a human being.
On Tuesday Ryan also tried to distance himself from the bill he co-sponsored with Akin to introduce the term 'forcible rape' into legislation, in order to limit federal funding on abortions for rape victims.
Sensing political peril ahead, Ryan sidestepped a call to clarify what the term 'forcible rape' actually meant by responding: 'Rape is rape. Rape is rape, period. End of story.'
But it isn't the end of the story. Not by a long shot. And certainly not for women.
The thing to remember about Akin is that he just got hammered for saying something that is completely within his own party lines. The party simply turned on him in a Public Relations move that was as cynical as it was insincere.
But each time it seems this nation is on the verge of an adult discussion about abortion or health care or immigration reform or gay rights the GOP revert to rehearsed demagoguery to quickly shut it down. This keeps happening because the GOP have moved so far to the right that there's no longer any room for debate or give, on any issue, ever. They KNOW the right answer, you're just a speed bump on the way to it.
The Republican platform writers know that their ideal candidates have finally arrived. That's why the New York Times just called their 2012 platform 'more aggressive in its opposition to women's reproductive rights and to gay rights than any in memory.'
These people are serious about living in a word free of abortion or government mandated health care or gay rights or planned parenthood (which Romney has vowed to defund). They're only getting started. You should take them at their word.
Until he got tapped by the Romney campaign as a running mate, Ryan was a vocal and absolutist right-to-lifer, even in cases of incest and rape. For him there is no room for compromise on this. The only thing that has changed for Ryan this week is that it has become temporarily inopportune for him to say so.
But against all the odds, Todd Akin and his talk of 'legitimate rape' have had a cold water to the face effect on this easily distracted nation. Ryan, and behind him Romney, have found themselves on the defensive. Suddenly the nation has grasped that they're serious about banning it completely. Suddenly the country is grasping just how far to the right they are on social issues.
Asked point blank if abortion should be available to women in instances of rape, Ryan demurred on Tuesday.
'I'm proud of my pro-life record,' he replied. 'And I stand by my pro-life record in Congress.'
In Tampa, Florida a week ahead of their national convention, Republicans drawing up their party platform didn't share Ryan's uncharacteristic reluctance. They are now seeking passage of a constitutional amendment that would extend legal rights to the unborn, effectively banning abortion. The language in the GOP platform includes no exceptions for rape or incest.
They're serious about banning it completely, too.
But Ryan's own record on this issue is such a matter of public record that it was a little surprising to hear him call for Todd Akin's head, a man whose views on abortion he apparently shares. Akin himself was clearly stung by Ryan's attempt to force him out of the race, ruefully telling Sean Hannity: ''Why couldn’t he run his race and I’ll run mine?'
It's quite true to say that on abortion Akin and Ryan are ideological doppelgängers, having worked together to promote a 'personhood' bill in 2009 which would have declared a fertilized egg a human being.
On Tuesday Ryan also tried to distance himself from the bill he co-sponsored with Akin to introduce the term 'forcible rape' into legislation, in order to limit federal funding on abortions for rape victims.
Sensing political peril ahead, Ryan sidestepped a call to clarify what the term 'forcible rape' actually meant by responding: 'Rape is rape. Rape is rape, period. End of story.'
But it isn't the end of the story. Not by a long shot. And certainly not for women.
The thing to remember about Akin is that he just got hammered for saying something that is completely within his own party lines. The party simply turned on him in a Public Relations move that was as cynical as it was insincere.
But each time it seems this nation is on the verge of an adult discussion about abortion or health care or immigration reform or gay rights the GOP revert to rehearsed demagoguery to quickly shut it down. This keeps happening because the GOP have moved so far to the right that there's no longer any room for debate or give, on any issue, ever. They KNOW the right answer, you're just a speed bump on the way to it.
The Republican platform writers know that their ideal candidates have finally arrived. That's why the New York Times just called their 2012 platform 'more aggressive in its opposition to women's reproductive rights and to gay rights than any in memory.'
These people are serious about living in a word free of abortion or government mandated health care or gay rights or planned parenthood (which Romney has vowed to defund). They're only getting started. You should take them at their word.
61 comments
Next
Page 1 of 5 pages
EphraimKibbey | Aug 29, 2012, 10:56 PM EDT
@BrianO - I'm glad to know it wasn't you! I apoliigize for jumping to conclusions.
Report abuse
BrianO | Aug 29, 2012, 12:26 PM EDT
@rehand32, Dumbasses are dangerous or sometimes humorous,
Report abuse
redhand32 | Aug 29, 2012, 08:36 AM EDT
It's really amazing that even now there are intellectual eunuchs like Geroid4 who dictate to rape victims the "simple" process of just putting the child up for adoption ? But, this will not ususally happen anyway we are comforted because some "pro-preborn life only" Dr. Frankenstein assures all women that there is this mysterious hormonal or other natural process that will prevent rape victims from becoming pregnant. That's really good to hear because all those African women in conflict zones brutally raped by government troops and rengade crazed "child" soldiers, can now take increased comfort by "science" that all those other rape victims with children were merely statistical flukes. Or, perhaps they like being raped, or enticed the act. Usually dumbasses are benign. In this instance, as with the Tea Bag movement dumbasses are dangerous !
Report abuse
BrianO | Aug 28, 2012, 06:45 PM EDT
If you refer to the article "I love and thank the enlightened posters" the answer is yes, bashing Ireland no. As to logging on properly that is a hit and miss proposition as I log in.
Report abuse
EphraimKibbey | Aug 28, 2012, 03:21 PM EDT
So, BrianO, you're saying it WAS you?
Report abuse
BrianO | Aug 28, 2012, 01:00 PM EDT
Dear condescending liberal puke, please level your drivel on your prepaid campaign hacks. PS. I've read your take on Irish vacations, it gives us tourist a bad name.
Report abuse
EphraimKibbey | Aug 27, 2012, 09:13 PM EDT
@hollabackgurl - becareful, if you post your comment after one has been posted without a by line, this site steals your by line and attaches it to the deficient one. BRIANO, was that you? Was that you bashing Ireland in an earlier article? You really should learn to log-on properly you know!
Report abuse
peterson | Aug 26, 2012, 03:40 PM EDT
Alisaann,yeer head is in the sand !!
Report abuse
eiriamach | Aug 25, 2012, 05:31 PM EDT
Gearoid4 thinks the right of a woman to terminate a pregnancy forced on her by a rapist is "spurious"! We know there are medications that delay ovulation in rape victims so that they cannot become pregnant, but Gearoid objects to the Affordable Care Act making them available to victims--it violates HIS "religious liberty." Ignoring the evidence of medical science, he even demonizes emergency contraceptives as abortifacients! He would close off every possibility of women exercising free will; he would use the law to coerce women into becoming slaves of sexual predators. That means stripping women of humanity, the perfect situation for Gearoid's "expert counseling" to tell pregnant rape victims what to do! No, there's only one "expert" on what a woman pregnant by rape should do, the expert appointed by natural law-- the pregnant woman herself! How can men who so extravagantly defend the "right" of a fertilized ovum have such contempt for the rights, the free will, and the humanity of women?
Report abuse
HBDuncan | Aug 25, 2012, 04:55 PM EDT
I have a friend who her mother tried to abort her and she survived. She grew up to forgive her and now is an advocate for pro-life. Oh, by the way her mother was raped and then tried to have her aborted. She is a fine young lady serving God and Country and is thankful to be alive and to have survived her near holocaust. If we had been aborted we wouldn't be able to even have this conversation now, would we? If we do not value the sanctity of human life then we are truly lost!
Report abuse
Gearoid4 | Aug 25, 2012, 04:04 PM EDT
Why compound the criminal act of rape by abortion, which is a horrendous practice, given a spurious legitimacy under "rights". This is a very difficult and emotive issue, and I recognize that there are no clean cut answers to it. We should respect the rights of all the victims in this, namely the woman and the child that results from it. One should consider the option of expert counselling on this, with the door left open for adoption services to step in, if the pregnant woman does not want to bring up the child.
Report abuse
hollabackgurl | Aug 25, 2012, 09:54 AM EDT
Well see Maggipoo, we actually still remember who got us into this economic mess with two unnecessary wars and a casino culture on Wall Street - Dubya. Member him?
Report abuse
hollabackgurl | Aug 25, 2012, 08:26 AM EDT
I love and thank the enlightened posters who rail against fox news. They think themselves to be to be tolerant and well read, but presented with an opposing opinion scream for said opinion to be demeaned. they scientific terms like "stupid" or "faux" how can you debate with arguments like these. So as the dirtiest presidential season in years drags on don't listen to opposing opinion, don't pay attention to the worst economic period in years, don't pay attention to the highest rates of unemployment, don't pay attention in the rise of the muslim brotherhood oversees, don't pay attention to the rise in wacko shootings at home, don't pay attention to $4.oo a gallon gas, because to do that might make you question the current leadership.
Report abuse
alisaann | Aug 25, 2012, 02:51 AM EDT
these GOP people ARE GANGROUS TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE....THEY WANT TO TAKE AWAY WOMEN'S RIGHTS, BAN CIVIL UNIONS AND SAME-SEX MARRIAGE....what's next?....return blacks to SLAVERY?....wake up people, before it's too late. alisa
Report abuse
Next
Page 1 of 5 pages
61 Comments

Report abuse